May 4, 2024

Bits Blog: Tech Pushes to Keep Its Spoils in Immigration Bill

Steve Case, co-founder of America Online and now chief executive of the investment firm Revolution, spoke about immigration reform outside the White House on Tuesday.Charles Dharapak/Associated Press Steve Case, co-founder of America Online and now chief executive of the investment firm Revolution, spoke about immigration reform outside the White House on Tuesday.

Keen to hold on to its winnings in a landmark Senate immigration bill, the technology industry this week put on what one lobbyist called “a full court press” on Capitol Hill, dispatching executives and entrepreneurs to buttonhole lawmakers and rallying people in the industry to dispatch e-mails, telephone calls and Twitter messages to Congress.

Human resource department heads from eight of the country’s largest technology companies popped into the offices of more than a dozen members of Congress. A new group called Engine Advocacy, which has focused on a so-called start-up visa for foreign entrepreneurs, sent its representatives to the Hill and set up a new online platform, called www.keepushere.org, to encourage techies to send Twitter posts to members of Congress. And yet another industry-led coalition, called Partnership for a New American Economy, and supported by New York City’s mayor, Michael Bloomberg, was rallying supporters to aim at crucial senators, state by state, to support the bill with a “virtual march.”

The efforts all point to a wave of unprecedented effort by Silicon Valley firms to make sure the overhaul of the federal immigration law goes in their favor. The omnibus bill, which arrived on the full Senate floor this week after intense negotiations in the Judiciary Committee, contains several provisions directed specifically at the technology sector. It makes it easier for foreign students who get science and engineering degrees at American universities to get permanent residency, creates a new temporary visa for entrepreneurs, and in the most contested clause, vastly expands how many temporary contract workers can be brought into this country under so-called H-1B visas, while also raising the minimum wages they must be paid.

The delicate political agreement could still fall apart, and for Silicon Valley, the temporary work visas expansion is by far the most delicate piece. Labor groups say the law should require these companies to hire Americans first. Industry groups call that undue regulatory interference. Both sides have tried to muster evidence to back their claims. And this week, the industry upped the ante by bringing human resources managers directly to Washington to persuade Congress of their need to bring in foreign workers to fill job openings. Organized by the Information Technology Industry Council, a trade group that includes companies like Apple and Oracle, the hiring managers told lawmakers that the demand for talent is so competitive that they sometimes blatantly poach from one another.

There are likely to be more calls on the Senate floor to require companies to show that they are making efforts to hire Americans.

Meanwhile, Senator Jerry Moran, Republican of Kansas, introduced an amendment Wednesday to lower the investments that an entrepreneur would need to get permanent residency. The current bill requires a foreign entrepreneur to raise $100,000 in investments to gain a temporary visa and $500,000 for permanent residency. Among other things, the amendment would lower those thresholds: anyone who raises $250,000 in investments would be eligible for permanent residence.

The biggest push is yet to come. All eyes are on what the industry’s newest, most well-financed lobby, Fwd.us, backed by Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, will do next. It has stepped into the immigration fight with expensive television advertisements for key Republicans who backed the immigration bill in the Senate Judiciary. Those ads included a television spot that praised the Keystone XL pipeline, a pet project of key Republican senators, and it cost Fwd.us support from some of its backers in Silicon Valley. It remains to be seen what kinds of political advertisements the group will bankroll next, and who they will back.

Article source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/tech-pushes-to-keep-its-spoils-in-immigration-bill/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Tazreen Garment Factory Used by 2nd Walmart Supplier

Two days after the Nov. 24 fire, Walmart said in a statement that it had stopped authorizing production at Tazreen and that despite that move, a single supplier, later identified as Success Apparel, had “subcontracted work to this factory without authorization and in direct violation of our policies.”

The documents — found in the factory by officials from the Bangladesh Center for Worker Solidarity — show that a subcontractor for an additional Walmart supplier, International Intimates, was having women’s robes and nightgowns made at the factory for Walmart’s winter season. The documents show that the factory was also making women’s nightwear for Sears.

The documents contain a June 2012 e-mail from International Intimates’ subcontractor to officials at the Tazreen factory confirming plans to produce a robe and nightgown for Walmart, as well as a robe and pajama set for Sears. The documents also contain a production report from September 13 showing plans to produce 117,000 of these garments for Walmart.

Another document, dated Nov. 24 — the date of the fire — shows that Tazreen’s parent company, the Tuba Group, billed the subcontractor, I.T. Apparels, for the “chemise robe” production.

The documents were found in factory offices that were largely undamaged by the fire and were made available to The New York Times by an intermediary, the Worker Rights Consortium, a factory monitoring group based in Washington that is financed by American universities.

Kevin Gardner, a Walmart spokesman, said that the retailer had stopped authorizing production at the plant “many months ago,” but on Monday he again declined to say when or why Walmart had ended such authorization.

“We are still investigating the facts,” Mr. Gardner said. “If we determine that other suppliers were using a deactivated factory to produce merchandise for Walmart, that’s a violation of our supplier standards. If that is the case, it is unacceptable and we will take appropriate action.”

Documents found at the factory earlier showed that orders in the name of three other American apparel suppliers had been produced at the factory for Walmart within the last year or so.

In a statement, International Intimates said it was “conducting a thorough review of this incident.” The company added, “It is critical to note that Tazreen Fashions is NOT one of our approved partners and no one was authorized to make our products there.”

Judy Gearhart, executive director of the International Labor Rights Forum, a Washington-based nonprofit group, said, “I don’t understand why Walmart is spending so much time focusing on trying to claim that they didn’t know that work for Walmart was being done in this factory when Walmart should be focusing on trying to insure decent compensation for the families and to prevent future fires in its supply chain.”

Mr. Gardner said Walmart was working with “key stakeholders,” including Bangladesh garment manufacturers, the Bangladesh government and others “to improve fire safety standards in Bangladesh.”

Scott Nova, executive director of the Worker Rights Consortium, said the new documents raised additional questions about Walmart’s role at the factory.

“If Walmart’s claim that they were the victim of one rogue supplier had any shred of credibility, it’s gone now,” he said. “Walmart is limited to one of two options — to say, yes, we know these suppliers were using the factory or, two, we have no control over the supply chain that we’ve been building in Bangladesh for more than 20 years.”

In a statement, Success Apparel said that it had placed an order with a Walmart-approved subcontractor, Simco, and that Simco, without its authorization, in turn subcontracted 7 percent of that order to Tazreen’s parent, the Tuba Group.

A spokesman for Success Apparel acknowledged that it was the company that Walmart had terminated as a supplier.

In a statement, Sears said that it did not know that one of its suppliers had been using Tazreen and that it, too, had terminated that supplier.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/11/world/asia/tazreen-factory-used-by-2nd-walmart-supplier-at-time-of-fire.html?partner=rss&emc=rss