April 19, 2024

Conversations: Wells Fargo Bankers Defend Their Small-Business Lending

Among the institutions that took criticism was Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest United States bank and the biggest lender to small businesses. But Marc Bernstein and Douglas Case, the bank’s two top executives for small-business lending, say the criticism was misplaced. In 2010, the bank made $14.9 billion in new loans to small companies, “just shy,” as Mr. Case put it, of a $16 billion goal for the year but more than the $14.5 billion it lent in 2009. In the first quarter of this year, the bank lent $3.7 billion, a 27 percent increase over the first quarter of 2010.

Wells Fargo, like many banks, defines a small business as any company with less than $20 million in annual revenue. But, said Mr. Bernstein: “Wells Fargo historically has put an awful lot of focus on lending to the smallest businesses. That’s why we’re the largest lender in loans under $100,000.”

Mr. Bernstein and Mr. Case spoke recently about lending through the economic crisis and maintaining the bank’s ties with struggling — and angry — customers. This is a condensed version of the conversation.

Q. Why has it been so difficult to approve loans?

MR. BERNSTEIN: First of all, a lot of businesses entered the recession with a great deal of debt. There was a 33 percent increase in the small-business loan balances nationally, between 2005 and 2008. Now that had grown slowly for years, but all of a sudden banks really went hog wild in terms of loaning to small businesses. Then, in some industries we saw sales fall as much as 30 percent. Now, imagine that small-business owner: they’re carrying much more debt than they’ve ever had, sales fall 30 percent, they have negative cash flow, they’re drawing down their reserves. It is highly likely they’re not going to survive another six months or 12 months in a scenario like that, and that’s the sort of thing we were dealing with at the height of the Great Recession. There were people coming to try and borrow more, who already had no visible means of being able to pay their existing debt.

Q. In the past, you have emphasized the consumer debt some of these business owners were carrying.

MR. BERNSTEIN: We saw that in what I call the bubble markets — Phoenix, Las Vegas, Southern California, Florida — a lot of small-business owners borrowed against their house to do whatever. Sometimes to expand their business, sometimes to do what other consumers did, to buy boats and other things. So when the real estate market collapsed, those people were in a very precarious situation as well.

Q. What happened to them?

MR. BERNSTEIN: Well, many businesses have closed in the Great Recession, and many bank loans to small businesses were charged off. The good news is that increasingly the small-business owners who have survived are having an easier and easier time paying their debts.

Q. How much of the Wells Fargo small-business loan portfolio had to be charged off?

MR. BERNSTEIN: From what I see from industry statistics, substantially less than our competitors. If you look at Bank of America’s quarterly earning statements, you’ll see that their charge-off rates got quite high for a while.

Q. Bank of America’s chief executive called his small-business portfolio a “disaster.” Was yours?

MR. BERNSTEIN: Not in my mind. Without meaning to criticize one of our fellow banks, our loan losses never got anywhere near, never approached even the neighborhood that Bank of America reported.

Q. Did you set a lending goal for this year?

MR. BERNSTEIN: We intend and expect loans to increase, but how much will depend on the economy. That’s one of the things that surprised us last year: the economy did not recover quite as quickly as we’d hoped, and loan demand didn’t recover quite as quickly as we hoped.

Q. How is your approval process different now than it was, say, a year ago?

MR. BERNSTEIN: I can tell you how it’s been different from two or three years ago. We use credit scoring — Wells Fargo was the pioneer in the United States in using credit scoring for small business, and it was a way to help us make more small-business loans than we were able to make before. But we have lenders looking at more decisions than we’ve ever had lenders look at before. It’s worth the time for a lender to save applications that the scorecard says are not quite good enough, people who maybe didn’t pass the cut-off score, but are not far from it. By the same token, sometimes the lenders look at applications that score high but have some serious problem.

Q. How does credit scoring work?

MR. BERNSTEIN: Credit scores are developed by looking at thousands of actual experiences where lenders made loans and determining what characteristics of the applicant predicted their likelihood of default. You look at 50 or 70 characteristics or more of an applicant — variables related to credit history, and also aspects of the business itself — and then you mathematically determine how does each of those contribute to the likelihood of going to loss.

Q. How often does an application that gets a second look end up getting approved?

MR. BERNSTEIN: That’s proprietary, but often enough that it’s worth our while to do it, and it’s a lot of peoples’ time.

Q. The financial industry market researchers Greenwich Associates surveyed small-business borrowers and found that the biggest banks not only failed to keep ties to small borrowers, they often actively severed them. Do you think Wells Fargo has to re-establish trust with the small-business marketplace?

MR. CASE: We never retreated from small business. And not to talk about competitors, but if you look at different approaches to small business, some came and went, and came back again, or will need to come back again. We’ve always been dedicated to this space, and this customer segment.

MR. BERNSTEIN: We are cognizant that the situation was ripe for people to feel like we weren’t serving them, and we tried to do whatever we could reasonably do to help our customers — and be very conscious of the fact even the customers we were calling to collect were often good people having tough times.

Q. Do you understand why so many small-business owners seem to feel big banks got a bailout and then did nothing to help small businesses?

MR. BERNSTEIN: A lot of people who frankly are not very good credit risks and who want a loan, I can understand their frustration. But Wells Fargo has been committed to small-business lending for a quite a while now, and we know here that we don’t help our customers, our communities or shareholders by declining a good loan.

Q. We get a lot of comments from readers who feel they have been mistreated by their banks, and some of them name Wells Fargo.

MR. BERNSTEIN: That’s hard to understand, because we’re definitely doing more small-business lending than other banks.

MR. CASE: We’re doing everything we can to say yes to every single loan that’s possibly approvable.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a5c82a211c57174f50133bc87969e2df

DealBook: As Citi Revives, Pandit Wins Big Pay Package

Vikram S. Pandit, Citigroup's chief executive, has led the bank from a federal bailout to five consecutive quarterly profits.Scott Eells/Bloomberg NewsVikram S. Pandit, Citigroup’s chief executive, has led the bank from a federal bailout to five consecutive quarterly profits.

8:58 p.m. | Updated

After spending years as one of Wall Street’s lowest paid chief executives, Vikram S. Pandit received a $23.2 million retention package that could catapult him to the top of the list.

Mr. Pandit earned a token annual salary of $1 as he steered Citigroup back into the black over the last two years. But on Wednesday, Citi’s board awarded him as much as $16.5 million in stock and options as well as a cash payment valued at more than $6.65 million as part of a special profit-sharing program for top executives.

The payouts will be spread over the next four years and are subject to Mr. Pandit’s meeting certain performance goals. They will be in addition to his regular salary and annual bonuses.

The announcement comes as Citigroup recently posted its fifth consecutive quarterly profit and completed a reverse stock split that, with the stroke of a pen, ratcheted its share price to more than $40 from $4.

Just three short years ago, Citigroup was in such dire straits that it twice needed to be rescued by the government. With the bank receiving more than $45 billion of federal aid, questions swirled about whether Mr. Pandit would remain at the helm. The large retention award seems to put those questions to rest.

“Vikram has done an outstanding job since coming on board as the financial crisis began,” Richard S. Parsons, Citigroup’s chairman, said in a statement. “This award is designed to retain Vikram as our C.E.O. and reward him for future performance benefiting the company and our shareholders.”

The retention package also could signify the unofficial end of the post-bailout pay era.

Most banks made minor adjustments to compensation practices amid the uproar over bonuses, shifting more pay into stock from cash but still awarding hefty sums. Others like Citigroup and Bank of America, which accepted multiple government rescues, needed a federal pay overseer to formally approve the awards for their 25 highest earners.

Mr. Pandit helped avert even more animosity toward his bankers when he pledged at a 2009 Congressional hearing to accept a mere $1 a year in salary until Citigroup turned a profit.

Even so, he continued to benefit from the Citi board’s largess. Throughout the crisis, Mr. Pandit was allowed to hold about $79.7 million in cash from the sale of Old Lane Partners, an investment firm he founded that was acquired by Citi in April 2007. Mr. Pandit would have to forfeit that money if he left the company before July 2011, giving the board a strong incentive to extend the retention package now.

Careful not to call it a bonus — Mr. Parsons referred to it as a “long-term, multiyear performance-based” award. Citigroup’s board broke the retention package into three parts. It also has the power to claw back any ill-gotten pay.

The largest part of the award is deferred stock valued at $10 million, which will vest in three equal installments from the end of 2013 to 2015. Mr. Pandit must meet largely subjective performance goals, including developing senior managers, satisfying certain regulatory goals like improved risk management and steering the bank toward a culture focused on so-called responsible finance.

The second part of the retention package is a special profit-sharing plan for top employees based on the company’s financials. If Citigroup’s core operations over the period earn at least $12 billion in pretax income during each of the next two years, Mr. Pandit could take home more than $6.65 million.

About two dozen or so other top executives participate in the program — including John P. Havens, Citi’s chief operating officer, who could receive almost $5.2 million. The bank earned $19 billion in pretax income last year.

Citigroup also awarded Mr. Pandit more than 500,000 options, which the company valued at as much as $6.5 million. The options carry strike prices ranging from $41.54 to $60. Citigroup shares currently trade at $41.24.

Citigroup’s board had signaled a pay increase for Mr. Pandit last fall when it granted stock awards to several of his top lieutenants and announced plans to restore his compensation so that it would be in line with other Wall Street chiefs.

In January, Citi’s board raised Mr. Pandit’s $1 salary to $1.75 million a year. The additional $5.5 million a year in retention payouts will set the stage for him to be paid as much, if not more, than his peers.

Bank of America’s chief executive, Brian T. Moynihan, received about $10.2 million in total compensation for 2010, according to Equilar, a compensation research and consulting firm. Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan’s chairman and chief executive, was awarded a $23.6 million pay package last year, making him the highest paid of any Wall Street chief. The heads of Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo were paid somewhere in between.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0b7802b45ffb191fc508da250bc71fdf

Hewlett-Packard to Report Its Earnings a Day Early

Separately, according to a memo obtained by Bloomberg News, H.P.’s chief executive, Léo Apotheker, told top executives that he was bracing for “another tough quarter” in the July period.

The company’s staffing plans are “unaffordable given the pressures on our business,” Mr. Apotheker wrote in the May 4 memo to deputies including Todd Bradley, executive vice president of the personal systems business, and its chief financial officer, Cathie Lesjak.

The third quarter is “going to be another tough quarter, one in which we will be driving hard for revenue and profit,” Mr. Apotheker wrote. “We have absolutely no room for profitless revenue or any discretionary expenditures.”

The memo indicates that the company continues to come under pressure and suggests job cuts are possible. In February, the company reported results that disappointed investors.

H.P. is expected to report profit excluding certain costs of $1.21 a share on sales of $31.5 billion, the average estimate of analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

“This is a continuation of what we’ve seen recently from H.P. — weakness on the top line, but better cost controls,” said Brian Marshall, an analyst at Gleacher Company in San Francisco.

Hewlett-Packard shares dropped as much as 5.1 percent to $37.76 in extended trading. Its stock closed down 61 cents to $39.80 on the New York Stock Exchange on Monday.

Hewlett-Packard also issued a disappointing forecast for the April period, casting a pall over Mr. Apotheker’s first quarter as chief and underscoring the challenges he faces. H.P.’s reliance on home-computer shoppers leaves the company vulnerable to a consumer slump, while its services unit is using acquisitions to take advantage of a shift to cloud computing.

Mr. Apotheker is stepping up an emphasis on higher-margin businesses including servers, storage computers and software, and deceasing its dependence on PCs, Mr. Marshall said.

Mr. Apotheker, who took over Nov. 1, outlined his strategy for the first time on March 14, announcing a stronger move into software and the expanding market for computing delivered via the Web. The company is starting a cloud-computing service that will let developers create applications for consumers and businesses that run on H.P. servers, Mr. Apotheker said at the time.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=507962d6c88819c453a5e4d07a308747