November 15, 2024

To Cut Taxes, Tribune Is to Split Into Broadcasting and Publishing Units

Months after Tribune announced it was exploring opportunities for its newspapers, including The Los Angeles Times and The Chicago Tribune, the company instead said on Wednesday that it would spin them off into a separate entity called the Tribune Publishing Company. In doing so, Tribune followed the example of Time Warner and News Corporation, which also recently announced spinoffs of their publishing businesses, even though print properties are the backbone of their companies.

“These companies were built on print. These guys are walking away from decades-long legacies. This is a big moment,” said Alan D. Mutter, a newspaper consultant who writes the blog Reflections of a Newsosaur. “It’s like everybody is saying, ‘We’re out.’ ”

By spinning off the newspapers instead of selling them, Tribune avoids the tax consequences of a sale in the near term while still allowing the company, now led by Peter Liguori, a longtime broadcasting executive, to focus its efforts on television, including 19 local stations that it acquired for $2.7 billion at the beginning of the month.

In making the announcement, Mr. Liguori said that “the separation is designed to allow each company to maximize its flexibility and competitiveness in a rapidly changing media environment.”

The spinoff of the newspapers leaves Tribune as largely a broadcasting company, which will include 42 local television stations and interests in the Food Network,Web sites like Classified Ventures and CareerBuilder and its real estate holdings, including the Tribune Tower in Chicago.

The new publishing company, which will have its own board and leadership, will include the Los Angeles and Chicago papers along with The Baltimore Sun, The Sun Sentinel in Florida, The Orlando Sentinel, The Hartford Courant and The Morning Call in Pennsylvania. The newspapers’ operational tie-ins with Tribune’s digital sites, a valuable part of the enterprise, will remain intact after the split.

The publishing side of Tribune actually had higher revenue than the broadcasting side in 2012 — $2 billion compared with $1.14 billion. But according to Ken Doctor, a newspaper analyst, publishing revenue at Tribune has dropped 51 percent from 2005 and 2011, mirroring the halving of revenue in the rest of the industry. The newspapers have had deep editorial cuts and a loss of luster after a debt-laden purchase by Sam Zell in 2007. In February, Tribune announced that it had hired Evercore Partners and JPMorgan Chase to look into the sale of its newspapers. Several bidders expressed interest, including Charles and David Koch, the conservative billionaires; Aaron Kushner, the owner of The Orange County Register; and a group led by Eli Broad, the Los Angeles billionaire. But the efforts to sell have proceeded slowly, and the financial deal books that generally precede a sale have yet to go out.

The spinoff does not preclude a quick sale of the newspapers, but because the necessary filings will take months to prepare and be followed by putting together a new board and leadership for the publishing enterprise, Tribune’s decision could push any sale further down the road.

Robert Willens, a longtime tax analyst who runs the firm Robert Willens L.L.C., said that Tribune could avoid roughly $250 million in taxes on the sale of its newspapers, which have been valued at roughly $623 million, by creating a separate company. He added that for the deal to pass muster with the Internal Revenue Service, Tribune just has to show that it has not had discussions over price with potential buyers for two years before the creation of the new company.

“People do spinoffs all the time for the purpose of avoiding taxes,” said Mr. Willens. “That’s the beauty of a spinoff. It permanently avoids the tax that would be payable on a more straightforward or conventional disposal of the business.”

The company, he noted, is already grappling with a $190 million tax bill, plus 20 percent penalty, on its sale of the Long Island newspaper Newsday to Cablevision in 2008. In its most recent earnings report, Tribune Company said that it also might have to pay an extra $225 million in taxes after the I.R.S. finishes auditing the company’s 2009 tax return over a sale of the Chicago Cubs baseball team.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/11/business/media/tribune-co-to-split-in-two.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Tribune Co. to Split in Two

Ending months of speculation, the Tribune Company announced on Wednesday that it would spin off its newspapers, including The Los Angeles Times and The Chicago Tribune, into a separate division called Tribune Publishing Company. Its broadcasting properties would remain together with other assets in the Tribune Company.

The move mirrors one by News Corporation, which late last month formally separated its newspapers into a new company. The common motivation is an effort to separate high-value, high-return entertainment and television assets from newspapers, which face a difficult operating environment that has dragged down earnings.

The Tribune Company, which emerged from bankruptcy at the end of 2012, signaled last week that it saw a bright future in broadcasting when it purchased 19 television stations in 16 markets, bringing its total number of television stations to 42 and giving the company a large footprint in the local TV business.

Some initial efforts to sell the newspapers were hampered by significant tax implications – given that the newspapers are mature businesses, the taxes on a sale of all the prosperities could reach well over $100 million. The company has interests in large digital assets, CareerBuilder.com and Classified Ventures, that include publishing arrangements with the newspapers that would have been invalidated by a sale. The broadcast entity, which will continue to be called the Tribune Company, will retain those assets, but the agreements will remain in place.

The spinoff does not preclude a sale of any or all of the newspapers, the company said, and executives are hoping that the announcement stirs interest in some of the properties and perhaps a greater willingness to shoulder some of the tax implications.

In a news release early Wednesday, Peter Liguori, chief executive of the company, said that each division would be able to operate independently.

“The two companies resulting from this transaction would each have revenues in excess of $1 billion and significant operating cash flow,” Mr. Liguori said. “We expect that this transaction will serve our shareholders and employees well, and put these businesses in a strong position for continued success.”

The split, like News Corporation’s, is expected to take months and is subject to some regulatory approvals. Each of the new entities will have its own board of directors and senior management team.

The company had retained Evercore Partners with an eye toward selling the newspapers, but the financial deal books that generally precede a sale had yet to go out, leading to speculation that an outright sale was complicated business proposition in the near term.

In addition, Mr. Liguori, an executive with a long history in broadcasting, has shown an increasing interest in the operational aspects of newspapers, indicating the company would likely not be selling them off wholesale. The split will give Tribune Company time to shop the newspapers over a longer time frame.

What had been envisioned as a straight-up auction of storied but troubled newspapers has been complicated by a business environment that is depressing values for newspaper properties, most remarkably large regional dailies that have been hit especially hard by changes in advertiser and consumer behavior. In October, The Tampa Tribune sold for a scant $9.5 million dollars; the Philadelphia newspapers sold for $55 million in April 2012 after fetching $515 million in 2006.

Still, several people or groups of people have expressed interests in the Tribune Company’s newspapers, which have been valued at roughly $623 million and also include The Baltimore Sun, The Orlando Sentinel and The Hartford Courant. Charles and David Koch, the conservative billionaires, are among the most prominent potential bidders. Aaron Kushner, the owner of The Orange County Register, said last December that he was looking at the properties, and Douglas Manchester, owner of The San Diego Union-Tribune, has expressed interest in The Morning Call of Allentown, Pa., one of the smaller newspapers in the chain.

According to Ken Doctor, a newspaper analyst, publishing revenue at the company has dropped 51 percent between 2005 and 2011, mirroring the halving of revenue in the rest of the industry. The properties have suffered deep editorial cuts and a loss of luster after a debt-laden purchase of the newspapers by Sam Zell in 2007.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/11/business/media/tribune-co-to-split-in-two.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

A Bid to Thwart Los Angeles Times Sale to Kochs

Ten public employee unions on Thursday sent a letter to the largest shareholder in the Tribune Company, which owns the newspapers, urging it not to sell to the billionaires, David H. Koch and Charles G. Koch. The Kochs have championed legislative efforts to cut public pension benefits and the power of public unions, notably in Wisconsin.

About one-quarter of the assets held by Oaktree Capital Management, the leading shareholder in the Tribune Company, comes from public employee pension fund investments, and labor leaders, looking to exert influence on Oaktree, signaled they would press to withdraw the funds if the sale went through.

“The sale of the Tribune Company’s newspaper assets would provide the Koch brothers a powerful and influential platform by which to promote, at both the local, state and federal level, that enactment of their anti-public pension fund policies,” the unions said in a letter to Bruce Karsh, who is president of Oaktree Capital Management and chairman of the Tribune board of directors. It said that the Koch brothers had a history of orchestrating efforts that are “anti-labor, anti-environment, anti-public education and anti-immigrant.”

The prospect that the Koch brothers, notorious in Democratic circles for their heavy financing of conservative candidates and causes, could run The Los Angeles Times has struck a nerve in this liberal corner of the country. The Times, if somewhat diminished by the cuts it has suffered over the years, remains a powerful influence in public life here and its existence is integral to the modern history of Los Angeles.

The resistance is not only here. In Chicago on Wednesday, demonstrators protested outside the headquarters of The Chicago Tribune, which is also owned by the Tribune Company, about the possibility of a Koch takeover.

The effort is at an early stage — no formal bids have been submitted — and the Koch brothers face competition from, among others, a team of Los Angeles business leaders, including Eli Broad, the philanthropist, and Austin Beutner, a business executive and former deputy mayor. Officials behind the campaign said they were moving quickly in hopes of discouraging the Koch brothers from proceeding with their plans, which come after an election campaign in which they spent millions of dollars in largely unsuccessful efforts to elect conservative candidates.

Melissa Cohlmia, a spokeswoman for the Koch companies, declined to comment on the protests. “We respect the independence of the journalistic institutions referenced in today’s news stories, but it is our longstanding policy not to comment on deals or rumors of deals we may or may not be exploring,” she said. A spokesman for Mr. Karsh also declined to comment.

The two Democratic leaders of the State Legislature — Darrell Steinberg, the president pro tem of the Senate, and John A. Pérez, the speaker of the Assembly — announced on Wednesday that they would oppose the sale. Both men control seats on the boards of California’s major pension funds.

“Newspapers are public trusts, and I think it is wrong for The Los Angeles Times to end up in the hands of two people who have such a pronounced rigid ideology on a whole host of issues,” Mr. Steinberg said in an interview. Mr. Pérez, in a statement, said he was “deeply concerned about media outlets being purchased to further a political agenda.”

A liberal advocacy group, the Courage Campaign, bought advertisements to run in The Los Angeles Times on Thursday urging readers to cancel their subscriptions if the Tribune Company agrees to sell the newspaper to “the right-wing Koch Brothers.” More than 1,000 people have pledged to cancel their subscriptions, said Rick Jacobs, the head of the campaign. while 110,000 have signed petitions opposing the sale.

“The LAT has a long and storied past of publishers taking it in various directions,” Mr. Jacobs said in an e-mail. “The Kochs are much more likely to end journalism as we know it. They are likely to stop coverage of climate change or skew it. They will almost certainly change the way the LAT covers state politics, especially ballot measures.”

A red-on-black poster — “No Koch Hate in LA: Stop the Koch takeover of the L.A. Times” — went out on Wednesday urging people to turn out for a rally next Tuesday in front of Mr. Karsh’s office here.

“The Koch brothers would use the newspaper in an extremist and ideological way,” said María Elena Durazo, executive secretary-treasurer of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, A.F.L.-C.I.O. “And I’m saying that even though I believe the current L.A. Times is not particularly labor friendly.”

Should the Koch brothers proceed with their efforts, and draw on their considerable financial assets to try to push rivals off the field, shareholders in the Tribune Company, including Oaktree and JPMorgan Chase Company, might be hard-pressed to refuse a deal that would be seen as in the best financial interest of the company. The union leaders, in their letter to Oaktree, argued that the cost of selling to the Kochs, in the form of losing the investments of the pension funds, would be as fiscally irresponsible.

“For those people whose retirement savings are invested in public pension funds, selling the Tribune Company’s newspapers to the Koch brothers so they could in turn use it to advance specific policies adverse to the retirement security of working people, would be akin to agreeing to selling your car to a buyer who you know wants to buy the car so they can run you over,” the letter said.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/us/a-bid-to-thwart-los-angeles-times-sale-to-kochs.html?partner=rss&emc=rss