December 21, 2024

Summers’s Opponents Must Overcome His Bond With Obama

The president’s preference: His former economic adviser, Lawrence H. Summers.

Mr. Obama, well aware of Mr. Summer’s love-him-or-hate-him reputation and the trouble he could face winning Senate confirmation, reasoned that it was hardly too soon to think about courting senators, even if a final decision on a nominee was nearly a year off. Shifting from his confidants — Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and the man who soon would succeed him, the White House chief of staff, Jacob J. Lew — the president gave Rob Nabors, then his liaison to Congress, the Summers project.

“He needs to do some work on the Hill,” Mr. Obama said, according to people with knowledge of the meeting. “You need to work with him, Rob.”

Months later, decision time is here, and Mr. Obama still has not finally settled on Mr. Summers or Janet L. Yellen, the economist he named to be Fed vice chairwoman in 2010. Yet as that Oval Office exchange shows, the president has long had Mr. Summers in mind to become the world’s most powerful central banker, based on their intellectual partnership that dates to the 2008 campaign and was “forged in the crucible of the financial crisis,” as the longtime Obama strategist David Axelrod put it.

And Mr. Obama still does have Mr. Summers in mind, associates say.

“It’s like the attachment you feel for your heart surgeon after he performs a quadruple bypass,” said a former administration official, who like most others did not want to be identified speaking of such a sensitive personnel matter.

But as that Oval Office meeting last year also suggests, Mr. Obama’s one concern about nominating Mr. Summers has been the potential for a Senate battle — not only from Republicans spoiling for fights, but also from liberal Democrats who view Mr. Summers as too friendly toward deregulating big banks when he was Treasury secretary late in the Clinton administration.

That concern about confirmation has been affirmed in recent weeks as bloggers and groups on the left have mobilized, either to oppose Mr. Summers outright or to urge Mr. Obama to pick Ms. Yellen to be the first female Fed chairman. Mr. Summers declined to comment for this article.

The president has already interviewed Mr. Summers and Ms. Yellen for the job, as well as Donald L. Kohn, a former Fed vice chairman, aides say. But administration insiders say they believe Mr. Obama remains inclined to nominate the man who, as his chief economic adviser through 2009 and 2010, helped him through the worst recession and global financial crisis since the Depression. Mr. Summers’s edge, they say, reflects that relationship, not any arguments against Ms. Yellen, whom Mr. Obama does not know well. And they do not rule out a fourth person emerging, though no other names are known to be in the mix.

Many current and former presidential advisers also favor Mr. Summers, including several who had run-ins with him on policy, or chafed at what many call his condescension and arrogance. But they say Mr. Obama knows Mr. Summers so well, he does not need their input.

Among the people the president is said to have consulted are Mr. Geithner, Mr. Lew and Mr. Axelrod. The list also includes Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, Mr. Obama’s first chief of staff and a Summers advocate, and Denis R. McDonough, the current chief of staff. (Aides say Mr. McDonough has stayed neutral.) Two of the most influential advisers on the nomination are the deputy chiefs of staff, Mr. Nabors and Alyssa Mastromonaco, given their knowledge of Senate confirmation politics.

Also influential — and described as the one insider pulling for Ms. Yellen — is Valerie Jarrett, the president’s close adviser and longtime Chicago friend, who had a cool relationship with Mr. Summers.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/business/economy/in-fed-succession-obamas-favorite-faces-opposition.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Senate Confirms Economic Adviser as Trade Representative

WASHINGTON — Michael Froman, a senior White House economic adviser and classmate of President Obama at Harvard Law School, on Wednesday won Senate confirmation to be the next United States trade representative.

The vote was 93 to 4, elevating Mr. Froman, 50, to the head of an agency now involved in two significant trade deals, including one with the European Union.

Mr. Froman, nominated by Mr. Obama in May, will succeed Ron Kirk, a former mayor of Dallas who resigned as the representative in February after serving through Mr. Obama’s first term and completing free trade agreements with South Korea, Panama and Colombia.

Mr. Froman has been serving as deputy national security adviser for international economic affairs and has been involved in coordinating White House policy on international trade, investments and energy.

One of his main responsibilities as trade representative will be meeting a goal to complete negotiations this year on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an Asian-Pacific trading bloc that includes Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, Vietnam, Chile, Singapore, Peru and Japan.

The trade office will also be at the forefront of talks to ease trade with the European Union known as the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Those talks are expected to begin next month.

“He’s very smart, he’s very tough, he’s the right person for the job as the United States begins to negotiate trade agreements with Asia, the so-called TPP, as well as trade agreements with the Europeans,” said the Senate Finance Committee chairman, Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, in support of Mr. Froman.

Mr. Froman worked as Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin’s chief of staff during the Clinton administration,

He was a managing partner at Citigroup and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations before joining the Obama administration.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/business/senate-confirms-economic-adviser-as-trade-representative.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Hearings Begin on Treasury Nominee

In his opening remarks, Mr. Lew stressed his longstanding qualifications on budget issues and his ability to work with Republicans.

“Working across the aisle while serving under President Clinton, I helped negotiate the groundbreaking agreement with Congress to balance the federal budget,” he said. “And as budget director, I oversaw three budget surpluses in a row even as we pursued policies to speed economic growth and create jobs.”

He added that he has been involved in “almost every major bipartisan budget agreement over the last 30 years,” and that “the things that divide Washington right now are not as insurmountable as they might look.”

But as one of Mr. Obama’s main budget negotiators in the past few years, Mr. Lew has at times clashed with Republicans, particularly in the House. Former Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, not Mr. Lew, acted as a main negotiator during the talks over the automatic tax increases and spending cuts, the so-called fiscal cliff, that Congress cut a deal to avoid last month.

Mr. Lew, a longtime Democratic aide and recently departed White House chief of staff, is expected to win the support of the committee and ultimately the confirmation of the whole Senate. As a former State Department aide and budget director, Mr. Lew has already won Senate confirmation twice during the Obama administration.

But Republicans have promised to grill Mr. Lew over the government’s trillion-dollar deficits, the White House’s spending plans and the sluggish economy. They have also raised questions about his short tenure at Citigroup, where he received a $940,000 bonus before leaving to return to public service.

At the outset, Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, stressed that the Treasury secretary’s responsibilities go far beyond the budget, and said he wanted to know more about Mr. Lew’s expertise in and thoughts about the financial system and its regulation. “We know very little about your knowledge of the activities and practices” at Citigroup, Mr. Hatch said.

In his opening remarks, Mr. Lew mentioned his financial markets experience just once. “During my time at Citi, I was part of the senior management team trying to drive organizational change at one of our nation’s largest banks,” he said.

In a statement before the hearing, Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana and chairman of the Finance Committee, said: “Mr. Lew has been confirmed by the Senate three times already. I don’t expect there to be any reason why he should not be confirmed this time around as well. We have a tremendous amount of work to do over the next couple months to get our fiscal house in order.”

Mr. Lew — known as a low-key and bookish budget expert — would face a daunting set of issues as soon as he took over at the Treasury Department, if confirmed. In March, the so-called sequester, a trillion dollars in automatic spending cuts that Democrats and many Republicans hope to delay or avoid, is due to take effect. Soon after, the continuing resolution financing the government will run out, raising the specter of a government shutdown.

In addition to Mr. Lew’s time at Citigroup, where he worked in an alternative-investments unit that at one point profited from the housing collapse, Republicans have also brought up a Cayman Islands investment that Mr. Lew properly disclosed, and lost money on when he returned to government service.

“I’m hopeful that Mr. Lew will answer some remaining questions that I have,” Mr. Hatch said. “I will not decide whether or not to support his nomination until those questions are answered. Lest no one forget, Treasury secretary is no small position and the people of this country need to know Mr. Lew is qualified and able to perform the job.”

Democrats have largely dismissed the concerns about Mr. Lew’s tenure at Citigroup.

“Jack Lew paid all of his taxes and reported all of the income, gains and losses from the investment on his tax returns,” said Eric Schultz, a White House spokesman. “There are no new facts that provide a basis for senators to reach a different conclusion about Mr. Lew’s nomination than they reached twice before in this administration.”

Some other senators — including Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, and Bernard Sanders, independent of Vermont — have indicated that they might not support Mr. Lew. But it seemed unlikely that he would face a filibuster that might delay his confirmation or end his candidacy.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/14/us/politics/hearings-begin-on-treasury-nominee.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

The Caucus: Defying Republicans, Obama to Name Cordray as Consumer Agency Chief

President Obama will name Richard Cordray, center, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.Doug Mills/The New York TimesPresident Obama will name Richard Cordray, center, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

11:49 a.m. | Updated President Obama will challenge Republican foes of the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau by naming Richard Cordray as its director while Congress is out of town.

Richard Cordray said that he would make judicious use of lawsuits to enforce financial regulations.Philip Scott Andrews/The New York TimesTestifying on Capital Hill in September, Mr. Cordray sought to reassure lawmakers that the bureau would be accountable to Congress, despite doubts expressed by Republicans that the bureau has too much unfettered power. .

That would allow the agency to establish new regulations over financial institutions, putting into effect elements of the financial regulatory overhaul that was one of the administration’s main achievements in Congress.

Mr. Obama’s exercise of constitutional powers to name top officials without Senate confirmation while Congress is in recess is a stiff challenge to Republicans, who have attempted to block the maneuver by holding “pro forma” sessions over the holidays.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, objected strenuously, saying Mr. Obama was overstepping the bounds of his executive power and leaving the agency open to legal challenges.

“Although the Senate is not in recess, President Obama, in an unprecedented move, has arrogantly circumvented the American people,” he said in a statement.

Mr. Cordray accompanied the president on Wednesday on a trip to Ohio, where the president is expected to deliver remarks on the economy at a high school in the Cleveland suburb of Shaker Heights. Cleveland is Mr. Cordray’s hometown.

Mr. Cordray looked a little shell-shocked when he got off Marine One to board Air Force One for the flight to Cleveland, clutching his brown folder to his chest as he walked to the plane.

But he sounded ready for battle once the plane landed in Cleveland and reporters cornered him under the wing, issuing a not-so-veiled warning to Wall Street.

“We’re going to begin working to expand our program to non-banks, which is an area we haven’t been able to touch before now,” he said.

The recess appointment represents a sharp departure from a long-standing precedent that has limited the president to recess appointments only when the Senate is in a recess of 10 days or longer. Breaking from this precedent lands this appointee in uncertain legal territory, threatens the confirmation process and fundamentally endangers the Congress’s role in providing a check on the excesses of the executive branch.

Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, called the recess appointment a “no-brainer,” and said that Mr. Obama would not be waiting around for Congress to act this year.

“He nominated Richard Cordray six months ago,” Mr. Carney said. “He won a majority of support in the Senate, yet Republicans refused to allow an up-or-down vote. This is a shame.”

He declined to speak about the legal and constitutional challenge which may be ahead, but said White House lawyers were confident. “When pro forma sessions are simply used as an attempt to stop the president from making an appointment,” then Mr. Obama was within his rights to move ahead.

President Bush, by this point in his tenure, Mr. Carney noted, had made 61 recess appointments, compared to Mr. Obama’s 28.

Senator Tim Johnson, a Democrat of South Dakota who is chairman of the Banking Committee, praised Mr. Cordray’s appointment.

“Mr. Cordray is eminently qualified for the job, as even my Senate Republican colleagues have acknowledged,” he said. “It’s disappointing that Senate Republicans denied him an up-or-down vote, especially when it’s clear he had the support of a majority of the Senate.”

The move came hours after the conclusion of the Iowa caucuses, and was sure to turn attention away from the Republican Party and back to the president.

In December, Mr. Cordray’s nomination was rejected after Democrats failed to achieve the 60 votes they needed to move his nomination forward.

The power struggle between the financial sector and its check-cashing, card-carrying customers has developed into one of the fault lines along which the political parties are playing out their own rivalries as the election year arrives.

Mr. Cordray is a former attorney general of Ohio noted for his aggressive investigations of mortgage foreclosure practices. Currently in charge of enforcement at the consumer agency, he was nominated in July to lead it.

Previous opposition from Republicans led to the withdrawal of Elizabeth Warren from consideration for the post. She is a Harvard law professor who was the driving force behind the agency’s creation and is now a Democratic candidate for the United States Senate in Massachusetts.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dd662812e008011914170437924b17bc

Obama to Nominate Economics Professor and Ex-Treasury Official to Fed Board

Jeremy C. Stein, a Harvard professor who worked briefly for the Obama administration in early 2009, has particular expertise in the workings of financial markets.

Jerome H. Powell, currently a visiting scholar at the Bipartisan Policy Center, brings private sector experience in the same area. He worked for almost a decade as a partner at the Carlyle Group, a private equity fund. Mr. Powell also served as Treasury under secretary for finance in the administration of President George H. W. Bush.

In a statement, Mr. Obama lauded their “impressive knowledge of economic and monetary policy.”

The nominations end months of waiting for the White House to resume its effort to fill the vacancies after it was forced to withdraw the nomination of an earlier candidate, the Nobel Prize laureate Peter Diamond, because Senate Republicans would not allow a vote.

The inclusion of Mr. Powell, a Republican, could help to smooth the way for Senate confirmation of both nominations this time around. But Senate Republicans are blocking a number of other nominations for vacancies at other financial regulatory agencies.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b9207cf641fd3ded74951731f4ee96a0

Republican Attacks Persist for Consumer Bureau

WASHINGTON — House Republicans threatened Thursday to roll back the scope and authority of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau even before it officially opens for business next week.

At a combative hearing before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Republicans squared off against Elizabeth Warren, who is setting up the new agency, challenging her to explain what they saw as a bloated, $500 million budget, an overly broad mandate and regulatory power that could deter lending.

As Democrats rallied to defend Ms. Warren and the start-up agency, the morning-long hearing underscored the fundamental disagreements between Republicans and Democrats over the mission and powers of the bureau, echoing the fight over its creation last year.

The agency, created by Congress in the sweeping Dodd-Frank financial regulations law to guard borrowers from unfair lending practices, formally starts operations next Tuesday after nine months of preparations.

Ms. Warren, a Harvard law professor, has been leading the organization of the bureau but many Republicans have opposed her as the full-time director because they believe she has a history of antibusiness attitudes. The White House has not announced a nominee for director, who would require Senate confirmation.

This was Ms. Warren’s second appearance before the oversight committee since May, when she and Republicans clashed openly when she attempted to excuse herself after an hour of testimony.

Both Republicans and Democrats promised more civil discourse in Thursday’s hearing. But the political sniping sometimes overwhelmed testimony as the hearing devolved into what one committee member called “a partisan food fight.” Democrats apologized to Ms. Warren for her treatment by Republicans whom they accused of “sabotaging” the agency to protect Wall Street.

Republican members opposed to the agency’s powers repeatedly asked Ms. Warren if there were credit instruments or practices, like payday lending, that she would seek to ban as abusive or unfair under the agency’s new authority.

Ms. Warren said there were not any practices she would want to ban at the moment, adding that she would instead pursue less severe remedies like consumer education, enforcement investigations, fines or civil lawsuits against lenders.

Several Republicans seized on her answer and then pressed her to agree to strip the agency of its power to ban such practices if she did not see any immediate need to use them. But Ms. Warren balked, saying the power to ban practices was one important tool the new agency needed to fix “a broken consumer credit system.”

Expanding on her vision for the agency, Ms. Warren said she saw it as a “cop on the beat” that would regulate lending institutions, seek to simplify loan documents to make them more understandable and guard against fraud and abuse.

Republicans have unsuccessfully tried to chip away at the authority and structure of the agency by proposing a commission instead of a single director to oversee it, among other ideas. They signaled Thursday that they want to reduce the agency’s powers by challenging the salaries of some staff members, the justification for its budget decisions, its authority to look into certain types of financial institutions and practices, and a number of other organizational issues.

Representative Ann Marie Buerkle, Republican of New York, said she worried that an overly intrusive consumer agency would drive up the cost of compliance by lenders and make it harder for small businesses and others to get affordable credit.

Ms. Warren said that the large banks and lenders hired “armies of lawyers” who produced loan documents that were indecipherable to many Americans. “We need some pushback. We’re the voice on behalf of the customers, the American families,” she said.

She said that the agency’s regulation of the industry should help to lower the costs of credit to Americans, rather than raise it, and make borrowers “a little more secure.”

Representative John F. Tierney, Democrat of Massachusetts, said he found it “stunning” that Republicans appeared to be “flacking for banks” rather for standing up for borrowers and for an agency meant to protect them.

Democrats won a small victory when they sought to get Representative Darrell E. Issa, the California Republican who leads the committee, to subpoena major mortgage lenders for documents on abusive practices.

Mr. Issa refused the demand for subpoenas, but he agreed later in the day to a compromise of sending a formal “document request,” along with Representative Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland, the ranking Democrat on the panel, to seek records from 10 major lenders related to lending abuses involving service members.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=208c606e60d0355ca3e30d3b26c61acc