April 26, 2024

British Newspaper Sues Armstrong Over Libel Case

Sunday Review »

Sunday Dialogue: Violence in America

Readers debate the best response to the surge in mass killings.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/12/23/sports/ap-cyc-armstrong-british-lawsuit.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

The Haggler: Cellphone Minutes Were Prepaid, but the Grief Was Free

Michael Phillips of Dublin noted that a 1996 episode of “Seinfeld” touched on a nearly identical issue. In it, Jerry has been bumped from the lineup of Career Day speakers at his junior high school, and this dialogue ensues:

JERRY It was a mix-up, I’m sure.

KRAMER They’re trying to screw with your head.

JERRY Now, why would a junior high school want to screw with my head?

KRAMER Why does Radio Shack ask for your phone number when you buy batteries? I don’t know.

Enough Radio Shack. Let’s talk about a different mystery and a different company: TracFone, which is based in Miami and sells pay-as-you-go minutes on cellphones.

Q. We keep a TracFone in our car in case of emergencies, and take it with us on trips, so it gets very little use. We are planning a trip next month, and being down to less than 100 minutes, I went online to buy another year’s worth, which I’ve done before.

The TracFone “buy minutes” page has a list of options, and this time there was a pop-up window offering 450 minutes with a bonus of 60 minutes if you bought before Oct. 31. Great, I thought, that’s just about the amount of minutes I need for a year.

So I clicked on the offer, and shortly thereafter my TracFone rang with this message: “450 minutes, 90 days.” In other words, any unused portion of my newly acquired 450 minutes would vanish in 90 days. I took the bait and there was a switch.

I immediately sent an e-mail to TracFone, asking it to void the transaction, and was informed that the minutes were already added to my phone so there was nothing it could do. I called the service number in the e-mail, explained how I was fooled by the pop-up window and asked that the transaction be canceled.

“Impossible,” I was told.

Eventually, I was offered a 30-day extension for my minutes. That seems insufficient. Might the Haggler do better?

Peter Freedman

Portland, Ore.

A. Of the many legitimate companies that the Haggler has tried to reach — as opposed to sham operations that are hiding from customers and the law — none have been as elusive as TracFone. It has no media relations line, and all the phone numbers listed on its Web site, which are printed beside the company’s Miami address, seem to ring in lands far, far away.

“I am in Miami,” a TracFone rep said, in an accent that did not exactly suggest Florida.

Really?

“Yes. Any question you have about TracFone you can ask me.”

“But my question is for someone who can speak on behalf of the company, to a reporter,” the Haggler continued. “Can you connect me to someone in your Miami headquarters?”

“I’m in the Miami headquarters,” this rep said.

Uh-huh.

“Who is the governor of Florida?” the Haggler asked.

Long pause. “Do you have a question related to TracFone?” the rep asked.

“Can you name a baseball team in Florida?”

Longer pause.

“Fill in the blank,” the Haggler said. “Florida is the blank state.”

More silence.

“I’ve only been here a month,” the phone rep said.

This was a dead end.

So the Haggler asked a New York Times researcher, Lisa Schwartz, to locate a home phone number for TracFone’s president and chief executive, Frederick J. Pollak — something the Haggler was unable to do with his own meager number-rummaging skills. She delivered, and Mr. Pollak seemed very surprised and not very delighted to be speaking to the Haggler one recent afternoon, on what sounded like his cellphone. He promptly bounced the Haggler to Mark Mahan, the senior vice president for customer care. He sounded less surprised, though no more delighted. He bounced the Haggler to Maria Montenegro, another senior vice president.

Ms. Montenegro asked for a screen grab of the offer that Mr. Freedman had responded to. The Haggler sent it, then waited a few days as she investigated.

“I understand why he was confused,” she said, referring to Mr. Freedman in a conversation last week.

She then offered this not-very-convincing defense: that, historically, all of TracFone’s 450-minute special offers have come with a 90-day time limit. In other words, even if this offer didn’t say “these minutes vanish after 90 days,” a customer ought to know because, hey, that’s the tradition.

Or something like that.

Even Ms. Montenegro seemed underwhelmed by this argument, and after the Haggler briefly noted its absurdities, she segued to her main point: that the company, prompted by Mr. Freedman’s letter, had decided to change all of its pop-up windows so that the time limit on minutes was abundantly obvious.

Why wasn’t it abundantly obvious already?

“Good question,” she said. “I can’t answer that. I’m told we’ve been using this type of pop-up offer for four years.” She said Mr. Freedman was the first to complain about it.

A customer service rep, meanwhile, called Mr. Freedman and walked him through a set of steps to delete the minutes he’d bought courtesy of that special and get a refund. So why did a phone rep initially say that deleting minutes from a TracFone was impossible?

Maybe they were trying to screw with his head.

E-mail: haggler@nytimes.com. Keep it brief and family-friendly, include your hometown and go easy on the caps-lock key. Letters may be edited for clarity and length.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/your-money/cellphone-minutes-were-prepaid-but-the-grief-was-free.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Automakers and U.A.W. Are Still Talking

The U.A.W. and Chrysler also agreed to extend their contract, though the pace of talks with Chrysler has slowed while the focus shifts to G.M.

Chrysler’s chief executive, Sergio Marchionne, criticized the U.A.W.’s president, Bob King, for failing to show up at the bargaining table Wednesday as expected. Mr. Marchionne had left the Frankfurt auto show in Germany early, and said he arrived in Detroit expecting to finalize a deal.

With regard to G.M., top U.A.W. officials said in an update to workers posted online by several union locals that they were “hopeful that an agreement can be reached soon.”

“While we have made significant progress, we have not been able to secure a new agreement that we would recommend for ratification,” the message said.

A G.M. spokeswoman confirmed that officials were back in negotiations as of 10 a.m. Thursday.

Mr. Marchionne sent the letter to Mr. King after the union leader spent the day huddled in contract talks with General Motors rather than Chrysler. A copy of the letter was obtained from sources close to the negotiations.

“I flew back from the Frankfurt Motor Show late last night to be here today to finalize our dialogue that has been started by our teams but that required your presence and mine to conclude,” Mr. Marchionne wrote. “You unfortunately could not be here, I am told, due to competing engagements.”

Mr. Marchionne went on to say that he and Mr. King “failed” employees by not concluding the months-long negotiations before the current contract expired.

“I am willing to extend the contract by an additional week to allow closure on all outstanding matters,” Mr. Marchionne wrote.

Workers for both companies had been anxiously awaiting word of a settlement, and even U.A.W. officials at several plants said they were being kept in the dark about the pace and nature of the discussions.

“We are confident that we can reach an agreement that will meet many of the goals we set at the beginning of negotiations,” Joe Ashton, a U.A.W. vice president in charge of negotiations with G.M., wrote in a message to workers Wednesday.

Any agreements must be approved by the U.A.W.’s local leaders and then ratified by the rank-and-file membership.

Labor experts expect the companies to offer workers signing bonuses of at least $5,000 to improve the chances of ratification without permanently increasing labor costs.

Workers at all three companies received a $3,000 signing bonus in 2007. Their wages have not increased since 2003.

Talks with the Ford Motor Company are not as far along as the negotiations with G.M. and Chrysler.

On Tuesday, Ford and the union agreed to extend their contract indefinitely, at least temporarily putting off the possibility that a strike could be called. The union can end the extension with three days’ notice, and it might do so when a deal is close to pressure the company to settle.

Talks with all three companies lacked much of the acrimony that has defined past rounds of bargaining in the auto industry. Union leaders have vowed to help keep the carmakers competitive while also seeking ways for workers to be rewarded as the auto industry turns around.

Workers at G.M. and Chrysler are barred from striking over wage and benefit disputes through 2015, a provision they were required to approve when the companies received federal loans as they went through bankruptcy protection in 2009. Their only recourse in the case of an impasse is binding arbitration, a somewhat unpredictable process that both sides have said they want to avoid.

A major theme for the union during these talks has been regaining much of what workers gave up to keep their employers from collapsing under the weight of heavy debt and plummeting sales. But the union also wants to add jobs in the United States after suffering years of wrenching cutbacks at the three carmakers.

Mr. King, the U.A.W. president, has said U.A.W. members each ceded $7,000 to $30,000 worth of pay and benefits since 2005. In 2007, the union agreed to create a two-tier wage system that allowed the carmakers to cut costs by hiring new workers at about half the pay of other workers.

Many in the U.A.W. oppose the two-tier system, but Mr. King has said it is a way for the companies to become more competitive without cutting pay for existing workers and helps create jobs. Only about 4,000 of the 112,000 workers at G.M., Ford and Chrysler earn second-tier wages currently, but the companies hope to hire more people at the lower pay scale as older workers retire, further reducing their labor costs.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=02d123258db051cd5eeda29c13c155dc

Business Briefing | ACQUISITIONS: Interest from Icahn Propels a Gain in Oshkosh Shares

The investor Carl C. Icahn reported a 9.5 percent stake in the Oshkosh Corporation, a specialty truck maker, and said he was seeking talks with the company to enhance shareholder value, setting off a 14 percent gain in the company’s share price on Friday. Oshkosh, which makes tactical vehicles for the military and specialty trucks for construction, is the latest diversified industrial and military company to be the focus of activist investors for a breakup. Stock in the company, which also makes fire and emergency equipment, rose $4.01, to $32.95 a share. Oshkosh said in a statement late on Thursday it was open to dialogue with shareholders, adding that the company believed Mr. Icahn’s investment was “evidence of his belief in the value of the company.” Mr. Icahn held 9.51 percent of Oshkosh shares as of June 20, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Thursday.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=cab3cf82a21ab6b02565b06b911ae815

Loan From Russia Props Up Belarus

Opinion »

Letters: A Dialogue on America’s Energy Options

Introducing a feature inviting readers’ responses.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/05/world/europe/05belarus.html?partner=rss&emc=rss