November 15, 2024

U.S. Economy Unexpectedly Contracted in Fourth Quarter

The United States economy contracted unexpectedly in the final quarter of 2012, hurt by weaker exports, a drop in military spending and a slower buildup in inventories.

The Commerce Department said Wednesday that economic output in the quarter fell at an annual rate of 0.1 percent, compared with growth of a 3.1 percent pace in the third quarter.

It marked the economy’s worst performance since the second quarter of 2009.

The third-quarter figures had been bolstered by a big jump in inventories, so part of the slowdown was expected as businesses eased back in the fourth quarter. Still, the magnitude of the pullback caught economists by surprise.

Businesses may also have cut back on production because of the fiscal uncertainty in Washington, economists said. In addition, exports have been hurt by slower growth overseas, especially in Europe.

Before Wednesday’s announcement, the consensus estimate among economists for fourth-quarter growth stood at 1.1 percent.

Because data for exports and inventories tends to be volatile, there was a wide range in the predictions. For example, while JPMorgan anticipated growth of 0.4 percent for the fourth quarter, Barclays expected a 1.5 percent increase.

This was the Commerce Department’s first estimate of fourth-quarter growth; revisions are due in February and March, so the final figure could go up or down significantly.

But economists expect that slow growth has continued into the first quarter of 2013, with the consensus estimate currently calling for output to rise at an annual rate of 1.5 percent.

Consumers have been more cautious recently, especially because of a tw0-percentage-point increase in payroll taxes beginning this month that will cost a worker earning $50,000 a year an extra $1,000 annually. That was reflected in a consumer confidence survey released Tuesday by the Conference Board, which reported a sharp downturn in January that it attributed in part to financial anxiety arising from a reduction in take-home pay.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/business/economy/us-economy-unexpectedly-contracted-in-fourth-quarter.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Off the Charts: An Uneven Recovery in the World’s Cities

— Matthew 20:16

SO it was in the Great Recession, according to a new survey of the world’s 300 largest metropolitan areas.

None of the wealthiest areas in the world escaped the downturn, and most of them have yet to fully recover more than four years after the downturn began. But nearly half of the poorest areas never suffered any decline, and most of those that did have recovered.

The survey, released by the Metropolitan Policy Program of the Brookings Institution, found that this year the pattern began to change. Growth rates slowed from 2011 in most areas, but the trend was less pronounced in wealthier areas. North America was the only region where more than half of the metropolitan areas grew faster than they had in 2011.

“The global metropolitan economy is fragile and many problems, like the falling euro zone and the slowdown of emerging economies, are here to stay, at least for the immediate future,” said Emilia Istrate, an associate fellow at Brookings. “Despite their challenges, U.S. metro economies are helping to power the global recovery.”

The survey looked at two measures of growth — gross domestic product and jobs — but did so in slightly different ways. It measured the change in per-capita G.D.P. but looked at total employment without adjusting for population change.

Within the United States, only three of the 76 metro areas measured are estimated to have fully recovered in both employment and per capita G.D.P. — Dallas, Pittsburgh and Knoxville, Tenn. Within the euro zone, nearly all major metro areas in Germany and Austria have recovered, but none outside those countries have done so. Nor have any of the major British areas.

Similarly, while more than three-quarters of the 48 Chinese areas have fully recovered, if they declined at all, none of the 12 Japanese areas have done so. While growth slowed this year in China, it still dominated the list of the fastest-growing regions.

The 300 metropolitan areas in the survey are the largest in the world in terms of G.D.P. and together account for nearly one-half of global output, Brookings said. But they include just 19 percent of the world population. The 2012 figures were estimated by Brookings based on data from Oxford Economics, Moody’s Analytics and the United States Census Bureau.

The accompanying charts break down the results by both wealth and region. Brookings found that 40 of the 300 regions did not suffer even one annual decline in employment or per capita G.D.P. from 2008 through 2012. Most of them were in the bottom fifth of areas, as measured by per capita G.D.P. in 2007, before the recession began. None were in the areas that made up the wealthiest half of the world.

The charts show the proportion of areas that experienced no decline, as well as the proportion that have fully recovered in both economic growth and employment and those that recovered by one measure but not the other. While most fell in 2008 and later made at least partial recoveries, there are a few, notably in Australia, that escaped pain early on but declined this year as Chinese growth — and demand for some imports — slowed.

This is the third year that Brookings has done the study, although it includes more areas than the previous studies did. One sad fact remained constant. Athens was the worst performer in 2012, as it had been in the previous years. The good news, if you can call it that, is that things are getting worse more slowly. Brookings estimates employment in the Athens area declined 6.9 percent in 2012, while per capita G.D.P. fell 5.1 percent. Both declines are greater than in any other area this year, but they are smaller than the ones Athens recorded in 2011.

Floyd Norris comments on finance and the economy at nytimes.com/economix.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/01/business/economy/an-uneven-recovery-in-the-worlds-cities.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bits Blog: The China-U.S. Smartphone Gap Grows Larger

Smartphones are so popular here that it’s difficult to avoid seeing one, and in China, these devices are poised to become even more widespread.

This year, China will account for 26.5 percent of all smartphone shipments, compared to 17.8 percent in the United States, according to a forecast by the International Data Corporation, a research firm.

China has surpassed the United States in smartphone sales in the past. However, only in the first quarter of this year did it become clear that the smartphone gap between China and the United States would become a “long-lasting gulf that won’t be bridged,” said Kevin Restivo, a senior research analyst with IDC.

What’s driving the spike in China? Cheaper Android smartphones priced below $200, like those made by Huawei, according to IDC. Apple’s iPhone has also been a big hit among Chinese customers — during Apple’s fiscal second quarter, sales of the iPhone there accounted for 20 percent of the company’s revenue. However, over all, Android phones are outselling the iPhone by about eight times in China, according to Mr. Restivo, which you would expect because Google’s operating system is available on a wider array of products at lower prices.

China’s overtaking of the United States in smartphones doesn’t mean sales here are grinding to a halt, says Ramon Llamas, a senior research analyst at IDC, in a statement. Smartphones already account for the majority of phone sales in the United States, so a slowdown was expected, he said.

Article source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/30/china-smartphone-sales/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Merger Costs Weigh on United Continental

The nation’s top carrier, United Continental, narrowed its fourth-quarter net loss to $138 million, an improvement from its loss of $325 million in the year-earlier period, the company said Thursday.

The loss was attributed largely to costs associated with the 2010 merger of United Airlines and Continental Airlines. Revenue was up 5.5 percent, to $8.9 billion, in the quarter.

The company recorded a full-year profit of $840 million, down 12 percent from the previous year.

Besides United Continental, the nation’s other top airlines — Delta Air Lines, US Airways and Southwest Airlines — all turned a profit last year despite a dismal global economy and record-high fuel prices.

By raising ticket prices and flying fewer planes, the airlines hope they can raise revenue this year faster than fuel prices can rise, while cutting capacity to offset a slowdown in demand.

On Wednesday, Delta Air Lines said fourth-quarter profit surged to $425 million, up from $19 million in the year-earlier period. In the quarter, the company filled nearly 82 percent of its seats while it reduced capacity by 3.5 percent. Revenue per passenger rose 12 percent as a result of higher ticket prices.

Delta reduced its capacity throughout most of its destinations, especially Europe, which saw a 10 percent drop. Latin America was a rare exception as Delta increased capacity there by 5 percent. The company emphasized it would continue to reduce its capacity in the first quarter by 3 to 5 percent.

Southwest Airlines saw its net income grow 16 percent in the fourth quarter, to $152 million, with a 32 percent jump in revenue to $4.1 billion. US Airways, for its part, said its net income declined by 35 percent to $18 million in the fourth quarter. Revenue in that period rose 8.5 percent to $3.2 billion.

So far, the airlines expect these gains to continue in the first quarter of 2012.

“If anything, the new year has seen a step up in business demand,” the US Airways president, Scott Kirby, said on a conference call Wednesday. “The pricing environment remains strong and the industry is successfully recovering high fuel prices.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=4974966be558a44ebea7743bf98dd400

DealBook: Weak Quarter Weighs on JPMorgan’s 2011 Profit

JPMorgan Chase's credit card business and commercial lending operation showed signs of improving.Justin Sullivan/Getty ImagesJPMorgan Chase’s credit card business and commercial lending operation showed signs of improving.

JPMorgan Chase kicked off bank earnings season on Friday with news that its quarterly profit dropped 23 percent last year, results that weighed on the full-year profit.

The bank turned a $19 billion profit in 2011, up 9 percent from $17.4 billion a year earlier, as its credit card business and commercial lending operation showed signs of improving. The results amounted to $4.48 a share, up from $3.96 a share last year.

But the profit engine stalled in the fourth quarter, when JPMorgan earned $3.7 billion, or 90 cents a share, down 23 percent from the same quarter a year earlier. The results matched analysts’ estimates for the period.

The fourth-quarter slump was owed in part to declining revenue and a slowdown in JPMorgan’s sprawling investment bank, which suffered from the sluggish economic recovery in the United States and concerns that the European debt crisis would sweep across the Continent.

The investment bank booked a $567 million accounting loss in the fourth quarter tied to the perceived riskiness of its own debt, reversing a one-time gain from the previous quarter that propped up earnings across Wall Street. In all, the unit’s profit sank 52 percent to $726 million in the fourth quarter.

Shares of JPMorgan were down more than 3 percent, to about $35.55, in morning trading.

Despite the turmoil in the fourth quarter, Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan’s chairman and chief executive, highlighted the firm’s gradual progress since the financial crisis. He also sounded a note of cautious optimism about the broader economic recovery.

“We have a mild recovery that might actually be strengthening,” Mr. Dimon said in a conference call with reporters, adding that the comeback appears to be “broad.”

The bank’s earnings report comes a day after Mr. Dimon announced the second major shuffling of his management team in a year. Among the changes, Jay Mandelbaum, head of strategy and business development, will leave the bank. And Barry Zubrow, JPMorgan’s risk management chief who guided the bank through the financial crisis, will now head corporate regulatory affairs.

With the steady growth in profit last year, JPMorgan has emerged from the crisis as one of Wall Street’s most dominant firms. In 2011, JPMorgan stripped Bank of America of its title as the nation’s biggest bank by assets. Bank of America is still struggling to shed the legacy of the subprime mortgage mess.

“JPMorgan is in the best position for no other reason than they don’t have the troubles that Bank of America has,” said Jim Sinegal, an analyst with the research firm Morningstar.

While JPMorgan had some recent bright spots in its core businesses, the gains were padded by the bank’s decision to set aside $730 million in fewer reserves for loan losses. Additions to the reserve are an expense.

Much of the change came from reserves held for the bank’s credit card portfolio, which has steadily improved. The move also benefited Chase Retail Financial Services, the bank’s consumer banking arm that offers everything from mortgages to checking accounts. The unit earned $533 million in the fourth quarter, up from $459 million a year earlier.

Commercial lending was a particular strong point for the bank. The unit’s profit rose to a record $643 million, a 21 percent increase from the prior year, as lending to corporations grew for the sixth consecutive quarter.

“I believe that you are seeing real loan growth,” Mr. Dimon said on the conference call. “And I think that will continue.”

But his bank’s earnings improvement last year was overshadowed by the fourth-quarter woes and a drop in revenue. Revenue fell to $99.8 billion, down from $104.8 billion last year, as new federal rules reined in fees tied to overdrafts and debit cards. The $567 million accounting loss also weighed down revenue.

The revenue struggles are not unique to JPMorgan, a diversified bank seen as a gauge for the performance of Wall Street. When the nation’s other big banks — Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America — report earnings next week, most are expected to detail similar slowdowns in revenue.

“It’s hard to think of a bright spot on the revenue side,” Mr. Sinegal said. “That issue is going to linger.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d710d9b241fa91b827c3b950d0151213

Manufacturing in China Grows Only Slightly in December

BEIJING — Big manufacturers in China narrowly avoided a contraction in December a survey showed Sunday, but downward risks persist and suggest that the Chinese economy will need fresh policy support to counter a slowdown in growth.

The official purchasing managers’ index, which is compiled by the China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing on behalf of the National Bureau of Statistics, rose to 50.3 in December from 49 in November.

That indicated a slight expansion in business activity in the vast Chinese factory sector, but the reading was barely above 50, which separates expansion from contraction.

The index fell below 50 in November for the first time since early 2009.

Analysts had expected the official purchasing index to be at 49.1 in December.

“The rebound in the December P.M.I. shows that there will be no big slowdown in the Chinese economy,” Zhang Liqun, a researcher with the Development Research Center of the State Council, wrote in a statement accompanying the survey.

The economy faces downward pressure, but there are positive elements that could underpin growth, the researcher said.

The new orders subindex rose to 49.8 in December, from 47.8 in November, while the subindex for new export orders rose to 48.6 from 45.6 in November.

A similar survey Friday by HSBC and Markit, a British data provider, which captures data from smaller factories, moved up to 48.7 in December from a 32-month low of 47.7 in November.

But the private survey signaled a modest contraction in activity on the month.

Despite the rise in the official survey, it is stuck near its weakest levels since early 2009.

Economists at Citibank said China was more likely to take policy steps to combat what the bank saw as a tangible slowing of economic activity.

“Accumulating evidence of economic weakness would herald more policy easing in the months ahead, starting with another” required reserve ratio cut by the Chinese New Year, Citibank said in a note to clients.

“Although domestic consumption held up steadily, its contribution may have been more than offset by weakened investment activity and deteriorating foreign trade conditions,” the note said.

China’s central bank is in the spotlight, with many analysts expecting that it will soon announce a cut in the required reserve ratio that it demands commercial lenders hold.

The central bank cut the ratio by 0.5 percentage points on Nov. 30 from a record high of 21.5 percent.

Cutting the ratio frees up funds that could be used for lending to support growth, but China’s leaders remain wary of relaxing their grip too soon on inflation.

The official survey showed that a significant drop in price pressures in November did not follow through to December.

The prices subindex of the official purchasing managers’ index rose to 47.1 from 44.4 in November.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/business/global/02iht-yuan02.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Russia Unexpectedly Reduces Its Main Interest Rate

Russia unexpectedly reduced its benchmark rate on Friday, suggesting that policy makers believed a global economic slump posed greater risks than inflation to the country, the world’s biggest energy exporter.

The refinancing rate was reduced to 8 percent from 8.25 percent, Bank Rossii said in a statement on its Web site. The move was forecast by two of 22 economists in a Bloomberg survey. Separately, the difference between the main lending and deposit rates was cut a quarter-point to 1.25 percentage points, the narrowest ever.

Russia joins nations like Brazil and Indonesia that are easing borrowing costs to manage the fallout from a slowdown in China and Europe’s deepening debt crisis. Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin, who will run for president next year, is seeking annual expansion of as much as 7 percent while the central bank plans to reduce inflation to at least 5 percent by 2014.

“The central bank noticeably softened the tone of its statement, signaling that it will pay more attention to economic risks going forward,” Dmitry Polevoy, chief economist at the ING Group in Moscow, said Friday.

The ruble extended gains against the dollar after the announcement and closed 0.5 percent stronger at 31.21 in Moscow. The currency has weakened 6.8 percent against the central bank’s target dollar-euro basket since the end of July.

Investors are betting interest rates will remain unchanged over the next three months, compared with expectations of as much as 21 basis points of increases on Nov. 24, according to forward-rate agreements tracked by Bloomberg.

The central bank chairman, Sergey Ignatiev, said on Thursday that he was surprised by the slow inflation even as the ruble’s recent slump might affect price growth next month. Risks to economic expansion “are strengthening” while inflation is at an acceptable level, Alexei Ulyukayev, a central bank first deputy chairman, said last week.

The overnight auction-based repurchase rate, Bank Rossii’s main lending tool, will stay at 5.25 percent and the overnight deposit rate, used to withdraw cash, will increase a quarter-point to 4 percent.

Russia’s ruble bonds due in 2016 rose, pushing the yield 0.04 percentage points lower to 8.12 percent.

The shortage of rubles in the banking system since September will help curb inflation next year, policy makers said in the statement. The government’s decision to delay price increases for utilities to July from January will bring a “substantial slowdown in the annual inflation rate” early next year, according to the statement.

Inflation eased to 6.4 percent from a year earlier as of Dec. 19, down from 6.8 percent in November, the regulator said. Year-to-date price growth was at 6 percent as of that date, the government said this week.

Record-low inflation may help Mr. Putin solidify voter support after his ruling United Russia party won less than half of the vote in a Dec. 4 parliamentary poll. Tens of thousands of people joined protests in Moscow after accusations of ballot-box stuffing.

Inflation at the lowest since August 2010 is bolstering purchasing power and helping shelter the economy from a slowdown in Europe. Gross domestic product may expand 4.5 percent this year and 3.7 percent in 2012, according to the Economy Ministry. Even so, more than half of Russians still see the inflation level as “very high,” a poll showed last month.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/business/global/russia-unexpectedly-reduces-its-main-interest-rate.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Brazil’s Growth Slowed by Decline in Consumer Spending

A decline in consumer spending contributed to a slight contraction in the third quarter from the previous three months, according to Brazil’s statistics agency. Economists now see Brazil’s growth in 2011 slowing to 3 percent or lower, a sharp reversal from a booming 2010 in which the economy surged 7.5 percent, the country’s highest growth rate in two decades.

Fearing a deeper slowdown, Brazilian authorities last week introduced a fiscal stimulus package, including tax cuts on some appliances and food, intended to get consumers to spend again.

The package was a break from policies earlier this year when the authorities actively sought to cool an economy thought to be overheating. Consumer spending had been growing substantially, fueled by a surge in newly available credit, and the authorities repeatedly raised interest rates and taxes in an effort to slow it down.

But Brazil’s recent boom seems to have fizzled, at least for now, though financial markets reacted calmly on Tuesday to the growth report, reflecting sentiment here that the government still has various policy tools at its disposal to stimulate growth. The Bovespa index for the São Paulo stock exchange climbed 1 percent on Tuesday, while Brazil’s currency, the real, strengthened slightly to close at almost 1.8 to the dollar.

“Brazil differs from other economies that are facing structural problems, which suggests a long period of low growth,” said Rodrigo Telles da Rocha Azevedo, a principal at Ibiúna, an asset management company in São Paulo. “Brazil’s problem is more cyclical, giving us space for measures to reverse declines in consumption and investment.”

Brazil still boasts indicators that suggest that the economy is far from a crisis. Unemployment fell in October to 5.8 percent, a historic low, from 6 percent the previous month. The country also maintains $352 billion in foreign currency reserves, compared with just $54 billion at the end of 2005.

Still, concerns are emerging over domestic issues like insufficient infrastructure stretched thin by the economic growth of recent years and a labor force that lacks some of the skills needed by companies to proceed with ambitious expansion plans.

One megaproject in Brazil’s arid northeast, which would redirect the flow of the San Francisco River, seems in danger of becoming a massive white elephant, according to a report over the weekend in the newspaper O Estado de São Paulo, which published photographs of abandoned concrete works cracking under the sun.

The vigor of Brazil’s currency is another concern. While the real has fallen more than 10 percent against the dollar since July, it remains resilient. A strong real makes Brazil costlier than other countries, and it is seen as diminishing the competitiveness of industry here by making its manufactured products more expensive in export markets.

“Apart from the currency appreciation, imports of industrial goods have grown very fast,” said José Márcio Camargo, an economist at the Catholic University here. He said that contagion from Europe’s debt crisis was still less worrisome than the strong real and other domestic problems, including a high tax burden and poor infrastructure.

New concerns from abroad may also be on the horizon. China, Brazil’s largest trading partner, is showing some signs of cooling off, with new reports of weakness in manufacturing and services. Unlike Brazil, China is still growing at a healthy clip. But Chinese authorities have also introduced measures in recent days aimed at stimulating growth.

Elsewhere in Asia, India is facing slower growth and high inflation. And closer to home, Argentina, South America’s second-largest country and an important trading partner for Brazil, still has a growing economy but is struggling with capital flight as uncertainty persists over economic policies there.

Despite problems at home and abroad, Brazilian authorities remain sanguine about their ability to avoid a prolonged slump.

Finance Minister Guido Mantega said that stimulus measures introduced this month would quickly return the economy to growth, characterizing the disappointing figures as “temporary.”

“The condition is reversible,” he told reporters, emphasizing that salaries and the job market remained unaffected by the economic slowdown.

Lis Moriconi contributed reporting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/world/americas/brazils-growth-slowed-by-decline-in-consumer-spending.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Staying Alive: A Business Owner Confronts the Specter of Layoffs

Staying Alive

The struggles of a business trying to survive.

In my last post I imagined an exchange between myself and two tiny visitors. Three weeks without a sale, an extremely unusual event, had forced me to take a hard look at the numbers and explore what to do next.

A little devil on one shoulder advised me to reduce expenses by firing staff members, while a little angel on the side pleaded that I should either take the hit myself, or slash advertising expenses and spare my workers. I didn’t much care for either option. I don’t want to cut my pay, I fear that cutting advertising will make the sales slowdown even worse, and don’t want to lose any of my hard-working and productive employees. (And that’s the only kind I have.)

In response to my request for advice, readers chimed in with some further questions, observations, and suggestions:

Question from Kris: Do you see this slowdown the same time each year?

Nope. In my 25 years in business, I have noticed two consistent slow periods: the two weeks before Christmas, and the first two weeks of April (which perhaps is related to the pall that paying taxes casts on our national mood). Otherwise, sales are pretty steady, but they do vary greatly in size and sometimes come in clumps. We frequently go a week without a sale and go two weeks without a sale maybe three times a year. But I had never gone three weeks without closing something. And that spooked me.

Question from The All Knowing One: It seems like the market for high-end conference tables is limited. It’s not an item people buy every day. What about adding other types of furniture, like dining-room tables and chairs, desks, maybe beds, etc.?

Been there, done that. And I’ve written many times about the difference between the residential and business furniture markets. For those who didn’t see those posts, selling to homeowners involves a very long sales cycle, with a lot of hand-holding, and the jobs are difficult to produce efficiently. And there is also ferocious competition from overseas producers. I lost money in that market for many years and I don’t plan to return any time soon. So even though I have a huge catalog of residential furniture, I don’t want to divert my efforts into a difficult business.

Another from The All Knowing One (an odd moniker for someone with so many questions): Are you still having weekly conferences with your staff and sharing financial info?

Yes, we have a meeting every Monday, and I have been clearly explaining the potential problem as it has developed, including the same numbers I detailed in my last post.

Which brings me to Adam, who observed: If I read that my boss was considering layoffs I’d be kinda ticked about finding out about it first on a blog on the internet.

As I said, I have been sharing the numbers at our meetings. However, the blog post was my first attempt to clearly lay out the problem and possible solutions. It’s hard for me to give that kind of logical exposition while speaking off the cuff, so I used the blog as a vehicle to communicate my thoughts on the situation. Yesterday, after seeing Adam’s comment, I asked my two salesmen their reaction to the post. One of them, who has been with me for many years, said he read it but wasn’t worried at all — he trusted me to do the right thing, and that whatever decision I made would most likely be a good one. The other, who is a new hire, said that he was disturbed by it, because he assumes that as the last hired, he would be the first one laid off. But he took some comfort from my stated desire to keep all of my staff.

From Ted: I think you should call the Angel the one that is trying to save your business and keep your family happy, and the Devil the one that wants you to keep spending money unrealistically by keeping your work force.

Funny, as I was writing it I started to consider the same point. But in the end I decided to go with the conventional liberal-lefty attributions. Kudos to you for realizing that it could be flipped and still make as much sense.

From Doug: Google Analytics will show you if your referrals are from paid search or natural search. If it’s natural (are you paying someone to get you on page 1?) then you can cut Adwords.

Yes and no. Looking at Google Analytics, I can see that 42 percent of my traffic is organic, and 22 percent is from pay-per-click. But what I can’t easily see is which type of traffic drives the phone calls that make up the majority of my inquiries. I understand that there are ways to set up the Web site so that I can trace those calls, but I haven’t done it yet. Up to the end of August, everything was going great guns, and I didn’t have any reason to change anything.

From David Fisher: Cut and cut NOW. Cut hours or layoff staff…or both. Whichever causes the least disruption to your business and production and keeps your doors open and a roof over your head. I waited for things to “get better” and believed the constant refrains of my (non-paying) clients and it wiped me out…I am still trying to re-build.

David, this is excellent advice and I, too, went through a similar episode in 2008. I told that story here and here. Fortunately for me, this time is different: my clients continue to pay on time, and I have a decent cash cushion. So I haven’t reached the point of desperation yet. But, having been there, I know how bad things can get. That’s why I started thinking hard about what to do before I needed to.

So here’s what I decided to do: nothing at all. I’m a big believer in the idea of “reversion to the mean,” which means that unusual events are most likely to be unusual events, and that it’s far more likely that what will happen next is what usually happens. Nothing about our marketing had changed, and we continued to get new inquiries at the same rate as we have the rest of the year. That told me that potential clients were not reacting to the news of stock market gyrations and European debt problems.

We were still sending out the same kinds of proposals that we usually did, and those proposals had gotten us work in the past. We contacted everyone who had received a proposal, but that we hadn’t heard back from, and many of them told us the jobs were still alive, but they didn’t know exactly when they would place an order. We still had work to do and money to do it with. Those two things told me that I should keep all my staff at least until we finish the jobs we have and our backlog goes to zero — cutting back on production would only slow the stream of cash we get when a job is done. And eliminating people would reduce our build capacity and our ability to take quick-turnaround jobs.

I wrote that post on Sunday, Sept. 26. We had sold one job in the preceding week, bringing our monthly sales to $19,366. (Previously, our average month this year had been $165,000.) Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday we received no more orders. Then on Thursday the dam burst. Five new orders came in, totaling $73,402. And on Friday we got four more, totaling $56,985. Our sales for the month of September totaled $149,753, and sales for the year added up to $1,495,963. That’s just $4,037 shy of my target of $1,500,000. Phew!

And whatever happened that week is continuing. We have booked five more orders, totaling $212,461. That’s right — we’ve sold more than a month’s worth of tables in three days. So in the space of a week I’ve gone from worrying about layoffs to sweating about how to get the work out the door. Which is also a problem, but the right kind of problem.

Is there a moral to this story? Maybe this: if you set up a system that reliably produces results, a sudden hiccup may not mean that all is lost. And it’s a good idea to have systems to track your cash supply, so that you can start planning for any scenario. Thanks to everyone who offered advice. I’m mighty happy that I haven’t had to take any of it.

Paul Downs founded Paul Downs Cabinetmakers in 1986. It is based outside of Philadelphia.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=51aee7e630dbbab6ee0871bb7f4de0ea

News Analysis: On the Verge of a Double Dip Recession

Economies have a strong self-reinforcing nature. When people are optimistic, they spend, which begets hiring and then more spending. When people are anxious, they pull back, which leads to a cycle of hiring freezes and further anxiety that often lasts for months.

The United States appears to have entered some version of the vicious cycle. Most ominously, job growth has slowed to a pace that typically signals the start of a recession.

Over the last 50 years, every time that job growth has been as meager as it has been over the last four months, the economy has been headed toward recession, in a recession or in the immediate aftermath of one. From early 2010 through this spring, by contrast, employment was growing fast enough to make the economy look as if it were in a recovery, albeit a modest one.

“The chances that we are in something that is going to feel like a recession are close to 100 percent,” said Joshua Shapiro of MFR Inc. in New York, who has diagnosed the economy more accurately than many other forecasters lately. “Whether we reach the technical definition” — which is determined by a committee of academic economists and based on gross domestic product, employment and other factors — “I think is probably close to 50-50.”

A double dip would present obvious political problems for President Obama, whose approval ratings have already fallen below 50 percent and who is scheduled to give a speech to Congress on Thursday outlining a new jobs plan. A weak economy also could threaten incumbents of both parties in Congress, whose approval rating has hovered around 15 percent in recent polls.

More immediately, the main significance of the recent slowdown is that the economy may not merely be going through a weak phase that will soon pass, as many policy makers hope. Instead, history seems to suggest that the situation will probably get worse before it gets better.

In a recent research paper, Jeremy J. Nalewaik, a Federal Reserve economist, described this concept as “stall speed”: once the economy slows markedly, it often continues to do so. (He did not make a forecast.) In the other two severe downturns of the last 80 years — in the 1930s and the early 1980s — the economy suffered just such a stall and fell into a second recession not long after the first.

Today, Europe’s troubles continue to weigh on banks and financial markets. Consumers remain indebted, and the housing market remains depressed. State and local governments continue to cut jobs, aggravating the problems in the private sector. Congress is unlikely to pass a major jobs bill.

The economy could, of course, defy history and turn around soon. Eventually, consumers will begin spending more on houses, cars, appliances and services, and employers will begin hiring in large numbers. A further decline in gas prices, which have generally been falling, would particularly help households.

But the latest indicators suggest that even if the economy does not continue to worsen, it appears to be too weak to add enough jobs each month — roughly 125,000 — even to keep pace with population growth. Anything less, and the share of the population that is employed will continue to fall.

Over the last four months, job creation has slowed to an average of just 40,000 jobs, or 0.1 percent, according to the Labor Department’s survey of employers. The last time such a meager increase did not coincide with a recession came in the 1950s.

The department’s survey of households presents a somewhat sunnier picture, but it is a smaller and noisier survey. And even it shows an unemployment rate of 9.1 percent last month, up from 8.8 percent in March. In the past, an increase of three-tenths of a percentage point has typically coincided with a recession.

James D. Hamilton, an economist at the University of California, San Diego, who has studied forecasting, said he believed the most likely case was still that the economy would avoid a double-dip recession. He also noted that the recent job growth numbers were estimates still subject to revision, although the unemployment rate is not.

“It’s extremely hard to predict recessions,” Mr. Hamilton said. The more important point, he added, was that the economy remained very weak, and weaker than people had expected.

Perhaps the best sign of how difficult it is to know the economy’s direction is that, as a group, the nation’s professional forecasters have failed to predict all the recessions since the 1970s, according to data kept by the Philadelphia Fed. In the last 30 years, the average probability they put on the economy lapsing into recession has never risen above 50 percent — until the economy was already in a recession.

The forecasters, on Wall Street and elsewhere, are not blind to economic change; they just tend to underestimate its severity. When the economy is on the verge of recession, the average recession odds from forecasters tend to rise to about 30 percent. There has been only one occasion, in 1988, when the chances rose above 30 percent and a recession did not follow.

And what do many forecasters say are the prospects of a double-dip recession now? Somewhere between 25 and 40 percent.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/business/economy/american-economy-on-the-verge-of-a-double-dip-recession.html?partner=rss&emc=rss