May 9, 2024

Archives for September 2011

News Analysis: E.C.B. Could Survive a Greek Default, but What About the Banks?

FRANKFURT — The European Central Bank’s holdings of Greek government bonds are small enough for it to be able to survive even a large haircut if the country defaults, and its main concerns lie with the impact on the banking sector.

The E.C.B. has spent more than €150 billion, or $200 billion, on peripheral government bonds through its Securities Markets Program, which started in May 2010, first buying Greek, Irish and Portuguese bonds and more recently Italian and Spanish.

Analysts estimate the E.C.B. holds about €45 billion to €50 billion of Greek government bonds it has bought in the secondary market at well below face value, weakening the hit the central bank would have to take in a debt restructuring.

“The E.C.B. by definition has been buying in times of stress, so a rough calculation shows, if they’ve been buying at 70-75 percent (of face value), they would effectively take only a 25 percent haircut,” a Nomura economist, Laurent Bilke, said.

This would mean the E.C.B. would have to accept a loss of around €15 billion to €20 billion from a 50 percent haircut to the face value of the bonds.

“It’s a large amount, but it’s not going to bring the E.C.B. under, it’s not going to go bankrupt,” Mr. Bilke said.

Capital and reserves of the E.C.B. and national euro zone central banks amount to more than €81 billion, the central bank’s balance sheet showed.

The Greek media reported a week ago that Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos had discussed plans for an orderly default with the International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde and the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, as one of three possible scenarios for resolving the country’s fiscal woes.

Officials played down the reports and Mr. Venizelos described them in a statement as an unhelpful distraction from the central task of sticking to Greece’s E.U.-I.M.F. bailout program.

Until recently, European leaders have rejected any chance of Greece defaulting, but are moving to allow for the possibility of this happening.

Klaas Knot, a member of the European Central Bank’s governing council from the Netherlands, on Sept. 23 became the first euro-zone central banker to warn outright of the possibility of a Greek default.

If it comes to a default of Greece — orderly or disorderly — the bigger problem for the E.C.B. would be the systemic risks stemming from such a step.

“It will be very difficult for Portugal and Ireland not to suffer a loss of confidence then,” said Silvio Peruzzo, a Royal Bank of Scotland economist, also pointing to Italy and Spain.

Talk that Europe needs to shore up its banks — if necessary with capital from taxpayers — is gathering strength. The past recession, losses on sovereign debt and higher funding costs are weighing heavily on banks’ balance sheets, and some suggest there should be forced recapitalization by governments if it does not happen otherwise.

The International Monetary Fund reckons Europe’s banks could need to recapitalize to the tune of €200 billion and many bank analysts are far gloomier than the Fund.

To ease stress on banks, the E.C.B. already reintroduced its longer-term, six-month refinancing operation in August and last week joined other major central banks in offering three-month U.S. dollar loans to commercial banks to prevent money markets from freezing up again.

There is now talk of offering longer, one-year liquidity to banks.

Stress in the interbank lending market is already an “indication that the crisis has moved into systemic mode,” Mr. Peruzzo said.

Crippled banks are also likely to leave the E.C.B. holding collateral with little value, but since it accepts all collateral at market value minus a haircut, its losses from this would be manageable — especially since governments would be loathe to let banks collapse as they fear contagion.

Major European banks would probably be able to take such a hit but for Greek banks it could be the last straw.

“Collateral becomes a problem only if Greek banks go under,” Mr. Bilke at Nomura said. “There would be a general issue with Greek banks, they would have to take a big loss and probably some of them would not be able to go through if there’s a big haircut.”

To prevent a Greek default from infecting the whole banking sector, authorities would have to come up with a program to keep banks afloat — and this would have to come mainly from governments, keeping E.C.B. exposure manageable.

So, while the E.C.B. could take the direct losses in its stride, the fear of instability and economic collapse keep it opposing Greek default.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/01/business/global/ecb-could-survive-a-greek-default-but-what-about-the-banks.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Stocks End Quarter With Steep Loss

Stocks closed a dismal third quarter with a sharp loss after data showed only a slight increase in American consumer spending and an unexpected rise in European inflation.

Hurt by investor fears about the crisis in the euro zone and signs that the global economy may tip into recession, the July-September quarter was set to go down as the worst three months for global equities in years.

The Standard Poor’s 500-stock index was off more than 14 percent for the quarter — and more than 10 percent for the year so far. The German, French and Spanish market indexes also recorded their biggest quarterly losses in nine years, Reuters calculated.

The Commerce Department on Friday said consumer spending in the United States in August rose 0.2 percent, while incomes actually fell for the first time in nearly two years.

By the close, the S.P. 500 was down 2.5 percent for the day, shedding 28.98 points to 1,131.42. The Dow Jones industrial average ended 2.2 percent lower, off 240.60 points to 10,913.38, and the Nasdaq composite index lost 2.6 percent, or 65.36 points to 2,415.40.

The Dow ended the quarter down 12 percent and the Nasdaq lost 13 percent.

In Europe, consumer prices in the 17 European Union nations that use the euro rose 3 percent in September, after a 2.5 percent increase in August, the largest increase since October 2008.

Coming on the heels of data showing declining consumer confidence in Europe and evidence that the economy is slowing in much of the region, the inflation figures complicate the monetary policy challenge facing the European Central Bank, which has a primary responsibility to maintain price stability.

Still, said Ben May, an economist at Capital Economics in London, investors are right to continue expecting another move by the European Central Bank to cut interest rates by the end of 2011, noting that so-called “core” inflation, which subtracts energy and food prices because of their volatility, appeared to be well below the bank’s 2 percent target.

“What’s more, any rise is likely to prove temporary, given the recent signs that the recovery is coming to an end,” Mr. May said.

The United States Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Japan all have set their main overnight target interest rates at close to zero.

The Euro Stoxx 50 index, a barometer of euro zone blue chips, closed down 1.5 percent, while the FTSE 100 index in London slid 1.3 percent. The DAX in Germany lost 2.4 percent.

American crude oil futures for November delivery fell 1.8 percent to $80.68 a barrel. Comex gold futures rose 0.5 percent to $1,624.10 an ounce.

Wheat and corn futures traded in Chicago plunged by their daily limit, Bloomberg News reported, after a government report showed bigger inventories of wheat in the United States than forecast.

The dollar gained against most other major currencies. The euro fell 1 percent, to $1.3445, while the British pound rose 0.1 percent, to $1.5628. The dollar rose 0.4 percent against the Japanese currency, to 76.11 yen, and it rose 0.8 percent against its Swiss counterpart, rising to 0.9046 francs.

Asian shares were mixed, with both the Tokyo benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average and main Sydney market index, the S.P./ASX 200, essentially unchanged. But the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong fell 2.3 percent and in Shanghai the composite index fell 0.3 percent.

Bond prices were mostly higher, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note dipping 9 basis points to 1.903 percent and the yield on the German 10-year falling 10 basis points to 1.9 percent.

David Jolly reported from Paris.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/01/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Austria Approves Euro Bailout Fund

Despite sustained heckling from far-right legislators that compelled Parliamentary leaders to call a temporary recess, the bailout was approved in the small Alpine country by a healthy 117 to 53 margin. The vote meant that Austria agreed to raise its share of the bailout to 21.6 billion euros, or roughly $29.4 billion, from 12.2 billion euros.

The decision in Vienna left just three countries out of the 17 members of the currency zone that had yet to approve the measure, which expands not only the size but the powers of the bailout fund. With Malta and the Netherlands set to vote next week, pressure mounted on Slovakia, viewed by many as the last holdout.

One day after Germany’s Bundestag passed the same measure with a wide majority, Chancellor Angela Merkel was in Warsaw where she met with Slovakia’s prime minister, Iveta Radicova, on the sidelines of a European Union summit. Ms. Radicova told reporters that she expected Parliament to ratify the fund no later than October 14, Reuters reported.

But the Slovak government’s majority in Parliament rests on four parties with divergent views, and many Slovaks feel that asking poorer Central Europeans to pay for the mistakes of the richer Greeks is unfair. One of the junior parties in Ms. Radicova’s coalition, the Freedom and Solidarity Party, known by its Slovak initials SaS, opposes the bailout, but in recent days has signaled some willingness to compromise.

With Germany’s weight behind the fund, known as the European Financial Stability Facility, political commentators say it is only a matter of time before Slovakia bows under the pressure and approves its own version of the bill.

The need to ratify the July agreement to expand the facility is all the more important in light of the fact that markets have already indicated that even a 440 billion euro fund, or roughly $600 billion, was nowhere close to enough money to fend off speculative attacks against heavily indebted countries, especially if larger countries like Spain and Italy are forced to turn to it for assistance.

Even as national parliaments have moved ahead with ratifying the agreement, Greece’s prime minister, George Papandreou, has pressed his case that his country will live up to its commitments to its European partners. Mr. Papandreou visited France’s president, Nicolas Sarkozy, in Paris on Friday.

Greece’s ability to stick to the difficult program of budget austerity has been viewed as crucial if it is to continue receiving aid. Mr. Papandreou also visited Berlin to meet with Mrs. Merkel Tuesday night.

But the euro crisis will never be resolved if debtor countries cannot take credible steps to reduce their national debts, said Norbert Irsch, chief economist at KfW Group in Frankfurt.

But he dismissed calls for Greece to leave the euro. The suggestion that Greece should leave the euro zone, he said, “does not sufficiently take into account the fact that the country would be plunged into an even more serious and long-lasting crisis.”

As the debate in Austria indicated, feelings run high on the subject of bailing out neighbors. Members of the far-right Alliance for Austria’s Future unfurled a banner on the floor of the chamber demanding a referendum.

Peter Filzmaier, a professor of political science at the Danube University Krems, said that the far-right parties saw the rescue fund more as an opportunity to score political points than a chance to alter the outcome of the vote.

“It was a very emotional debate,” said Mr. Filzmaier. “Austria has an extremely large number of people disinterested in the E.U., and when you’re talking about large sums of money and you don’t understand what is going on you get scared.”

The German press declared Thursday’s vote a victory for Mrs. Merkel, while asking how far she could push her intransigent coalition for further steps to rescue the common currency. Germany’s upper house, the Bundesrat, where delegations from the country’s states must approve legislation, signed off on Thursday’s vote in the Bundestag or lower house. But Bavaria’s state premier, Horst Seehofer, said Friday that his state would not support “additional increases or greater risks” beyond the existing guarantees.

Mrs. Merkel has faced criticism of her leadership almost from the beginning of the debt crisis, from the right and the left, domestically and from other foreign leaders, including President Obama. She has been attacked in particular for being slow and reactive in dealing with market turmoil and speculative attacks on fellow members of the euro zone.

The muddling through approach is criticized by academics, who find that it “does not fit into the worlds of models and textbooks,” said Mr. Irsch from KfW, but the German government and the European Central Bank “have acted in a pragmatic way and, in my opinion, also in a fitting manner.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/01/world/europe/austria-approves-euro-bailout-fund.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bits Blog: The Oracle-H.P. Rivalry, PowerPoint Version

A slide about Autonomy posted by Oracle.A slide about Autonomy posted by Oracle.

Did information technology just run afoul of disinformation technology?

The computing giants Oracle and Hewlett-Packard, known for trash talking each other and for fighting in court, took their sniping to the Internet on Wednesday when Oracle charged that the British software company Autonomy, which H.P. is buying for $10.2 billion, tried to sell itself to Oracle last April. Oracle said it was not interested, since the $6 billion market value Autonomy had at the time was still far more than Autonomy was worth.

The implication was that H.P. came in second, and is foolish, in buying Autonomy.

Oracle even posted a series of slides on its Web site that it said showed that Mike Lynch, Autonomy’s chief executive, intended to sell his company. The slides, Oracle said, were “all about Autonomy’s financial results, Autonomy’s stock price history, Autonomy’s Price/Earnings history and Autonomy’s stock market valuation.” Oracle also said Mr. Lynch showed up at the meeting with “Silicon Valley’s most famous shopper/seller of companies, the investment banker Frank Quattrone.”

Mysteriously, those slides, which were widely commented on in the industry press Thursday, were posted for only about 12 hours. Then they disappeared. A few hours later they were back. It seems there is less there than Oracle intended. Here’s what I learned.

Oracle continued to publish a page that said Mr. Lynch came by for talks with Mark Hurd, Oracle’s co-president, and Doug Kehring, who is in charge of mergers and acquisitions at Oracle. For his part, Mr. Lynch acknowledged the meeting, but said it was just a customer visit that Mr. Quattrone organized. Why he was meeting the head of mergers was not explained.

Upon request, Oracle sent The New York Times the slides, which it said were sent from Qatalyst Partners, the investment bank headed by Mr. Quattrone, not Autonomy, in January. That backs up Autonomy’s assertion that Oracle had lifted an older slide deck from Mr. Quattrone to make Mr. Lynch look bad — Mr. Quattrone wasn’t even working for Autonomy then.

So what is going on here? Did Mr. Lynch try to sell Autonomy to Oracle, or did Oracle post the story and slides to make H.P. look bad? This may be a little bit of both. Mr. Lynch did talk to Oracle’s head of M.A. before he took the H.P. deal, and Oracle’s cleverly worded description of the meeting makes it look as if he went into a lot more detail than he would like to admit. The deck looks like a bit of extra “evidence” that Oracle later withdrew.

Mr. Lynch probably set off Oracle’s outburst with his recent statements that Larry Ellison, Oracle’s chief executive, was lying about whether Oracle’s software could do the same kinds of things Autonomy’s software. Not that it took a lot to get Oracle started: in the last year, Mr. Ellison has publicly criticized H.P.’s board for firing Mr. Hurd, his friend and tennis partner, and then hired Mr. Hurd himself. The hiring provoked H.P. to file a lawsuit against Mr. Hurd, which was quickly settled. Another lawsuit between H.P. and Oracle, over Oracle’s decision to discontinue software development on one of H.P.’s advanced chips, is still going on.

In between the lawsuits, Mr. Ellison said Léo Apotheker, Mr. Hurd’s replacement, conducted industrial espionage against Oracle when he was running SAP. (Though SAP settled that suit and admitted wrongdoing, it said Mr. Apotheker was not involved in the incidents.)

Only one thing is nearly certain in this name-calling mess: Meg Whitman, who took over at H.P. when Mr. Apotheker was fired last week, will not be on stage for hugs and camaraderie when Mr. Ellison kicks off Oracle’s big trade show in San Francisco on Sunday evening.

Or, as one observer involved in the cross-company slinging put it: “Oracle used Autonomy to give H.P. a poke in the eye. It just got ridiculous.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=c89846c8bf583fb26f632397d3263974

DealBook: Good at Chess? A Hedge Fund May Want to Hire You

Garry Kasparov, left, a former world chess champion, with Boaz Weinstein of Saba Capital in May 2010.Hiroko Masuike for The New York TimesGarry Kasparov, left, a former world chess champion, with Boaz Weinstein of Saba Capital in May 2010.

Boaz Weinstein’s opening move on Wall Street came as a result of chess.

Mr. Weinstein, now a star hedge fund manager, was trying to get a summer job at Goldman Sachs in 1991, when he was just 18. After being told there was nothing available, he stopped in a bathroom on the way out and ran into David F. Delucia, then the head of corporate bond trading.

Mr. Delucia, who is ranked as an expert by the United States Chess Federation, had played Mr. Weinstein, ranked as a master by the federation, many times. He arranged for a series of interviews until Mr. Weinstein got an internship on a Goldman trading desk.

Off The Clock
View all posts

Mr. Weinstein is not alone among Wall Streeters who have a chess connection.

Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal who now runs the hedge fund Clarium Capital, is also a chess master, and Douglas Hirsch, the founder of Seneca Capital, while not an expert, has become an ardent chess enthusiast.

Chess helps in trading, Mr. Weinstein said. To become a good chess player, he learned to focus on how he made decisions because he could not calculate the results of all his possible moves. Learning to deal with that uncertainty or risk has been useful. When you make an investment, “you can have an 80 percent chance of being right. And then the 20 percent comes up,” he said. “But really it is the process that you used to make the decision.”

Other games of strategy are prominent in finance. Warren E. Buffett, the chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway, is an accomplished bridge player; and David Einhorn, president of Greenlight Capital, who bet against Lehman Brothers in 2008, finished 18th in the main event of the 2006 World Series of Poker.

But being skilled at games is no guarantee of success. James E. Cayne, the former chief executive of Bear Stearns, which collapsed in March 2008, is a world-class bridge player who has won many international bridge tournaments.

Still, the idea that gaming skills may be adaptable to investing spurred a hiring program in the early 1990s at Bankers Trust. At the time, the bank had a successful trader named Norman Weinstein (no relation to Boaz Weinstein), who had earned the title of international master from the World Chess Federation. In an effort to replicate his success, the bank hired a small group of people who had little or no trading experience, but were world-class chess and bridge players.

David Norwood, a World Chess Federation grandmaster (the highest ranking a player can obtain), was one of the recruits. “I was studying history at Oxford,” Mr. Norwood said. “Right out of the blue, I got contacted by Bankers Trust who said, ‘You would really make a good trader.’ I had no idea what trading was.”

Mr. Norwood took the job and was soon put on a trading desk, but it was too sudden. “It was like being stuffed into a world-class chess match without knowing the moves,” Mr. Norwood said. He quit after only a few months.

Despite the setback, Mr. Norwood said the experience “kind of planted a seed in me.” After a year, he found a job at Duncan Lawrie, a British private bank, and began learning trading and investing. In 2008, at the age of 40, he retired a multimillionaire.

Mr. Norwood said that he definitely believed that his skills in chess helped make him a success in business. “So many people in the investment world have bull-market mentalities. They do well when things are going well,” Mr. Norwood said. In chess, he said, you are constantly facing setbacks, and the people who become great players learn to overcome them.

Other companies have followed the Bankers Trust example. The Web site of the hedge fund manager D. E. Shaw Group lists among its employees a life master at bridge, a past “Jeopardy!” champion and Anna Hahn, the 2003 United States women’s chess champion.

Ms. Hahn, who joined the company shortly after winning the championship, is a senior trader, focusing mostly on commodities. Her chess background “definitely got our attention,” said Michelle Toth, who oversees human resources. “We prize analytical rigor here,” she said. “Someone who achieves this level definitely stands out.”

Boaz Weinstein rebounded from a trading loss of more than $1 billion at Deutsche Bank during the financial crisis to found the $4 billion hedge fund Saba Capital Management, whose flagship fund is up more than 7 percent for the year. He said he often considered chess players when hiring.

At Deutsche Bank, which he left in early 2009, Mr. Weinstein said he helped recruit Elina Groberman, who was the 2000 United States women’s co-champion. He also hired Anatoly Nakum, a master. Mr. Nakum eventually left to head credit trading at Barclays Capital before moving on to UBS, where he was co-head of North American credit trading operations. He left in June and said that he was currently pursuing opportunities in investment management.

In 2005, Mr. Thiel hired Patrick Wolff, a two-time United States champion, as an analyst. Mr. Wolff rose to become one of the managing directors at Clarium. This year, he set up his own fund, and, in a reference to his chess background, named it Grandmaster Capital. He said the fund had about $50 million under management, much of the money from Mr. Thiel.

Mr. Hirsch, the founder of Seneca Capital, became interested in chess when his children started studying it. Eighteen months ago, he began taking lessons. As his understanding has grown, he has noticed analogies between chess and investing.

For example, he said, memory, pattern recognition and the order in which you play moves are important in chess, and the same is true in investing.

Mr. Hirsch said that when he first started playing chess, he just wanted to enjoy the game. He has improved rapidly, he said, and now his goal is to become a master by raising his official numerical rating through participation in tournaments.

But his new obsession has not come without a cost, at least to one of his other passions. When he is playing golf, Mr. Hirsch said, he often thinks about chess positions. Strangely, he said, the reverse is not true.

At Talpion, the hedge fund started earlier this year by the billionaire investor Henry Swieca, one of the fund’s senior traders, Matthew Herman, is also a senior chess master, a rank above an ordinary master.

“I don’t think chess is usually going to get someone a job in finance,” said Mr. Herman, who worked at Goldman Sachs for six years before joining Talpion. But the ability to play chess at a high level “is perhaps reflective of your approach to everything.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d92893c4d1540a3cf9f9af72d4e3603a

Advertising: Chili’s Uses Bold Spots and Flavors to Spice Up Brand

She swivels in her chair, smiles, and when she speaks what comes out is the voice of the bluesman John Lee Hooker, singing, “I love that talk, when you talk like that, you knocks me out, right off of my feet.”

Looking surprised but undaunted, he says, “So, that’s a yes, or — ?”

As she nods, it is again the voice of the late Mr. Hooker from “Boom Boom” — first released in 1962 — that she incongruously lip-syncs, “Hoo, hoo, hoo.”

The ad — by Hill Holliday, Boston, part of the Interpublic Group of Companies — continues with a voice-over that urges, “Go bold with Chili’s $20 dollar dinner for two,” and footage of entrees eligible for the deal, including a new menu item, grilled shrimp tacos.

“We want to play up the boldness of the brand,” said Krista Gibson, senior vice president for brand strategy at Brinker International, Chili’s parent company, about the new spot, which is scheduled for an Oct. 3 premiere. “How he behaves is bold, how she behaves is bold, and the food we’re featuring in the spot is boldly flavored.”

Along with the advertising campaign, Chili’s newest plans for spicing up its brand include new menu items, a new logo, and a redesign for restaurants that was recently completed in 61 of the 1,299 Chili’s outlets in the Unites States. An additional 240 operate abroad. Chili’s, which declined to reveal the cost of the campaign, spent $125.3 million on advertising in 2010, less than Olive Garden, $162 million; Applebee’s, $147.9 million; and Red Lobster, $129.8 million, according to Kantar Media, a unit of WPP.

Beyond the challenge of the economic downturn, Chili’s has struggled to draw consumers being beckoned by other chains. “Where Chili’s and Applebee’s may have been new and hot in the ’90s, now they have become more traditional,” said Darren Tristano, an executive vice president of Technomic, a restaurant consulting and market research business.

Popular so-called fast casual chains like Panera Bread and Chipotle Mexican Grill tend to have more healthful menus and better ambience than typical fast-food chains — and lower prices than most sit-down restaurants. Technomic recently calculated that a meal of chips and salsa, chicken tacos and a soft drink costs $9.86 at Chipotle and $16.72 (including a 15 percent tip) at Chili’s, a difference of 70 percent.

Grocery chains like Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s, meanwhile, increasingly offer “meal solutions,” an industry term for dinners that require little or no preparation, and those compete with casual restaurants, too, Mr. Tristano said.

Brinker owns 824 Chili’s restaurants in the United States, with an additional 475 licensed to franchisees. Among the company-owned stores, at least, the financial picture has been brightening.

Year over year revenue at individual company-owned restaurants dropped an average of 5.6 percent in fiscal year 2009 and 4.6 percent in fiscal year 2010 for Chili’s, whose fiscal years close at the end of June. But for the recent quarter than ended in June, average sales were up 2.1 percent over the same quarter in 2010, and the year closed with average per-restaurant sales down just 2 percent from last year.

Surely the best known campaign for Chili’s was introduced in 1996. A jingle began, “I want my baby back, baby back, baby back,” — a standard lovelorn setup — followed by a pause, and then “ribs.”

The jingle, by Tom Faulkner Productions, topped the list of “10 songs most likely to get stuck in your head,” by Advertising Age, besting such ear worms as “We Will Rock You,” “Y.M.C.A.” and “Don’t Worry, Be Happy.”

The campaign was by GSDM, Austin, Tex., part of Omnicom, an agency Chili’s released after two decades before hiring Hill Holliday in 2007.

David Gardiner, a creative director at Hill Holliday, said that about three years ago, as the economy began to decline, Chili’s “reverted to doing 100 percent product driven work,” focusing particularly on specially priced dishes and including live-action shots of diners or servers only incidentally if at all.

“They have a trade term for it: food romance,” said Mr. Gardiner, who described the genre as “extreme close-ups of food, slow-motion food being prepared, with a piece of music and an energizing voice-over.”

Some new ads differ from those produced in recent years in that they are set outside restaurants and include “engaging storytelling,” Mr. Gardiner said, adding that appetizing shots of food still remain an element.

In another new spot, three office workers step out of their building and shield their faces with their hands. “What is that?” says one. “It burns!” says another. And another adds, “It’s singeing me!”

A window washer nearby deadpans, “It’s the sun.” Then a voice-over says, “Get out of the office more often, with Chili’s $6 Lunch Break combos” and shots of half sandwiches with soup and French fries are shown.

The new Chili’s spots “strike a nice balance between branding and personality and the food,” said Jeffrey T. Davis, president of Sandelman Associates, a restaurant consulting and market research business. “They pump up Chili’s personality, but also romance the food and end on strong value.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=6b5e446fb755d1d11f24416be1be2455

Bits Blog: Why Magazine Publishers Like the Fire

Magazine publishers see tremendous potential in the Fire and hope that the device can do for their business what the Kindle did for books: bring droves of new customers into a business that is having difficulty retaining its traditional print readers.

With another player besides Apple – particularly one that is as large and influential with consumers as Amazon is – magazine companies could suddenly find they have a useful bargaining chip when it comes to negotiating with Apple.

The Fire also allows publishers to start getting a higher price for their magazines. The magazine business has long sold subscriptions on the cheap – many for as little as a dollar an issue – while advertising subsidized much of their costs. But as much as it lamented the practice and tried to raise prices, it found consumers were resistant. Prices of many magazines on the Amazon Fire are set higher than print editions.

And by offering buyers a newsstand, publishers can avoid having to worry that their magazines are getting lost in a jumble of other media. This has long been a complaint of theirs with Apple, which is set to introduce its own newsstand next week.

“When you’re lost in the middle of 100,000 apps, you only have people who find you when they’re looking for you,” said Bob Sauerberg, president of Condé Nast. “This helps with getting consumers in. They pick what they want, and we sell them more of what interests them. And everybody is happy.”

Tablet versions of magazines are still in their very early days, and so far the sales figures don’t tell a complete picture about how strong consumer demand is. But across the board, publishers have said they like what they are seeing: small but relatively strong subscription and single issue sales that suggest more and more readers are beginning to adopt the tablet as their medium for magazine reading.

Hearst, publisher of many leading women’s magazines like Cosmopolitan and O The Oprah Magazine, has found the Barnes Noble Nook to be a particularly encouraging bright spot. Sales on that device have in some cases surpassed those on the iPad.

But in a sign of how much remains unsettled in the tablet magazine marketplace, Time Inc., the country’s largest magazine publisher, has yet to reach an agreement with Apple or Amazon to sell subscriptions. Time Inc., publisher of Sports Illustrated and People, continues to try to resolve issues including how revenue will be split with Amazon.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d7fa2fa65d7650043a563d2ffff73c76

Economix Blog: Uwe E. Reinhardt: Flow of Money From Households to Providers of Health Care

DESCRIPTION

Uwe E. Reinhardt is an economics professor at Princeton. He has some financial interests in the health care field.

My last post, “The Role of Prices in Health Care,” contained a chart connecting health spending with health income. One reader commented:

The graph misses a very major, and growing, component of the U.S. health care system. In between “the rest of society” and the “owners of health care resources” there is not only the “health care system” but also the United States government (unless we view the government as one of those resources). This is sapping a not insignificant portion of the resources that could and should otherwise be devoted to the provision of actual health care services.

Today’s Economist

Perspectives from expert contributors.

I am not sure just what to make of this. Is the argument that government is a sinkhole that absorbs “a not insignificant portion of the resources” that could otherwise be devoted to health care proper? Are there not other intermediaries, such as private insurers? Or is the argument that government as a public provider of health insurance to millions of Americans siphons off financial resources and returns no benefits to society, while private insurers do?

Consider the chart below. It illustrates that the flow of money through health care in the United States is complicated, with many detours on the way from households, which ultimately pay for all of the nation’s health care, to providers. Along the way are a number of pumping stations, employers among them.

Naturally, the providers of health care receive less than what households originally contributed to finance health care. Like private insurers, public insurers are pumping stations along the way that keep some of the money to finance their own operations. And both the public and private pumping stations provide society benefits in return, namely, access to health care when needed and the peace of mind that the family will not go broke over medical bills from a major illness.

Readers who seek to get a feel for the dollars flowing through this piping system — $2.6 trillion in 2010 — can find insight in Table 16 of the most recent National Health Expenditure Projections published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services (referred to hereafter as C.M.S. data).

This next chart conveys an idea of changes over time in the money flow through major public and private insurance programs and through out-of-pocket payments by patients. It should be noted that the fraction of Medicaid in this chart includes the federal match, which is about two-thirds of total Medicaid spending. It is a fact that government insurance programs have played an increasing role in the overall health care money flow. Their role in the future is now a fiercely debated issue in the political arena.

To get a rough indication of what fraction of the money flow is retained by the various pumping stations in the money flow, it is helpful to compare what the C.M.S. actuaries call National Health Expenditures, or N.H.E., with what they call Personal Health Care Expenditures, or P.H.C., a component. N.H.E. includes all outlays on health care, including research and construction. It also includes what the intermediate pumping stations (i.e., public and private health insurers) retain for their operations. P.H.C., on the other hand, represents only what the providers of health care received from the various intermediaries and directly from patients.

This next chart exhibits personal health spending as a percentage of total national health spending for three health insurers: private insurers, Medicare and Medicaid. These data are calculated from Tables 3 and 5 of the C.M.S. data. These percentages suggest that a relatively high share of the funds Congress and state legislators appropriate for the two largest government programs, Medicaid and Medicaid, becomes revenue for the providers of health care.

According to a C.M.S. actuary, for the traditional Medicare program excluding money contributed by Medicare to private Medicare Advantage plans on behalf of beneficiaries choosing those plans, as much as 98 cents is paid to providers for every $1 appropriated by Congress for Medicare. (The 93.8 percent shown in the next chart includes Medicare dollars channeled through Medicare Advantage plans.)

In fairness, it must be added that traditional Medicare basically sets prices and then just pays bills. It makes no active attempt to manage care (utilization controls, disease management, coordinating care and so on), because it has not been allowed by Congress to do so. It is almost as if Congress did not want traditional Medicare to be a prudent purchaser of heath care for the elderly.

From the viewpoint of prudent purchasing, most economists would probably judge these prices too low. On the other hand, the fact that traditional Medicare just pays bills more or less passively may be precisely the reason that it is still so popular among the elderly. Traditional Medicare still offers beneficiaries completely free choice of providers and therapy — a degree of freedom that many younger Americans in insurance plans with limited networks of providers no longer enjoy.

The ratio of P.H.C. to N.H.E. for private insurance reflects what is known as the medical loss ratio, or M.L.R., on which I have written a post previously. It is the fraction of the premium an insurer pays out for “health benefits.” The overall average of 88.3 percent for private insurance includes M.L.R.’s ranging all the way from a low 55 percent for small insurers selling policies to individuals and small employers, mainly through insurance brokers, to M.L.R.’s above 90 percent for large insurers performing merely administrative services (e.g., negotiating fees or claims processing) for self-insuring large employers.

The ratios in the last chart should not be confused with the overall administrative overhead of health care in the United States, a topic already touched on in an earlier post. A public or private health insurance program not only has its own operating costs but visits substantial administrative costs on the providers of health care, mainly on billing properly for services rendered.

I shall comment on these additional overhead costs in a future post.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8d9f2c092dc61e27ceedc4d516123768

Stocks Fall on Fresh Economic Data

Stocks fell on Wall Street and in Europe on Friday after data showed only a slight increase in American consumer spending and an unexpected rise in European inflation.

The Commerce Department said consumer spending in August rose 0.2 percent, while incomes actually fell for the first time in two years.

The Standard Poor’s 500-stock index fell 1.5 percent in early trading. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 1.1 percent and the Nasdaq composite index lost 1.6 percent.

Consumer prices in the 17 European Union nations that use the euro rose 3 percent in September, after a 2.5 percent increase in August, the largest increase since October 2008.

Coming on the heels of data showing declining consumer confidence in Europe and evidence that the economy is slowing in much of the region, the inflation figures complicate the monetary policy challenge facing the European Central Bank, which has a primary responsibility to maintain price stability.

Still, said Ben May, an economist at Capital Economics in London, investors are right to continue expecting another move by the European Central Bank to cut interest rates by the end of 2011, noting that so-called “core” inflation, which subtracts energy and food prices because of their volatility, appeared to be well below the bank’s 2 percent target.

“What’s more, any rise is likely to prove temporary, given the recent signs that the recovery is coming to an end,” Mr. May said.

The United States Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Japan all have set their main overnight target rates at close to zero.

In afternoon trading, the Euro Stoxx 50 index, a barometer of euro zone blue chips, was down 2 percent, while the FTSE 100 index in London slid 1.8 percent. The DAX in Germany lost 2.7 percent.

American crude oil futures for November delivery fell 2.3 percent to $80.26 a barrel. Comex gold futures rose 0.1 percent to $1,616.80 an ounce.

The dollar gained against most other major currencies. The euro fell to $1.3429 from $1.3597 late Thursday in New York, while the British pound fell to $1.5547 from $1.5627. The dollar was flat against the Japanese currency, at 76.85 yen, but higher against its Swiss counterpart, rising to 0.9043 francs from 0.8971 francs.

Asian shares were mixed, with both the Tokyo benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average and main Sydney market index, the S.P./ASX 200, essentially unchanged. But the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong fell 2.3 percent and in Shanghai the composite index fell 0.3 percent.

Bond prices were mostly higher, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note dipping 5 basis points to 1.95 percent and the yield on the German 10-year falling 10 basis points to 1.9 percent.

David Jolly reported from Paris.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f6aad14aeedbdfb60ee2f68a06629651

Bucks Blog: Friday Reading: Twitter Study Tracks When We’re Happy

September 30

Friday Reading: Twitter Study Tracks When We’re Happy

A study uses Twitter to track when we’re happy, Full Tilt Poker loses its gambling license, privacy groups seek review of Facebook features and other consumer-focused news from The New York Times.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9aafdd8171f501aa8c30b21f5cfe59ae