December 22, 2024

Credit Warnings Give World a Peek Into China’s Secretive Banks

The People’s Bank of China, the central bank, let the world know on Monday that it was putting the nation’s banks on notice: the loose money and the speculation it fed had to stop. It said banks had to step up risk controls and improve cash management. And they had to do it, the bank said, by avoiding a “stampede” mentality.

The banks had quietly received that very message a week earlier, which set off, if not a rush for the exits, certainly widespread worry in China and financial centers around the world.

It precipitated a cash squeeze among the banks that sent their short-term interest rates sharply higher last week. The crackdown, which appears aimed at reining in banks engaged in complex deals that involve hiding and repackaging risky loans so that regulators cannot notice them, also led to a sharp sell-off in stocks worldwide during the last week. Investors feared it might further slow the Chinese economy.

China, the world’s second-largest economy after the United States, has a huge influence on the world economy so the actions of its central bank are closely watched across the globe. But its financial and banking system remains opaque to Chinese and foreigners alike. Within the government’s own warnings about lending lies its dilemma: it needs to control where money is being lent at the same time it wants to reform a banking system that has grown dependent on government direction.

“The government knows some banks are doing things that aren’t prudent,” says Yukon Huang, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. “Some of them are taking easy money and putting it in Ponzi schemes. The government is saying, ‘Don’t do that any more. And don’t count on the government to bail you out.’ ”

Li Keqiang, China’s prime minister, who took office last March, has promised a more market-oriented approach to managing the economy. And analysts say his economic advisers are pressing to reorganize the economy in a way that will allow it to respond better to market forces.

But to put such reforms in place, the new government is going to have to take on powerful state-run companies and interest groups that sometimes resist pressure from the center or turn to allies in the central leadership who block such moves.

The government’s target is the sharp and potentially dangerous rise in the so-called shadow banking. Banks borrow at the low interbank rate, then lend to trust companies and smaller banks who in turn make riskier loans. The fear among some analysts is that the vast amount of bad debt and hidden liabilities the shadow banking system masks could start sinking banks. Those excesses could start a chain of other economic setbacks.

Most economists say China’s financial system is not facing huge systemic risks, and that growth could even come in at 7 percent, which would still make it the world’s fastest-growing major economy. But there are mounting concerns here that the good times could be over partly because the banking sector is hiding piles of bad debt.

The Chinese government has the policy tools to deal with a crisis, including huge foreign exchange reserves and the ability to force state banks to lend in a time of crisis. The People’s Bank of China is not an independent institution, like many central banks in major economies are; it reports to the central government.

But after years of pumping money into the economy, the central bank can see signs of diminishing returns. Banks lent a huge amount of money in the first half of this year, and yet growth has been tepid. Manufacturing has begun to contract, according to a recent survey, and banks seem desperate for more cash.

Last Friday, Fitch Ratings said in a report that less money in the market for interbank loans could hamper some banks from making payouts when high-interest financial instruments for China’s rich,called wealth management products, mature later this month.

Fitch said about $244 billion would come due later this month and that the effort to make the payout could send short-term borrowing rates even higher.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/25/business/global/credit-warnings-give-world-a-peek-into-chinas-secretive-banks.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Drilling Down: Insiders Sound an Alarm Amid a Natural Gas Rush

But the gas may not be as easy and cheap to extract from shale formations deep underground as the companies are saying, according to hundreds of industry e-mails and internal documents and an analysis of data from thousands of wells.

In the e-mails, energy executives, industry lawyers, state geologists and market analysts voice skepticism about lofty forecasts and question whether companies are intentionally, and even illegally, overstating the productivity of their wells and the size of their reserves. Many of these e-mails also suggest a view that is in stark contrast to more bullish public comments made by the industry, in much the same way that insiders have raised doubts about previous financial bubbles.

“Money is pouring in” from investors even though shale gas is “inherently unprofitable,” an analyst from PNC Wealth Management, an investment company, wrote to a contractor in a February e-mail. “Reminds you of dot-coms.”

“The word in the world of independents is that the shale plays are just giant Ponzi schemes and the economics just do not work,” an analyst from IHS Drilling Data, an energy research company, wrote in an e-mail on Aug. 28, 2009.

Company data for more than 10,000 wells in three major shale gas formations raise further questions about the industry’s prospects. There is undoubtedly a vast amount of gas in the formations. The question remains how affordably it can be extracted.

The data show that while there are some very active wells, they are often surrounded by vast zones of less-productive wells that in some cases cost more to drill and operate than the gas they produce is worth. Also, the amount of gas produced by many of the successful wells is falling much faster than initially predicted by energy companies, making it more difficult for them to turn a profit over the long run.

If the industry does not live up to expectations, the impact will be felt widely. Federal and state lawmakers are considering drastically increasing subsidies for the natural gas business in the hope that it will provide low-cost energy for decades to come.

But if natural gas ultimately proves more expensive to extract from the ground than has been predicted, landowners, investors and lenders could see their investments falter, while consumers will pay a price in higher electricity and home heating bills.

There are implications for the environment, too. The technology used to get gas flowing out of the ground — called hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking — can require over a million gallons of water per well, and some of that water must be disposed of because it becomes contaminated by the process. If shale gas wells fade faster than expected, energy companies will have to drill more wells or hydrofrack them more often, resulting in more toxic waste.

The e-mails were obtained through open-records requests or provided to The New York Times by industry consultants and analysts who say they believe that the public perception of shale gas does not match reality; names and identifying information were redacted to protect these people, who were not authorized to communicate publicly. In the e-mails, some people within the industry voice grave concerns.

“And now these corporate giants are having an Enron moment,” a retired geologist from a major oil and gas company wrote in a February e-mail about other companies invested in shale gas. “They want to bend light to hide the truth.”

Others within the industry remain optimistic. They argue that shale gas economics will improve as the price of gas rises, technology evolves and demand for gas grows with help from increased federal subsidies being considered by Congress. “Shale gas supply is only going to increase,” Steven C. Dixon, executive vice president of Chesapeake Energy, said at an energy industry conference in April in response to skepticism about well performance.

Studying the Data

“I think we have a big problem.”

Deborah Rogers, a member of the advisory committee of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, recalled saying that in a May 2010 telephone call to a senior economist at the Reserve, Mine K. Yucel. “We need to take a close look at this right away,” she added.

A former stockbroker with Merrill Lynch, Ms. Rogers said she started studying well data from shale companies in October 2009 after attending a speech by the chief executive of Chesapeake, Aubrey K. McClendon. The math was not adding up, Ms. Rogers said. Her research showed that wells were petering out faster than expected.

Robbie Brown contributed reporting from Atlanta.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a382f707e5573df93d50f7a7dce09fbb

Economix: Podcast: Credit Ratings, Ponzi Schemes and Data

Despite an ever-growing mountain of debt, the United States government has an impeccable credit rating. But this week Standard Poor’s warned that the Treasury’s triple-A status is in jeopardy.

While it reaffirmed the Treasury’s sterling rating for the short term, S..P. said that there was a one-in-three chance of a downgrade over the next few years. In ratcheting its outlook downward, the agency cited concerns about the ability of Congress and the White House to agree on a plan to reduce the budget deficit. All of this threw the equity markets into turmoil for a day, before stocks moved upward again. The bond market was barely affected by the credit warning.

But why? In a conversation in the Weekend Business podcast, Floyd Norris, the chief financial correspondent for The Times, says part of the reason is that S..P. itself has less than a stellar reputation after failing to warn of the problems looming in the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008. And this current warning, he says, has been shrugged off by the markets to some extent. It’s also possible that by focusing on the fiscal deficit — and by putting some pressure on the politicians in Washington — S..P. may have made it more likely that the deficit will come down. Furthermore, despite signs of a slowing American economy, corporate earnings have been very strong in the United States and abroad, bolstering the markets.

The financial crisis upset the plans of many financiers, including Bernie Madoff, whose Ponzi scheme came to an end as unwitting participants called in their chits on investments that didn’t actually exist. Diana Henriques has been covering the Madoff case since it came to light, and she’s written about it in a new book, “The Wizard of Lies: Bernie Madoff and the Death of Trust,” portions of which are adapted for a Sunday Business article. In a podcast discussion with David Gillen, Ms. Henriques paints a vivid picture of Mr. Madoff’s last days as the engineer of one of the biggest frauds in history.

In another podcast conversation, Steve Lohr, a veteran Times reporter, sees some indications that a long-awaited data-driven surge in productivity may finally be at hand. In the Unboxed column in Sunday Business, he cites research led by Erik Brynjolfsson, an M.I.T. economist, showing that companies making heavy use of data in their decision-making have improved productivity more rapidly than other businesses.

Historically, as innovations percolate through the economy, there has always been a lag in bolstering overall economic productivity. The United States economy may at last be benefiting from the Internet revolution, but Robert Gordon, an economist at Northwestern University, suggests that we may be digesting those benefits so rapidly that they will be short-lived.

How to make the best use of the data that companies collect on individuals is the concern of Richard Thaler, an economist at the University of Chicago. In a separate podcast conversation and in the Economic View column in Sunday Business, he says that such personal data needs not only to be protected, but also to be made available to individuals for their own benefit.

If, for example, you could relay information about your cellphone use to a third-part Web site, you could find help in choosing the cheapest phone plan for your needs, Mr. Thaler says.

In the news section of the podcast, I discuss a major fraud conviction, a National Labor Relations Board complaint against Boeing, and the impact of the disasters in Japan on that nation’s auto companies.

You can find specific segments of the program at these junctures: Floyd Norris on the U.S. credit rating (32:24); news headlines (25:17); Diana Henriques on Bernie Madoff (22:02); Steve Lohr on data-driven productivity (14:12); Richard Thaler on data for personal use (8:42); the week ahead (2:20).

As articles discussed in the podcast are published during the weekend, links will be added to this posting.

You can download the program by subscribing from the New York Times podcast page or directly from iTunes.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=78a64b93a8e7934a44f034aa71005e86