April 19, 2024

You’re the Boss Blog: The Risks of Expanding Into Australia

Sustainable Profits

The challenges of a waste-recycling business.

In 2012, TerraCycle had $15 million in sales with operations in 22 countries, primarily in North and South America as well as in Europe and a little bit of the Middle East. A few months ago, we embarked on opening in our 23rd market, Australia.

While opening in a new country presents an opportunity for growth and revenue, it is also an opportunity to lose ours shirts — through unexpected issues and complications. As such, it is important for small businesses that don’t have gobs of cash to manage each opening carefully.

That said, we now live in a world where opening abroad is much easier than it used to be. With Internet phone service, long-distance calls are cheaper than ever and flying to Australia from New York can cost little more than flying to Fayetteville, Ark. Most important, while there are certainly cultural differences among foreign markets, they are far less problematic than many presume. TerraCycle, for example, is basically operated the same way in every country where we have operations, from Brazil to Turkey. We do adjust for each location, but we try as much as possible to avoid making adjustments in order to maintain coherence in a small organization of just more than 110 employees.

For TerraCycle, the first step in choosing a new market is to evaluate the legal, financial and language issues to make sure we have a good fit. The next step is to look at the market opportunity. Will our business model — in our case, recycling waste that has been considered nonrecyclable — work in that market, and is the market big enough to make the effort worthwhile?

These issues are connected. Big markets — Britain, Canada, Australia, Germany — tend to have relatively simple legal and financial requirements, and they tend to use English as a primary (or, worst case, secondary) business language. This is not as true in Asian markets like Japan or South Korea, which are immense but handle business very differently (and not in English).

Countries like Turkey, Puerto Rico and Argentina are more challenging for us, with smaller economies, bigger language barriers, and complicated (meaning expensive) processes to set up a business. For example, incorporating in Argentina cost considerably more than incorporating in Canada, and the market size opportunity is smaller. This goes not just for setup but also for maintenance. And then you have the idiosyncratic human resources rules in each of these markets, which tend to favor the employee over the corporation.

For us, opening in a new country usually begins with landing a deal with a company to create a  waste-collection system for nonrecyclable waste. In Brazil, it was Pepsico that wanted to start a national chip-bag collection. In Japan, it was a major cigarette company that wanted to start recycling cigarette butts. And in Canada, it was Mondelez International that wanted to recycle juice pouches. The benefit of having a client up front, before incurring costs, is that the revenue from the deal can help finance the investment.

Now, this doesn’t always work. We thought we had a deal in Colombia, and it fell through. We had already incorporated and opened bank accounts, which means filing taxes — even if the income is zero. It also means paying lawyers and accountants $5,000 to $10,000 a year to keep the entity alive. It will cost us money even if we dissolve the entity, and we cannot just walk away if we ever want to operate there in the future. As a result, we are working very hard to land a deal in Colombia as soon as possible.

About a year ago, to get started in Australia, I led a one-week business development mission to Melbourne and Sydney. Even though we knew interest was high among potential clients, our United States-based business development team had not been able to convert that interest into a deal.

This is rare, but it does happen in markets that prefer to work with locals. We have seen this in Mexico, Brazil, Israel and a few other places. When it happens, we look to find a local person who is willing to take the lead — without pay — until a deal is signed and starts invoicing. We spend resources on training and support, but we align incentives by making the general manager’s job tentative, pending the landing of a deal. Once that occurs, we open a local office, and put the general manager on the payroll. This is how we opened in both Argentina and Israel, where we have had great success.

For Australia, we brought on a fantastic new addition to our team, Anna Minns, who joined TerraCycle a few months ago and worked initially from our Trenton headquarters as a G.M. trainee. Anna was able to embrace our culture and business model, and she recently got back from a trip to Australia where she had terrific meetings with more than a dozen potential clients.

It didn’t hurt that the Agence France-Presse happened to run a positive story about TerraCycle that was picked up by The Sydney Morning Herald on the first day of her trip. Last year, we finished working with local lawyers and accountants to incorporate and set up bank accounts in Australia. Just as with Colombia, we thought we had a deal ready to go after my business-development mission to Melbourne and Sydney.

But it fell through. So even with our low-risk approach, there is always risk. The process of setting up the entity typically costs $10,000 to $25,000 in year one and then $5,000 to $10,000 a year thereafter. Naturally, this depends on the market, and is generally the only major investment we have to make in a local market because the rest of the investment is generally financed through the partnerships — once they start coming in.

For the next few months, Anna will work from Trenton as she attempts to finalize a deal with the goal of opening a Sydney office this summer. The next question we will face is how we will manage an office that is literally halfway around the world. And will Anna prove to be as great a G.M. as we expect?

The key challenge with G.M.’s is that the job changes quickly. Initially, these new offices are one-person shops, and the G.M.’s have  to do everything — get the deals, manage them, handle the accounting, and provide customer service. It’s highly entrepreneurial and highly stressful. Then, as the office expands and more staffers are hired, the job evolves into a managerial function.

For example, in Britain, our London office opened in September 2009 with one person, Chris Baker. Today, it employs around 25 people. Chris’s job has evolved, and while Chris has been a fantastic G.M., not all of our hiring choices have been able to handle this evolution. I’ll talk more about that in my next post.

Tom Szaky is the chief executive of TerraCycle, which is based in Trenton.

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/08/the-risks-of-expanding-into-australia/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: New Leader for Pearson Unit That Includes Financial Times

John Ridding, the current chief executive of The Financial Times, was promoted to lead the FT Group that includes The Financial Times.Simon Newman/Reuters John Ridding, the current chief executive of The Financial Times, was promoted to lead the FT Group that includes The Financial Times.

John Ridding will take over as chief executive of the FT Group, a subsidiary of Pearson that includes The Financial Times and half of The Economist, the company said Tuesday.

Mr. Ridding, who has served as chief executive of the Financial Times since 2006, will replace Rona Fairhead. Ms. Fairhead said last month that she would be leaving the London-based media conglomerate in April. Her resignation followed the departure of Marjorie Scardino, who had served as chief executive of Pearson for nearly 16 years.

A long-time newspaperman and Asia hand, Mr. Ridding previously served as editor and publisher of the Asian edition of The Financial Times, and chairman of Pearson in Asia. He spearheaded the development of the newspaper’s Chinese language Web site and introduced China Confidential, a source of business intelligence related to Chinese trade.

Pearson’s high-level departures have sparked speculation that the company could decide to sell The Financial Times. The FT Group has been slimmed down in recent years to include a handful of core assets.

Mr. Ridding’s background and appointment signals that the group is firmly centered on the business daily, with its distinctive bisque-colored newsprint, and its prominence in fast-growing Asian markets. Both Bloomberg L.P. and Thomson Reuters have emerged as likely buyers. A Pearson spokesman has said the newspaper is not for sale.


Amy Chozick is The Times’s corporate media reporter. Follow @amychozick on Twitter.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/new-leader-for-pearson-unit-that-includes-financial-times/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Calling Bankers’ Bluff, Merkel Got Europe a Debt Plan

It was approaching 2 a.m. Thursday, not long before the Asian markets would open, and the two leaders were desperately trying to nail down the last component of a complex deal to save the euro: forcing the banks to pay a greater share of Greece’s effective default.

For hours, negotiators had been trying to persuade the banks to accede to a “voluntary” 50 percent loss in the face value of their Greek bond holdings. The banks, which had already agreed to a 21 percent write-down, had dug in their heels.

They knew how badly the European leaders needed a deal, and how much financial experts feared a disorderly, involuntary default. That could set off a “credit event,” throwing world financial markets into turmoil, much as the collapse of Lehman Brothers did in the fall of 2008.

But Mrs. Merkel called the bankers’ bluff, said officials present at the discussions. Accept the 50 percent write-down, she told the bankers, or bear the consequences of default. In effect, she was willing to risk a credit event, and to place the blame for any fallout on them.

The European success sent the markets soaring and laid out the path to a more comprehensive solution to the euro crisis, though the plan faces hurdles.

It includes an order to weak banks to raise more capital to protect against bad loans, and an effort — still very vague — to increase the firepower of the $625 billion bailout fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, to better protect large and vulnerable economies like Spain and Italy.

But the very process of achieving those steps underscored the many problems that lie ahead for the euro zone. While the rescue package has been hailed as an important step, it was achieved only under enormous pressure from the financial markets and with a steely, last-minute stand by Mrs. Merkel.

Foremost among those problems is Italy, which is too big to bail out, owing a total of $2.7 trillion, or 120 percent of its gross domestic product. While Italy runs a relatively small budget deficit, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s government seems paralyzed, vowing structural changes to produce growth and to further shrink public spending, but it is so far too weak and divided to deliver on most of its promises.

Italian news outlets reported on Thursday that a number of lawmakers from Mr. Berlusconi’s coalition had signed a letter asking him to stand down to allow for the creation of a government that could pass the measures that would tranquilize jittery financial markets.

Market skepticism about Italy has led to high interest rates on its bonds, which if unchecked could rip huge holes into its budget and possibly provoke a full-blown credit crisis. With Mr. Berlusconi hanging on by a thread, and his coalition partner, Umberto Bossi of the Northern League, working to block fundamental change, Italy remains a major vulnerability in restoring market confidence to the euro.

European leaders Thursday welcomed new promises made by Mr. Berlusconi, including a weak pledge to increase the age for pensions to 67 from 65 by the year 2026, but said sternly that carrying them out was the key.

Along with the European Central Bank, they have demanded such changes in return for buying up Italian bonds at cheaper than market rates and helping to create the bailout fund, and now to expand it to about $1.4 trillion, because at $625 billion it is far too small to protect Italy or Spain, and nearly half of that is already committed.

But the leaders were vague about how to enlarge the fund, and reluctant to put up more of their own nations’ capital. They said they hoped to create another special fund open to investment by China, Russia and Japan — which all expressed a willingness to help in principle — as well as by other wealthy nations with surplus cash. But how such a fund would work, and what guarantees it would provide to investors, remain to be determined next month, European officials said. Until the details are clear, there is likely to be little investment.

Also left unclear are the details of how to leverage the existing fund, by guaranteeing a percentage of potential losses by bondholders. While Mr. Sarkozy said the aim was to leverage the fund up to $1.4 trillion, there was no agreement on the specific percentage the fund would guarantee. More should become clear by the time of the Group of 20 summit meeting on Nov. 3 and 4 in Cannes, France.

Liz Alderman contributed reporting from Paris, and Elisabetta Povoledo from Rome.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/28/world/europe/europe-in-accord-on-basics-of-plan-to-save-the-euro.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Once Wall Streeters, and Now Cabbies

Now he drives a yellow cab, not just to make a living, but also to find his next post: He hangs a hiring pitch in the back seat. “Three interviews so far,” he said with a grin.

At his taxi garage in the South Bronx, Mr. Curtis, 47, shares job-hunting tips with another felled financier, who drives home after shifts to Westchester County in his own car, a BMW. They wave hello to a pal, laid off from JPMorgan, who drives to help pay for her son’s European study-abroad program.

It is a long slide from the trading floor to the driver’s wheel of a taxicab, but these former bankers have adopted a bullish outlook on their new profession. They say taxi driving, with its flexible hours and all-cash wages, is an undervalued asset — and an efficient way to meet potential employers face to face.

“There are 20 million other people on Monster.com,” said Mr. Curtis, who chats up his fares in case a chief executive or headhunter has stumbled in. “I thought people would see this, and think, ‘He’ll go the extra yard to go and get a job.’ ”

More accustomed to the back seat of a taxi, these cabbies are importing skills from their former world to the front seat, dressing well to impress their “clients” and finding ways to exploit the inefficiencies of the taxi market.

While most cabbies view the meatpacking district in Manhattan as a must for late-night fares, Herb Reyes, once a financial director at a major entertainment company, sees a market with excess supply. So he heads to the usually deserted Avenue of the Americas in Midtown, where he knows bankers who work the Asian markets will be looking for rides home.

Tough times have prompted more New Yorkers to seek financial relief and upward mobility in the taxi trade. The number of licensed city cabbies has risen by 10 percent since the stock market began its decline in late 2007, according to the Taxi and Limousine Commission. License renewals are up, too, officials said, suggesting that drivers who used to move on to higher-paying jobs are sticking with the hack trade for now.

At Master Cabbie Taxi Academy in Long Island City, Queens, instructors have noticed an increase in former financial workers since the recession began. “As they lay off, people come through,” the owner, Terry Gelber, said. “I haven’t driven in 18 years, but somebody I drove with back then was a broker. He was back last year to get his hack license again.”

Mr. Reyes, 38, registered for a cabby license after the severance from his former job ran out. “People weren’t hiring at the salary I was making,” he said on the phone from Westchester, where he lives with his wife and two sons, who both attend private school. “They weren’t offering jobs at a level below, or even two levels below, where I was.”

When a friend suggested he look into taxi driving, he scoffed. “I was born and raised in the city,” Mr. Reyes recalled saying. “I’m not driving a cab in New York.” But on his first night in a taxi, he cleared $180 on fares. It was a Tuesday. “I could only imagine what Saturday and Sunday would be like,” he said.

Passengers who climb into Mr. Curtis’s cab are greeted by a laminated sheet of paper reading: “Ask to see my résumé. You won’t be sorry!” It has led to three interviews, one with a major British bank, though none has yet resulted in a job offer.

Mr. Curtis, who is hoping to land a hedge-fund position, said he decided to become a cabby after having little luck with traditional headhunters and job Web sites. “I just figured the best way to market myself was to be driving around town with a sign that said: ‘Hey, help me! I need a job!’ ” he said.

Mr. Curtis, divorced with two children and living in Cliffside Park, N.J., is earning a small fraction of his former income, he said. He is asked for his résumé about four times a day but acknowledges that after five months, he had hoped to already be back in an office. “I get guys who say, ‘This is ingenious!’ I’m like, if I’m such a genius, why am I driving a cab?”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e34567039ac2b273a9ae95ed86ba1ab9

Asian Markets Rally on Optimism Over Europe

Opinion »

Op-Ed: Fight Health Care Fraud

We should be much more aggressive in recovering money stolen from Medicare and Medicaid.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Asian Markets Rebound

The Fed’s symposium at Jackson Hole, Wyo., has been the key focus of investor attention for days now, with some anticipating — rightly or wrongly — that the Fed’s chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, could outline more stimulus measures for the ailing U.S. economy during the event.

Many have been sitting on the sidelines in anticipation of the event, though hopes for fresh signals of Fed support have also helped stock markets in the United States and Europe post gains.

Markets in Asia have staged a less decisive rally than those in Europe and the United States this week, mostly wavering between losses and gains all week.

After modest falls on Wednesday, Thursday was a day of muted rises across the region: The key indexes in Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong were all 1.4 percent higher by late morning. In Australia, the S.P./ASX200 rose 1.2 percent, and in mainland China, the Shanghai composite index gained 0.9 percent by late morning.

Meanwhile, the price of gold hovered around the $1,750-an-ounce mark, having sagged about $100 dollars during the U.S. trading day Wednesday.

The precious metal is seen as a haven, and is generally much sought after in times of uncertainty. This haven status has pushed the price of gold sharply higher since July — an ounce of gold was worth about $1,484 on July 1. But as the price rises continued, analysts have increasingly warned that the market was due for a correction.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/26/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Asian Markets Rise While Gold Continues Its Climb

HONG KONG — Stock markets in the Asia-Pacific region staged a mild rally Tuesday morning, following a muted performance on Wall Street as investors awaited weekly U.S. jobless claims data and the Federal Reserve’s annual symposium later this week.

Australia and Taiwan saw gains of 1.5 percent and 1.8 percent, respectively, by midmorning. The Hang Seng index in Hong Kong edged up 0.5 percent, stocks in mainland China rose 0.9 percent and the Kospi in South Korea recouped the previous day’s losses with a gain of 2.5 percent.

The Straits Times Index in Singapore was flat, and the Nikkei 225 index was 0.1 percent higher by the lunchtime break in Tokyo.

In a sign that investors remain intensely nervous after the rollercoaster ride of the past weeks, gold hit another nominal high during early Asian trading, topping $1,910 an ounce. By late morning, the precious metal, which is a traditional haven for investors amid times of uncertainty, was trading at around $1,896.

The main focus of investor attention this week will be the assessment by Ben S. Bernanke, the Fed chairman, of the U.S. economy during the Fed’s symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, on Friday.

Some Wall Street analysts said they expected the Fed to take some action — perhaps the lengthening in maturity of the bonds it holds — to depress longer-term interest rates.

“The behavior of financial markets has become truly worrying, with stock market averages down sharply around the globe as heightened risk aversion has gripped markets,” Kevin Logan, chief U.S. economist at HSBC, wrote in a research note.

“A flight to safety, or alternatively, a disinclination to take risk can affect real economic activity as well as financial markets,” he cautioned. “A recession begins when thousands of independent decision makers all around the country decide to postpone hiring and capital investments, all in an attempt to protect cash positions and reduce risk of loss.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss