November 18, 2024

You’re the Boss Blog: A ‘Not-to-Do’ List for Recent College Graduates

College graduation: lofty commencement speeches are given, bright futures anticipated and, for some lucky college graduates, new jobs await. While commencement addresses may be inspiring, I wish someone would take the opportunity to deliver a more practical message to new college graduates who are about to enter the work force. It would go something like this:

“Congratulations. You’ve just earned your college degree. I’m glad to be here as the first person to speak to you as college graduates. I have good news and bad news. First, the bad news: Despite your newly obtained degree, you don’t know anything. You have no skills. If you are really lucky, you will soon land your first job. You are not entitled to that job. Quite the contrary, there are many people just like you who would love to have that job. If you get it, you should be grateful for your good fortune and make the most of it. It will be hard work, sometimes backbreaking work, and you may feel that the work is beneath you. But the reality is that nothing is beneath you, because you don’t know anything — yet.

Now, the good news: You live in the United States of America, the greatest country in the world. If you work really, really hard, if you are happy to start at the bottom and work your way up, if you are ready to grind and scratch and claw, and if you catch a bit of luck, anything is possible. Anybody can be anything in America. You just have to be willing to learn fast from those around you and work really hard.”

Unfortunately, I was not invited to deliver any commencement speeches this year. So I’m doing the next best thing and reflecting in this post on my first job. I hope that it can provide a bit of help and guidance.

I’ll start with a summary: I totally whiffed on my first job experience. When I graduated from college, I knew nothing, had no skills and was not owed anything. But that’s not how I felt at the time.

I had just graduated from the Wharton School, the country’s oldest undergraduate business school and one that consistently lands the top slot in college rankings. I studied entrepreneurial management and tried to drop out of school to start a business during the winter break of my junior year. (Thankfully, my parents forced me to stay in school.) I finished my studies early in my senior year and spent the remaining weeks waking up early to read The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, and then using the rest of the day to consume voluminous amounts of coffee while devouring Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged.” I was biding my time until I left academia to do what I thought I was meant to do: run a business.

Like all Wharton undergraduates, I interviewed with companies that came calling on campus: investment banks, strategy consulting firms and technology companies. At the time (I graduated in 1997), there was a company called Trilogy, based in Austin, Tex., that was getting a lot of press. Trilogy had been started by Joe Liemandt, who dropped out of Stanford to start an enterprise software company that was selling multimillion dollar software applications to big companies like Boeing, Sun Microsystems and Hewlett-Packard. While the software seemed esoteric — who understands what product configuration software does and why another company would spend millions of dollars for it? — Joe’s success was tangible. He was on the covers of business magazines and was ranked as one of Fortune’s 40 richest under 40 in 2001. He was the type of entrepreneur from whom I could have learned a tremendous amount.

But I didn’t think there was anything I needed to learn.

I was recruited to Trilogy by Ajay Agarwal. Before joining Trilogy, Ajay had graduated from Stanford, then Harvard Business School and worked in strategy consulting at McKinsey Company. Today, Ajay is a managing director at the venture capital firm Bain Capital Ventures. Ajay’s recruiting pitch was particularly compelling: come to Trilogy to work in an entrepreneurial environment with extremely smart people. The problem was that I believed I was ready to be the entrepreneur immediately.

Still, I accepted the job, and after a summer schedule meant to shed a wanderlust that I assume most college seniors have, I moved to Austin. I was paired with Jason Wesbecher, another Wharton undergraduate who had been working at Trilogy for about six months. (Today, Jason is the founder and chief executive of Handshakez in Austin.) Jason was the epitome of inherent intelligence, hard work and focus. He was driven to acquire customers for Trilogy, understanding that revenue was the lifeblood of a fast-growing start-up. At the time, I could not have been less impressed with that role.

I was ready to start a company. I felt it was my destiny to do so. It was what I had dreamed about since I was a child. In retrospect, I was terribly, utterly, naïve. Now, 16 years later, here are my reflections:

1. I knew nothing. Yes, it is true I studied business in college, and the college I went to is a good one (if you were to ask Donald Trump, it is without question the best). But there is a vast difference between studying business and doing business. Until I had actually done it, I knew nothing at all.

2. I didn’t know that I didn’t know anything. This is actually worse than not knowing anything. I thought that I had something to contribute. In fact, I thought that my presence at Trilogy was a real gift to the company. I was wrong.

3. I missed the opportunity to learn. Because I believed that I already knew everything, I missed the chance to learn from the incredibly smart people who did know something. Trilogy was an exceptionally good company at recruiting. It produced a Trilogy Mafia well before anyone talked about the Paypal Mafia. Former Trilogians have gone on to accomplish absolutely amazing things. And the people I had the chance to work with directly — Joe, Ajay, Jason and many others — were all truly extraordinary businessmen.

4. I thought I was entitled to something. Somehow, I arrived at Trilogy thinking that it was to their great benefit to have me as an employee. As a result, I thought I was entitled to the opportunity of doing something “strategic.” What I came to understand afterward was that many college graduates would have loved to have that job, and that it was my opportunity, but not my right, and certainly not something to take for granted.

5. I was confused about the meaning of hard work. I thought I should spend my time thinking big thoughts. I assumed that if I were in the office a lot, I must have been working hard. I didn’t know that I should have been doing what Jason was doing — the hard work of calling potential customers, learning about their problems and presenting our solutions. That was hard work and meaningful work. I didn’t realize it until after I had left.

My time at Trilogy was a missed opportunity. I realized it at the annual Trilogy Prom, where the entire company gathered at a luxurious location to celebrate the year’s success and to recognize extraordinary individual performance. Jason (deservedly) won a Trilogy Star Award based on his exceptional contribution to the company. As I watched him walk to the front of the room to accept his prize, I was of mixed emotion: proud of him but disappointed with myself. The experience proved to be a turning point.

After just over a year at the company, I decided to leave. Thankfully, I started to figure out what it took to achieve success. It was Jason’s focus and do-whatever-it-takes attitude that caused me to re-evaluate my own disposition. Once I did, I realized that I needed to start afresh. I looked for a small start-up where I could join on the ground floor. If I proved my mettle and the company grew, I might be able to take on more and more responsibility, learning essential skills to start my own company someday.

Next week, I’ll talk about my second job experience — what I did when I joined Callidus Software.

Bryan Burkhart is a founder of H.Bloom. You can follow him on Twitter.

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/10/a-not-to-do-list-for-recent-college-graduates/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Economix Blog: The Happiest States of America: North Dakota on the Rise

North Dakota is not only the most employment-rich state in the country. It’s also on its way to becoming the happiest.

According to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, based on a daily survey of Americans that tries to measure the elements of “the good life,” North Dakota is the second happiest state, behind Hawaii. (Hawaii has been the happiest state for a while now.) North Dakota has been in the Top 10 list for the last couple of years, but has been steadily climbing its way upward.

North Dakota’s Well-Being Index score has also moved up proportionally more than any other state in the last year.

CATHERINE RAMPELL

CATHERINE RAMPELL

Dollars to doughnuts.

The index is based on an average of six component indices, which reflect Americans’ answers to questions about how they evaluate their lives; their emotional health; how they feel about their work environment; their physical health; the kinds of healthy behaviors they do (or don’t) engage in; and how much access they have to basic necessities. Perhaps not surprisingly, given the state’s fleet-footed job growth, North Dakota’s score benefited most from respondents’ views of their work environment.

Poor West Virginia once again claimed the lowest rank in the latest Well-Being Index report, a spot where it has languished for several years. In general, Southern and Rust Belt states rank lowest on this index, while the Plains states and Pacific states rank best, as shown in the interactive map above.

The latest scores are based on daily polls conducted from January through June 2011, in which more than 177,000 American adults were surveyed.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=59458494072f6b314d98dfd50c749964

Administration Defends Effort on Debt After Credit Warning

Mr. Obama made his remarks at the start of a campaign to promote his ideas for reducing the deficit, while Mr. Geithner made the rounds of business television programs.

The appearances came a day after the S.P. revised its outlook on the country’s Triple AAA rating — the highest level — to negative from stable, an announcement loaded with political implications because it cited the need for Republicans and Democrats to agree on a plan to reduce the deficit.

As Mr. Geithner took the lead for the administration in responding to the S.P. warning, President Obama focused on the deficit. In his first stop, at a town hall meeting in Virginia, Mr. Obama said there was “general agreement” between Democrats and Republicans on the need to cut spending by about $4 trillion over the medium term.

But “it won’t be easy. There are going to be some fierce disagreements,” said Mr. Obama, who is also planning stops this week in California and Nevada.

Both President Obama and Republican lawmakers have suggested plans to cut the federal deficit by at least $4 trillion over the next 10 to 12 years, but disagree on methods.

In his comments, Mr. Geithner tried to reassure investors that the Democrats and Republicans would reach a deal, a concern at the heart of the S.P.’s reasoning for lowering its outlook.

He said there was “no risk” that the United States would lose its AAA credit rating and that investors were still confident in government bonds, strongly disagreeing with the negative assessment of the nation’s outlook by the Standard Poor’s ratings agency.

“Again, if you look — if you listen carefully now, you see the leadership of the United States of America, the president, the Republican leadership in both houses and the Democrats recognizing now that this is the right thing to do for the economy,” Mr. Geithner said according to a transcript of the Fox Business News interview.

Representative Eric Cantor, Republican of Virginia and House majority leader, who on Monday called the S.P. decision a “wake-up call,” said on Tuesday that the government was a “fiscal train wreck” with more than $14 trillion in debt.

“House Republicans have taken an honest, responsible approach to confront the debt crisis facing our nation,” he wrote in an opinion article published by The Culpeper Star Exponent in Virginia.

In its warning, the S.P. questioned whether government leaders would be able to agree on how to address the medium- and long-term budget challenges by 2013.

But Mr. Geithner said that a long-term deficit reduction plan can be in place before the 2012 election: “Absolutely,” he replied in response to a question. “We have a chance to make progress on that just in the next couple of months.”

“Our challenge now is to lock that in, in terms of reforms that Congress passes, so that people around the world will look at the United States and know that we’re not going to get behind the problem, we’re going to get ahead of it,” Mr. Geithner said in an interview on CNBC.

Mr. Geithner also said that he did not think the S.P. decision accelerated the need for a vote on the debt ceiling.

“There is a lot of confidence in the capacity of this economy to grow to make sure that we can meet our commitments or obligations,” Mr. Geithner told Bloomberg Television. “You can see that in that price at which we borrow every day, but we have to earn that confidence.”

When asked whether foreign buyers of United States debt had to be reassured, he added: ”Absolutely not. Look at the price at which we borrow.”

Anthony G. Valeri, a senior vice president and market strategist for LPL Financial, said there was little movement in the bond market on Tuesday, with the 10-year yield at 3.32 percent in the early afternoon and narrower credit default swaps, suggesting that the market does not see the default risk changing for United States Treasuries.

As such, he said that Mr. Geithner’s appearances seemed intended to ease political concerns rather than financial ones.

“I think he is trying to do potential damage control in Treasuries,” Mr. Valeri said. “Not that he needed to. The bond market saw right through the S..P move.”

“I think the market has moved on, and we have also got the Easter and Passover holidays this week,” he said.

The Dow Jones industrial average was up 0.50 percent, after a decline of more than 1 percent the previous day, less than two hours before the close of trading. The broader S. P. 500-stock index was up 0.46 percent, and the technology-heavy Nasdaq gained 0.14 percent. The three indexes posted their largest one-day drop in more than a month on Monday after the announcement.

In the Asia-Pacific region, stocks fell broadly but shares rebounded in Europe, after a sharp decline on Monday.

The S.P. announcement reverberated in global economies.

China’s foreign ministry said in a statement on its Web site on Tuesday that the United States must take “responsible” measures to protect investors in its debt.

It said that United States debt “reflects the credibility” of the government, and said China hoped the United States takes “responsible” measures to safeguard the interests of investors.

Government officials in Japan voiced their support of the United States.

“The United States is tackling fiscal issues in various ways, so I still think U.S. Treasuries are basically an attractive product for us,” Japan’s finance minister, Yoshihiko Noda , said, according to Reuters.

Bettina Wassener contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1ee1317a0292bb00c61ecae6105d178c