April 26, 2024

‘Lucky Guy’ by Nora Ephron as Recalled by Jim Dwyer

Also, me, a member of the standing army of columnists.

Down the right side of the page was the customary list of the actors playing them  — well, playing us — starting with Tom Hanks, cast in his Broadway debut as McAlary, the subject of the late Nora Ephron’s new play, “Lucky Guy.” 

Curtain up.

The newsmen are standing at a bar, bellowing “The Wild Rover,” the Irish ballad. 

For an instant, I wonder: Who were these people with our names and why were they singing those songs? This must have been what the von Trapp family felt when they saw “The Sound of Music.” 

Then the action moved to the familiar racket of a newsroom. An editor yelling at a tardy writer that this was a daily, not a weekly paper; one reporter ducking an assignment, another one running harder, staying later and getting the best story. Icarus was cleared for take off. 

On four March evenings in the tranquil New York of 2013, I sat in the Broadhurst Theater watching previews of “Lucky Guy,” a show set 25 years ago in the raucous, ragged city of 1988 about a friend who died young. 

It took a couple of performances for me to lose the hazy filter of actuality — to get over myself and the people I knew, even though it is well-known that hardly anyone is more entertaining than journalists, certainly not to other journalists — and to recognize something besides the names. This was reality, sampled, with the pathos and comic folly remixed. The guts of it had stayed true, thrillingly so, to the life I had witnessed.

That was one more surprise to savor after 14 years of knowing about “Lucky Guy,” before that was its name, or it was a play, or it seemed at all likely.

IF MEMORY SERVES, sometime around March 1999 a caller to The Daily News introduced herself as Nora Ephron, and how about dinner?

She was thinking that the life and death of Mike McAlary would make a film. Ephron told me that she couldn’t remember ever meeting him, but that she had read the obituaries a few months earlier, after his death at 41 on Christmas Day 1998. Seen from a distance, the contrails of his life were the stuff of myths. 

 Fueled by high-octane swagger, McAlary had been a star columnist at the city tabloids for a decade, specializing in police corruption and police heroics. Near the end he fell spectacularly on his face and was written off, prematurely and in some circles, gleefully, as a sloppy, self-aggrandizing hack. Terminally ill, he bolted his own chemotherapy session one summer morning to sneak into the hospital room of Abner Louima, who had been grotesquely tortured with a plunger by police officers. A few months before he died, McAlary was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for the columns that made the case a national scandal.

What Ephron needed from me, and others, were not bold-type headlines, but brush strokes. There were things I couldn’t be much help on. McAlary and I were not bar buddies — he was a night life Olympian — and for most of the decade, we worked at different papers. But we were the same age, both writing columns three times a week and we spoke almost every day to help each other feed the column furnace, swapping names, phone numbers, angles.

He began practically every conversation not with hello, but by announcing, “This is good for us.”

What was? Almost anything. 

If we turned up on opposite sides of some issue — let’s say that McAlary wrote that the police commissioner was a bum, and my column crowned him a prince — he would call early. 

“This is good for us!” he’d say. “If they push him out, I’ll have the new guy. You’ll get leaks from the empire in exile, which is even better.”

At our dinner in 1999, Ephron did not touch her food. She had insisted that I order the veal chop, a bit bossy considering that we’d only met 90 seconds earlier.

She kept taking notes as I passed along McAlary lore.

Jim Dwyer, now at The New York Times, wrote columns in New York Newsday and The Daily News from 1986 to 2001. 

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/theater/lucky-guy-by-nora-ephron-as-recalled-by-jim-dwyer.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Madrid Journal: An Awakening That Keeps Them Up All Night

They had gathered most evenings this week, hoping to turn two weeks of demonstrations that have filled city squares across this country and taken the political establishment by surprise, into something more lasting — a set of demands.

“We need change in this country,” said Ruth Martínez, a member of the group who has been unemployed for nearly three years.

Until recently, young people in Spain were dismissed as an apathetic generation, uninterested in party politics. But the outpouring of young people who have taken to the streets since May 15 — at one point about 28,000 protesters spent the night in Madrid’s Puerta del Sol square — has changed all that, forcing the country to take heed and reconsider.

The recession that has ravaged Spain, along with much of southern Europe, has had an especially hard impact on the young, with unemployment rates soaring to more than 40 percent for 20- to 24-year-olds, about twice the national average and the highest in the European Union. Many of them see limited hope of improvement unless they reshuffle the political deck and demand a new approach to creating jobs.

“Suddenly people are talking about politics everywhere,” said María Luz Morán, a sociologist at the Complutense University of Madrid. “You go to have coffee or you are standing in the subway and you hear conversations about politics. It’s been years since I heard anyone talking about politics.”

Even young people who have jobs here are often caught in a system of poorly paid, temporary contracts. The contracts were once designed to help them break into the labor force, but they have served instead to put adulthood out of reach for many. Ms. Moran said that one survey showed that about 50 percent of 30-year-olds in Spain were still living with their parents.

“We call 32- and 35-year-olds young people in Spain, because they are forced to live like children,” she said. “Thirty-year-olds should have their own homes.”

Few experts are willing to say what the protesters might achieve. But already issues that were discussed only at the margins are being taken more seriously. One major conservative daily newspaper, ABC, polled constitutional experts this week about what it would take to change the election laws, one of the principal demands of the demonstrators, who say the current system heavily favors the country’s two leading political parties.

“They have already had an impact,” said Rafael Díaz-Salazar, another sociologist at Complutense, who believes that the protesters may represent about two million voters. “They are forcing people to take a look at this impoverished generation. There will have to talk about precarious work contracts and housing in the next election. They cannot avoid it anymore.”

Experts say that there are two broad categories of unemployed and underemployed young people in Spain. At one end of the spectrum are relatively uneducated young people who left school in the past decade when the country’s economy was booming and they could easily find work in the construction industry. Now those jobs have disappeared and are unlikely to come back.

At the other end are workers who have one or more university degrees, who cannot find work either, or who get hired on six-month contracts at low wages, often in menial jobs that have nothing to do with what they were trained for.

Lidia Posada García, 26, is one of them. She is active in ¡Democracia REAL Ya!, a group that helped rally protestors through the Internet. A lawyer, she is one of the few in her circle of friends who has a job. But she says she is paid as if she is doing administrative work.

“We all live at home,” she said. “We are the most prepared, qualified generation. But there is not much for us.”

One of the catchiest slogans to emerge from the protests is “no jobs, no houses, no pension, no fear.”

Rachel Chaundler contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0b06e8d5050ebfcec9d72f32b88568a5