November 22, 2024

DealBook: Calculating Apple’s True U.S. Tax Rate

Some have suggested that Timothy D. Cook’s calculation of Apple's tax rate is based on a badly distorted measure of United States income.Jason Reed/ReutersSome have suggested that Timothy D. Cook’s calculation of Apple’s tax rate is based on a badly distorted measure of United States income.

One lesson from the Senate hearing about Apple’s offshore tax planning is that figuring out what a multinational company actually pays in taxes is harder than it should be. At the risk of sounding Clintonesque, it depends on what the meaning of “pays” is.

“The way I look at this is that Apple pays 30.5 percent of its profits in taxes in the United States,” Apple’s chief executive, Timothy D. Cook, said at the hearing. The statutory rate for companies is 35 percent, and in theory the government taxes corporations on their worldwide income at that rate. Mr. Cook explained that Apple paid less on a global basis because its profits generated abroad were taxed at a lower rate than in the United States.

The way I arrive the real taxes paid by Apple is a little different. As Bloomberg News highlighted recently, Mr. Cook’s calculation is based on a badly distorted measure of United States income.

Standard Deduction
View all posts


The whole point of the Senate hearing was to show how Apple shifts substantial amounts of its economic profits from the United States to Ireland, where they are taxed at a rate close to zero. Those profits are then sheltered in Ireland and untaxed unless Apple decides to bring the cash back to the United States.

These overseas profits create deferred tax liabilities that will not be taxed until the cash is repatriated. But Apple is reluctant to repatriate its overseas cash; it would rather lobby for another tax holiday and bring the cash back tax-free. An added benefit of a tax holiday for Apple is that it would provide a quick jump in reported earnings when the accounting entry for the deferred tax liability is reversed.

My point is that politicians and voters are interested in a very different question than Apple’s shareholders. Shareholders are indifferent to whether a dollar of tax is paid to the Treasury Department or to a foreign government and credited in full by the American tax system. Either way, it’s a dollar that won’t be distributed to the shareholders.

But as voters we care about actual dollars flowing to the federal government. You can’t finance a food stamp program with foreign tax credits.

Most of us think of paying taxes as writing a check to the government or having money withheld from a paycheck. By this common sense measure, how much tax does Apple actually pay?

The number can be calculated from the company’s tax return, but tax returns are not public. Felix Salmon of Reuters has suggested that public companies file their tax returns with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The problem is that many companies would resist disclosing information that could offer competitors insight into company strategy, including tax avoidance strategies.

It’s sometimes possible to dig through a company’s filings and figure out the amount of cash paid in taxes, but accounting conventions make the task onerous and imprecise. It shouldn’t be this hard.

Here’s my suggestion. Congress should require every large American company to disclose to the public a simple number each year, which I would call the “true U.S. tax rate”: (1) the amount of cash tax payments to the Treasury Department divided by (2) worldwide pretax book income. To account for fluctuations, we might calculate this number over a three-year period.

According to the Senate report, Apple paid $5.3 billion to the Treasury Department in the fiscal years 2009 to 2011. Its worldwide pretax book income over that period was about $65 billion. Thus, Apple’s “true U.S. tax rate,” according to my own calculation, was 8.2 percent.

Companies might complain that this figure is deceptive, as it does not account for foreign taxes paid and credited in the United States, or book-tax differences like accelerated depreciation. But so what?

The point of the disclosure is to allow voters and policy makers an easy way to understand how well the tax system is working and what each corporation contributes to the public coffers.


Victor Fleischer is a professor at the University of Colorado Law School, where he teaches partnership tax, tax policy and deals. Twitter: @vicfleischer


This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: June 4, 2013

An earlier version of this column referred incorrectly to Mr. Cook’s estimate of Apple’s 2012 tax liability. It does not include deferred tax liabilities. According to Mr. Cook’s written testimony, the estimate was based on “a reflection of federal taxes Apple paid against U.S. pretax earnings, not a calculation of Apple’s final tax liability for FY 2012.”

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/06/04/calculating-apples-true-u-s-tax-rate/?partner=rss&emc=rss

U.S. Economy Speeds Up, but Less Than Forecast

The American economy sped up in the first quarter of this year, with output expanding at an annual pace of 2.5 percent, according to a Commerce Department report released Friday. The number was lower than the 3 percent forecasters had been expecting.

While faster growth of any kind is welcome, much of the acceleration in gross domestic product was probably a result of unusually slow growth at the end of 2012, when the economy grew at an annual pace of just 0.4 percent. Growth in the fourth quarter had been dragged down by reduced restocking of businesses’ inventories, for example, and in the first quarter businesses made up for this by adding much more to their shelves.

Consumer spending was up too, despite fears that the lapse of the temporary payroll tax holiday at the start of the year would hold back how much consumers were willing to spend. It’s unclear whether consumers will continue to spend as freely in the months ahead, once they start to feel the pinch of this effective tax hike, particularly if wages continue to stagnate.

Exports, residential investment (housing, essentially) and business spending on equipment and software also rose.

Economists have expressed concern that the pace of growth may have started out strong in 2013 but slowed by the end of the first quarter, given recent disappointing reports about economic indicators in March. Employment slowed dramatically in March, for example, and orders for durable goods like aircrafts fell more than analysts had expected.

Additionally, across-the-board federal spending cuts, enacted as part of Congress’s so-called sequester, are likely to weigh on growth going forward. In the first quarter of this year, government spending fell at an annual rate of 8.4 percent, after a decrease of 14.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012.

“With fiscal tightening weighing on the spring and summer quarters, we expect weaker growth ahead,” Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomic Advisers, said in a note to clients said before the report. “We have seen good quarters before, but what counts is sustainability, and on that score we are deeply unconvinced.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/27/business/economy/us-economy-grew-at-2-5-rate-in-first-quarter.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Shares Decline Sharply Amid Uncertainty

In afternoon trading, the three main market indexes had fallen about 2 percent. The Standard Poor’s index of 500 stocks and the Dow Jones industrial average were each down about 2.3 percent, and the Nasdaq composite index was down 1.9 percent.

Stocks in the United States followed Europe, where the European Central Bank said Jürgen Stark, a German who sits on the executive board of the E.C.B. and is known as an opponent of the bank’s bond-buying program, will resign his post.

The DAX in Germany fell 4 percent. The FTSE 100 in Britain closed down 2.4 percent. The Euro Stoxx 50 index was down 4.2 percent and the CAC 40 index in France was down 3.6 percent.

Paul Ballew, a former Federal Reserve economist and now chief economist at Nationwide, said short-term interest rates in Greece were reflecting increased uncertainty in Europe as well as speculation over whether there would be adequate restructuring in that nation’s economy to address its problems.

There was also evidence of a flight to safety among investors, in which they shed stocks for bonds. Yields on Germany’s 10-year bonds declined, and the United States Treasury’s 10-year note yield fell to 1.93 percent, from 1.98 percent late Thursday, after touching a low of 1.89 percent. “Issue number two is the continued anxiety in the United States that the recovery continues to stall, and that we will not be getting growth as strong as we would need in terms of corporate profits,” said Mr. Ballew.

“Even yesterday’s speech raises questions of whether there will be support for fiscal policy,” he said about the president’s jobs address.

Mr. Obama’s plan focused on generating jobs and included a number of tax cuts and spending proposals, like an extension and expansion of the cut in payroll taxes and a tax holiday for small businesses for hiring new employees. The president was to send a detailed proposal to Congress in a week.

Mr. Ballew said that questions persisted about how much of the proposal would pass.

In addition, investors were considering whether fiscal or monetary policy could come to the rescue of the economy as they await the Federal Reserve policy meeting later this month. Stocks were sharply lower on Thursday after the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben S. Bernanke, gave no new signs that there would be fresh stimulus measures.

“If you are in the market right now, you’ve got uncertainty on top of uncertainty on top of uncertainty,” Mr. Ballew said. “You have got a pretty toxic mix.”

The stock declines on Friday set the markets on track to extend their year- and month-to-date declines. And Clark Yingst, the chief market analyst at Joseph Gunnar, said that the fall of the euro against the dollar on Friday, resulting in a six-month low, suggested that the broader market as measured by the S.P. 500 had not yet completed its recent correction.

He said a rally earlier in the week in stocks was partially in anticipation of Mr. Bernanke’s and Mr. Obama’s speeches, and their possible policy tools that could be in the making.

“The market just doesn’t believe that it is going to be passed by that Republican house,” Mr. Yingst said of Mr. Obama’s speech.

He noted that the United States bond’s 10-year price recently touched record highs, with the yield lower than where it was in the midst of the global financial meltdown, 2.055 percent in December 2008.

“It is an indication that bond investors clearly see a significant slowdown in the U.S. economy,” he said, “and bond investors think it is going to remain very slow, very sluggish.”

Jack Ewing contributed reporting from Frankfurt.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/10/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Letters: A Tax Holiday, Rethought

Opinion »

The Thread: Dead in the Water?

The bizarre controversy surrounding the flotilla to Gaza gets washed ashore in Greece.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b2b6242ed391abac5aea680048317668