May 20, 2024

Archives for September 2019

At Fox News, Trump Impeachment Inquiry Brings On-Air Sniping

What was unusual was the spectacle of network personalities clashing on-air. Under the iron rule of its former chairman, Roger Ailes, overt conflict between hosts was quickly snuffed out. That Mr. Carlson and Mr. Smith traded jabs over 36 hours suggested that the Ailes style of harsh discipline had eroded at the network.

Earlier in the week, an episode of the talk show “The Five” deteriorated after the liberal pundit Juan Williams suggested that his conservative co-hosts were echoing talking points from the White House. “Asking a foreign government to investigate a political rival is illegal,” Mr. Williams said, before his colleagues angrily shouted him down.

“You get that from Media Matters, Juan?” one co-host, Greg Gutfeld, said in an angered tone, referring to an advocacy group that regularly denigrates Fox News. Even by the standards of “The Five,” it was a stinging exchange.

Mr. Wallace, in his appearances Friday on Fox News, offered a grim analysis of Mr. Trump’s political standing, even as he made clear he did not view impeachment as inevitable. But he swatted down some of his colleagues’ suggestions that the whistle-blower’s complaint contained little of note.

“To dismiss this as a political hack seems to be an effort by the president’s defenders to make nothing out of something, and there is something here,” Mr. Wallace said.

At one point, the news anchor Sandra Smith challenged Mr. Wallace, saying that she did not see a clear offer of quid pro quo — “the exchange of something for value” — in the rough transcript of Mr. Trump’s call.

Mr. Wallace arched a brow. “You don’t think that dirt on Joe Biden and Joe Biden’s son would be of value?” he asked.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/business/media/fox-news-sean-hannity.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

Spider-Man Will Remain in the Marvel Cinematic Universe

The studios joined forces in 2015, and since then Mr. Holland has appeared as Spider-Man in “Captain America: Civil War,” “Spider-Man: Homecoming,” “Avengers: Infinity War,” “Avengers: Endgame,” and “Spider-Man: Far From Home.” Two previous Sony series of films featured Tobey Maguire and, later, Andrew Garfield, as the character.

As part of the deal, Spider-Man will also appear in a future Marvel Studios film. Amy Pascal will produce the upcoming film through Pascal Pictures. She produced the first two films featuring Tom Holland as Spider-Man.

“This is terrific,” Ms. Pascal said in a statement. “Peter Parker’s story took a dramatic turn in ‘Far From Home’ and I could not be happier we will all be working together as we see where his journey goes.”

Paul Dergarabedian, a senior media analyst for ComScore, called the decision an “important milestone in the whole evolution of Spider-Man with the M.C.U.” and said he was impressed with the fan base’s ability to influence the studios that control and produce the content.

“I’m so glad this worked out,” Mr. Dergarabedian said. “Kudos to the studios for making it happen. The balance in the M.C.U. is restored with the return of Spidey.”

Sony’s Universe of Marvel Characters encompasses over 900 characters from Spider-Man comics, Mr. Lawson said.

“Venom,” a film released last year featuring one of Spider-Man’s greatest foes, was the first in a larger “tent pole” movie strategy and grossed more than $80 million in its opening weekend. Sony is working on a “Venom” sequel and “Morbius,” another villain film. Other projects are also in development and all will take place in Sony’s cinematic universe, Mr. Lawson said.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/business/media/spiderman-mcu-sony-marvel.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

Locast, a Free Streaming Service, Sues ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox

The Locast complaint cites YouTubeTV as one example of a company that got cold feet. YouTubeTV, which is owned by Google, sells a streaming service that replicates a cheap cable bundle.

According to the complaint, Google executives alerted Locast in April that the networks had warned the tech company not to allow YouTubeTV to provide access to Locast. If it did, according to the complaint, Google would be “punished by the big four broadcasters.”

The broadcasters — working together — could put pressure on Google (and other pay-TV operators) by refusing to sell rights to cable channels that are allied with the broadcast networks, the complaint suggests.

ABC and ESPN, for example, are both controlled by the Walt Disney Company. NBC and the USA cable channel are owned by NBCUniversal, while the broadcast station Fox and the cable network Fox News are controlled by the Murdoch family. CBS, which owns the Pop TV and Showtime cable networks, recently agreed to merge with Viacom, which owns MTV and Nickelodeon.

“This is classic copyright abuse,” the lawsuit reads. The networks have “misused copyrights to expand their market power beyond what those copyrights were intended to protect.”

The complaint also accuses the networks of failing to transmit their over-the-air signals with enough power, thereby “forcing consumers” to pay for cable or satellite service, or the broadcasters’ own direct streaming services.

Locast sits mostly under the radar, but it has gained in popularity at a time when more consumers are watching television digitally. More than 700,000 users are signed up in 13 cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/business/media/streaming-locast-sues-abc-cbs-nbc-fox.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

Ryan Murphy, Super Producer, Reboots Himself for Netflix and ‘The Politician’

Early reviews for “The Politician” have been mixed, a reaction that the creators met with a shrug.

“This show is so built for streaming that people are going to fly through these episodes,” Mr. Falchuk said. “They are going to love some parts, hate some parts, be unsure about some parts. But I don’t think some intellectual review is going to be the thing that stops them from checking it out.”

Whether “The Politician” succeeds or not, Mr. Murphy will have plenty of chances to create something binge-worthy. As part of his Netflix deal, he has been working on a limited series, “Hollywood,” about a group of people he described as a “band of outsiders” demanding a seat at the table in the entertainment business of the postwar 1940s.

Another planned Netflix series, “Ratched,” has Nurse Ratched, the villain of “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,” as its main character. Mr. Murphy said the show would be ready next September, probably a month after the second season of “The Politician” goes live. Also coming next year: his movie adaptations of the play “The Boys in the Band” and the Broadway musical “The Prom.”

Mr. Murphy, who signed on to make “The Politician” under his old contract with Fox’s television studio shortly before reaching his big overall deal with Netflix, has not left traditional television altogether. The next season of “American Crime Story,” for FX, will focus, in part, on the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky impeachment saga. He will also continue to oversee his other series, like FX’s “Pose” and “American Horror Story.”

“I have a lot of stuff rolling out,” Mr. Murphy said, “so I’m going to be a busy boy.”

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/business/media/netflix-ryan-murphy-the-politician.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

Bit by Bit, Socially Conscious Investors Are Influencing 401(k)’s

The evidence that E.S.G. can match or beat traditional investment options is piquing greater interest among plan sponsors.

“We’re getting more questions from plan sponsors — they’re asking if they should be adding this to their investment menus,” says Mikaylee O’Connor, head of defined contribution solutions at RVK, a New York-based investment firm that advises workplace retirement plans. “What’s driving many of the conversations with plan sponsors is there is more research that supports consideration of sustainable investing.”

But obstacles remain — starting with regulatory uncertainty.

Under federal law, plan sponsors have a fiduciary obligation to employees to put the economic interests of participants ahead of other considerations when making decisions about retirement benefits. But guidance issued in recent years by the Labor Department on whether E.S.G. products meet that obligation has shifted repeatedly.

Sponsors typically take a conservative approach to change. “Part of the issue is a reluctance to upset the apple cart,” said Timothy Yee, a specialist in E.S.G. investing and co-founder of Green Retirement, which advises 401(k) plans, including Veritable Vegetable’s. “Some senior managers view their 401(k) plans simply as a cost center, rather than as a way to promote company values, or retain employees.”

Most experts agree that E.S.G. investing in workplace plans will take off only if it becomes available more widely through target date funds, which automatically reduce participants’ exposure to stocks as retirement approaches. Target date funds have been the overwhelming favorite in 401(k) plans since they were designated by the Department of Labor as a qualified default investment choice.

Many plan sponsors view these funds as the most cost-efficient way to deliver improved retirement outcomes to plan participants of various ages.

But there’s an expense hurdle stopping target date funds from becoming socially responsible funds. By definition, E.S.G. and socially responsible investing funds are actively managed and typically carry higher expense ratios than passive index funds. The Natixis target date fund series, which is marketed as an E.S.G., carries an average expense ratio of 0.58 percent, which is a bit lower than the 0.62 percent average for all market-weighted target date funds in 2018, according to Morningstar. But the industry’s most efficient passive target date fund offerings are far less expensive than that — Vanguard’s charged just 0.12 percent last year.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/business/esg-401k-investing-retirement.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

The White-Collar Job Apocalypse That Didn’t Happen

“I can share my screen with them, but I can’t, in real time, sit with them while they’re making the mistakes and show them where they’re making the mistakes,” he said.

Mr. Kincaid’s current employer, Nexient, develops software for companies on a contract basis — work that is a prime candidate for outsourcing. But all of Nexient’s employees are in the United States, which the company uses as a selling point with its clients.

Mark Orttung, Nexient’s chief executive, said that offshoring worked fine for certain types of work, such as short-term projects, but less well on projects where requirements change over time and collaboration is more important. American workers can also have an edge on projects that require them to understand the specifics of the business: how the American health care system works, for example, or what customers expect from a particular brand.

“When we work with a large retailer, most of our employees probably shop at that retailer,” Mr. Orttung said.

Nexient is based in the San Francisco Bay Area, but most of its employees are in Columbus or in Ann Arbor, Mich. Both are college towns, with plenty of young graduates with technical skills. They are in or near metropolitan areas with big companies that are sources of more experienced workers. And they are much cheaper places to live than Silicon Valley.

A growing number of companies are shifting operations to cities like Columbus, said Susan Lund, who has studied the future of work for the McKinsey Global Institute, the consulting firm’s think tank. No American location can compete directly with India on labor costs, she said, but shifting jobs elsewhere in the country can narrow the gap.

“The companies that started the offshoring trend were largely based in Manhattan or the West Coast, in the very high-cost places, and they realized that, hey, there are a lot of other places in the U.S.,” she said.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/business/economy/jobs-offshoring.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

EU & Japan strike ‘connectivity’ deal to link Asia & to counter China’s new Silk Road

The agreement formally seals Japan’s engagement in the new EU-Asia connectivity plan and was signed by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker at the Europa Connectivity Forum in Brussels on Friday.

Whether it be a single road or a single port, when the EU and Japan undertake something, we are able to build sustainable, rules-based connectivity from the Indo-Pacific to the Western Balkans and Africa,” Abe told reporters ahead of the signing ceremony.

Also on rt.com Why China believes the World needs the new Silk Road: Beijing’s ambitious mega-project explained

EU officials have turned to Japan in an apparent move to evade attracting Chinese financing, fearing what they see as China’s dominance in infrastructure building across Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia. Since 2013, China funded the construction of bridges, roads and tunnels across more than 60 countries under its Belt and Road infrastructure initiative, which aims to build a network of land and sea links with Southeast Asia, Central Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa.

“The sea route that leads to the Mediterranean and the Atlantic must be open,” Abe said, emphasizing the deal’s signatories’ aim to prevent China-financed projects from dominating EU-Asia transport links.

Japan and the EU endeavor to ensure synergies and complementarity between their respective cooperation on connectivity and quality infrastructure with partner third countries and coordinate action, notably in the regions of the Western Balkans, Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Indo-Pacific, as well as in Africa,” the bilateral document states.

Also on rt.com China’s new Silk Road to link Africa’s huge market to the rest of the world – official

The deal is also to ensure “transparent procurement practices,” as well as “free, open, fair, non-discriminatory and predictable regional and international trade and investment.” It will be backed by a €60 billion ($65.48 billion) EU guarantee fund, development banks and private investors. The signatories promised to pay “utmost attention” to the sides’ “fiscal capacity and debt-sustainability.” Jean-Claude Juncker promised to help build infrastructure “without mountains of debt” or a reliance “on a single country.”

Although not all the money distributed under the deal will be spent in Asia, the EU’s new agenda makes spending on infrastructure links with Asia official EU policy, which also involves the bloc’s common budget.

The two-day Europa Connectivity Forum is a multi-nation convention which aims to enforce ties between governments, financial institutions and private sectors, across Europe and beyond. This year’s Forum, held under the theme “EU-Asia Connectivity: Building Bridges for a Sustainable Future,” is focused on strengthening cooperation between the EU and its partners in the Asia-Pacific region.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/469754-eu-japan-asia-deal/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Two-Thirds of College Students Take On Debt, but Amount Is Rising More Slowly

Here are some questions and answers about borrowing for college.

How much money may I borrow for college?

The amount of federal loans that dependent undergraduate students — meaning they rely on their parents for financial support — may borrow each year is limited to $5,500 for freshmen, $6,500 for sophomores, and $7,500 for juniors and seniors, or a total of $27,000 over four years. (The cumulative limit, in case a student takes longer than four years to earn the degree, is $31,000.)

But many families borrow more than that, by taking out federal PLUS loans, available to parents of undergraduates. PLUS loans, which carry higher interest rates, are available up to the total cost of attendance.

Families can also take out private loans from banks and other government lenders. Such loans typically carry fewer borrower protections, and should generally be considered a last resort, Ms. Cochrane said.

How much money should I borrow for a four-year degree?

Students should consider their future earning potential when deciding how much to borrow, said Mark Kantrowitz, publisher and director of research at Savingforcollege.com.

“My rule of thumb is that your total student loan debt at graduation should be less than your annual starting salary,” Mr. Kantrowitz said. “Ideally, a lot less.”

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently published estimates of typical early-career annual earnings, based on college major. The median was $44,000, but was considerably higher for those with computer engineering degrees ($65,000) and lower for those majoring in elementary education ($35,000).

Where can I see the typical debt held by graduates of a particular college?

Students can check online tools like the College Scorecard, offered by the Education Department, to get that information, Ms. Cochrane said. The scorecard includes only federal loans, not any private loans that students may also have.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/your-money/student-debt-what-to-do.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

LNG investments hit record in 2019 & the biggest growth is coming from China

“This year, 2019 already broke the highest amount of (final investment decisions) for the first time ever, $50 billion,” Birol told the LNG Producer-Consumer conference in Tokyo, as quoted by Reuters.

Unsurprisingly, the driver of this growth in investments is growing demand for the fuel in Asia, with China still expected to overtake Japan as the world’s top importer of LNG.

Also on rt.com China wants to build world’s biggest LNG tanker

“The biggest growth is coming from China. In the next five years, about one-third of global LNG demand will come from China alone,” Birol said. He added that in five years, China will become the largest importer of the fuel.

As for the growth in investments, there are no surprises there, either. The bulk of these has been made in the United States and Canada.

In a December 2018 report the Energy Information Administration said it expected the United States’ LNG export capacity to double by the end of this year to 8.9 billion cu ft daily. This will make the US the third-largest exporter of LNG in terms of capacity after Qatar and Australia. By 2030, US LNG exports are estimated to reach 17 billion cu ft daily, from some 3 billion cu ft at the start of 2019.

Also on rt.com Russian shipments of LNG to Europe Asia leave United States well behind

In Canada, there is just one LNG project under development right now—LNG Canada—but it could have a final capacity of 28 million tons of the fuel annually. The US$31-billion project is led by Shell, with minority participants including Petronas, PetroChina, Mitsubishi, and Kogas.

Meanwhile, Qatar is stepping up its efforts to keep its number-one spot in the global LNG export race. The country has lifted a moratorium on new drilling in its North Field—the world’s largest offshore gas field Qatar shares with Iran—aiming to boost export capacity by 43 percent to 11 million tons annually.

Global LNG demand is seen at 550 million tons by 2030, according to projections by IHS Markit.

This article was originally published on Oilprice.com

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/469748-lng-investments-record-high/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Poland says EU has averted an energy tragedy by limiting Russian gas supplies to Europe

According to Petr Wozniak, head of Poland’s state oil and gas company PGNIG, Gazprom’s continued operation of the Opal pipeline at full capacity would lead to terrible consequences for his country.

This would lead to tragic supply interruptions, which are unacceptable for our gas transmission system and consumers,” Wozniak said at a Polish economic forum on Thursday, as quoted by the Biznes Alert portal.

Also on rt.com Story of 5 major pipelines explains Europe’s love-hate relationship with Russian energy

Wozniak stated that if the European Court of Justice (ECJ) had not decided to limit the transfer of Russian gas via the Opal pipeline, there “would not have [been] enough gas in southeastern Poland.” On the other hand, if the gas transfer via Opal was reduced, increased volumes of Russian gas would flow into Poland via Ukraine.

These missing volumes of gas, which Gazprom should reduce transmitting via Opal, will be sent [to Poland] through Ukraine,” Wozniak said.

On September 10, the European Court annulled the 2016 European Commission decision to allow Gazprom use Opal to 100 percent of its capacity, which is 36 billion cubic meters per year. The decision was made on Poland’s demand, with Warsaw claiming Gazprom’s full use of Opal threatened gas supplies to central and eastern Europe.

Also on rt.com Washington Warsaw make pact to obstruct Russia’s Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline

Now the Russian state energy giant can use only 50 per cent of the pipeline’s capacity. Wozniak said at the time the ECJ’s decision would prevent Gazprom from completely halting transit via Ukraine, a prospect feared by Kiev as its gas-transit contract with Russia expires in January.

The Russian company did reduce Opal supplies starting September 14, while slightly increasing pumping through the Nel gas pipeline, which also receives gas from Nord Stream but has less capacity than Opal. At the same time, Gazprom also began to pump more gas through Ukraine.

Opal is a branch pipe connecting Nord Stream with the gas transmission system of Central and Western Europe. The gas enters Germany at the border with the Czech Republic.

Both Poland and Ukraine fear that Gazprom may decide to bypass legacy gas routes via these two neighboring states when it doubles the capacity of Nord Stream with the Nord Stream-2 pipeline, now in the final stages of construction. Nord Stream 2 will be owned and operated by Gazprom, though 50% of the funding is provided by Germany’s Uniper and BASF’s Wintershall unit, Anglo-Dutch oil major Shell, Austria’s OMV and France’s Engie.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/469740-opal-gazprom-poland-eu/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS