November 22, 2024

Bucks Blog: Corporate America Weighs In on Treatment of Gay Couples

The Cost of Being Gay

A look at the financial realities of same-sex partnerships.

Gay couples face a host financial and legal complications because of the federal law that bans same-sex marriage. As a result, they often end up having to pay more for a host of things — tax preparation, health benefits and estate planning, among other things.

So it’s not terribly surprising that the law complicates things for same-sex partners’ employers, too, especially when a couple’s union may be recognized in a particular state, but not in the eyes of the federal government. Not only does that leave plenty of room for error in the administration of employee benefits, it also forces employers to treat their employees differently simply because of their sexual orientation.

As a result, more than 200 companies — among them giants like Citigroup, Apple, Mars and Amazon — as well as city governments, law firms and others, are arguing that the law that bans same-sex marriage imposes serious administrative and financial costs on their operations. The companies filed a supporting brief with the Supreme Court on Wednesday, urging it to overturn a section of the Defense of Marriage Act that denies federal benefits and recognition to same-sex couples.

“It puts us, as employers, to unnecessary cost and administrative complexity, and regardless of our business or professional judgment forces us to treat one class of our lawfully married employees differently than another, when our success depends upon the welfare and morale of all employees,” they wrote in the brief.

We’ve documented these inequities and complications as part of the “Cost of Being Gay” series on Bucks. For instance, gay employees who add their partners to their health benefits are taxed on the value of that coverage (if the partner is not considered a dependent) since their unions are not federally recognized. Opposite-sex married couples are not subject to the tax, so some employers have attempted to equalize the playing field by covering the extra costs for same-sex employees. We’ve tracked these efforts on a chart, which can be found here.

We’ve also written about the errors that can arise when organizations have to keep track of those extra taxes, including Yale University‘s failure to withhold the proper amount of income for a group of workers.

Then, there are the variety of questions that are easily answered for married employees with opposite-sex spouses, but not so straightforward for gay employees: If I get married, can I automatically add my spouse to my health insurance outside the annual “open enrollment” period? Will my partner even be covered? What about our children?

What other administrative and benefit-related issues do same-sex couples face in the workplace? Please share your thoughts in the comment section below.

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/28/corporate-america-weighs-in-on-treatment-of-gay-couples/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Amex Equalizes Health Costs for Gay Employees

The Cost of Being Gay

A look at the financial realities of same-sex partnerships.

American Express is the latest company to equalize the cost of health insurance benefits for heterosexual employees and employees with same-sex partners.

The movement to reimburse gay employees for the extra taxes they must pay has gained momentum in recent weeks: American Express joins Morgan Stanley and Bank of America, which also recently announced that they would adopt the policy.

We’ve been keeping close tabs on which companies have decided to equalize the cost of benefits in this chart. As it stands now, a total of seven big financial institutions equalize benefits for workers, trailing only law firms, where, last we counted, 16 firms offered the reimbursement. Four big technology companies and five big consulting firms do the same.

Under federal law, employer-provided health benefits for domestic partners are counted as taxable income, if the partner is not considered a dependent. On top of that, the employees cannot use pretax dollars to pay for their premiums — unlike their opposite-sex married counterparts.

Since gay unions are not recognized by the federal government, same-sex couples can not avoid the extra costs by getting married. So while many large employers offer health insurance coverage for domestic partners, these employees must pay more to use it.

Like many of its competitors, American Express is only reimbursing employees with same-sex partners and their dependents. The policy will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2012, and employees will receive the reimbursements — also known as a “gross up” — every pay period, a company spokesman said.

Who are we missing? Will Citi and JPMorgan Chase be next? Please let us know if you learn of any other companies that decide to reimburse their gay and lesbian employees.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=60d57c5b80cad44c46d8fd473ce0b482

Bucks Blog: Morgan Stanley to Equalize Health Costs for Gay Employees

Starting on January 1, Morgan Stanley will begin reimbursing employees for the extra taxes they pay on health insurance for their same-sex partners.Mary Altaffer/Associated Press Morgan Stanley plans to extend a health benefit to its gay and lesbian employees.

The Cost of Being Gay

A look at the financial realities of same-sex partnerships.

Another financial titan has decided to extend a benefit that will put its gay and lesbian employees on equal footing with their heterosexual co-workers.

Beginning Jan. 1, Morgan Stanley will begin reimbursing employees for the extra taxes they pay on health insurance for their same-sex partners. The news follows a similar announcement last week from Bank of America, which makes Morgan Stanley the sixth financial services firm to adopt the policy, joining Barclays, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse and BNP Paribas.

The new policy has also spread relatively quickly among big consulting companies, law firms and handful of big technology companies. We’ve been keeping close track of who’s doing what on a scorecard. (You can see if your company made the list here.)

For those of you who haven’t been following the issue closely, here’s some background: Under federal law, employer-provided health benefits for domestic partners are counted as taxable income, if the partner is not considered a dependent. On top of that, the employees cannot use pretax dollars to pay for their premiums — unlike their opposite-sex married counterparts.

Since gay unions are not recognized by the federal government, same-sex couples can not avoid the extra costs by getting married. So while many large employers offer health insurance coverage for domestic partners, these employees must pay more to use it.

Like several other firms, Morgan Stanley is covering the costs only for same-sex partners and their dependents. Eligible employees will be reimbursed with a lump sum once a year, a company spokeswoman said.

Let us know if you’ve heard of any other companies that have adopted the policy, and we’ll add them to our chart. And if you have asked your company to adopt the policy, let us know in the comment section below what kind of response you received.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=aca3683ada76b1ff56ab37f3cf8ff6ef

Bucks Blog: How to File for Financial Aid if Your Parents Are Gay

The Cost of Being Gay

A look at the financial realities of same-sex partnerships.

Filling out the federal form for student financial aid is an arduous task for most applicants. But if you have two mothers or two fathers, or if you happen to be married to a same-sex partner, it can quickly escalate into an even more complicated exercise.

Since the federal government doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage, neither does the federal form, called the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, informally known as the Fafsa. So students whose immediate families include same-sex partners often find themselves struggling to figure out how to accurately represent their families. The 106-question form only asks applicants to list their “mother/stepmother” and “father/stepfather.”

For now, there are no easy fixes. It’s not as simple as adding in gender-neutral language on the form, something the Department of State recently did to passport applications to acknowledge that some children are being raised by same-sex parents. That’s because the amount and type of aid provided to students uses a formula that takes the entire family unit into account — including the parents and students’ marital status. And the Department of Education said it relies on the federal definition of marriage (one man, one woman).

For now, applicants must fill out the form according to the current rules, which can result in applicants getting more or less aid than identical families with opposite-sex partners.

Here are some guidelines for students with same-sex parents or same-sex partners, as well as gay students who have been cut off financially by their parents. The tips were provided by Mark Kantrowitz, the financial aid expert and publisher of FinAid.org. As he said, “It gets real complicated real fast.”

You have two legal parents (biological or adopted) but they are no longer together. Only the one you are living with is responsible for completing the Fafsa. And if the parent you live with has married someone of the same sex, the income and assets of the stepparent are not reported on the form since the marriage is not recognized by the federal government. But the stepparent is included for the purposes of “household size” if the legal parent also provides more than half of the support for the stepparent. The same applies to the stepparent’s children. (In a heterosexual marriage, the stepparent and stepchildren living in the home are automatically included in the household size.) And any financial support that your stepparent provides will be counted as untaxed income on the Fafsa.

Keep in mind that if the student is attending a college in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage, it is possible that the college will also treat the stepparent as a parent for state aid and institutional aid purposes, Mr. Kantrowitz said, even if the federal aid is based only on the other parent.

You have two parents, but only one is a legal parent. Only the legal parent is responsible for completing the Fafsa. The other parent (and his or her children) will be included in household size only if the legal parent provides more than half of their support. And once again, if the other parent provides you with any additional financial support, it will be counted as untaxed income to you on the form.

This will affect families who live in states that don’t permit same-sex couples to have second-parent adoptions. That occurs when one partner adopts the other’s biological or adopted children.

You have two legal parents — whether biological or adoptive — and you live with both. You must fill out the form as if they were divorced. In a heterosexual divorce, the parent with whom the child lives for most of the time is responsible for completing the form. But if the student splits time equally with both parents, only the parent who provided more support is responsible.

Since students with married same-sex parents typically live with both parents, they, too, must have the parent who provided more financial support complete the form. The other parent’s income and assets are not reported, and that parent will only be included in the official household size if the parent filling out the form provides more than half of the applicant’s support. And if the “second” parent has any children who are not legal children of the parent on the Fafsa, the children won’t be included in household size unless the Fafsa parent provides more than half of their support, too. (This is unlike heterosexual married couples, who would automatically include all dependent children and stepchildren, regardless of whether they live in the family home.)

Meanwhile, if the “second” parent — that is, the one not on the Fafsa — provides support to the prospective student, it should be reported as untaxed income to the student.

Both parents may be considered in certain situations. If, for instance, you are attending college in a state where same-sex marriage is legal, the college may include your second parent for state aid and institutional aid purposes, even though federal aid is based just on the one parent.

You are a student who is married to a same-sex partner. You’re treated as if you are simply living together, so you wouldn’t include your spouse on the form unless you contribute more than half of his or her support. If you do, the partner would be included for the purposes of household size (but you don’t have to report your partner’s income). The same rules apply for your spouse’s children. (Of course, opposite-sex married applicants include their spouse’s income, if they have it, and they are automatically included in household size; the same goes for stepchildren.)

If your partner provides you with any financial support, it would count as untaxed income on the Fafsa.

Keep in mind that gay and lesbian students who are married and under the age of 24 may still be considered dependents of their parents, unlike heterosexual married students under the age of 24. Once again, it’s because their unions are not recognized by the federal government. But if you have children, you will be considered independent — as long as your parents don’t provide more than half of your children’s support. (The same goes for unmarried but partnered heterosexuals.)

You are a gay or lesbian student, and your parents refused to fill out the Fafsa form or provide support. Those circumstances alone are not “sufficient ground” for a college to grant you independent status, Mr. Kantrowitz said. But college financial aid administrators have the authority to deem you independent under certain circumstances, as well as other situations where students become estranged from their families. The college can do what is called a “dependency override,” which means it will treat you as financially independent from your parents. (For purposes of federal aid, students are generally considered dependents until age 24.)

“The student will need to ask the college for a professional judgment review to determine whether they qualify,” Mr. Kantrowitz said, adding that only the college financial aid administrator can approve a dependency override. “The student will need to supply documentation of their circumstances, such as letters from clergy, social workers, guidance counselors or others who are familiar with their situation.”

But just because the college has the authority to grant you independent status doesn’t mean that it necessarily will — or that the process will be easy, as evidenced by the student in my article whose family cut him off after he told them he couldn’t change his sexual orientation. The administrators decide what to do on a case-by-case basis.

Consider a recent graduate from a liberal arts college in Maine. After he told his financial aid office that his mother cut off support when she learned that he was gay, the administrators recommended that he switch to a less expensive college. “There were very few resources at my school to help me,” said the student, who is now in his first year of graduate school and wanted to remain anonymous because he didn’t want to openly criticize the college. “The college couldn’t extend emergency support because anyone could claim they were gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender and had been excluded from family resources.”

The college eventually decided that it would grant the student independent status — but only after a friend suggested that he get in touch with a gay trustee who sat on the college’s board to lobby on his behalf. The financial aid office wasn’t pleased that he sought a higher authority, but his strategy worked. “I am still not sure how that process works or who calls the shots,” he said. The student also received a scholarship from Point Foundation, which provides support to gay, lesbian and transgender students. Without their help, he said he would have graduated with $30,000 in student loan debt instead of $14,000.

Even if your college decides not to grant you independent status, you may still be eligible for some federal loans. The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 added a new provision that allows students whose parents have severed financial support to qualify for unsubsidized Stafford loans without parental information on the Fafsa (though they are not eligible for other types of federal aid, like Pell Grants or federal work-study programs). But eligibility is determined by the college financial aid administrators.

You’re thinking about listing your two moms or two dads, even though the form only provides space for “mother/stepmother” and “father/stepfather.” Just like federal tax forms, there is no way to automatically reject applications that list two mothers or two fathers. “But if the Fafsa is selected for verification, and the financial aid administrator notices that the parents listed on the Fafsa are of the same sex, they have an affirmative obligation to require the students to correct the Fafsa,” Mr. Kantrowitz said.

This could be viewed as an innocent mistake, he added, since the Fafsa instructions do not address such a situation with much clarity.

But if you choose to list them both and know that you aren’t supposed to, and the financial aid officers figure that out, well, don’t expect any favors. “Financial aid administrators tend to not give students the benefit of the doubt on other problems when they notice a deliberate inaccuracy,” he said. “They’ll view the entire Fafsa with a greater degree of suspicion.”

So don’t use the Fafsa as a place to cast a protest vote. And if you have any questions on how to fill out the form properly, ask the financial aid administrators what to do before you file.

Have you faced any challenges when filling out the federal form for aid? Have any helpful hints? Please drop your thoughts in the comment section below.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a5c8fcf738d5e02c48d9ff2abd71aa91

Bucks: Married Gay Couples ‘Refuse to Lie’ on Tax Forms

The
Courtesy of Equality Florida The “Refuse to Lie” campaign was created gay activists who believe that the federal government should acknowledge same-sex marriage.

What if You're Gay - Your Money - Bucks Blog - NYTimes.com

Some same-sex married couples are refusing to file their federal tax returns separately this tax season, as part of a movement demonstrating that they’re no longer content to quietly comply with the federal law that does not recognize same-sex marriage. And in some cases, these taxpayers will pay Uncle Sam more when they do so.

Same-sex couples who have married, or who have a legal status equivalent to marriage in certain states, must still file separate federal returns because the government — and therefore the Internal Revenue Service — defines marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman.

Using that definition, federal tax returns ask taxpayers to check one of five options under their filing status: single, married filing jointly, married filing separately, head of household or qualifying widow(er) with dependent child. Married same-sex partners typically file their own federal returns either as single or, if they qualify, as head of household, which has more favorable rates than the single filing status.

But many same-sex couples contend that filing as single amounts to lying about their marriage status, and that’s the message behind the “Refuse to Lie” campaign created by gay activists, which is timed to coincide with tax season.

“More people are refusing to lie on those forms, even though the government is telling them to,” said Nadine Smith, executive director of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender advocacy group Equality Florida, who plans on filing a joint return with her wife, Andrea. “It would be both dishonest and deeply humiliating to now disavow each other or our marriage and declare ourselves single on our tax form.”

Nina E. Olson, the national taxpayer advocate who acts as an ombudsman for the I.R.S., acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding federal taxation of same-gender spouses in an annual report to Congress. In the report, she said that taxpayers may take a filing position without penalty if there is “substantial authority” to do so, such as a court case that hasn’t been overruled by the United States Court of Appeals. And there happen to be two such cases, which are currently on appeal.

In July 2010, the Federal District Court in Massachusetts declared the Defense of Marriage Act — the federal law known as DOMA that defines marriage as between a man and a woman — as unconstitutional in two cases. They are now being appealed in the First Circuit. “Thus, there may be substantial authority for same-gender spouses to take certain tax positions as married as long as the Massachusetts district court’s opinions stands,” Ms. Olson said in the report.

The “Refuse to Lie” Web site warns same-sex couples of the risks of filing jointly, and explains different options to both adhere to the law while expressing that they disagree with it. One way to do that would be to put an asterisk by the “single” box, and then indicate at the bottom of the tax form that you are “only single under DOMA.” Another option, the site says, is to attach a note with a similar message.

The campaign also explains on its Web site how to file a joint return while avoiding penalties. In the first method, each partner would file their own single return and include an attachment stating that they’re married, and then file an amended return jointly. “Once the I.R.S. rejects the amended return, or if six months passes and they do nothing, the taxpayers who file an amended return have the right to file suit in Federal District Court claiming the refund,” the activists’ site said, adding that this option would avoid penalties because your original return would be filed according to the law.

Another method suggests filing two returns: one filed jointly (and showing the tax due on the joint return) and one filed as a single taxpayer (showing the tax due on that return). Pay whatever is due on the single return — which means you will not have underpaid — and then ask the I.R.S. which return to accept. But if the I.R.S. accepts the joint return and issues you a refund, “there is no way to know what will happen if you are later audited,” the site said.

“People who follow this example need to do so with a clear head about the decision they are making and that what could happen is unclear,” Ms. Smith, of Equality Florida, said. “It’s not without risk.”

But there’s another way to preserve your right to collect any refunds due to you if the law is eventually struck down. Patricia Cain, a professor at Santa Clara Law and an expert on sexuality and federal tax law, said that couples who would benefit from a joint filing — that is, couples who would pay less in taxes or receive refunds — can file a protective claim using I.R.S. Form 843. (File separate returns in accordance with the law, then attach the form to an amended joint return).

“If you state on Form 843 that your claim is based on the unconstitutionality of DOMA, which is an issue pending in current litigation, it is more likely that the I.R.S. will do nothing until the issue is finally determined,” she added. “And if DOMA is struck down as unconstitutional, you should be entitled to the refund on the amended return.”

Although she generally recommends that same-sex married couples file their own returns in accordance with the law, she said that couples living in Massachusetts might be able to better justify filing their returns jointly because of the two court cases there.

“The question is whether that is sufficient as substantial authority to avoid being assessed penalties if you were audited by the I.R.S. and found to have filed incorrectly,” Professor Cain said.

She also said that she knew some same-sex couples in several different states who had filed joint returns and received refunds. “It’s because the returns are handled by machines,” she said, adding that the 1040 forms don’t have any gender markers on them. “That doesn’t mean they won’t be audited sometime. But honestly, I think the I.R.S. has bigger fish to fry than figuring out where same-sex couples filed jointly.”

Taxpayers who don’t pay the proper amount of tax will be levied a 20 percent penalty on top of the amount of tax owed. An I.R.S. spokeswoman said the agency followed the federal Marriage Act and declined further comment.

But for Kate Kendell it’s about more than the money. Ms. Kendell, executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said she and her wife, Sandy, who have been together for 18 years and have two children, are going to file as married this year (they married in California during the brief window in 2008 when same-sex marriage was permitted there).

“As a lawyer and a legal advocate for the L.G.B.T. community, I am often in a position to advise people to exercise great caution and to comply in most cases with the letter of the law, even when that means denying who we are,” she said. “This is my small way of saying, where we can, we are not going to play the game anymore.”

In their case, the move is going to cost the couple more than $5,000.

If you’re part of a same-sex couple and would like to file jointly, how far would you go to show that you disagree with the current law? And what does everyone else think about this effort?

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=c9e8552f674bb1277242a3a8695383bc