November 28, 2024

You’re the Boss Blog: The Brutal Truth: My Score as a Sales Manager

Staying Alive

The struggles of a business trying to survive.

Editor’s note: Paul Downs is writing this week about his decision to hire a sales consultant. The series started with this post.

The sales training began with evaluations. My three sales staffers (Don, Nathan, and Mary) and I were given a psychological profile test (DiSC profile) and a test to gauge our attitudes toward selling. I was given an additional set of questions designed to reveal my capabilities as the sales manager. Mr. Waks also spent a morning with us listening in as we talked to clients on the phone.

A couple of weeks after the evaluations, I received a thick report with the results of all of the tests, both for me and for my staff. The good news is that we all had potential to be sales professionals, although some work would be involved. The bad news was that I scored a zero, literally, as a sales manager.

I wasn’t performing any of the practices that defined the role. No regular meetings. No ongoing training for the salesmen. No consequences for failure to meet goals. No data gathering, other than the gross sales amounts. I had been convinced that I had done a decent job in training Don and Nate to sell, but confronted with my many weaknesses, I realized that I had dropped the ball.

Soon after the evaluations came in, we started classes. These were group sessions, and most of the attendees came from small companies like mine. I was one of the few boss-level attendees. Most of the people were front-line staff, employees who needed to interact with customers and keep the money flowing in but who had never had any education in how to sell. We were being taught the Sandler Method.

Sandler is not the only sales strategy out there, and I have no opinion whether it is the best one or not. It was what Mr. Waks taught, and I figured that any structured training would be useful. As it turned out, Sandler focuses on understanding whether the person we are talking to has power and how to get to the decision maker. It also teaches techniques of influencing interactions with potential customers, to maximize our chance of closing a deal. This set of ideas gave me a new way to think about what we were doing. And I realized that we had been making some classic mistakes.

In particular, we were giving away our design and engineering expertise and revealing our pricing way too early in the process. It was an easy task for a potential buyer to hand our proposals to our competitors and ask them to beat our price. Also, we were making no attempt to figure out where our customer contacts sat in their company’s hierarchy. We had no idea whether the person we were speaking with could make a decision, and we made no attempt to work our way up the power structure so that we could make our case to the people who would actually choose a vendor. We didn’t have good systems for keeping track of inquiries, and we weren’t keeping good records of what the sales staff was doing all day.

We also started coaching sessions with Mr. Waks, both one-on-one with me and with my staff. When I had told Don and Nate, my salesmen, that we would be undergoing sales training, they were a little worried about the amount of time it would require, but they could see as well as I that we needed to do something. When we started the actual training, they were even more uneasy. Both had started their careers at a workbench, and they thought of themselves as craftsmen who happened to be doing a sales job. Now they were being asked to consider themselves salesmen first, with some specialized product knowledge.

They were both worried about the snake-oil aspect of selling, whether they would be required to do unseemly things to close deals. It took a great deal of discussion for us to agree on a better way to think about selling — that customers called us because they wanted what we make, that nobody is ever tricked into or forced into buying anything from us, and that selling to support the company and their families is a perfectly honorable way to make a living. I had long since come to believe this, even before receiving the training, because I could always see the connection between a sale, a healthy company, and a satisfied customer. Without sales, the company can’t exist. There would be no work to do, and no money to pay anyone.

By the middle of last July, we started to deploy the new techniques, and we started to close deals again. We also introduced a technical modification to our sales process. Instead of sending out pdf documents to clients, we started presenting our ideas in Web chat sessions, using screen-sharing software to show potential buyers a 3-D interactive model of our proposed design. This is very cool to see, but it leaves the client without a set of images to hand to our competitors. The technical documentation is a goody we now reserve for clients who have placed an order and given us a deposit.

I also spent much of the summer writing code to add a customer-relations management component to our database program, which we use to run the rest of the business. I considered buying an outside package, like SalesForce or Act! but decided against it — too expensive, and all of my staff are already in the database all day. I am not a FileMaker star, but I was able to add the features we needed without much trouble. I also wrote a number of Google Docs spreadsheets to tabulate data on incoming calls and the daily activities of the salesmen.

Our sales started to recover in July, and in August we finally hit our target, closing deals worth $200,607. Even better, we kept up the pace for the rest of the year and, somewhat to my surprise, we have continued to do so through the present day. We have exceeded my $600,000 sales goal in every quarter since beginning our sales training.

Friday: Should I Renew the Consultant’s Contract?

Paul Downs founded Paul Downs Cabinetmakers in 1986. It is based outside Philadelphia.

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/the-brutal-truth-my-score-as-a-sales-manager/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Retro Import From Russia Lures Older, Easier Riders

Think of it as Easy Rider, the golden years.

It started as a matter of survival for the Irbit Motor Works, which for decades had churned out its signature Ural motorcycle with sidecar attachment, but which discovered that its business was sputtering into the Post-Communist sunset like so many other Soviet enterprises.

Irbit found salvation in an unlikely niche market: older American riders seeking utility, not thrills or spills. Suddenly the sidecar, a seemingly anachronistic product evoking a World War II newsreel, had a new life among the late middle-aged.

The company shifted its sales strategy overseas in the 1990s and today, despite its deep roots in Russia as the purveyor to the Red Army, it sends 60 percent of its output to the United States.

For the target male consumer, the born-to-run ideal of a motorcycle mama on the back has given way to a spouse or girlfriend riding alongside, holding the dog or the groceries.

Irbit and its dealerships say older bikers represent their core market, but the bike-sidecar combination has also begun to catch on with a younger generation of riders, couples who find its retro look appealing.

“In the Soviet Union, our motorcycle was a workhorse,” said Vladimir N. Kurmachev, Irbit’s factory director. “Now it is an expensive toy.”

David Reich, 65, a retired carpenter in Salem, Ore., bought a white Ural Patrol from a dealership there last year.

“It’s something my wife and I can both enjoy,” he said in a telephone interview. They considered buying two bikes, he said, but decided on the sidecar so his wife, Jeanne, would not have to get a motorcycle license. Also, they could chat while touring.

“I am having a ball!” Jeanne Reich wrote in an e-mail. “I enjoy cruising along a few inches off the road with nothing to do but take in the view.”

Peter terHorst, the spokesman for the American Motorcyclist Association, said the average age of its 230,000 members was 48. As people’s strength and coordination wane, he said, “you see them transitioning to the sidecar.”

“Older couples say it’s just not comfortable to double up,” Mr. Kurmachev said during a tour of the shop floor, where sidecars are polished, painted and installed standard on nearly every bike.

Irbit, known by its Russian acronym IMZ, says it is the only motorcycle manufacturer in the world selling stock sidecars in volume; some BMW and Harley-Davidson dealers have sold them as options, though Harley is discontinuing sidecar production.

Sidecars, while popular with some riders, still account for a fraction of the motorcycle market in the United States, said Ty van Hooydonk, a spokesman for the Motorcycle Industry Council, a trade group. The makers do not disclose sales figures, he said.

Irbit’s factory sits on the rim of a ramshackle town of wooden buildings and rutted dirt roads on the Siberian side of the Urals, with a statue of Lenin still in the main square. It is operating, but at greatly diminished capacity compared with its 1970s heyday, when it produced up to 130,000 vehicles a year. Assembly lines have closed and the motorcycles are now built by hand.

A ride in a sidecar can be either exhilarating or, for those not accustomed to the sensation, terrifying. Set low to the ground, the sidecar tends to rise into the air on right-hand turns. The bike is street legal in all 50 states. But because the entire three-wheel contraption is legally a motorcycle, no seat belt is provided or required. With United States sales rising, Irbit says it is studying an air bag for the sidecar.

The Ural is a heavy, 40-horsepower motorcycle whose two cylinders jut sideways from the frame. It is modeled after a late-1930s BMW sidecar bike called the R71, which Nazi Germany provided to the Soviet Union after the countries signed a nonaggression pact in 1939. When the Nazis broke this pact and invaded, the Russians used the bike to fight them.

Irbit stopped building military models in 1955 and began focusing on a civilian market of hunters, outdoor enthusiasts and owners of summer homes.

Norman Mayersohn contributed reporting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/world/europe/29sidecar.html?partner=rss&emc=rss