April 26, 2024

Europe Seeks to Ratchet Up Effort on Debt

Waves of fear that Greece could default on its mounting debts, and that other European countries might follow, have repeatedly sent global markets plunging in recent weeks. Investors are also increasingly concerned that uncertainty itself is freezing and disrupting economic activity around the world, slowing growth.

Olli Rehn, the European Union’s monetary affairs commissioner, said Saturday that there was “increasing political will” among European leaders for a new effort to soothe investors. He said they were discussing a plan to multiply the financial impact of an existing bailout fund designed to make up to 440 billion euros ($600 billion) in loans to troubled nations and banks, so that it could instead insure a few trillion euros in loans.

French and German officials here continued to insist publicly that they were focused on the July plan, but in private meetings this weekend they made clear that they now understand the need for a new plan, according to a senior American official who described the private conversations on condition of anonymity.

The shift in European strategy comes after several days of intense public pressure from world leaders gathered here for the annual meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. One after another, they have warned publicly and privately that Europe’s problems are dragging down their nations, too.

“We are in a precarious situation,” said Singapore’s finance minister, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, chair of the fund’s steering committee. “And contributing to that is a problem of lack of confidence, in particular lack of confidence in the credibility of policy actions to arrest the crisis.”

The United States also has sharpened its rhetoric. “The threat of cascading default, bank runs and catastrophic risk must be taken off the table, as otherwise it will undermine all other efforts, both within Europe and globally,” the United States Treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, said in a statement on Saturday. “Decisions as to how to conclusively address the region’s problems cannot wait until the crisis gets more severe.”

The Obama administration has been pressing European leaders, particularly the Germans, to act more forcefully, fearing that a continued deterioration of the continental economy, and instability in global markets, might undermine the fragile health of the American economy — and President Obama’s re-election prospects.

Perhaps the most obvious option would be an increase in the size of the bailout fund, which was created in 2010 by the 17 nations that use the euro currency. Independent analysts generally agree that the fund is not large enough to meet the borrowing needs for all the countries with problems, including Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Spain.

But political opposition to bailouts and the strained finances of some European countries make such an increase unlikely and, as a result, officials are focused instead on ways of making each euro go further.

One option under consideration, suggested by American officials, is to treat the fund as an insurance program. The European Central Bank, which has an unlimited ability to create money, would lend money to investors to buy the debt of troubled countries. The bailout fund would agree to absorb any losses but, as an insurance program, its capital would be sufficient to guarantee loans with an aggregate value several times as large.

This approach, too, faces some obstacles. Europe’s central bank, which is far more conservative than the Federal Reserve in the United States, would need to accept a new role as a direct lender to investors. Governments would need to embrace an idea that amounts to providing public subsidies for those investors. And the only precedent, an American effort called the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, created during the 2008 financial crisis, is not regarded as a clear success.

The discussions among European officials are intense, reflecting the urgency of the situation, but they remain at an early stage. Mr. Rehn said that countries were focused first on approving the July plan, which allows the fund more flexibility, for example to make preemptive loans to nations that are not yet in distress. Legislatures in each country must approve the changes, and so far only 6 of the 17 have, but Mr. Rehn and other officials said they were confident the process would be done by mid-October.

European officials have already promised to unveil “a collective and bold action plan” together with other major economies in early November, when the leaders of the Group of 20 largest economies holds a scheduled meeting in France.

If financial markets continue to plunge this week, however, there will almost certainly be pressure for more immediate action.

The rest of the world appears to be watching and waiting impatiently.

The fund’s steering committee, which represents the 187 member nations, said Saturday that it was committed “to restore confidence and financial stability, and rekindle global growth.”

But it announced no new measures, reflecting in part the widespread conviction that Europe is the cause of the current problem, and that Europe needs to fix it.

“It is the responsibility of European policymakers to ensure that their actions stop contagion beyond the euro periphery,” Guido Mantega, the Brazilian finance minister, said in a statement Saturday. “Europe has a crucial role to play and needs to act swiftly and boldly.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=35bdb53409534d9e744dc5df73eab0f9

Amid Warning Signs, Hints That Europeans May Step Up Action

Analysts at Royal Bank of Scotland are among those who now believe that the European Central Bank will make a U-turn on monetary policy next month, cutting its benchmark interest rate less than three months after raising it.

A cut would be an embarrassing reversal, reminiscent of a similar about-face by the bank on the eve of the financial crisis in 2008.

But the E.C.B. governing council is likely to be concerned about “an acceleration in the deterioration in financial market conditions which we believe risks snowballing into a much more severe crisis,” R.B.S. economists wrote in a note to clients Friday.

Declines in French business and consumer confidence, according to surveys published Friday, reinforced the perception that Europe was slipping toward a downturn before output in many countries has fully recovered from the last downturn in 2009.

“The latest round of cyclical indicators suggests the euro area economy is close to recession,” Sofia Rehman, an analyst at Credit Suisse, wrote in a note.

The euro, which had held up remarkably well during much of the crisis, has plunged 10 cents against the dollar since the end of August, to $1.34. Markets appear to have already priced in the effect of an E.C.B. rate cut when the governing council holds its next meeting, on Oct. 6.

Many of Europe’s key crisis managers, including Jean-Claude Trichet, the president of the E.C.B., are in Washington this weekend for the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. The gathering of finance ministers and central bank chiefs has fueled expectations that the leaders might agree to concerted action to prop up the euro area.

Late Thursday, the world’s major economies released an unexpected joint statement intended to calm nervous investors.

“We are committed to supporting growth, implementing credible fiscal consolidation plans, and ensuring strong sustainable growth,” said the communiqué from the Group of 20 nations. “This will require a collective and bold action plan with everyone doing their part.”

But some analysts warned against expecting much more than soothing words from the meetings in Washington.

While countries have a common interest in containing the European crisis, their interests diverge on issues like exchange rates. They would all prefer to have weaker currencies as a way of increasing exports at each others’ expense, Karen Ward, an analyst at HSBC, wrote in a note to clients.

“Quite simply this is a beggar-thy-neighbor, not a coordinated world,” she wrote.

Slovenia, a member of the euro area, provided the latest example of how the sovereign debt crisis was creating problems for European banks. The ratings agency Moody’s downgraded bonds issued by the country of two million people by one notch and said further downgrades were under review.

Moody’s said the downgrade was prompted by the likelihood that the Slovenian government would have to support the nation’s banks, which like banks elsewhere in the euro area are having trouble raising money.

“The ongoing financial crisis has exposed significant vulnerabilities in the solvency and short-term external funding and overall business model of the Slovenian financial sector,” Moody’s said Friday.

Mutual mistrust among banks about each others’ exposure to a Greek default is making them reluctant to lend to each other. At the same time, European banks have all but given up trying to raise money by issuing their own bonds, another key funding channel. Bond issuance by European banks since the beginning of July is down 85 percent compared with the period last year, according to Dealogic, a data provider in London.

With a default by Greece on its debt considered inevitable by many economists, attention has turned to whether European banks could absorb the shock. But European authorities denied a report in The Financial Times that regulators were planning to require weaker banks to shore up their reserves more quickly than had been planned.

“There is no acceleration in the calendar that the European Banking Authority gave the banks,” said Olivier Bailly, spokesman for the European Commission. “There is no acceleration on the part of the E.B.A. or on the part of the commission.”

Mr. Bailly said that stress tests this year had identified eight European banks that need to be recapitalized by the end of the year. These must present their proposals to do so to the E.B.A. by Oct. 15, he said.

A further 16 banks, which passed the stress tests narrowly, have until April 2012 to increase their reserves.

Mr. Bailly said that the banks could raise money on the financial markets or turn to their national governments. When changes to the euro zone’s €440 billion, or $595 billion, bailout fund are ratified, he added, it could become a source for bank recapitalization.

In Athens, government officials denied reports that Evangelos Venizelos, the Greek finance minister, had presented members of Parliament with three ways to resolve the debt crisis, including a default that would pay bondholders just half the face value of Greek debt.

Mr. Venizelos lashed out at “discussions, rumors, comments and scenarios that distract attention from” the country’s efforts to cut spending and improve economic growth.

“Greece takes hard and tough measures in order to achieve its fiscal targets,” Mr. Venizelos said in a statement.

But with some members of Mr. Venizelos’s party balking and Greek citizens demonstrating and striking to protest tax increases and other austerity measures, economists doubt that the country can avoid default.

“Greece is going down,” Carl B. Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in his daily memo on the global economy. “Some days it feels as though the end of the world is knocking at the door.”

Stephen Castle in Brussels, Niki Kitsantonis in Athens and Binyamin Appelbaum in Washington contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=fa5231b437dcfe103beb0fb8bcc055fc

Brazilian Criticizes Wealthy Nations’ Economic Policies

The minister, Guido Mantega, said wealthy countries were attempting “to export their way out of difficult economic situations” by printing money and keeping interest rates low. Those policies are driving up the prices of food and oil, causing particular pain for the world’s poorest people, Mr. Mantega told the policy-making committee of the International Monetary Fund.

His strong remarks highlight the challenges the United States and Europe face as they try to change their economic relationship with the developing world. In place of unsustainable borrowing to fuel consumption of imported goods, they would like to sell more goods and services to those countries. The problem is that developing nations, losing business from their best customers, hope to replace sales by increasing domestic consumption — selling to the same customers developed nations are trying to reach.

It is a dispute that plays out largely in terms of exchange, with both sides charging that their rivals are boosting exports by artificially suppressing the value of their currencies.

The two sides spoke past each other over the last week, during the annual meetings of the major forums for international economic coordination — the monetary fund, the World Bank and the Group of 20.

The United States says that higher prices are not a necessary consequence of American policies, but instead have resulted from the efforts of developing countries to hold down the value of their own currencies in the face of the capital inflows from developed countries.

The treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, said Saturday that developing nations should allow the value of their currencies to be determined by open-market trading. The United States believes that the exchange rates set by the market will contribute to a more sustainable allocation of economic activity among nations, and increased international growth.

“Major economies — advanced and emerging — need to allow their exchange rates to adjust in response to market forces,” Mr. Geithner said.

Rising concerns about inflation shadowed the debate. Commodity prices and asset values are already rising sharply in the developing world, and there is concern that those pressures could contribute to inflation in developed countries.

Economic development in China and other emerging markets has long been felt in the United States largely in the form of lower prices. As those countries absorb a larger share of the world’s raw and finished goods, the impact instead may be felt in the form of rising prices.

“Interest rates rising in the emerging world could drive up interest rates in the developing world,” said Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the finance minister of Singapore and the new chairman of the International Monetary and Financial Committee. “We’ve learned from very painful experience during the last few years that nothing is isolated.”

Economic policy makers in the United States have played down the impact of commodity prices on domestic inflation. European policy makers, by contrast, are increasingly concerned.

Didier Reynders, the Belgian finance minister, warned in a statement that “one should not underestimate” the possibility that food and oil price inflation could travel from the developing world to Europe and the United States. He noted that those pressures would pass through the same financial and trade channels that helped to lower global inflation in the past by holding down prices. “Central banks everywhere should be highly vigilant,” Mr. Reynders said.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=2b8060090fc648129d00143767a7e38d