November 22, 2024

DealBook: Rio Tinto to Book $14 Billion Charge; C.E.O. Replaced

A ship is loaded with iron ore at Rio Tinto's loading terminal in the Pilbara region of western Australia.Rio Tinto, via ReutersA ship is loaded with iron ore at Rio Tinto’s loading terminal in the Pilbara region of western Australia.

5:42 a.m. | Updated

LONDON – Rio Tinto, the Anglo-Australian mining giant, said on Thursday that its chief executive had stepped down because of a $14 billion write-down on the value of assets that he helped acquire.

Tom Albanese is leaving Rio Tinto after joining two decades ago and spending five years in the top job. He will be succeeded by Sam Walsh, head of the company’s iron ore unit. Doug Ritchie, who led the purchase of coal assets in Mozambique whose value has dropped, also stepped down.

Jan du Plessis, Rio Tinto’s chairman, said the scale of the write-down related to the assets in Mozambique was “unacceptable.”

“We are also deeply disappointed to have to take a further substantial write-down in our aluminum businesses, albeit in an industry that continues to experience significant adverse changes globally,” he said in a statement on Thursday.

The write-downs are linked to two of Rio Tinto’s biggest acquisitions in recent years: Alcan and the coal producer Riversdale Mining. The company blamed falling aluminum prices for $10 billion to $11 billion of the noncash charge. Most of Rio Tinto’s aluminum assets stem from its $38 billion acquisition of Alcan in 2007, which was led by Mr. Albanese.

The acquisition has weighed heavily on Rio Tinto’s performance, and some investors had criticized the firm for paying too much in a buoyant market just to avoid becoming a takeover target. Rio Tinto already wrote down $8.9 billion on the value of these assets a year ago.

Another $3 billion of the write-down has been attributed to lowered estimates of the value of its coal business in Mozambique, after the company failed to secure crucial government approvals to ship coal it mined in the African country. Rio Tinto bought Riversdale Mining for around $4 billion in 2011 after having to increase its offer price because of a standoff with the company’s shareholders.

Rio Tinto, the world’s second-largest mining company after BHP Billiton, cited strong currencies and high energy and raw material costs as other factors leading to the write-down.

“The level of the write-down is very disappointing and it does come as a surprise,” said Keith Bowman, an analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers. “There have been some rash takeovers in the mining industry and I hope this continues to prove a lesson.”

Rio Tinto’s shares fell 1.9 percent in morning trading in London on Thursday. The company’s shares have dropped more than 5 percent in the last 12 months compared with a 0.5 percent increase in the stock price of BHP Billiton in the same period.

Mr. Albanese said in the company’s statement that he fully recognized “that accountability for all aspects of the business rests with the C.E.O.”

Mr. Albanese will stay on until July 16 to help with the transition. He will not receive a bonus for this year and any outstanding remuneration in form of deferred stock bonuses would lapse, Rio Tinto said.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/ceo-replaced-as-rio-tinto-to-book-14-billion-write-down/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Deutsche Bank Chiefs Outline Overhaul Plan

Jürgen Fitschen, left, and Anshu Jain, the co-chief executives of Deutsche Bank, spoke in Frankfurt on Tuesday.Daniel Roland/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesJürgen Fitschen, left, and Anshu Jain, the co-chief executives of Deutsche Bank, spoke in Frankfurt on Tuesday.

The new chief executives of Deutsche Bank acknowledged on Tuesday that the bank was weighed down by relatively weak capital reserves, excessive dependence on investment banking and a tarnished reputation as they announced an overhaul to address these flaws.

Three months after taking over from Josef Ackermann, the bank’s longtime chief executive, Jürgen Fitschen and Anshu Jain, who are sharing the top job, moved to put their mark on the largest German bank.

They presented an unusually frank assessment of Deutsche Bank’s shortcomings and promised to take remedial steps, including delaying bonuses for top managers.

They also said the bank planned to cut costs by 4.5 billion euros ($5.8 billion) a year by 2015.

“Tremendous mistakes have been made,” Mr. Jain said at a news conference in Frankfurt. “We can see times have changed and we need to change and change rapidly.”

The presentation came a day before the European Commission was scheduled to present a proposal for a banking union that would shift supervision of institutions like Deutsche Bank from German regulators to the European Central Bank.

The plan presented by Mr. Jain and Mr. Fitschen on Tuesday was partly a response to the pressure banks were experiencing from tougher regulations, as well as from investigations into manipulation of money-market rates and other wrongdoing.

Mr. Jain and Mr. Fitschen vowed to push through a change in Deutsche Bank culture that would include tougher sanctions for wrongdoing. “We’re in an industry where a small group of people can do irreparable damage,” Mr. Jain said. “We will not stand by and let that happen.”

Deutsche Bank is among the banks accused of manipulating the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, which is used to set rates on trillions of dollars of financial contracts.

Mr. Jain said the bank was taking the investigation into Libor rate-fixing very seriously, but repeated previous assertions that any wrongdoing was the work of a small group of people and that no members of the management board were implicated.

Mr. Jain, former chief of Deutsche Bank’s investment bank, said the business was simply not as profitable as it once was and that highly paid employees would have to accept more modest compensation.

The top 150 managers are to receive no bonuses at all for five years, he said, to encourage them to avoid taking excessive risks in the name of short-term gains. They would lose their bonuses if profits fell or they committed wrongdoing.

Addressing a common criticism of the bank, Mr. Jain said that Deutsche Bank’s capital reserves, while within regulatory limits, were lower than those of competitors. He vowed to raise the buffers to the same level as rivals by early next year and significantly higher by 2015.

The banking industry has shrunk since the beginning of the financial crisis and will shrink further, Mr. Fitschen said, requiring Deutsche Bank to cut costs and reduce the amount of money it has at risk. The bank had previously announced the elimination of 900 jobs, mostly in investment banking. On Tuesday the bank said it would set up a unit for noncore assets that would be sold.

Mr. Jain said that, while he was convinced the euro would survive, the economy in the euro zone was likely to grow slowly in the next several years. The bank will seek growth in Asia and the United States, he said.

Mr. Fitschen added: “We can’t deny that in the course of the crisis margins have fallen and funding has become more expensive. That demands answers on our part that sometimes will be painful.”

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/deutsche-bank-chiefs-outline-overhaul/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Stocks and Bonds: Bank Shares Skid, Hitting the Broader Indexes

Two years after Brian T. Moynihan became Bank of America’s chief executive, the beleaguered bank’s shares crashed through the psychologically important $5 mark on Monday, the lowest they’ve traded since March 2009. Other bank stocks including Morgan Stanley fell even harder on Monday as investors fretted on renewed concerns about bank capital cushions and a darkening economic outlook in Europe.

When Mr. Moynihan was appointed to the top job on Dec. 16, 2009, Bank of America was trading near $15 a share, a far cry from the $4.99 at which it closed Monday. The loss of two-thirds of its value far exceeds the drop in other battered financial institutions like Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo over the same period.

“This is like a fire in a 10-story building,” said Mark T. Williams, a former Federal Reserve bank examiner who now teaches courses on banking at Boston University. “It’s burning through each floor as investors dump their shares.”

Financial stocks fell by more than 2 percent Monday in the United States, leading the entire stock market down. The Dow Jones industrial average closed off 100.13 points, or 0.8 percent, at 11,766.26. The Standard Poor’s 500-stock index was down 1.2 percent, and the Nasdaq composite index fell 1.3 percent. The Dow is now down more than 2 percent this month, while the S. P. is down more than 3 percent.

Trading on Wall Street had opened higher, but then turned negative in the late morning. Analysts said that market moves were expected to be exaggerated, with lighter volumes in a holiday week.

During the day, some focus shifted to European sovereign debt troubles as the European Central Bank warned of a perilous year ahead. The sovereign debt crisis is colliding with slower economic growth and a dearth of market financing for banks.

A report in The Wall Street Journal that the Federal Reserve would rebuff pressure from American banks and go along with international recommendations on capital levels for banks also affected the markets, analysts said.

Citigroup fell 4.7 percent and Morgan Stanley 5.5 percent.

For Bank of America, which tumbled 4.1 percent, trading below $5 represents one more embarrassment this year. The company, based in Charlotte, N.C., recently lost its title as the country’s largest bank by assets to JPMorgan Chase. More than anything else, Bank of America’s problems stem from its disastrous 2008 acquisition of Countrywide Financial, the subprime mortgage giant whose excesses have come to symbolize the housing bubble of the last decade. It now faces lawsuits from investors seeking to force it to buy back billions in soured mortgages.

In addition, slow economic growth and ultra-low interest rates are eating into profit margins in traditional businesses like commercial lending. What’s more, capital markets where banks help companies raise money and make deals have slowed in recent weeks, hurting results at Bank of America’s investment banking unit.

Even a $5 billion investment by Warren E. Buffett this summer has failed to mollify sellers — he has lost roughly $1.5 billion on paper, although the generous terms of his purchase agreement protect him against losses.

Along with more fundamental factors, institutional money managers are also quietly dumping their losers before 2012 arrives, a practice known as “window dressing,” which removes stocks like Bank of America when investors read year-end reports.

“It’s a headache that a lot of money managers don’t want,” said one mutual fund manager who insisted on anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly. “Managers don’t want endowments and other clients asking them why they own Bank of America.”

 Some observers have speculated that going below $5 would force some institutional investors to unload Bank of America stock because of rules forbidding them to own shares in the low single digits. But Glenn Schorr, an analyst with Nomura, played down the likelihood of that.

Christine Hauser contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9ecf4bdc2871419e9cf09cfb8f59ff53

For Deutsche Bank, Talk Of a Shared Chief Position

Speculation has arisen that the company may split the job between the head of the investment bank and the chief of operations in Germany.

Some have suggested that Anshu Jain, an Indian-born executive who oversees the bank’s trading and transaction businesses, could share chief executive duties with Jürgen Fitschen, a member of the bank’s management board whose responsibilities include Deutsche Bank’s German operations.

The businesses overseen by Mr. Jain, 48, generate far more profit than the bank’s other units combined. But he is not fluent in German and is seen as ill-suited to handle the political and ceremonial responsibilities that are expected of the head of the country’s signature bank.

Mr. Ackermann, whose contract as chief executive runs until 2013, was a crucial adviser to Chancellor Angela Merkel during the global financial crisis.

He has also been a spokesman for the banking industry on regulation, serving as chairman of the Institute of International Finance, an association of the world’s biggest banks, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup.

At the same time, Deutsche Bank risks losing Mr. Jain, its top moneymaker and a favorite of investors, if he does not get the top job. Mr. Jain and Mr. Fitschen, who oversees Deutsche’s regional operations worldwide, have a very good relationship, say people who know both men.

Mr. Fitschen, 62, could oversee the bank’s efforts to reduce its dependency on volatile and risky investment banking, and expand its more stable businesses like corporate lending and retail banking. Then, the thinking goes, Mr. Fitschen could retire in a few years, clearing the way for Mr. Jain to serve as sole chief executive once he had the chance to learn more about other areas of the bank.

In recent months, the German news media have reported on supposed friction between Mr. Ackermann and Clemens Börsig, the current chairman of the supervisory board. Also, there are signs that the succession debate is straining relations between Mr. Ackermann and Mr. Jain.

“The public back-and-forth over personnel has increasingly damaged the image of the bank,” the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said Sunday in an editorial.

There has been more pressure to decide on a successor to Mr. Ackermann after Axel Weber, former head of the Bundesbank, took a job at UBS, Deutsche Bank’s Swiss rival. Mr. Ackermann had advocated pairing Mr. Weber with Mr. Jain to address his concern that Mr. Jain was not ready to assume the more ceremonial aspects of the job.

A nominating committee of the bank’s supervisory board was expected to meet late Sunday to discuss succession. But the bank said on Sunday afternoon that it would not have any statement after the meeting, though the succession issue has unsettled investors and hurt the institution’s image.

The bank denied a report by Der Spiegel, the German news magazine, that Mr. Ackermann was seeking to become chairman of the bank’s supervisory board, a part-time oversight position.

Mr. Ackermann, who has led the bank since 2002, has said on numerous occasions that he did not want to take over the supervisory board when he retired as chief executive. Such a move is common practice among retiring chief executives in Germany, but is regarded also as poor corporate governance. The new chief may not be able to make necessary changes if his predecessor continues to loom over him.

“His position on switching to the supervisory board has not changed,” Deutsche Bank said of Mr. Ackermann in a statement.

Jack Ewing reported from Frankfurt and Landon Thomas Jr. from London.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9ea8a468156647de97d1908e59146384

A Star Faces Barriers to Deutsche Bank’s Top Job

A banker with a pied-piper quality, Mr. Mitchell persuaded Mr. Jain and 500 others to leave secure jobs at Merrill Lynch in the mid-1990s to help him transform Deutsche Bank from a slumbering financial institution focused mostly on traditional lending to German companies and individuals into a global powerhouse that generated half its profit from trading and deal-making. At the peak of his success, in late 2000, Mr. Mitchell was killed in a plane crash.

In building Deutsche’s investment bank, Mr. Mitchell formed the template for the global universal bank that has since been emulated — for good and ill — by Citigroup, Royal Bank of Scotland, JPMorgan Chase, UBS and Barclays.

At 48 — about the same age as Mr. Mitchell was when he died — Mr. Jain controls all of his former mentor’s empire, and more. In a given quarter, those operations may produce as much as 90 percent of the banking giant’s profit. Now he is confronting the same obstacle that confounded Mr. Mitchell and prompted him to start looking for another job in the days before he died.

As a non-German speaker and Wall Street product, Mr. Jain is facing an uphill battle to succeed Deutsche Bank’s chief executive, Josef Ackermann.

More diplomat than banker, the Swiss-born, German-speaking Mr. Ackermann and the Deutsche board have resisted persistent shareholder demands that the bank put forward a succession plan before Mr. Ackermann’s contract expires in 2013.

All of which has enhanced the view that Mr. Ackermann sees it as his legacy to crown a successor in his own statesmanlike mold — perhaps Axel A. Weber, the recently departed president of the German central bank. There has been much talk of Mr. Weber’s becoming chief executive or coming in to share the job in some way with Mr. Jain.

Ultimately it will be a board decision, and the bank may well decide to anoint Mr. Jain. But the delay, institutional shareholders say, runs the risk of alienating Mr. Jain and might cause him to jump to another investment bank.

“In Germany, no one can imagine an Indian working in London who does not speak German being the C.E.O. of Deutsche Bank,” said Lutz Roehmeyer, a portfolio manager at LBB Invest in Berlin and a large shareholder. “But Deutsche Bank is an investment bank now, and Mr. Jain deserves to run it.”

On a narrow profit and loss calculation, that may be so. But even though Deutsche’s risk-taking was not as outlandish as that of others, the bank was an enthusiastic participant in the United States mortgage boom and it is being sued for $1 billion by the United States government, which contends that its mortgage unit engaged in fraud and deceived regulators to have its loans guaranteed.

While the majority of the alleged fraud took place before Deutsche acquired the mortgage operation, Mr. Ackermann and the Deutsche board may well be wary of choosing a bond and derivatives technician at a time when the practices of all major banks are still being scrutinized.

People who have spoken to Mr. Jain say that he recognizes this is a board decision and that his priority is to keep the profits coming. But, these people say, the delay and the possibility that Mr. Ackermann may not support him for the job have had an effect.

During a brief interview on Tuesday, Mr. Jain took issue with rumors in the market that his relationship with Mr. Ackermann — never close to begin with — had cooled and that he might leave the bank.

“I have been given a huge new opportunity to integrate the investment bank and I am very excited about that,” he said. “As for my relationship with Joe, it is as good as it ever was in almost 15 years of working together.”

Mr. Ackermann declined to comment on the question of his successor, but in the past he has made it clear that the decision to pick the bank’s next leader is the board’s responsibility — with his advice, of course — and that his contract runs until 2013.

By all accounts, Mr. Jain wants to complete the job that Mr. Mitchell and he started 16 years ago. Highly ambitious, with sharp bureaucratic elbows and an even sharper, although impatient, intelligence, he can claim that on his watch Deutsche’s investment banking side did not fall into the trap of so many of its rivals, allowing Deutsche Bank to weather the global financial crisis without assistance, public or private.

Moreover, Deutsche Bank’s United States fixed-income business was, for the first time, ranked No. 1 last year by the closely watched Greenwich Associates investor survey — beating those of institutions like JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Merrill Lynch in their own backyard.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/business/global/15jain.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Emerging Nations Warm to Lagarde for I.M.F. Role

Despite their alarm over efforts to put yet another European in one of the most powerful positions in global finance, China, Brazil and other fast-growing nations appear to be concluding that it would be in their interest to support Ms. Lagarde over her main rival, the Mexican central bank governor, Agustín Carstens.

For now, some of the biggest developing nations seem to see Ms. Lagarde as their best bet for increasing their power at the I.M.F. as their economies gain status in the global financial order.

With a deadline looming Friday for nominations to the I.M.F. directorship, Ms. Lagarde has mounted an energetic campaign — including sending messages via Twitter of her impressions of meetings with country leaders at each stop, and promising to give developing nations more sway at the fund.

On Tuesday, Ms. Lagarde sought to broaden her appeal in India. There, officials have fumed about the European arrogance they perceive in pushing her to succeed the former I.M.F. chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who resigned last month to fight charges in New York of attempted rape and sexual assault.

Ms. Lagarde vowed Tuesday at a news conference in New Delhi to represent the needs of emerging markets so thoroughly that “a little part of me will become Indian.”

Ms. Lagarde plans to go to China on Wednesday. Her campaign could gain even more momentum if leaders there decide that supporting her could pave the way for a Chinese citizen to be named as one of the I.M.F.’s three deputy managing directors, three people with ties to Beijing’s decision makers said.

Mr. Carstens is on his own international tour and plans stops in India, China and Japan to seek support.

Although I.M.F. representatives from Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have condemned the “obsolete, unwritten convention” of reserving the top job for a European, they have not displayed similar solidarity for one candidate of their own.

Instead, officials in Brazil, Russia and China have already privately conceded that Ms. Lagarde may have more ability than Mr. Carstens, or another candidate, to increase their own influence at the I.M.F.

“I think that it will be very difficult to compete with Christine Lagarde,” said Sergei A. Storchak, a Russian deputy minister of finance. “The countries with the most votes in the I.M.F. stand behind her.”

Ms. Lagarde and Mr. Carstens began their campaign swings through emerging economies in Brazil. But after the meetings, Brazilian government officials privately said they were leaning toward Ms. Lagarde. Argentina was also not willing to commit to Mr. Carstens.

On Tuesday, before her news conference in New Delhi, Ms. Lagarde met with the prime minister of India, Manmohan Singh, and the finance minister Pranab Mukherjee. Mr. Mukherjee later told reporters that India had not decided to back Ms. Lagarde, and that it would like to be part of a consensus of nations that chooses a new managing director for the fund.

Europeans and the Group of 8 wealthy economies have backed Ms. Lagarde to address concerns that a debt crisis in the euro monetary union, where most of the I.M.F.’s rescue programs are focused, could become more unwieldy if a European did not run the fund. The I.M.F. has lent about 100 billion euros to Greece, Ireland and Portugal to prevent a wider crisis.

“It would be a mistake at this point to give up the European leadership of the I.M.F.,” said a senior fund official, who would not be identified because the selection process was not complete. “The sovereign debt problems in Europe are still so severe that the international community doesn’t have one or two years for a new candidate to learn on the job,” the official said.

In an interview Monday, Mr. Carstens, whose résumé includes four years as a senior I.M.F. official, played down concerns that he would not be able to manage Europe’s debt crisis, saying he would bring a “pair of fresh eyes” to the situation.

He pledged to take new steps to improve the representation of emerging markets and developing countries at the I.M.F., calling those taken so far too “timid.”

Liz Alderman reported from Paris and Keith Bradsher from Hong Kong. Reporting was contributed by Heather Timmons in New Delhi, Elisabeth Malkin in Mexico City, Andrew E. Kramer in Moscow and Alexei Barrionuevo in São Paulo.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dd44981195ad2566d1f20fc4e2155f0f