April 26, 2024

French Banks Ready to Help Greek Bailout

PARIS — French banks are ready to participate in the rescue of Greece by extending the maturity of their holdings of debt issued by that country, President Nicolas Sarkozy said Monday.

A plan is being worked on between the government and French lenders to reinvest, between now and 2014, 70 percent of their holdings of Greek debt into new securities with a duration of 30 years, he said.

Mr. Sarkozy said he hoped that the other European countries would adopt a similar plan. Germany had previously pushed hard to obtain a tough, compulsory private sector involvement in the Greek bailout but backed down amid opposition from France and the European Central Bank.

“We’ve been working on this with the banks and insurance companies,” Mr. Sarkozy said at a news conference in Paris. “We’re committed to going from a principle — the voluntary participation of the private sector — to concrete reality.”

“If it wasn’t voluntary, it would be viewed as a default, with a huge risk of an amplification of the crisis,” he added.

In announcing the voluntary restructuring plans, Mr. Sarkozy was confirming a report earlier in the newspaper Le Figaro, which said that the banks were ready to re-invest, or roll over, much of their holdings of Greek sovereign debt.

According to Le Figaro and other French press reports, the rollover would concern 70 percent of the redemptions in 2011 and 2012. It would be split in two, with 50 percent re-invested in Greek securities with a maturity of 30 years, paying a coupon close to the current interest rate on the loans to Greece, to which a “GDP growth” link would be added as a sweetener. The other 20 percent would be invested in a separate “guarantee fund.”

The French plan was expected to be formally presented for discussion to the International Institute of Finance, which represents many of the largest global finance institutions, at a meeting of Greece’s creditors in Rome Monday.

“Each country could find it interesting and it shows we won’t let Greece go and that we will defend the euro,” Mr. Sarkozy said of the French plan. “It’s in all our interest.”

An exit from the euro by any country would be “folly,” he argued, as it would raise the repayment costs for any government which chose to devalue its currency while retaining legacy debts denominated in euros.

“We are conducting our own talks,” a German Finance Ministry official said Monday. “The French plan is the French plan. We are not commenting yet on what we might do.”

The official, who was not permitted to speak publicly, said Berlin would wait for a meeting of euro-area finance ministers in Brussels July 3 before publicly outlining its stance in more detail.

Meantime, Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero of Spain was quoted late last week as saying that Spain’s banks were “well disposed” to private-sector involvement in a Greek rescue.

Gilles Moec, an economist at Deutsche Bank, said there would be “quite a few hurdles” for the French plan.

Apart from requiring backing from Germany and other European countries, he said that the Union’s structures created to bail out struggling economies would need to be altered to create the “guarantee mechanism” and that could necessitate Union-wide and national ratifications.

“This does not protect against a political meltdown in Greece this week if the government can’t manage to get its austerity plan endorsed by Parliament,” he added.

A vote on the Greece’s latest austerity measures is scheduled for Tuesday, to be followed by another vote Thursday on separate legislation to implement the reforms.

If the measures are passed, the European Union is expected to announce the size and details of a new, second bailout package at the meeting of ministers July 3.

And assuming that the International monetary Fund approves its own review of Greek measures, Athens should then be able to receive new funds by mid-July.

“If this process is derailed and Greece is pushed into a disorderly default, the spillover effects could be global and may not be contained only in Greece and the rest of Europe.” economists at Bank of America Merrill Lynch said in a research note Friday

The Greek government has already survived a confidence vote, on June 21, related to its handling of the crisis.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/28/business/global/28iht-euro.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

British and Dutch to Sue Over an Icelandic Debt

The prospect of legal action, likely to take more than a year to resolve in an international court, arose this weekend after Iceland’s voters rejected a deal for the country to repay Britain and the Netherlands over 30 years starting in 2016.

It extended a bitter dispute that began in 2008 when Iceland’s overstretched banks failed. With assets eight times the country’s gross domestic product, the banks could not depend on the government to bail them out as some European countries, like Ireland and Britain, had done for their banks.

As a result, the 400,000 depositors in Britain and the Netherlands, who had been lured by the high interest rates of Icelandic banks, were reimbursed by their governments. Those countries are now seeking to recover that payout, which approached 4 billion euros ($5.8 billion).

The deal submitted to the voters was approved by the Icelandic Parliament in February. It had better terms for Iceland than an earlier accord, which was modified in hopes of winning voter backing.

The government of Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir had pushed hard for approval, arguing that Iceland, amid a financial rescue program backed by the International Monetary Fund, needed to put the issue behind it if it hoped to re-enter international financial markets and join the European Union.

But after a devastating recession and with animosity toward bankers still running high, Iceland’s electorate was not swayed. With close to 90 percent of the ballots counted, 59 percent had voted no.

There is also a strong residue of anti-British sentiment dating back to 2008, when Britain used antiterror laws to freeze the assets of one of the failed institutions, Landsbanki.

More than anything, the vote was driven by a view that the liability was just too much for a small economy to shoulder, no matter how favorable the terms.

Speaking on a television program over the weekend, Danny Alexander, a treasury official in the British government, described the referendum result as “disappointing,” and said Britain was obliged to do all in its power to seek repayment, especially while running a fiscal deficit of close to 10 percent of its gross domestic product.

The case will be taken up by the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority, an international court based in Brussels.

Government officials in Iceland said that they expected the process to take more than a year but added that they had enough central bank reserves to cover the country’s short-term financial responsibilities.

The International Monetary Fund in the past has said that a resolution of the dispute over the depositor claims is not a condition for its Iceland program to proceed as long as other creditors do not abandon the country.

In a statement, the government said over the weekend that it was committed to the I.M.F. program, though it said the next review of the program, due April 27, would be delayed several weeks for unspecified reasons.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/11/business/global/11krona.html?partner=rss&emc=rss