April 20, 2024

You’re the Boss Blog: The Risks of Expanding Into Australia, Part 2

Sustainable Profits

The challenges of a waste-recycling business.

In my last post, I wrote about our plans to open our 22nd foreign office in Australia. We have checked the very important first few boxes in our process to conduct a successful foreign-office opening with limited risk and investment — including finding a general manager, Anna Minns, who will start drawing a salary as soon as we start invoicing. Most important, we have a few partnership deals that are close to closing.

Our partnership deals rely on major brands to finance our ability to take their non-recyclable waste — cigarette butts, chip bags, etc. We have incorporated, and we have our Australian bank accounts set up. In anticipation of the deals closing, we have identified operational partners — a warehouse, manufacturers, etc. — to help us run our recycling operations. Pending commitments from our partners, we plan to introduce TerraCycle Australia this summer from a new office in Sydney.

The big question is not whether we will open but how successful we will be. This will depend primarily on the people we hire and how well we manage and support them. I’ve found that a business model that works in a few countries generally works well in similar markets, and Australia is a similar market to the United States. Australians speak English, and the economy functions under Western principles. Perhaps the country most comparable to Australia is Canada, and Canada is often the first foreign market that an expanding American company will enter, typically followed by Britain.

The role of a general manager evolves dramatically in the first few years; unfortunately, only about half of our G.M.’s survive the transition. In the beginning, Anna will have to manage everything from operations to client relations. We support this by having a team of global leaders, based in our headquarters in Trenton, N.J., who manage each department globally.

That means Anna will get support from Michael, our global head of client management; Kevin, our global head of operations; and 10 other leaders on a department-by-department basis. Doing this gives us global cohesiveness and allows us to have multiple people overseeing our people and operations. There can be instances where a local G.M. may think everything is going well but our department head thinks otherwise. This redundancy is critical, especially when we are asking an individual to take on such a wide range of responsibilities.

In addition, we ask each team to submit detailed monthly reports. The reports are sent to every staff member and reviewed by the senior team on a monthly basis. Those notes are then forwarded to every other employee to make sure everyone knows how we are doing. By maximizing oversight and transparency, we are able to offer the best possible support to our local G.M.’s, and we can also keep track of what is happening in our far-flung markets.

That’s especially important because the role of the G.M. will change quickly for Anna as her business unit grows. As she brings on more partners, her budget will grow and she will be permitted to hire more employees. When this happens, her role will evolve from doing every function herself to managing a team.

We opened our office in Mexico in 2009, for example, and today it has 14 people. As you can imagine, the role of our G.M. in Mexico has changed dramatically in the past few years as the office has grown. The growth of the office was not a smooth ride — in fact, we changed G.M.’s four times.

Our first Mexican G.M. was terrific when he was working in Trenton but he struggled in Mexico — not everyone is cut out to work remotely. We then hired a young entrepreneur I had met while giving a talk in Hermosillo. He was 20 at the time, but I generally don’t worry too much about age (I started TerraCycle at 21 and am 31 today). But it turned out that getting a business off the ground and running it was too much for him, and we agreed that a transition would be appropriate. We went through one more G.M., who resigned because of the pressure, before we landed our current G.M., Isaac, who has done a fantastic job the past few years.

Hiring can be tricky for any position, but it’s especially tricky for a position that will evolve in a market that you may not fully understand. For me, the biggest lesson I have learned opening offices in 22 other countries is that the success or failure of a foreign office will be determined almost entirely by the abilities of the talent that you deploy there.

Tom Szaky is the chief executive of TerraCycle, which is based in Trenton.

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/the-risks-of-expanding-into-australia-part-2/?partner=rss&emc=rss

You’re the Boss: Alcohol, Tobacco, Guns

Sustainable Profits

A few years ago we were approached by Nomacorc, leaders in the production of synthetic wine corks, to run a “cork brigade.” We needed millions of corks at the time to create a cork board product that Office Max was ordering from us, and we concluded that wine, as controlled vices go, is rather innocuous. In the end, there wasn’t much internal debate, so we partnered rather quickly with the alcohol industry.

At TerraCycle we run free collection programs for waste that allow individuals, community groups and offices to collect waste and send it to TerraCycle to be recycled or “upcycled” into new products. Schools happen to be a very big source of collections for TerraCycle. In fact, we are in more than 60 percent of all schools in America.

I preface the discussion this way because we have been approached by all three “Merchant of Death” industries that are highlighted in the movie “Thank You for Smoking.” All three industries have waste streams that are not recyclable: alcohol has wine corks, guns have bullet casings, and tobacco has cigarette butts. For us, the question boils down to this: Should we censor the products we collect and recycle? Or should we collect any product that advances TerraCycle’s mission of eliminating waste?

TerraCycle collects a broad range of waste streams: candy and cookie wrappers, cosmetic and personal-care packaging, empty glue sticks, worn-out flip flops, cups and plates, diapers, used pens and yogurt containers. We not only keep waste out of landfills or from being incinerated (which results in carbon emissions), we stop virgin material from being used in products and we replace it with material derived from previously non-recyclable waste. All of these positive outcomes have been documented by third-party lifecycle analyses.

In the case of wine corks, bullet casings and cigarette butts, the intention is consistent with TerraCycle’s core mission: to find recycling and/or upcyling solutions for waste. With cigarettes (our most recent waste challenge), we’ve found that we can recycle used butts into two products: compost (from the paper and the tobacco) and park benches (from the filters). So long as people smoke, wouldn’t the world be a better place if instead of throwing billions of butts into the trash or onto our streets, they sent them to TerraCycle for re-purposing? Shotgun shells, too, have many potential uses (think Christmas lights, for one fun example).

There may well be a legitimate debate as to whether certain industries should exist, but so long as they do exist, shouldn’t we try to minimize their waste? I’ve had long arguments with friends in the natural products industry who claim that by collecting the waste of nonorganic products, TerraCycle is validating companies whose products are “less good.” I argue that TerraCycle’s job is to collect and re-purpose the vast amounts of waste generated by all companies and their consumers — not to judge whether one company or product is better than another. If we apply this logic to alcohol, guns and tobacco, I think the answer is clear: We should accept the waste of legal products and let the law and market work out which products thrive and which fail.

I view TerraCycle’s role as doing for non-recyclable products — with the help of the manufacturers — what recycling does for our soda bottles and newspapers. Ultimately, I think it’s commendable for these companies to take a proactive, nonlegislated stance on solving problems created by their products.

So is TerraCycle going to partner with alcohol, guns and tobacco? We’ve already done it with alcohol (the Cork Brigade is in its third year). As for guns and tobacco, we’re working on them with the intention of introducing programs early next year. I hope that concerned teachers and parents will agree that solving our waste problem is critical and that we shouldn’t discriminate against certain types of garbage.

Tom Szaky is the chief executive of TerraCycle, which is based in Trenton, N.J.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e5230f3bafdc8c49e9118a1059709d73