November 23, 2024

Filmmakers Embrace Reality, on the High Seas and Beyond

LOS ANGELES — Capt. Richard Phillips was bobbing in a boat full of Somali pirates on the Indian Ocean four years ago when Hollywood recognized an Oscar moment.

Film producers who were glued to the news sensed the stuff of next-wave nonfiction — an action hero, in a real-life global drama.

Things turned out well, from a cinematic point of view: Navy SEALs flew to the rescue, three of the pirates were shot dead, and Captain Phillips was freed unharmed.

The resulting movie, “Captain Phillips,” directed by Paul Greengrass, will arrive in October with Tom Hanks in the title role. It is one of a dozen nonfiction narratives that are promising to shake up the coming awards season, and perhaps to reinvent a reality-based movie genre that only a few years ago seemed moribund.

While Hollywood still loves the summer escape movie, sophisticated real-life dramas are filling up the latter part of the year, attracting top-flight stars and directors and finding a niche with audiences continually wired into unfolding news events.

Almost everybody knows something about the tales behind the new films, giving them a recognition factor that serves as a built-in marketing motor.

“The story already exists, everybody around the table says, ‘Yeah!’ ” Mr. Hanks said in an interview, describing the current preference of studio executives as they sift through scripts and proposals.

Hollywood is quick to adopt a winning formula, and the critical and box office success of films like “The Social Network” and “Moneyball” has proved that reality-based narratives can make money and win awards — something beyond the ability of most blockbusters.

At the same time, executives and film historians say, media fragmentation has made studios more wary of jumping into purely fictional drama, because they can no longer rely on best-selling novels, original stage shows, or the even the reputation of master filmmakers to supply a mass audience.

“It’s quite possible that we’re in a golden age for this type of film, and we’re just not aware of it yet,” said Robert Birchard, editor of the American Film Institute catalog of feature films.

Since long before Gary Cooper played Lou Gehrig in “The Pride of the Yankees” (released in 1942), the nonfiction genre has tended to “come and go,” Mr. Birchard noted.

It seemed to be fading in early 2010, when a 3-D fantasy, “Avatar,” was all the rage, and — despite the real underpinnings of fictions like “An Education” and “The Hurt Locker” — only one nonfiction film, “The Blind Side,” figured among 10 best picture nominees at the Academy Awards. But “The Social Network,” which got eight Oscar nominations in 2011, set the film world abuzz with its close examination of Facebook and its founders — even as an old-style historical drama, “The King’s Speech,” took the top honors that year. Then, three inventive, reality-based dramas — “Argo,” “Lincoln” and “Zero Dark Thirty”— unexpectedly turned the last Oscar contest into a rousing political brawl.

This year, nonfiction is back with a vengeance, beginning Friday with the national release of “Fruitvale Station,” by the Weinstein Company, about the 2009 shooting of a young man by an Oakland transit officer.

Some of the more notable entries that follow will focus on events or people still prominent in the public consciousness: “The Fifth Estate,” about the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, from the director Bill Condon; Jobs,” about the Apple founder Steve Jobs, from Open Road; and “Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom,” from the Weinstein Company.

Others examine subjects in both the recent and distant past, including “Rush,” about the Formula One racers Niki Lauda and James Hunt, from Ron Howard; “Twelve Years a Slave,” about the 19th-century abduction of Solomon Northup, by Steve McQueen; and “The Monuments Men,” about those who saved great art from destruction by Hitler, with George Clooney, who directed, in a starring role.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/18/business/media/filmmakers-embrace-reality-on-the-high-seas-and-beyond.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

The Bay Citizen: Number of Green Jobs Fails to Live Up to Promises

Mr. Reed called the opening of the new headquarters of SolFocus, which produces large, free-standing solar panels, an “enormously important” development for the city’s economy.

“Clean technology is the next wave of innovation that Silicon Valley needs to capture,” the mayor said, noting that the San Jose City Council had committed to increasing the number of “green jobs” in the city to 25,000 by 2022. San Jose currently has 4,350 such jobs, according to city officials.

But SolFocus assembles its solar panels in China, and the new San Jose headquarters employs just 90 people.

In the Bay Area as in much of the country, the green economy is not proving to be the job-creation engine that many politicians envisioned. President Obama once pledged to create five million green jobs over 10 years. Gov. Jerry Brown promised 500,000 clean-technology jobs statewide by the end of the decade. But the results so far suggest such numbers are a pipe dream.

“I won’t say I’m not frustrated,” said Van Jones, an Oakland activist who served briefly as Mr. Obama’s green-jobs czar before resigning under fire after conservative critics said he had signed a petition accusing the Bush administration of deliberately allowing the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, a claim Mr. Jones denies.

A study released in July by the non-partisan Brookings Institution found clean-technology jobs accounted for just 2 percent of employment nationwide and only slightly more — 2.2 percent — in Silicon Valley. Rather than adding jobs, the study found, the sector actually lost 492 positions from 2003 to 2010 in the South Bay, where the unemployment rate in June was 10.5 percent.

Federal and state efforts to stimulate creation of green jobs have largely failed, government records show. Two years after it was awarded $186 million in federal stimulus money to weatherize drafty homes, California has spent only a little over half that sum and has so far created the equivalent of just 538 full-time jobs in the last quarter, according to the State Department of Community Services and Development.

The weatherization program was initially delayed for seven months while the federal Department of Labor determined prevailing wage standards for the industry. Even after that issue was resolved, the program never really caught on as homeowners balked at the upfront costs.

“Companies and public policy officials really overestimated how much consumers care about energy efficiency,” said Sheeraz Haji, chief executive of the Cleantech Group, a market research firm. “People care about their wallet and the comfort of their home, but it’s not a sexy thing.”

Job training programs intended for the clean economy have also failed to generate big numbers. The Economic Development Department in California reports that $59 million in state, federal and private money dedicated to green jobs training and apprenticeship has led to only 719 job placements — the equivalent of an $82,000 subsidy for each one.

“The demand’s just not there to take this to scale,” said Fred Lucero, project manager at Richmond BUILD, which teaches students the basics of carpentry and electrical work in addition to specifically “green” trades like solar installation.

Richmond BUILD has found jobs for 159 of the 221 students who have entered its clean-energy program — but only 35 graduates are employed with solar and energy efficiency companies, with the balance doing more traditional building trades work. Mr. Lucero said he considered each placement a success because his primary mission was to steer residents of the city’s most violent neighborhoods  away from a life of crime.

At Asian Neighborhood Design, a 38-year old nonprofit in the South of Market neighborhood of San Francisco, training programs for green construction jobs have remained small because the number of available jobs is small. The group accepted just 16 of 200 applicants for the most recent 14-week cycle, making it harder to get into than the University of California. The group’s training director, Jamie Brewster, said he was able to find jobs for 10 trainees within two weeks of their completing the program.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b29861a23979a6dba9fcd3a470bbf8f2