April 27, 2024

Archives for May 2011

As China’s Workers Get a Raise, Companies Fret

Bruce Rockowitz, the chief executive of Li Fung, the largest trading company supplying Chinese consumer goods to American retail chains, said in a speech here on Tuesday that the company’s average costs for goods rose 15 percent in the first five months of this year compared with the same period last year. Executives at other consumer goods companies have encountered similar or larger increases.

Airline flights to Vietnam, Bangladesh, Indonesia and other low-wage Asian countries are packed these days with executives looking for alternatives to double-digit wage increases in China. But wages are rising as fast or faster in many of these countries, following China’s example, while commodity prices have surged around the world, leaving buyers with few places to turn.

Bangladesh raised its minimum wage by 87 percent late last year, yet apparel factories there are still struggling to find enough workers to complete ever-rising orders. “Everywhere you see signs saying ‘people wanted,’ “ said Annisul Huq, the chairman of Mohammadi Group, a large Bangladesh garment manufacturer.

The Gap surprised financial markets on May 19 by announcing that a 20 percent jump in costs from suppliers by the second half of this year would depress its profits, prompting a 17.5 percent plunge of its shares the next day. Coach, the luxury handbag company, announced in January that it would try to reduce its reliance on China to less than half of its products within four years, from 80 percent now, by moving production to Vietnam and India.

Yet wages in Vietnam have been rising as fast as Chinese wages, or faster, while India has posed many problems for large-scale manufacturers. Mr. Rockowitz said that India’s infrastructure — roads and ports — was “really poor,” while labor issues, including government regulations, make it hard to build Chinese-style factories for tens of thousands of workers.

With costs rising in China and few alternatives elsewhere, “you have the perfect storm for raising prices,” said Bennett Model, the chief executive of Cassin, a Manhattan-based line of designer clothing. The company’s costs have risen 25 to 35 percent in the last year for cotton and fur garments alike.

Cassin has begun experimenting with garment production in Guatemala with some success, Mr. Model said, adding that many garment companies were still leery of buying from anywhere except China. “Everybody’s scared of the quality — you spend so many years training a factory” to meet detailed specifications, he said.

Yet with 14 million people, Guatemala has the population only of a single large Chinese metropolitan area like Shenzhen or Guangzhou.

Workers in developing countries all over the world are becoming more aware of pay elsewhere through the Internet and the use of social media like Facebook, increasing the pressure for higher wages, Mr. Rockowitz said.

Li Fung handles about 4 percent of American retailers’ imports from China of virtually all kinds of consumer goods, according to investment analysts. The exception is electronics, which tend to be imported directly to the United States by other companies like Apple.

Mr. Rockowitz and other executives predict that the extremely high concentration of factories in southeastern China near Hong Kong will give way to a dispersal across the country in the next five years. Workers are becoming much more reluctant to spend up to three days on buses and trains from the interior to reach coastal factories, particularly when the growth of domestic spending in China is creating more jobs in the interior.

Even the recent opening of high-speed rail routes that cut travel times by up to 80 percent has not been enough to revive the flow of migrants. “They don’t have to take a 1,000-mile trip to the coast — there’s a shortage of people, unbelievable,” said Douglas Hsu, the chairman and chief executive of the Far Eastern Group, a big Taiwanese multinational with extensive investments in mainland China.

And wages in China’s interior have been rising even faster in percentage terms than in coastal provinces, steadily narrowing what was once a pattern of much higher wages in coastal export zones.

Many companies have another reason for staying in China these days: that is where their sales are growing fastest. “If the market is in China, which in many cases it now is, there’s much less incentive to move,” said Charles Oliver, the senior partner of GCiS China, a market research company in Shanghai.

China has become the world’s largest market for a long list of products, from cars to steel. Producing and selling in China protects companies from later facing “Buy Chinese” policies, antidumping cases or other Chinese import restrictions.

Manufacturing in China allows companies to incur costs in renminbi, the same currency as a growing part of their sales. That insulates them from one kind of currency volatility even as the renminbi fluctuates more against the dollar and euro.

Rising wages and strengthening currencies in Asia are making it less attractive to move higher-value industries like auto manufacturing out of the West. But little mentioned by almost anyone making or trading consumer goods in Asia these days is the possibility of moving these relatively labor-intensive manufacturing industries back to the United States or Europe.

Mr. Rockowitz was dismissive of the idea in his remarks on Tuesday at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club.

“The Western world does not have the work force to do this kind of business,” he said. “For ‘made in Italy,’ the workers are old now and there are no new workers coming in.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9835ac9fae1535e52dec80b710233429

France Marshals G-20 to Combat Rising Food Costs

His remarks, in April, came soon after a United Nations gauge of food prices touched its highest level since its creation in 1990, and as popular uprisings fanned across the Middle East, toppling the longstanding rulers of Tunisia and Egypt and destabilizing a host of other regimes.

Those upheavals, in a region once known as the Fertile Crescent but now dependent on imported grain, were set off in part by concerns about the rising cost of essential foodstuffs, demonstrating to global leaders the extreme effects that food price spikes can have on social, economic and political stability.

Now, France is now using its chairmanship of the Group of 20 leading economies to keep the issue of volatility in commodities, and especially food, at the top of the international agenda.

The French government has convened the first-ever meeting of G-20 agriculture ministers for June 20 and June 21 in Paris. It hopes to achieve agreement on an action plan that would be sent to G-20 leaders when they meet in the French city of Cannes in November.

The plan would include commitments to stem sudden and excessive fluctuations in agricultural prices; improve security of supplies; bolster transparency of information, especially about stocks; and improve risk management and the regulation of agricultural derivatives.

Since the warnings this spring, there has been a slight letup in price pressure as commodities have slipped from their peaks. On Wednesday, wheat futures for July delivery on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange were at $7.89 a bushel, down 3.7 percent, after an announcement by Russia that it would let a ban on wheat exports expire on July 1.

But over the past 12 months, the wheat price is up around 75 percent after drought and fires led to the Russian export ban last summer, as floods damaged crops in Canada and Australia, and as a particularly dry spring in Western Europe threatens output this year. Few analysts expect a major retrenchment in prices in the months ahead.

Aid agencies have started pushing for more action. In a report released Tuesday, Oxfam International said the global food system was buckling under pressure from climate change, ecological degradation, population growth, rising energy prices, increasing demand for meat and dairy products and intensifying competition for land from biofuels, industry and urbanization.

The charity warned that prices for staple foods including corn and wheat would more than double in two decades unless action were taken. “The warning signs are clear,” the report said. “Surging and unstable international food prices, growing conflicts over water, the increased exposure of vulnerable populations to drought and floods are all symptoms of a crisis that may soon become permanent.”

Oxfam called on governments to seek a fairer and more sustainable food system by investing in agriculture, managing food distribution better and promoting equal rights for women, who produce much of the world’s food.

It also called on the private sector to shift away from a model that profits at the expense of poor producers, consumers and the environment. Specifically, it said that three global companies — Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge and Cargill — held disproportionate sway over the world grain trade and that their activities were adding to volatility.

Meantime, higher food prices, along with rising energy costs, are affecting economic debate and policy making.

In March, a paper published by the International Monetary Fund concluded that an increase in food prices resulted in less private consumption and greater income inequality, as well as fueling anti-government demonstrations and riots. This year, a number of central banks, among them the European Central Bank, the Bank of Canada and the Reserve Bank of Australia, have raised interest rates, citing inflationary pressure as a factor.

That pressure appears to be taking root. On Tuesday, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said that consumer prices in industrialized countries rose 2.9 percent in the year to April 2011, after growth of 2.7 percent in March. It was the highest rate since October 2008 and was driven by an acceleration in food and energy prices.

In the euro area, inflation eased to an annual rate of 2.7 percent in May from 2.8 percent the month before, the statistics agency Eurostat said. Still, that rate remains well above the E.C.B.’s comfort zone of just below 2 percent.

In the lead-up to the meeting in June, Bruno Le Maire, the French agriculture minister, has visited China, Brazil, Russia and India, and he will head to the United Stares this week.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=5737a0af466883d558a5374e0f94427b

Nokia Abandons 2011 Profit Goal

PARIS — Nokia, the cellphone giant battling to maintain its position in the face of competition from the iPhone and Android, said Tuesday that it was abandoning its 2011 profit targets after an unexpectedly poor second-quarter showing.

Shares in Nokia tumbled 17.5 percent, closing at €4.75 in Helsinki, after the company, which is based in Espoo, Finland, said “multiple factors are negatively impacting” sales, particularly lower selling prices and a reduced sales volume.

“The fact that things are getting worse is not a surprise,” said Stuart Jeffrey, an analyst at Nomura International in New York. “But the scale of the decline is surprising, coming just six weeks after they offered guidance.”

Facing an erosion in sales of phones using its Symbian technology, Nokia in February formed an alliance to use Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 operating system in new models. The company said Tuesday it had “increased confidence” that the first Nokia-Microsoft phone would be shipped in the fourth quarter.

Nokia said it was still investing in the Symbian lineup and intensifying its focus on point-of-sales marketing.

“The Symbian portfolio is in terminal decline,” Mr. Jeffrey said, “so the importance of the Windows phone is even greater now.”

He added that the weakness of the Symbian model appeared to vindicate the wisdom of the switch to the Microsoft platform, though it might have been better to at least add a few models using the Android operating system created by Google to benefit from its growth.

Nokia lowered its forecast for second-quarter sales in its devices and services business to “substantially below” the range of €6.1 billion to €6.6 billion, or $8.8 billion to $9.5 billion, it had previously forecast.

“Given the unexpected change in our outlook for the second quarter, Nokia believes it is no longer appropriate to provide annual targets for 2011,” it said.

A world-beater just a few years ago, Nokia remains the world’s largest cellphone maker by unit sales. But it has fallen behind Apple, maker of the iPhone, to the No.2 position when measured by revenue generated in the mobile phone market.

The phenomenal success of the iPhone and devices using Android, Google’s operating system, have left Nokia scrambling for market share in high-end smartphones, at the same time that Samsung of South Korea and its Chinese rivals have carved out major territory in the market for less expensive phones. In April, Nokia said it would cut costs nearly 20 percent over three years, a goal that is likely to result in thousands of layoffs.

“It’s very difficult to have a strong feeling about the outlook for Nokia in 2012 and beyond,” Mr. Jeffrey said, “because it’s all contingent on the success of the Windows phone.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b4a14c1705f0bc24be1f46b5e44582ac

Bits: Apple to Unveil New Software

Apple said on Tuesday that it would announce “next generation” software for its computer and mobile operating systems next week in a keynote address at a developers conference.

The announcement will be made Monday by Steven P. Jobs, Apple’s chief executive, and a team of other executives at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference. Mr. Jobs has been on medical leave since January, though he made a surprise appearance in March to introduce a new iPad.

Apple said the new software would include iCloud, which will be the company’s cloud computing offering. The company will also show a new release of its OS X operating system for desktop and laptop computers, called Lion, and iOS 5, the latest update to Apple’s mobile operating system, which supports the iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch.

The company’s decision to announce the keynote event in advance was unusual for Apple as the company usually goes to great pains to remain secretive about any coming announcements or new products.

Apple has recently completed a billion dollar data-center that it is expected to discuss at the developers conference.

There has been curious speculation for over a year about the company’s plans for a cloud-based music service that would eliminate the need for consumers to download songs from iTunes and instead stream them from any Apple device.

The iCloud software could also be used to power a new era of cloud computing for the company in which desktop computers and mobile devices are able to share content, including music, photos and videos, through the iCloud software without the need of a USB cable and the laborious task of synching these devices.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f73be91e8917348566d73a7c0cb623b6

Trichet to Leave a Difficult Legacy at E.C.B.

Time and again the E.C.B. and its president, Jean-Claude Trichet, have applied pressure when they thought heads of state were not acting responsibly. As a result, when Mr. Trichet’s eight-year term expires at the end of October, he will leave behind an institution that has grown significantly in stature and influence.

He also leaves behind a difficult legacy for his likely successor, Mario Draghi, the governor of the Bank of Italy. Mr. Draghi appears to share Mr. Trichet’s ability to negotiate cordially with European leaders — and browbeat them when necessary. But Mr. Draghi, already an influential member of the E.C.B. governing council, will also inherit an institution that has become deeply entangled with the banking system, financial markets and the political process.

“The E.C.B. so far has done an admirable job, all things considered,” said Dennis Snower, president of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy in Kiel, Germany. “But it has found itself in a very uncomfortable place not of its own choosing. This place may become more uncomfortable as time goes on.”

In May 2010, Mr. Trichet and others pushed leaders to recognize that there was a crisis in the first place, and then to fashion a rescue package for Greece. The E.C.B. did its part by buying Greek government bonds.

This year, the E.C.B. has used its clout in the banking system to insist that Portugal and Ireland accept bailout loans. Mr. Trichet has also pushed, with limited success, to get governments to adopt tougher sanctions against euro countries that run up too much debt, with the goal of averting future crises.

In recent days, as the idea of letting Greece stretch out its debt payments gains traction, the bank has set itself up as the main opposition. It is not yet clear whether the E.C.B. will succeed in blocking a restructuring that many economists see as inevitable.

Mr. Trichet and others argue that a Greek default could disrupt financial markets in ways that would be unpredictable and impossible to control. But in recent weeks the E.C.B. has faced criticism that it has a conflict of interest.

In May 2010, the E.C.B. began buying Greek, Portuguese and Irish debt to try to stabilize markets for those bonds. The E.C.B. moved in concert with the national governments, who at the same time created a €500 billion bailout fund, worth $720 billion at current exchange rates, for the distressed countries.

As a result, though, the E.C.B. now holds €75 billion in bonds from those countries, and would take a big hit to its balance sheet if any of them defaulted.

Last month, Mr. Trichet walked out of a meeting with euro area leaders in Luxembourg. He was upset that the politicians were toying with the idea of a Greek debt restructuring.

Yet the E.C.B.’s foray into politics also created strains inside its own governing council. Axel A. Weber, the president of the German Bundesbank and a member of the council, argued strenuously that the E.C.B. was making a mistake by intervening in government bond markets.

Based on public statements Mr. Weber made later, it appeared that he believed the E.C.B. was moving too far into fiscal policy and letting governments off the hook.

“Primary decision making over wide areas of economic and finance policy remains with member states,” he and two Bundesbank economists wrote in a March commentary published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper.

The ideological split had lasting consequences for the E.C.B. Mr. Weber, who had long been seen as the front-runner to succeed Mr. Trichet, resigned as Bundesbank president at the end of April rather than have to defend polices with which he strongly disagreed.

Even though European politicians seem to resent E.C.B. meddling, they have been glad to allow the central bank to deploy its financial resources at crucial moments, propping up commercial banks with cheap credit and intervening in bond markets.

In many respects, the E.C.B. is far better equipped to deal with the crisis than national governments. It is a pan-European institution able to act quickly — and independently.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1f4a460d6854697f7a7e27ab1fc4b49d

New Rescue Package for Greece Takes Shape

While the agreement for as much as €60 billion, or $86 billion, would, in theory address Greece’s need for cash this year and next, it puts off for the time being a restructuring, hard or soft, of Greece’s mammoth debt burden.

At the deal’s heart would be an informal understanding that the private sector holders of Greek government bonds might be persuaded to roll over their debts, or extend new loans at the time their older obligations come due.

By taking on more dubious Greek risk — backed by new funds from Europe and the International Monetary Fund — exposed banks would not just step back from the precipice of a “haircut,” or a forced loss on their bonds, they might also hope that in another two years, Greece will be in a better position to repay its debts in full.

The expectation that Europe will again come to Greece’s rescue bolstered both the euro and equity markets on Tuesday. Yields on Greek 10-year bonds have dropped sharply, to 15.7 percent Tuesday from a high of 16.8 percent last week.

“Restructuring is off the table,” said a senior official in the Greek Finance Ministry. “For now it is all about growth, growth, growth.” This person, who spoke on condition of anonymity while the talks continued, said an announcement from the European Union, the I.M.F. and the European Central Bank could come as soon as Friday or early next week.

Later in June, the E.U. first and then the I.M.F. would approve the additional financing, thus clearing the way for €12.5 billion to be disbursed to Athens at the end of the month.

The new loans, however, will only be forthcoming if more austerity measures are introduced.

Along with faster progress on privatization, Europe and the fund have been demanding that Greece finally begin cutting public sector jobs and closing down unprofitable entities.

They also have been pushing Greek politicians to unite behind the new austerity package to help ensure it sticks, and are discussing a decrease in the value-added tax as a concession to win support from the right-of-center opposition, which wants more tax relief to help the moribund economy.

A team of bankers and technical experts from the international institutions have been on the ground in Athens for close to a month, attempting to reconcile the essential conundrum of Greece’s financial condition.

Harsh austerity measures have taken a severe toll on the economy, resulting in missed financial targets and the need for more public money.

Adding to the urgency has been the persistent flow of deposits out of the banking sector. Since the crisis began, €60 billion in deposits have been withdrawn from Greek banks, about a quarter of the country’s output. Bankers in Athens said that outflows were particularly severe last Thursday and Friday following comments — later described as rhetorical — by a Greek politician about Greece leaving the euro.

With great reluctance, European governments have come to the conclusion that an additional €60 billion now, while politically unappealing, would be less costly than the unquantifiable public funds that would be needed if a restructuring of Greece’s debt produced a Lehman Brothers-like contagion that spread not just to Portugal and Ireland but possibly Spain and the financial system as a whole.

But how an economy already in free fall will generate the growth to produce the needed budgetary surplus to start paying down its debt remains unanswered.

“Greece’s G.D.P. is already declining and now the government will need to cut another €7 billion in spending,” said Jason Manolopoulos, who manages a hedge fund based in Athens and Geneva and is the author of “Greece’s ‘Odious’ Debt: The Looting of the Hellenic Republic by the Euro, the Political Elite and the Investment Community.”

“That is only going to make the debt to G.D.P. figures worse,” he said. “There is no getting around it: Greece is insolvent.”

With a debt of 150 percent of gross domestic product, or G.D.P., that may well be so. But while skeptics like Mr. Manolopoulos are keeping the cash levels in their funds high, convinced that Greece will be required to default sooner rather than later, such a sense of pressing gloom has not yet become contagious.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=ec01ab5fb2cc96bd0996a980b5631a48

DealBook: In I.P.O. Price Debate, an Investment Giant Weighs In

You might recall that about a week ago, my colleague Joe Nocera wrote an intriguing column about LinkedIn’s initial public offering, in which he said that the bankers who underwrote the deal “scammed” the social network company by pricing it too low, lining the pockets of its investor clients.

I countered two days later, arguing that the bankers, at worst, made a mistake, but that the I.P.O. price might actually have been correct given the outsized interest in social networking companies.

Over the weekend, a new entrant waded into the I.P.O. pricing debate: BlackRock, the giant money manager.

In a letter to British securities regulators, which was reported in the press over there, BlackRock said it was worried that investors, not companies, were getting the short end of the stick. While BlackRock’s letter was unrelated to LinkedIn’s offering, the investment firm suggested all the same that the I.P.O. process had grown unfair because banks have been intentionally overpricing companies to garner higher fees.

We are concerned that companies are appointing advisors based on indications of valuation that are unrealistic. …

We are concerned about the structure of incentive fees which maximise your returns for the price achieved on the first day of trading rather than at some, more distant date, e.g., six months after float. Such fees do not represent an alignment of interests between us and seem to drive increasingly aggressive behaviour from syndicates.

BlackRock’s view runs counter to Joe’s argument that investment bankers underprice I.P.O.’s so that “money could be diverted to favored investors.” In fact, it’s the opposite viewpoint.

Clearly, there are many ways to look at the process. As one retired banker e-mailed me, “We never make everyone happy. We are supposed to, at the conclusion, make sure all sides are equally UNhappy.”

Perhaps that’s unsatisfying. But it’s true.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=206c63f4c99e72dbb19bb032b4a66108

Frequent Flier: A Flying Eye Hospital Raises Security Eyebrows

When I fly back to the United States, I tell my family to give me an extra hour to get through customs and security.

Because of all the stamps on my passports, especially from places like Vietnam, Syria and Myanmar, which are some of my favorite countries, it sometimes takes a while to explain to border agents that I’m a doctor returning from an Orbis program.

How I get from one country to another always raises questions since I could fly into a country on a commercial flight, but fly out privately on the Orbis Flying Eye Hospital. That raises eyebrows with immigration officers in all countries.

I usually carry Orbis annual reports with me to prove who I am and what we do.

Still, I’ve had some trouble convincing agents there really is such a thing as an eye hospital on an airplane. Ours is a DC-10 jet that’s fully equipped to teach and provide eye care no matter where we are in the world.

A few times, I’ve been taken to what I like to call “the room,” that place where you’re questioned more. I’m unfailingly polite, but I’m sure I sound like I’m a few fries short of a Happy Meal because I talk of an incredible Orbis Flying Eye Hospital and nervously say, “Yes, sir,” or “No, sir” so much.

I have no problem stepping up if there’s a need for a doctor onboard a flight. Three times in the past six years, I have responded to a pilot’s call for intervention during a health emergency. I take the person’s vital signs, monitor them and work with the onboard personnel.

I always give my card to the pilot after we land. When they see that I’m an ophthalmologist, it’s like they think, “Oh, great, this guy has been taking care of a really sick person and he’s an eye doctor.” I nicely explain to them that I graduated from medical school and that I’m a “real doctor.”

There’s nothing like the wonder of giving someone in a developing country the chance to see. And it’s very rewarding to train local doctors in procedures that we take for granted.

The members of our medical team come from many different countries. After working 14- or 16-hour days, and coping with extreme conditions, the only thing we ever really fight about is the best team competing in the World Cup.

People like to romanticize this kind of work. We don’t have doctors like “McDreamy” or “McSteamy.” This isn’t “Grey’s Anatomy.” It’s real life with the medical team, volunteers and host country doctors all working together to treat avoidable blindness. Trust me, there’s nothing romantic about flying for 48 hours, and sometimes being without hot showers.

One of the most amusing patients I ever helped to treat with Orbis was an older gentleman in Jamaica. He hadn’t seen his wife in about 20 years because of advanced cataracts. His wife had been feeding and clothing him the whole time, and she helped him get around. It was an extraordinary relationship.

When it came time to take off his eye patch, the patient asked if his wife could wait outside. I thought something was wrong. He leaned toward me and asked, “Is my wife still pretty?” I started laughing to myself because no matter how old they are, men can be, well, men.

I assured him his wife was beautiful. She came back into the room, he smiled and gave her a hug and a kiss. And then he thanked me for reuniting them.

By Hunter Cherwek, as told to Joan Raymond. E-mail: joan.raymond@nytimes.com.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=36417d46bd9981ca96a894465e7fbee0

On the Road: The Hotel Push for In-Room Movies

One is semiretired but is still a frequent traveler and goes to movie theaters frequently. Yet, he is still unable to see a handful of the very latest and most talked-about movies. As a result of the archaic studio distribution systems, many of the cutting-edge films have not yet come to theaters outside of the major marquee cities like New York and Los Angeles.

Two of the others at the party, including myself, occasionally go to the movie theater but more often catch up on films later on DVD. The other two, very frequent international travelers, never go to theaters, and instead see movies, including current ones, on in-flight entertainment systems offered by many premium international airlines. Some of the systems offer more than 100 on-demand high-definition recent movies on big flat in-seat screens.

None of us, however, said we watched a movie in a hotel room.

That reality underscores challenges facing LodgeNet Interactive, the major supplier of hotel-room movies and television. Challenges also face the hotel industry itself, digging out of a recession, still perplexed about what guests are willing to pay for in in-room on-demand entertainment. The chains are also struggling to weigh the cost-benefit of investing in new hardware like big flat-screen high-definition screens for hundreds, or thousands, of rooms they may operate in any given hotel.

LodgeNet provides interactive video service in about 1.5 million rooms in 9,000 hotels in North America. This week, the company plans to announce a new initiative, VOD 2.0, to broaden its appeal to travelers.

Instead of selling a selection of video on-demand movies at a single price, LodgeNet has revamped its system to offer a wider range of movies at various price levels, including budget prices for older movies. But the main feature is a new-release feature that LodgeNet says will provide the earliest availability, outside of movie theaters, for a select number of movies.

This move comes just weeks after DirecTV, whose satellite TV service is mostly used in homes, introduced DirecTV Cinema, which charges $29.99 for high-definition newer movies like “Just Go With It,” starring Jennifer Aniston and Adam Sandler. It was available about 60 days after opening in theaters, and will become available on usual cable on-demand menus or on DVDs and Blu-ray.

LodgeNet says its VOD 2.0 for hotels has a wider selection of these earliest nontheatrical-release movies, at a price of about half what DirecTV charges.

Will people pay this much for a hotel-room movie, especially as the trend rapidly grows in travelers bringing with them more sophisticated personal mobile technologies like iPads? With free cable television choices in rooms, with the Internet and myriad other diversions already available in ever-wider options on personal mobile devices, is there a real growth market for selling hotel-room movies?

In hotels, market research shows that “the consumer profile of the guest improves with more trips made and higher affluence; that this group is huge consumers of entertainment,” said Derek White, the president of LodgeNet’s Interactive division. “In important terms, they also are very important in helping to socialize new movies.”

He is referring to the argument that some airlines also make — that the studios should be working harder to get newer releases in front of business travelers. These travelers, like my friends, are movie buffs who spread their interest via word of mouth.

In general, movie theater owners, who have been big powers in Hollywood since the silent-film era, do not like any suggestion that might keep anyone away from the box office. But as on-demand personal and in-home video grows, battles over movie distribution schedules are intensifying.

Word of mouth recommendations from people with wide social networks, like business travelers, can actually be part of a newer movie’s promotion and “help these movies take hold” in the market, said Mr. White. “It won’t really steal business away from the main theaters, which is the big issue right now with premium VOD that has the theater owners up in arms.”

It’s going to be interesting to watch, so to speak. Right now, only 16 percent of LodgeNet’s hotel-room base has the requisite big-screen, high-definition TV sets.

But as the hotel industry gains better economic traction, “the transition to high-def is really back in gear,” said Mr. White, who added: “For those hotel rooms that actually have gone to the flat screens and hi-def, we’re seeing 40 percent more revenue. You’re just more likely to plunk down $15 for a movie if you can enjoy it on a big beautiful screen in your room.”

E-mail: jsharkey@nytimes.com

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0d8d30c91660122fcfb57c234374d179

Advertising: PBS Plans Promotional Breaks Within Programs

But those leisurely stretches of break-free programs could be going away.

PBS officials told member stations at its recent annual meeting in Orlando that beginning this fall, the Wednesday science series “Nature” and “Nova” would contain corporate and foundation sponsor spots, promotional messages and branding within four breaks inside the shows, instead of at the very beginning and end.

The longest period of uninterrupted programming, according to a plan shown to the programmers, would be just under 15 minutes, compared with the current 50 minutes or more. Based on what PBS learns in the fall, the new format would continue to be introduced night by night through the year, officials said.

Even before the plan became public last week, it was being intensely debated among PBS station executives and program producers. While many support testing the new model, others are worried about how viewers and the financial supporters will react, and if PBS can recover should they react badly.

The great unknowns are whether PBS viewers will welcome receiving programming in shorter bites, or rebel against a move they see as more commercial, and if foundation supporters will see the change as an abdication of mission.

“One of the biggest things they have to sell is that they are noncommercial,” said David D. Oxenford, a partner with the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine, who represents some public broadcasters.

“My first reaction is that in any kind of marketing opportunity, if you give up something that is desirable and differentiates you from your competition, it’s too bad, and that’s what this is,” said Alberto Ibargüen, a former PBS board chairman and president and chief executive of the Knight Foundation, which finances some public broadcasting initiatives. But, he added, “the people of PBS would not do this lightly.”

The change is meant to address a serious problem. Currently, the messages that a PBS station broadcasts are packed into a block at the end of each show, which, for hourlong programs, sometimes stretches to nearly eight minutes. Not surprisingly, viewers routinely flee.

“It’s almost as if someone pulled the fire alarm and they scrambled for the exits,” John F. Wilson, the chief programming executive for PBS, told attendees to the annual meeting, while exhibiting a Nielsen ratings chart showing a steep cliff where the audience disappeared between shows. (PBS executives declined to quantify the falloff depicted.)

Such an exodus makes it harder for PBS to build up an audience for the show that follows, Mr. Wilson said.

Under the new plan, there would be no break between shows, a transition known as a “hot switch” used by many cable networks. To accomplish this, the sponsor messages, PBS “Be more” branding spots, and show promotions would run inside programs, in short pods of under two minutes.

Mr. Wilson, in an interview, said viewers would never be more than one minute and 40 seconds away from actual program content. And, he noted, PBS shows would still be “the longest hour in television in terms of content,” with as much as 54 minutes of programming, compared with about 40 minutes for commercial networks.

All shows may not end up being candidates for breaks. “I’d look really carefully at a ‘Masterpiece’ drama, at how we’d do that or how often we’d do that,” he said. But many producers, who now have the luxury of structuring their shows without worrying about where the breaks will come, are likely to have to adapt. PBS is meeting with some concerned producers this week.

Jon Abbott, the president and chief executive of WGBH in Boston, which produces “Nova,” “Masterpiece” and “Frontline,” among others, called it a “missed opportunity” if viewers don’t see the work. He added, however, that “we have a lot of people who care about the work and care about our way of presenting work; that trust, the values that people place in public media are things that we are very attentive to and respectful of.”

The plan is “a fundamental change” likely to elicit viewer complaints, John Boland, the president and chief executive of KQED in San Francisco, said via e-mail. However, in the end, he wrote, “this is not a test of what people say but rather what they do. Do they spend more time or less time watching PBS stations with embedded breaks and a hot switch? There is ample evidence that this strategy has worked for commercial TV, and there is ample evidence that our viewers may be concerned about change but won’t desert us if we provide a reasonable explanation and continue to provide quality programming that simply is not available anywhere else (and certainly not available without interruption).”

PBS told station executives that they should check with their lawyers to make sure that they weren’t violating Federal Communications Commission policy governing noncommercial stations, but Mr. Wilson said he was confident the new policy wa legal. F.C.C. guidelines, he said, allow stations to acknowledge sponsors at “natural breaks,” and shows like “Nova” and “Antiques Roadshow” can be divided into chapters, just as noncommercial NPR programs already do.

“It’s not like this is untested, uncharted territory in some respect,” he said.

Mr. Oxenford said that under F.C.C. rules, announcements and acknowledgements may not interrupt regular programming. But sponsor messages are allowed at the beginning and end of shows, between identifiable segments of longer programs, or during station breaks, “such that the flow of programming is not unduly interrupted.”

Programs like “Antiques Roadshow,” which PBS said was scheduled to move to the new model starting in January, might indeed have identifiable breaks, “between looking at Grandma’s sofa and the 1850s flintlock someone had in their basement,” he said.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=98f44bc70ef0e9d3b5a26d2fc8b2c7fb