December 22, 2024

Xi Makes Bridge-Building Trip to Mexico

China has moved forcefully to secure oil and other commodities in South America over the past decade. Mexico — Latin America’s second-largest economy — has played a different role though, not supplying China but competing with it to export manufactured goods like electronics and clothing to the United States.

President Xi’s visit to Mexico, coming only two months after President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico traveled to China, is an effort to recast the relationship under two new leaders.

The trip underscores China’s growing ties in the hemisphere. Before arriving in Mexico, President Xi visited Central America and the Caribbean, further securing his nation’s foothold there. In Trinidad and Tobago, he met with 10 Caribbean leaders and promised $3 billion in loans for projects in the region, according to Bloomberg News. Among the loans was one for $250 million to build a children’s hospital in Trinidad, the Caribbean’s largest energy supplier.

China has given billions in loans and aid to Caribbean nations to build stadiums, roads, ports and tourist resorts, and Mr. Xi’s visit came days after Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. met with 15 regional leaders in Trinidad, drawing a sharp contrast about what the two countries had to offer the area’s tiny economies.

Mr. Biden announced no new initiatives, though he spoke about providing help for clean energy research and education and promised to dismantle remaining trade and investment barriers.

On Sunday, Mr. Xi traveled to Costa Rica — which has no diplomatic ties with Taiwan — and promised almost $300 million in loans to finish building a highway. The trip sent a clear message to other Central American countries that by withdrawing their recognition of Taiwan “they could get goodies too,” Kevin P. Gallagher, a professor at Boston University, wrote in an e-mail.

Latin American leaders have long complained that Washington pays too little attention to the rest of the hemisphere’s concerns, and China has begun to take advantage of that perception.

As Latin America and the Caribbean become less dependent on the United States, “they have another economic ally, and that economic ally is a superpower,” said S. Lynne Walker, the director of the China-Americas program at the Institute of the Americas in California.

Matt Ferchen, a scholar at the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy in Beijing, suggested that President Xi’s itinerary may also be intended as a message to the United States. “China wants to remind the U.S. that just as the U.S. has influence in regions close to China, China too has rising influence in the Americas,” he wrote in an e-mail.

Analysts will be watching the trip closely for signs that Mexico and China are taking steps toward changing their frosty relationship.

Mexico’s government would like to narrow its large trade gap with China. Last year, Mexico imported $57 billion in goods from China and sent back only $5.7 billion in products, according to Mexico’s Ministry of Economy.

The two countries announced a series of agreements late Tuesday covering energy, trade and education. “We agree on the importance of balancing our trade and investment relationship,” Mr. Peña Nieto said, noting promises from China to start by accepting more tequila and pork imports.

China could also send a strong message by announcing investments in Mexican manufacturing, experts said, perhaps in the automobile industry.

“At least having the possibility of greater Chinese investment on the table might allow China and Mexico to move beyond their up-till-now quite dysfunctional and competitive relationship,” Mr. Ferchen wrote.

Still, China’s interest in natural resources leaves little doubt that it is looking at future oil deals in Mexico. In a symbolic move, Mexico’s state-owned oil monopoly, Pemex, signed an agreement during Mr. Peña Nieto’s visit to China in April to ship 30,000 barrels a day to Sinopec, a state-owned company there.

Mexico’s Congress is expected to begin debating measures to open the country’s closed oil industry to outside investment later in the year, although it is unclear how far that opening will go.

Still, “in Mexico the goal is to get to the head of the line in energy reform,” Mr. Gallagher wrote.

Despite China’s rising influence in Latin America, the United States has an opportunity to improve relations with the region, he added.

“As excited as Latin American governments are about the new trade and finance from China, they are also getting concerned about an overreliance on commodities and about the heavy toll on the environment Chinese-led growth has exacted,” he said.

The problem is that the United States is not making an attractive enough counteroffer, he said: “We used to be able to dangle access to the biggest economy in the world, but that is no longer enough.”

Karla Zabludovsky contributed reporting from Mexico City.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/world/americas/xi-makes-bridge-building-trip-to-mexico.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Obama Nominates 2 Senate Aides for S.E.C. Posts

President Obama continued his shake-up of the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, naming two Senate aides to senior posts at the Wall Street regulatory agency.

The nominees to the five-member agency are Kara M. Stein, a Democrat, and Michael Piwowar, a Republican. If confirmed by the Senate, they will succeed commissioners whose terms are set to expire.

The move comes just months after Mr. Obama named Mary Jo White, a former federal prosecutor turned Wall Street defense lawyer, to be chairwoman of the agency. In recent weeks, Ms. White has started to overhaul the staff, naming co-heads of the agency’s enforcement unit, new leaders of other major divisions and her own chief of staff. She also hired a general counsel, Anne K. Small, who rejoined the S.E.C. from the White House.

The transition period has coincided with challenges for the agency, which has fallen far behind its rule-making responsibilities. Nearly three years after Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act, the overhaul of Wall Street regulation, the S.E.C. has carried out only a small fraction of the changes.

The possible arrival of Ms. Stein and Mr. Piwowar could add to some delays as they settle into the agency. Yet the nominees are hardly strangers to the S.E.C.’s business.

Ms. Stein is an aide to Senator Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who is a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the S.E.C. Mr. Piwowar is the committee’s Republican chief economist.

In a statement late Thursday, the committee chairman, Tim Johnson, expressed support for both nominees. “I look forward to moving both their nominations forward to ensure the commission continues to operate at full strength,” said Mr. Johnson, Democrat of South Dakota.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/s-e-c-changes-continue-as-obama-names-2-senate-aides-for-posts/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bits Blog: Cyberattacks a Topic in Obama Call With New Chinese President

Xi Jinping, the newly elected president of China.Feng Li/Getty Images Xi Jinping, the newly elected president of China.

Cyberthreats featured prominently in President Obama’s congratulatory call to the new Chinese president, Xi Jinping, on Thursday.

The president used the occasion to discuss the loss of United States intellectual property from cyberattacks. The mere mention of cyberthreats is a step forward for an administration that has been reluctant to confront Beijing on Chinese military attacks even as billions of dollars’ worth of trade secrets have been stolen.

But a spate of recent headlines about Chinese cyberattacks on The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and others have thrust the issue on the diplomatic stage.  A report by Mandiant, a computer security firm, tying hundreds of attacks back to one Chinese military unit, made the issue even harder to ignore.

Mr. Obama has been increasingly vocal about cyberthreats, but has not gone as far as to call out China by name. In his State of the Union address, he was careful to omit China when he said “we know foreign countries and companies swipe our corporate secrets.” And when the Obama administration sent the nation’s Internet providers a confidential list of Internet addresses tied to a hacking group that had stolen terabytes of data from American corporations, it failed to mention that every single address could be traced to the Chinese military cybercommand.

But privately, administration officials have said they plan to tell China’s new leaders that the volume and sophistication of Chinese cyberattacks have become so intense that they threaten the relationship between Washington and Beijing.

“In any discussion with China, the U.S. needs to have three agenda items: One, cybersecurity; two, cybersecurity; and three, cybersecurity,” Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in an interview.

China has long denied that it is responsible for cyberattacks on American companies and has said that it too is a victim of such attacks. And in discussions with American officials, Chinese representatives often refuse to discuss economic espionage.

“They say that the topic of economic espionage is ‘embarrassing’ for them,” said James A. Lewis, a cybersecurity expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, who has participated in such discussions. “They say, in the U.S. cyberwarriors are treated as heroes but those who participate in economic espionage are treated like criminals. In China, the line is not so clear.”

Article source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/cyberattacks-prominent-in-obama-call-with-new-chinese-president/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Asian Shares Pressured by Uncertainty Over U.S. and Greece

The euro dropped 0.2 percent to a two-month low of $1.2676, which hoisted the dollar index to a two-month high of 81.20.

MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan fell 0.9 percent in a decline led by growth-sensitive energy and technology sectors.

Worries about weak global demand, underscored on Monday by data showing Japan’s economy shrank, and the firmer dollar weighed on commodities prices and some regional share indexes.

Stocks in resource-rich Australia dropped 1.1 percent while Hong Kong shed 1 percent and Shanghai lost 1.2 percent.

Japan’s Nikkei average gave up early gains to fall 0.3 percent to a four-week low, putting it on course for a seventh straight session of decline.

“Investors can’t assess the extent of impact from the fiscal cliff and it could be months before the issue is settled, so this uncertainty is keeping investors guarded,” said Yuuki Sakurai, chief executive of Fukoku Capital Management.

“This, along with Europe continuing to muddle through its fiscal problems, is putting downside pressure on markets.”

U.S. lawmakers return to the capital on Tuesday. Analysts say a failure to act on scheduled $600 billion in tax increases and government spending cuts due early next year could tip the United States back into a recession.

Greece’s international lenders agreed on Monday to give Athens two more years to meet budget targets but euro zone finance ministers did not disburse more aid. Euro zone finance ministers will meet again on November 20 to discuss Greece.

Sakurai said market caution over the leadership transition in China this week is offsetting more bullish sentiment from recent data suggesting a pick up in the economy. Investors want to see the political change completed without any problems and the shape of the new leaders’ policies, he said.

COMMODITIES SLIP

Reflecting the slight risk aversions, Asian credit market spreads on the iTraxx Asia ex-Japan investment-grade index widened by 1 basis point.

U.S. crude futures fell 0.4 percent to $85.20 a barrel and Brent dropped 0.4 percent to $108.60.

London copper eased 0.3 percent to $7,618.75 a tonne and gold inched down 0.2 percent to $1,723.44 an ounce, having failed to test last week’s high around $1,738.

“I think there’s some disappointed selling. Of course a strong dollar also affects gold a little bit,” said Ronald Leung, director of Lee Cheong Gold Dealers in Hong Kong.

Analysts have said commodities are under pressure from hedge fund selling as they close their books for the year.

U.S. shares ended little changed on Monday in low volume trading while European shares fell.

(Additional reporting by Joyce Lee in Seoul and Lewa Pardomuan in Singapore; Editing by Neil Fullick)

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/11/12/business/12reuters-markets-global.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

The Next Level: Further Thoughts on the Brilliant Jerk

The Next Level

Avoiding the pitfalls of fast growth.

In my first post for this blog, I wrote that I wanted my posts to provide a forum for “debate and disagreement” on what it takes for a company to grow fast. Well, that didn’t take long. One week later, my post on what to do with a “Brilliant Jerk” sparked plenty of debate and disagreement. In fact, the overwhelming majority of commenters disagreed with me — although I did get some support from people who actually own and run businesses.

If nothing else, I seem to have united the Brilliant Jerks around the country, which is good. I respect Brilliant Jerks; they do invaluable work for start-ups and small businesses. In my post, I may have even gone overboard explaining how invaluable their contributions are in the early phase of a company. I wanted to give them their due.

But times change. What the start-up really starts to grow, the entrepreneur needs to bring on new people and adopt new strategies that can undermine the Brilliant Jerk’s self-worth and identity. For example, in rapid growth, entrepreneurs who identify winners on the front line may need to promote them two, three or even  four levels at a time. You have to push these winners to the top. The team will applaud and embrace these new leaders but the Brilliant Jerk won’t.

In a fast growth company, he becomes the Grinch who steals growth, which is why he has to go. This can be hard to understand unless you have experienced the fragile environment of rapid growth when you are adding customers and employees by the dozens and sometimes hundreds. Everything is thin – time, cash and management. It is like driving a race car across thin ice, and you certainly do not need anyone jumping up and down and screaming and distracting from the larger cause.

Many of the comments suggested that maybe I was just a bad manager. There is probably some truth to those comments — entrepreneurs, admittedly, are not always great managers or developers of people. But there are times when those skills are all but irrelevant. In rapid growth, you need leaders who take action. If you want to remain a small company, spend your time managing and pacifying the Brilliant Jerk. But if you want to grow your company, then you have to grow up, lead and put others before yourself. You need a team that wants to be lead, not managed.

When my start-up put 150 additional people on the payroll in one month, it took everyone on the team wanting the person next to them to succeed. There were no Brilliant Jerks to be found in that group. Fast growth is not about happiness and who keeps the coffeepot full. It is a team sport. When you walk into a meeting, you are there to make everyone else better. In a fast growth company, you either add energy to the company or take it. The Brilliant Jerk sucks the life out of a company. Every minute you spend consoling the Brilliant Jerk is a minute you take from customers and, by the way, it is the customers who pay the bills.

Some of the commenters suggested that this is really about entrepreneurs being greedy. That’s not how I see it. When fast growth takes off, the entrepreneur is usually “all in” — with his house, a second mortgage, savings, college funds all on the line. Greed would be milking the Brilliant Jerks, who are generally very high producers, for everything they are worth. Guts is accepting the short-term financial pain of letting a big producer go for the long-term gain of the company. Most of the time, you are watching revenue walk out the door. It is a gutsy gamble but the right one.

Some commenters asked how I could just toss away a dedicated, smart employee. Well, I can tell you after we discovered he could not work in a culture of growth, it should have taken me three months to let him go instead of three years, and boy, did I try everything over those three years. I promoted him to chief operating officer, and I sent him home to work by himself and gave him special assignments. Nothing worked – the Brilliant Jerk needs singular recognition in a controlled environment.

The reality is, I waited too long. And that was the purpose of writing my blog post – to introduce the Brilliant Jerk so that when entrepreneurs recognize one in their organizations, they don’t wait three years to figure out what has to be done. It is not easy. You will have gone through so much together. When I finally walked into that room and said, “it’s time to go,” we both cried.

One last thing – let’s clear up the Steve Jobs issue. He was not a Brilliant Jerk; he was a Brilliant Entrepreneur who always put the Apple brand and his products way ahead of himself. But if you read his biography, you will understand that he had to be fired. That gave him the opportunity to learn from his mistakes and become a better leader. If he had been a Brilliant Jerk, he would have continued to whine about getting fired from Apple and played the victim – “Oh, they were so mean to me.” Instead, he was a leader who moved on and made history as one of the greatest entrepreneurs ever.

In a fast growth company, rule No. 1 is no whining allowed. Period. And no second-guessing. Period. Happily, however, that rule does not and should not apply to blog posts. I look forward to reading your comments.

Cliff Oxford is the founder of the Oxford Center for Entrepreneurs.

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/03/further-thoughts-on-the-brilliant-jerk/?partner=rss&emc=rss