November 17, 2024

Battered by Crises, Toyota Declares a Rebirth

The Crown, the preferred ride of staid Japanese executives, had gotten an edgy makeover. With a new oversize grille, vamped-up hybrid engine and an unveiling at a fashion mall, there was nothing stodgy about this car.

“Reborn,” read a logo beamed onto a large screen.

“My initial reaction was: ‘You’re kidding! Please, not pink,’ ” Akio Toyoda, the Toyota chief executive and a scion of the Japanese automaker’s founding family, told reporters at the event. “But being reborn does mean taking on new challenges.”

Toyota has spent much of the last year trying to leave behind what has been a tumultuous four years in which the automaker booked its largest loss ever, became embroiled in a recall scandal, struggled with a decimated supply chain after the 2011 tsunami and weathered the punishing effects of a strong yen.

One by one, the pieces have been falling into place.

In 2012, Toyota leapfrogged General Motors and Volkswagen to regain its title as the world’s largest automaker, selling 9.7 million vehicles, a record for the company. Now the company is on the cusp of a recovery, analysts say, that could put it on track to post the kind of growth promised before the crises.

“Toyota is now in the position — for the first time in years — where it is beating market expectations while its peers are disappointing,” Clive Wiggins, a Tokyo-based autos analyst for Macquarie, said in a recent note to clients. “We expect earnings to continue beating expectations over the next three years.”

Last week, Toyota agreed to pay more than $1 billion to settle a class-action suit over claims that its electronic malfunctions caused its cars to accelerate without warning, one of the largest payouts ever for an automotive lawsuit. Toyota still faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits, as well as an unfair business practices case brought by 28 attorneys general in the United States. But the company’s $1.1 billion charge against earnings for the class action was seen as a significant step toward closing the chapter on its recall problems.

There have been other signs of change. The company supply chain bounced back more quickly than predicted, profits are on the rise and the yen has started to weaken after the newly installed prime minister, Shinzo Abe, promised to drive down that currency.

And there is a loud message of change being sounded through the stepped-up emphasis on design — with both Toyota and Lexus models getting new looks, including the pink Crown. “It’s actually a beautiful color,” Mr. Toyoda said.

Toyota’s rebound has been centered in the United States, where its sales increased 28.8 percent last year to 1.88 million vehicles through November. That’s more than double the industrywide increase of 13.9 percent over the same period.

The biggest contributors have been stalwart products such as the Camry, and the expanded line of Prius hybrid models. Through November, combined sales of Prius cars had risen 81.3 percent in 2012, as the company continued to dominate the hybrid segment.

The company is also betting on a revamped version of a perennial also-ran, the Avalon sedan. Sales of the current version of the car were down 5 percent last year. The new model, with its wide-mouth grille and sculptured headlamps, reflects the company’s efforts to appeal to younger buyers. Toyota is trying to shave 10 years off the average age of buyers, now in the mid-60s.

The Avalon, which was designed and engineered in Michigan and is being built at Toyota’s assembly plant in Kentucky, is also a test of how much Japanese officials can delegate decision-making to the company’s subsidiaries. Promoted as Toyota’s most American vehicle ever, the Avalon is the first Toyota prototype not developed in Japan but at the sprawling Toyota Technical Center near Ann Arbor, Mich., where 1,100 employees work.

Hiroko Tabuchi reported from Tokyo and Bill Vlasic from Detroit.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/business/battered-by-crises-toyota-declares-a-rebirth.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Politically Tied Lawyers Win Jobs Handling Foreclosures in the City

Nearly 600 people in Manhattan had been approved for such work. But the job went to a lawyer named Mark D. Lebow, who is the husband of Patricia E. Harris, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s most trusted aide.

Since then, Mr. Lebow has earned $352,000 in fees, more than $5,000 a week, according to court records.

The foreclosure crisis has caused a surge in the number of court-appointed receivers for distressed properties in New York, and politically connected lawyers are benefiting.

Yet even as the fees mount, totaling millions of dollars, it remains unclear why judges are selecting some of these lawyers, and whether the fees are being well spent.

The court system in New York State has long been criticized for fostering a system of patronage appointments that enriches lawyers and others with ties to influential politicians. Court officials defend the process of selecting receivers for distressed properties, saying judges are looking for people who they know have done good work.

Over all, the number of receivers appointed by judges to oversee distressed properties in the city jumped to 284 last year from 47 in 2007, records show.

Paul Vallone, a scion of one of Queens’s most powerful political families, earned nearly $17,000 for one assignment. Howard R. Vargas, a former commissioner of the Taxi and Limousine Commission, was awarded $28,000 for three cases. Marc Landis, a Democratic district leader and member of the transition team of the new state attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, was compensated $22,000 for supervising three buildings.

And those were for assignments that were given out earlier in the foreclosure crisis and that have already yielded fees. The newest appointments, with the billing to come, are filled with even more lawyers with ties to the powerful.

Dominick Calderoni, a law partner of State Senator Jeffrey D. Klein, a Bronx Democrat, was handed six receiverships. William C. Thompson Sr., the father of William C. Thompson Jr., the former city comptroller and mayoral candidate, got six. Gregory C. Soumas, a member of the city’s Board of Elections, received two, though he said one property went into bankruptcy, ending his involvement.

When a building goes into foreclosure, a judge appoints a lawyer as a receiver who acts a property’s temporary landlord during the process. Receivers are entitled to fees that typically amount to 5 percent of a property’s revenues. Judges can award less than 5 percent, but usually do not.

The court-appointed lawyers in turn usually hire property managers and other lawyers to assist in overseeing the properties. The receivers do not pay out of their own pockets for the costs of the property managers and other lawyers. That money comes from the properties’ revenues. “This is why mortgagees hate foreclosures,” said Harold Shultz, a senior fellow at the Citizens Housing and Planning Council, a nonprofit research group. “During this process all these people are sucking money out of the building.”

With complaints about the quality of receivers growing, city officials said they were considering state legislation to require people seeking to become receivers to be vetted by the city’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development. Receivers are now vetted only by the courts.

Not all receiverships come with high fees, or go to lawyers with ties to politicians.

Some lawyers are handed cash-poor and dilapidated buildings, and are hamstrung by a lack of resources. Some appointments can be low paying and time consuming.

Other lawyers, though, have won plum appointments. The receivership obtained by Mr. Lebow, the husband of Ms. Harris, the first deputy mayor, was one of the highest-paying in the city recently. In court papers, the judge did not explain why she gave Mr. Lebow the work.

There are now 605 people eligible to be receivers in Manhattan, according to court records.

Mr. Lebow is a partner in his own law firm, Lebow Sokolow, and has served on the board of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority since 2002. Mr. Bloomberg recommended him for the authority position. Mr. Lebow did not respond to six telephone and e-mail messages left over a month seeking comment on the receiver appointment.

Stu Loeser, a mayoral spokesman, would not comment. The judge in the case, Marylin G. Diamond of State Supreme Court in Manhattan, has recently retired, and did not respond to requests for comment. State Supreme Court judges, who appoint most receivers in these cases, are elected.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: June 21, 2011

An earlier version of this article incorrectly described the position of Howard R. Vargas. He is a former, not current, commissioner of the Taxi and Limousine Commission.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=de42f699ce935a0308ddb33cebb6a1d4