December 22, 2024

At White House, Top Lawmakers Say They Expect Budget Deal

The four leaders – two Republicans, John A. Boehner, the House speaker, and Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority leader; and two Democrats, Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader, and Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader – politely took turns at a microphone outside the West Wing, addressing each other by first names and describing the 70-minute session as constructive.

“We feel very comfortable with each other, and this isn’t something we’re going to wait until the last day of December to get it done,” Mr. Reid said.

“This isn’t the first time that we’ve dealt with these issues,” he said. “We feel we understand what the problem is. And we felt very – I feel very good about what we were able to talk about in there. We have the cornerstones of being able to work something out. We’re both going to have to give up some of the things that we know are a problem.”

Mr. Boehner said he outlined a framework for overhauling the tax code and spending programs that is “consistent with the president’s call for a fair and balanced approach.”

“To show our seriousness,” he added, “we put revenue on the table as long as it’s accompanied by significant spending cuts.”

His Senate counterpart, Mr. McConnell, made plain that Republicans were talking about spending for the entitlement programs, chiefly Medicare and Medicaid, which are growing fast as the population ages and, along with military spending, are squeezing everything else in the federal budget. Republican senators, Mr. McConnell said, “fully understand that you can’t save the country until you have entitlement programs that fit the demographics of the changing America in the coming years.”

“We’re prepared to put revenues on the table,” he added, “provided we fix the real problem, even though most of my members, I think without exception, believe that we’re in the dilemma we’re in not because we tax too little but because we spend too much.”

Ms. Pelosi, whose House Democratic colleagues include many liberals who resist significant changes to entitlement spending, said: “We understand our responsibility here. We understand that it has to be about cuts, it has to be about revenue, it has to be about growth, it has to be about the future.” She added, “I feel confident that a solution may be in sight.”

With Mr. Obama in the Roosevelt Room, the leaders made up the same cast who bitterly fought in 2011, then eventually agreed to nearly $1 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years but deadlocked on the roughly $4 trillion “grand bargain” both sides say the country needs.

Mr. Obama demands that it include up to $1.6 trillion in tax increases for the wealthy, while Republicans favor less in revenue but big cost-saving changes to Medicare and Medicaid.

The talks began on a friendly note, as well: With reporters and cameras briefly allowed into the room, the president wished a happy birthday to Mr. Boehner, who turns 63 on Saturday.

The two sides met after a tense week of postelection, pre-bargaining positioning. Mr. Obama, after making an issue of it in his re-election campaign, claims a mandate to insist on extending the Bush-era tax cuts, which otherwise expire on Dec. 31 — but not for income of $250,000 and above for couples and $200,000 for individuals.

More broadly, the outcome of the budget talks will go a long way toward defining his leverage for a second term, both in terms of his influence and the resources available to him to press his agenda.

The president “will not sign, under any circumstances, an extension of tax cuts for the top 2 percent of American earners,” his spokesman, Jay Carney, told reporters on Thursday.

“We have to make sure that taxes don’t go up on the middle class, that the economy remains strong,” Mr. Obama said as the meeting began.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/us/politics/obama-meeting-top-lawmakers-in-tough-deficit-talks.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Senate Struggles to Muster Republican Support for a New Fiscal Compromise

“We now have a level of seriousness with the right people at the table,” Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, said during a news conference he held with Speaker John A. Boehner. He said that Republicans were now “fully engaged” in discussions with the White House and that he expected a deal soon.

Both men expressed confidence they could find an acceptable resolution to a crisis that has nerves frayed on Capitol Hill, a tension illustrated in a heated House debate where House Republicans pre-emptively rejected the latest debt limit proposal from Senator Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat and majority leader.

Just how they would get a resolution remained unclear given the months of partisan fighting over the debt limit and the fact that any deal would have to clear a Senate controlled by Democrats and a House dominated by Republicans who as recently as last Thursday had rebelled against Mr. Boehner’s own proposal.

In another indication of some possible movement toward an agreement, President Obama called Mr. Reid and Representative Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, to the White House on Saturday afternoon to confer over the situation. The burst of activity came as Senate Democrats struggled to round up Republican support for Mr. Reid’s plan, which is scheduled for a vote early Sunday morning.

Their efforts were set back Saturday when 43 of the 47 Republican senators signed a letter to Mr. Reid saying they would not back his proposal that would allow a $2.4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling in two stages while establishing a new Congressional committee to explore deeper spending cuts. The numbers signaled that without changes in the plan, Mr. Reid would not be able to overcome a Republican filibuster, which requires 60 votes.

House Republicans signaled their disapproval of the Reid plan by holding a symbolic vote on Saturday, rejecting it by a 246 to 173 vote, in a move intended to show it had no chance of passing in that chamber. About a dozen Democrats joined Republicans in rejecting the Reid plan.

The pre-emptive vote could strengthen the hand of Mr. McConnell as he seeks additional concessions from Mr. Reid.

Mr. Reid, for his part, said Mr. McConnell was dragging his feet on beginning talks to find a compromise solution, and he called on Republicans to offer their plans to alter his measure.

“We have heard very little from the Republicans,” Mr. Reid said on the floor. “My friend the Republican leader must generate some more action on the part of his Republicans.”

But Mr. McConnell, in a floor exchange with his Democratic counterpart, indicated that Republicans wanted to first have a chance to oppose Mr. Reid’s measure before entering new talks. He also demanded that the president take part in any final negotiations.

“We’ve got a couple of days to work this out and we can’t do it without the president,” Mr. McConnell said.

The unusual Saturday session came after a week of brinkmanship on Capitol Hill. On Friday, Mr. Boehner managed to pass his own House bill, along party lines, just a day after suspending the vote as the Republican leadership tried frantically to line up enough votes for passage. But that plan was swiftly rejected by the Senate late Friday.

While some of the back-and-forth between the House and Senate and the party leaders was typical of the late stages of a negotiation, the combative and unyielding tone in both chambers of Congress was creating more pessimism about the prospects that a final agreement could be struck and cleared before Tuesday.

Mr. Obama, who has warned that the government could run short of money as soon as Wednesday morning, laid the blame for the impasse squarely on House Republicans in his weekly address, which largely repeated remarks he made on Friday as the stalemate gripped Washington.

“Democrats in Congress and some Senate Republicans have been listening and have shown themselves willing to make compromises to solve this crisis,” he said. “Now all of us — including Republicans in the House of Representatives — need to demonstrate the same kind of responsibility.”

In the Republican video response, Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona said that “Republicans have tried to work with Democrats” to raise the debt ceiling, “but we need them to work with us.”

Though the current Senate plan was in serious trouble, Democrats and the administration were exploring ways to adjust it to win some Republican backing and send it back to the House as a final offer to raise the debt limit and avert a default after Tuesday.

If a measure is able to win significant bipartisan endorsement in the Senate, the reception in the House could be different with the Treasury Department’s Aug. 2 deadline for increasing the debt limit imminent.

Jackie Calmes contributed reporting from Washington, and Thom Shanker from Kandahar, Afghanistan.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=3bd08865264e67df9311c9d7d10d6651

Judge Strikes Down Wisconsin Law Curbing Unions

Judge Maryann Sumi of Dane County Circuit Court said the Senate vote on March 9, coming after 13 Democratic state senators had fled the state, failed to comply with an open meetings law requiring at least two hours notice to the public.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in the case on June 6 , and Republican lawmakers are hoping that the court overturns Judge Sumi’s ruling and reinstates the law.

The State Senate could choose simply to pass the bill again while assuring proper notice. But some political experts say there might be some obstacles to re-enacting the vote because some Democrats could conceivably flee the state again, and some Republican Senators are frightened about pending recall elections.

The law, which generated huge protests in Madison, the state capital, bars public-sector unions, except for police officers and firefighters, from bargaining over health benefits and pensions. The law allows bargaining over wages alone, but does not allow raises higher than the inflation rate unless they are approved in a public referendum.

The Senate’s 19 Republicans approved the measure, 18 to 1, in less than half an hour, without any debate on the floor or a single Democrat in the room.

Scott Fitzgerald, a Republican who is the Senate majority leader, attacked Judge Sumi’s decision.

“There’s still a much larger separation-of-powers issue: whether one Madison judge can stand in the way of the other two democratically elected branches of government,” he said in a statement. “The Supreme Court is going to have the ultimate ruling.”

Mary Bell, president of the Wisconsin Education Association Council, the state’s largest teachers union, applauded the judge’s decision, saying the law was always intended to “bust unions.”

“In the wake of this ruling, state lawmakers should back down and not take another run at this divisive legislation,” she said in a statement. “It is not in the best interest of students, schools or Wisconsin’s future to take the voices of educators out of our classrooms.”

Republican senators asserted that they had enacted the collective bargaining law under emergency conditions, obviating the need to comply with the open meetings law. But Judge Sumi said she found no official evidence of emergency conditions or notice.

“This case is the example of values protected by the open meetings law: transparency in government, the right of citizens to participate in their government and respect for the rule of law,” Judge Sumi wrote in her conclusion.

She said the evidence demonstrated a failure to obey even the two-hour notice allowed for good cause if a 24-hour notice was impossible or impractical.

A Republican spokesman said party leaders were studying Judge Sumi’s ruling and were not yet ready to issue a statement. Cullen Werwie, a spokesman for Mr. Walker, declined comment, saying the Senate vote did not directly involve the governor.

Judge Sumi rejected the Republicans’ claims that the open meetings law did not allow bills passed by the State Legislature to be struck down, asserting that only laws by lesser bodies can be overturned under that law. She also rejected the idea that the law was so important that it should stand despite the open meetings violation.

Quoting a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision from last year, Judge Sumi wrote, “The right of the people to monitor the people’s business is one of the core principles of democracy.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1b2befab8fa284a389abb63e258301ce