November 15, 2024

Underground Lender Gets Death Sentence in China

BEIJING — A businesswoman in southern China has been sentenced to death on charges of defrauding investors as the government tightens controls on informal financing that is widely used by entrepreneurs.

The woman, Lin Haiyan, was convicted of “illegal fundraising” for collecting 640 million renminbi, or $100 million, from investors by promising high returns and low risk, according to a statement by the Intermediate People’s Court of Wenzhou. It said that the plan had collapsed in October 2011 and that 428 million renminbi could not be recovered.

The case highlighted potential abuses in the largely unregulated informal lending that supports entrepreneurs who generate China’s new jobs and wealth but often cannot get loans from the state-owned banking industry. The government is tightening controls after a surge of defaults following the global financial crisis set off protests by lenders.

Another businesswoman from Wenzhou was also sentenced to death last year on charges of illegal fund-raising. That penalty was overturned following an outcry on the Internet and she was sentenced to prison.

Communist leaders have promised more bank lending for entrepreneurs and announced a pilot project in 2012 in Wenzhou to allow closely supervised private sector lending. But business leaders in Wenzhou say it is harder for entrepreneurs to get loans because worsening economic conditions have made banks and private sources reluctant to lend.

The underground credit market is estimated by China’s central bank and private sector analysts at 2 trillion to 4 trillion renminbi, or as much as 7 percent of total lending. In some areas, informal lending exceeds that of official banks.

Many households provide money for private lending in an effort to get a better return than the low deposit rates paid by Chinese banks, which effectively force depositors to subsidize low-interest loans to state industry.

The authorities have sentenced 1,449 people to prison terms of at least five years for involvement in underground lending since 2011, a police official, Du Jinfu, said last month.

Legal experts say loans between individuals are legal and that the government has failed to make clear what lenders and borrowers are allowed to do.

“The distinction between illegal fund-raising and private lending still remains unclear,” the Dui Hua Foundation, a group based in San Francisco that researches China’s justice system, said in a report in February.

Ms. Lin started raising money from friends, relatives and co-workers in 2007, according to a statement on the court’s Web site. It said Ms. Lin had told investors the money was going into stock offerings and bank deposits but used it to speculate in stocks.

Even as losses mounted, Ms. Lin continued to raise money until the scheme collapsed, the court said.

The statement said the penalty still must be confirmed. All death sentences in China are automatically appealed to the country’s highest court for review.

The court took the unusual step of issuing a second statement to support sentencing Ms. Lin to death after a Chinese blogger questioned the penalty in a comment that included the phrase “killing the witness.”

“Lin Haiyan’s actions constituted financial fraud that caused huge losses and seriously damaged the people and the state,” said the statement, which was several times the length of the original announcement. It criticized the blogger for challenging the court’s decision.

Protests erupted in 2011 and early 2012 in cities and towns throughout central China and along the southeast coast, areas with large concentrations of small private businesses, after the slowdown in global trade set off a wave of defaults. Schoolteachers, retirees and others who had lent to entrepreneurs demanded the authorities get back their money.

Regulators also worried that banks and state companies had gotten involved in underground lending, exposing the official financial system to unreported risks.

In the earlier case in Wenzhou, an entrepreneur, Wu Ying, was sentenced to death for improperly raising 770 million renminbi from investors in 2005-7. Ms. Wu, who started with a hair salon and built a business empire, had earlier been praised by the state news media as a role model for female entrepreneurs.

The Chinese Supreme Court overturned Ms. Wu’s death sentence following an outcry on the Internet over the severity of the penalty. She was resentenced to death with a two-year reprieve, which usually is commuted to a long prison term.

A statement on the Web site of China’s highest court, dated in 2011, says charges of “illegal fundraising” can be applied to an individual who receives more than 200,000 renminbi of informal loans or causes losses to lenders of 100,000 renminbi. Enterprises can face charges if they receive 1 million renminbi or cause losses of 2.5 million renminbi.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/business/global/underground-lender-gets-death-sentence-in-china.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Quietly, Google Puts History Online

PARIS — When the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, home to the Dead Sea Scrolls, reopened last year after an extensive renovation, it attracted a million visitors in the first 12 months. When the museum opened an enhanced Web site with newly digitized versions of the scrolls in September, it drew a million virtual visitors in three and a half days.

The scrolls, scanned with ultrahigh-resolution imaging technology, have been viewed on the Web from 210 countries — including some, like Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and Syria, that provide few real-world visitors to the Israel Museum.

“This is taking the material to an amazing range of audiences,” said James S. Snyder, the museum’s director. “There’s no way we would have had the technical capability to do this on our own.”

The digitization of the scrolls was done by Google under a new initiative aimed at demonstrating that the Internet giant’s understanding of culture extends beyond the corporate kind. The Google Cultural Institute plans to make artifacts like the scrolls — from museums, archives, universities and other collections around the world — accessible to any Internet user.

“We’re building services and tools that help people get culture online, help people preserve it online, promote it online and eventually even create it online,” said Steve Crossan, director of the institute, which is based in Paris.

The plans for the Cultural Institute grew out of the Dead Sea Scrolls initiative and another pilot project for Google in Israel, in which it helped bring the photos and documents of the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial onto the Web.

Previous Google cultural programs have also been incorporated into the center, including the Google Art Project, a digital repository of pictures from museums like the National Gallery in London, the Gemäldegalerie in Berlin and the Uffizi Gallery in Florence.

Now the institute is building up its activities in Paris, where it will be one of the anchors of a sprawling new Google headquarters for Southern and Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa, which is set to open next year.

So far, the institute is mostly just a team of engineers working on projects like the ones in Israel. Among the first projects are partnerships with the Palace of Versailles, to help it develop galleries devoted to the history of the chateau, and with the Nelson Mandela Foundation in South Africa. Other plans will be announced soon, Mr. Crossan said.

In addition to working with individual museums and archives, Mr. Crossan said, the engineers intend to develop a standard set of tools that any institution could use to digitize its collection. That way, even small, private archives or collections could be placed online in formats that would make them easily accessible to broad audiences.

When the new building opens, the institute will get a physical presence, including a gallerylike area featuring exhibits on how to present culture in an increasingly digital world.

Google plans to invite cultural figures for talks before live audiences, which will be filmed and posted on YouTube, the company’s video sharing site.

“We’ll discuss all kinds of things — subjects that are of relevance to Google, but really just subjects that are of relevance to the cultural world and the world of technology more generally,” Mr. Crossan said, in his first interview since plans for the institute were disclosed. “It’s one of the ways we actually wanted to connect with the cultural world.”

“We’re engineers; we’re technologists,” added Mr. Crossan, who does, however, have a history degree from Oxford. “We hope we bring competence in storing large amounts of data and serving it and creating a good experience for users, but we’re not professional curators or historians or artists ourselves, so we need to connect with that world.”

Indeed, Google has sometimes struggled to persuade cultural leaders to accept its plans. The company has been sued by authors and publishers on both sides of the Atlantic over its book-digitization project. In 2009, President Nicolas Sarkozy pledged hundreds of millions of euros toward a separate digitization program, saying he would not permit France to be “stripped of our heritage to the benefit of a big company, no matter how friendly, big or American it is.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=07797bd669c92dfc3068ca1ae0aacbd9