November 28, 2024

You’re the Boss Blog: Why I Am Not Going to Renew the Sales Consultant

Was the sales consultant worth the money to Paul Downs (above)?Laura Pedrick for The New York Times Was the sales consultant worth the money to Paul Downs (above)?

Staying Alive

The struggles of a business trying to survive.

Editor’s note: Paul Downs is writing this week about his decision to hire a sales consultant. The series started with this post.

A year has gone by, and I need to decide whether to renew my sales consultant’s contract. If I do, we will continue with two coaching sessions per month, one for me individually that will focus on my role as sales manager and the other a group meeting with my three sales representatives. Both sessions will be with the consultant, Bob Waks. For this, he wants $12,000. Is this a good value?

To answer that question, I need to first ask whether I got my money’s worth in the first year of consulting. I spent $37,000 for initial evaluations, a course in the Sandler Method, and ongoing evaluations. And after participating in all of that, I got the results I wanted. We have exceeded our sales target in every quarter since we started the training. In the first half of 2012, before training, we sold $865,274. In the second half of 2012, after starting the training, we sold $1,236,864. And this year, as of June 15, we had sold $1,218,414.

So for me, hiring a consultant worked. Here are some of the things that went right:

• I found my consultant by taking a recommendation from a colleague, Sam Saxton, who had had good results in a similar situation.

• The consultant had experience working with companies the size of mine, and he relies on referrals to keep busy. He had both the means and the motives to make our project a success.

• We had an easily identifiable problem, and the services we were offered were a good solution. All the way through, Mr. Waks explained exactly how he was going to address our issues, and it all made sense to me.

• We put a lot of effort into implementing the training we received. Everyone in my company knew from the beginning that we were in trouble, and I made it clear that this was going to be the solution and that I was behind the effort 100 percent. At the beginning, this took some faith in Mr. Waks’s skills, but the recommendations I had received were enough to build my own confidence. I put considerable effort into building up the information systems that would support our new sales method, both by writing new code in our database and by building spreadsheets (in Google Docs) that gave us a much more detailed look at incoming call patterns. These have been invaluable in identifying what type of client is calling us and in helping us identify those customers most likely to buy.

• We received ongoing evaluation and training. Our monthly meetings, over the course of a year, were critically important. They allowed us to get feedback as we adapted the broad ideas of the Sandler Method to our own world. Mr. Waks helped us figure out exactly how we should respond to particular situations. And the one-on-one sessions that I had with him were useful as well. He provided good advice as I puzzled through the implementation of the new system.

The best result for me, other than hitting our numbers, was to free up a lot of my time by allowing me to ease out of the sales role. Selling was my primary job for many, many years, and it took up most of the hours of my day. I now have more confidence that my sales people can hit their quotas, and I no longer feel the need to jump into the thick of things to save us. This has allowed me to spend more time analyzing the whole business, and it let me put into place a large number of improvements in communications and operations. It even gave me the opportunity to go back out on the shop floor and build some furniture for the first time since 1992. (I’ll be writing more about that.)

So will I renew the consultant’s contract? My decision is to hold off for now. Our steady stream of new orders has revealed some weaknesses in our production capacity, and I’d prefer to spend my cash addressing those issues. Also, I want to see if we can take what we have learned and implement the lessons on an ongoing basis without outside help. My main goal for the company this year is to set up ongoing processes, with data gathering and regular meetings, so that we can continually evaluate and improve our performance. It may be counter-intuitive, because people complain about it so much, but I feel that we need more bureaucracy. In large companies, organization can be stultifying. In my tiny company, where chaos has been the norm, my goal is to add routines, here and there, until we aren’t constantly reacting to disasters but rather making orderly plans for the future.

This leaves the question of whether I will recognize the next opportunity to get outside help and improve my situation. What’s a good way to figure out where we are weak? Should numbers be the only consideration? Or are there areas where most businesses could benefit from hiring a consultant?

Paul Downs founded Paul Downs Cabinetmakers in 1986. It is based outside Philadelphia.

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/why-i-am-not-going-to-renew-the-sales-consultant/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Netflix to Deliver All 13 Episodes of ‘House of Cards’ on One Day

Binge-viewing, empowered by DVD box sets and Netflix subscriptions, has become such a popular way for Americans to watch TV that it is beginning to influence the ways the stories are told — particularly one-hour dramas — and how they are distributed.

Some people, pressured by their peers to watch “Mad Men” or “Game of Thrones,” catch up on previous seasons to see what all the fuss is about before a new season begins. Others plan weekend marathons of classics like “The West Wing” and “The Wire.” Like other American pastimes, it can get competitive: people have been known to brag about finishing a whole 12-episode season of “Homeland” in one sitting.

On Friday, Netflix will release a drama expressly designed to be consumed in one sitting: “House of Cards,” a political thriller starring Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright. Rather than introducing one episode a week, as distributors have done since the days of black-and-white TVs, all 13 episodes will be streamed at the same time. “Our goal is to shut down a portion of America for a whole day,” the producer Beau Willimon said with a laugh.

“House of Cards,” which is the first show made specifically for Netflix, dispenses with some of the traditions that are so common on network TV, like flashbacks. There is less reason to remind viewers what happened in previous episodes, the producers say, because so many viewers will have just seen it. And if they don’t remember, Google is just a click away. The show “assumes you know what’s happening all the time, whereas television has to assume that a big chunk of the audience is always just tuning in,” said Ted Sarandos, Netflix’s chief content officer.

The producer Glen Mazzara took a similar approach to AMC’s “The Walking Dead” this year. In the second half of the season, which will start in mid-February after a two-month break, “we decided to pick up the action right away — to just jump right in,” Mr. Mazzara said. Fans of the show, he said, have little tolerance for recaps, since many of them will have just watched a marathon of the first half to prepare for the second.

That the fans even have a choice in the matter is a testament to the fundamental changes under way in the television business. Digital video recorders, video-on-demand capabilities and streaming Web sites have given viewers command of what they watch and when, not unlike the way the invention of supermarkets gave food shoppers a panoply of new choices. In both cases, some consumers love to binge.

While a large majority of TV is still watched live, not recorded, the ratings for some series — like FX’s “Sons of Anarchy” — double after a week of recorded viewing is counted. A first-of-its-kind Nielsen study last fall found that a handful of shows gain an extra 5 percent after another three weeks.

Nielsen does not routinely count viewers who wait more than a week to watch an episode, nor does it count most of the viewers who watch online, so it’s hard to estimate the true amount of bingeing. Some hoarders wait years: Mr. Mazzara, for instance, said he’s waiting to watch HBO’s “Girls” until the whole series is over, several years from now. This stockpiling phenomenon has become so common that some network executives worry that it is hurting new shows because they cancel the shows before would-be viewers get around to watching them.

Kevin Reilly, the Fox Entertainment chairman, whose network has already canceled two of the three shows it introduced last fall, alluded to this problem at a news conference earlier this month. “If I bumped into one more person that was doing a ‘Breaking Bad’ marathon in the middle of our fall launch…,” he said, trailing off as reporters laughed.

But the networks are adapting to the generational shift from on-a-schedule to on-demand viewing. When Fox introduced its biggest bet of the season, “The Following,” last week, it bought ads saying “Set your DVR now!” And sure enough, episode No. 2 this week out-rated the premiere, suggesting that the ad campaign had worked.

In recognition of the change, some networks are pushing to expand the metrics that determine advertising rates — from the current three-day ratings to a seven-day rating that would better account for on-demand habits.

Binge-viewing has been around at least since the advent of videotapes, when companies started to sell box sets of shows. But it has come of age because of the catalogs on Netflix, Hulu, Amazon and other Web sites.

Some media executives like to call the behavior “marathoning,” since bingeing can have negative connotations. Either way, the behavior “extends the life of a show,” said Anthony Bay, the vice president for digital video at Amazon.

That’s been true for “Lost,” which ended its run on ABC three years ago, but is still a hit on Netflix and Hulu. Damon Lindelof, a co-creator of the mystery, said he has found that some people enjoyed it more by watching from start to finish, without the weeklong and monthlong waits for answers. Bingers, he said, “were spared the anxiety and the stress of the weekly episodes.”

For a creator, he added, speaking to a roomful of producers and distributors in Miami this week, it’s comforting to know that “ultimately the way your work is going to be viewed is more like reading a novel.”

That said, the traditional TV cliffhanger is far from dead. The producers of shows — even the five beginning on Netflix this year — know they have to satisfy multiple types of audiences. Said David Fincher, the acclaimed film director who is working with Mr. Willimon on “House of Cards” for Netflix, “I want to make sure that people who set the book down on the night stand are able to connect the dots, but I also want the people who are rabidly turning pages to go, ‘Yeah, yeah, yeah, I got all that.’ ”

In some corners of Hollywood there is deep skepticism about Netflix’s all-at-once release of “House of Cards.” Mr. Willimon acknowledged the advantages to stretching out a season — it’s a format viewers are used to, there’s more time for marketing — but said that as a storyteller (he’s best known for the play “Farragut North,” which inspired the film “The Ides of March”) he prefers the “House of Cards” approach.

As television becomes less beholden to the schedule and more acclimated to the Web, he said, “it might even dispense with episodes altogether. You might just get eight straight hours or 10 straight hours, and you decide where to pause.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/business/media/netflix-to-deliver-all-13-episodes-of-house-of-cards-on-one-day.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Wholesale Inventories Rose in August for 20th Month

Another report showed that consumers cut back their borrowing in August by the most in 16 months. The drop suggested that many worried about taking on new debt while the economy slumped and the stock market fluctuated wildly.

The combination of rising sales and inventories should be a good sign for future factory output.

The Commerce Department said Friday that wholesale inventories rose 0.4 percent in August after a 0.8 percent July gain. Sales were up 1 percent, the best showing since a 3 percent rise in March.

The stronger sales gain was an encouraging sign after a slowdown that had raised concerns about whether the economy could be in danger of toppling into a recession. Economists expect overall economic growth to post a modest rebound in the second half of this year.

The August inventory gain pushed stockpiles to a seasonally adjusted level of $464.3 billion, up 21 percent from a September 2009 low of $383.6 billion. Companies were slashing inventories during the recession as they tried to control costs in the face of falling demand. The change to rebuilding inventories has been a major factor supporting growth over the last two years.

The economy slowed significantly in the first six months of this year as consumers, feeling the pinch of soaring gas prices, cut back on spending on other items. The overall economy grew at an anemic rate of just 0.9 percent from January through March, the weakest performance since the recession ended in June 2009.

Economists expect growth will show a slight improvement to about 2 percent in the last half of this year, still too weak to make a significant improvement in the unemployment rate.

The government reported Friday that the unemployment rate in September remained stuck at 9.1 percent for a third consecutive month.

Meanwhile, fewer Americans used their credit cards and a measure of auto and student loan demand fell.

Total borrowing dropped by $9.5 billion in August, the Federal Reserve said Friday. That follows an increase of $11.9 billion in July.

Consumer borrowing had risen for 10 consecutive months before the August decline, which was the largest drop since April 2010

Borrowing for auto and student loans plunged $7.2 billion in August. A category that includes credit cards tumbled $2.3 billion.

The overall decline lowered total borrowing to a seasonally adjusted $2.44 trillion. Borrowing is just 2.1 percent higher than the recent low hit in September 2010.

Americans have been struggling with high unemployment, meager pay raises and a big increase in gasoline prices in the spring. That has depressed consumer spending, which fuels 70 percent of economic growth.

Economists expect modest growth of 2 percent in the second half of the year. Households began borrowing less and saving more when the country fell into recession and unemployment surged.

While economists say they think that borrowing will gradually increase in coming months, they do not expect consumers to load up on debt the way they did during the housing boom. Americans felt wealthier then and were more willing to take on added debt because of the soaring value of their homes.

The Federal Reserve’s borrowing report covers auto loans, student loans and credit cards.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=52f65d2a08dadf8c7e41216fd6d5020b