December 22, 2024

DealBook: Corzine Denies Knowing That MF Global Was Tapping Client Funds

Jon S. Corzine, right, MF Global's former chief executive, consults with an aide during his testimony before a House hearing on his firm's demise.Alex Wong/Getty ImagesJon S. Corzine, right, MF Global’s former chief executive, consults with an aide during his testimony before a House hearing on his firm’s demise.

WASHINGTON — Jon S. Corzine, the former chief executive of MF Global, on Thursday denied claims that he had known the brokerage firm was improperly tapping customer funds to stave off collapse.

Mr. Corzine told a House panel that he had received assurances, “both orally and in writing,” that the firm followed federal laws about keeping customer money separate from firm funds.

But some lawmakers suggested that MF Global might have breached those rules on Oct. 28, three days before it filed for bankruptcy. After the firm transferred about $175 million to JPMorgan Chase to shore up an overdrawn account, the bank contacted Mr. Corzine to ensure that the money was not customer cash, according to testimony Thursday by the former chief executive.

Mr. Corzine told lawmakers that a back-office employee in MF Global’s Chicago headquarters had affirmed that the funds came from the firm and not customers.

“I don’t know of any loan that was backed by customer funds,” Mr. Corzine said on Thursday before the oversight subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee. “I wouldn’t have authorized it.”

The hearing was the third appearance by Mr. Corzine — a former Democratic United States senator and a former governor of New Jersey — before a Congressional panel in just over a week. As in the previous hearings, lawmakers gained little insight on Thursday into the whereabouts of some $1 billion that vanished from MF Global. But the House committee did offer Mr. Corzine his first chance to rebut claims that he knew all along about some of the missing money.

His denials came in sharp contrast to testimony by Terrence Duffy, executive chairman of the CME Group, the exchange where MF Global did business. Mr. Duffy, testifying on Tuesday before a Senate committee, said that MF Global had used customer funds to lend from one arm of the firm to another — and that Mr. Corzine had been aware of it. Mr. Duffy repeated those accusations on Thursday before the House panel, saying “in our opinion, someone has violated the law here,” though he did not specify Mr. Corzine.

Mr. Corzine however, challenged Mr. Duffy’s assertion that he had been aware of the loans using customer money.

“I don’t know the source of the suggestion,” Mr. Corzine said, adding that he had first learned of the shortfall in customer funds late on Sunday, Oct. 30.

Mr. Duffy said only that a CME auditor had learned of the accusation in a conference call with “senior MF Global employees.”

But Representative Randy Neugebauer, a Republican from Texas and chairman of the House panel, said on Thursday that the unnamed executive was the chief financial officer of MF Global’s North American operations.

“Let’s be clear Mr. Corzine, this individual is a senior employee of your firm — a person you interact with regularly,” the congressman said. “Were you aware of loans made from customer accounts?

“As I have repeatedly stated, I was stunned on Sunday night,” Mr. Corzine said, referring to a conversation about 11 p.m. on Oct. 30, when he said he learned that the firm was missing about $1 billion in customer money.

Yet other MF Global executives were aware of the shortfall about five hours earlier, according to documents that CME submitted to lawmakers on Thursday.

About 6 p.m. that day, the firm’s general counsel notified CME that there was an apparent shortfall. But the counsel, Laurie Ferber, blamed an accounting error, according to CME.

At about 10 p.m., MF Global still held that the shortfall must be an accounting error, telling CME that the amount of money in question was “too big to be anything else.” Around midnight, Ms. Ferber sent an e-mail to CME saying “we may have it.”

But by 2 a.m., those hopes were dashed.

Mr. Neugebauer, citing information from CME, described an early morning meeting that day, when two MF Global executives told a CME official at the firm’s offices that as much as $700 million in customer funds had been transferred for the purposes of the firm. Such a move would have been intended to meet MF Global’s liquidity needs.

“If true, this is the first acknowledgment from officers of your firm that customer segregated accounts were in fact raided,” the committee chairman said.

But Mr. Corzine, who was not present at the time, appeared unfamiliar with that particular meeting.

“I’m aware of a phone call with regulators on the 31st,” he said. “I am not aware that we used the terms that you used.”

Much of the remainder of the marathon hearing, which lasted more than five hours, centered on the missing money and who was to blame for MF Global’s collapse. House members took turns posing harsh, sometimes-arcane questions to Mr. Corzine and Bradley Abelow, the firm’s chief operating officer. In response, the men responded with variations of “I don’t know.”

The dispute often got testy, as Republican lawmakers grew impatient with Mr. Corzine.

At one point, Representative Steve Pearce, Republican of New Mexico, wondered aloud what it would take for staff members at MF Global to bring information to Mr. Corzine.

“When do they have to come to you?” he asked. “Your day-to-day knowledge is not very thorough.”

Another congressman asked about a document issued by the company on Nov. 7, a week after its bankruptcy, suggesting there were no fund imbalances at MF Global.

Mr. Corzine indicated that following the bankruptcy and his resignation, he was no longer privy to such information.

Clearly miffed, the congressman muttered “slippery when dry” before ceding the floor.

Ben Protess reported from Washington and Azam Ahmed from New York.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9aa3ec7344ae26f0998214bbf25d4fd3

The Caucus: White House Would Cut Tax Breaks to Pay for Jobs Plan

President Obama announced that he would send his proposed jobs legislation to Congress on Monday.Philip Scott Andrews/The New York TimesPresident Obama announced that he would send his proposed jobs legislation to Congress on Monday.

2:24 p.m. | Updated The White House said on Monday that it would cover most of the cost of his payroll tax cut and other job initiatives by limiting the deductions that can be claimed on the tax returns of wealthier taxpayers.

President Obama, repeating what is clearly going to be the mantra for his stump speeches this fall, called on lawmakers Monday to “pass this bill” — his $447 billion jobs package.

At the White House, his budget director described how the administration would propose to pay for the plan, as the president has promised to do.

Jack Lew, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, said the bulk of the plan –- $400 billion over 10 years — would be raised by limiting the itemized deductions, such as those for charitable contributions and other expenditures, that may be taken by individuals making more than $200,000 a year and families making over $250,000 a year. The rest would come from provisions affecting oil and gas companies, hedge funds, and the owners of corporate jets.

Mr. Lew said that the Congressional panel charged with finding at least $1.2 trillion in savings this fall as part of the agreement to raise the debt ceiling will have the option of accepting the payment proposals submitted by Mr. Obama, or proposing new ones of their own.

Republicans were quick to signal their continuing opposition to the tax increases that Mr. Lew described, which have been suggested by the administration before.

Brendan Buck, spokesman for House Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio, said the White House plan was not showing a “bipartisan spirit.”

Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House majority leader, said, “I sure hope that the president is not suggesting that we pay for his proposals with a massive tax increase at the end of 2012 on job creators.” If Mr. Obama’s bill resembled the 2009 stimulus plan, he said, “I don’t believe that our members are going to be interested in pursuing that; I certainly am not.”

Like that stimulus plan, Mr. Obama’s jobs bill is made up largely of tax cuts, such as the expanded reductions of the payroll taxes that finance Social Security. The White House wants to cut both employee and employer contributions in half next year, putting more money in the pockets of all wage earners and on the bottom line of most smaller companies.

Mr. Obama, speaking in the Rose Garden, held up a copy of the American Jobs Act, which will be sent to Congress on Monday evening. Flanked by people from across the country who he said would be helped by the law if it passes, the president struck tones similar to those of his big jobs speech on Thursday.

“On Thursday I told Congress that I’ll be sending them a bill called the American Jobs Act,” Mr. Obama said, holding up a folder. “Well, here it is.”

Mr. Obama said the jobs act was “based on ideas from both Democrats and Republicans.” Americans, he said, cannot afford to wait 14 months until the next election for lawmakers to act, particularly given the dire economic straits and the high unemployment rate.

“We’ve got a world economy that’s full of uncertainty right now,” Mr. Obama said. “Some events are beyond our control.” By contrast, he said, his jobs bill is “something we can control.”

Mr. Obama is heading to Ohio and North Carolina this week to push his jobs plan. On Tuesday, in Columbus, Ohio, Mr. Boehner’s home state, he will argue once again that Congress should act; he will be making a similar pitch in the Raleigh-Durham area of North Carolina on Wednesday. While the president won both states in 2008, they are expected to be highly competitive in next year’s election.


This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: September 12, 2011

An earlier version of this post incorrectly identified House Speaker John A. Boehner’s home state. He is from Ohio, not Iowa.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=32e3d8a064195c56f7e370d630e3c505