November 14, 2024

Record High Close for Dow, Spurred by Fed and Profits

The Dow Jones industrial average, which measures the performance of 30 blue-chip companies, closed with a gain of more than 125 points Tuesday, surpassing its previous record close of 14,164.53, which it achieved nearly five and a half years ago, as well as its record intraday high, set around the same time, of 14,198.10.

Of course, a few things have happened since October 2007. The housing market collapsed, the financial system went into meltdown, the European Union started to fray and politicians dragged the United States through an on-off-on-again fiscal imbroglio.

 But stocks managed to move beyond all that.

 Since a low point in March 2009, the Dow Jones index has more than doubled, stunning even the most seasoned stock market watchers. It closed at 14,253.77 Tuesday.

 “What’s amazing about this bull market is that people still don’t think it’s real,” said Richard Bernstein, chief executive of Richard Bernstein Advisors, a money management firm. “We think this could be the biggest bull market of our careers.”

On Tuesday in particular, leading indexes abroad rose after the Chinese government announced that it would step up spending and European data showed that retail sales there have been stronger than expected.

After the bell sounded at the New York Stock Exchange, stocks were pushed up even more after a reading on the service sector in the United States showed that it had risen to its highest level of activity in a year, surprising analysts.

“Given that the service sector accounts for close to 85 percent of the U.S. economy, the strong performance on this index suggests that the overall recovery may be continuing to build on the positive momentum at the end of the year,” said Millan Mulraine,  a senior strategist at TD Securities. There are some important caveats to the record, however. The Dow is a rather narrow measure of the stock market, so it can provide a somewhat distorted picture of the market’s performance.

At its Tuesday close of 1,539.79 points, the much broader Standard Poor’s 500-stock index was still off its nominal high of 1,565.15, also set in October 2007.

After taking inflation into account, both indexes are down from their earlier highs in 2000. And, on an inflation-adjusted basis, the S.P. 500 is down even after factoring in returns from dividend payments.

Still, American stocks are far ahead of their foreign counterparts. The Euro Stoxx 50, a barometer of euro zone blue chips, ended Tuesday at 2,683.02 points, off its record high of 5,464.43 reached in March 2000, while the FTSE 100 in London was at 6,431.95, compared to a record of 6,930.20 in December 1999.

In Asia, the Nikkei 225-share index in Tokyo closed Tuesday at 11,683.45; it reached its high of 38,916 points in December 1989. And the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong finished at 22,560.50, versus a high of 31,638 points in October 2007.

Despite its flaws, the Dow Jones average is the recognizable face of the stock market to many Americans, and it contains some of the best-known American corporations, like Wal-Mart, Coca-Cola, General Electric and International Business Machines.

The stock prices of some of the companies in the index have more than doubled since that low point in 2009. For instance, American Express is up more than 400 percent. After the crash of 1929, it took 25 years for the Dow to get back to the nominal level it plunged from. The severe economic contractions of the 1930s, during which scores of banks collapsed, weighed heavily on stocks.

But one essential government institution did things differently after the 2009 low point, and that has bolstered the stock market. The Federal Reserve has added more than $3 trillion of monetary stimulus to the economy and more than $1 trillion of bailout loans to financial firms since the 2008 financial crisis. This was done to prevent a widespread banking crash and help the wider economy.

Anne Bagamery contributed reporting from Paris.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Rajat Gupta’s Fateful Day

Rajat K. Gupta, left, and his lawyer, Gary Naftalis, on Wednesday after Mr. Gupta was charged with insider trading.John Marshall Mantel for The New York TimesRajat K. Gupta, left, and his lawyer, Gary Naftalis, last week after Mr. Gupta was charged with insider trading.

On Sept. 23, 2008, Rajat K. Gupta called Raj Rajaratnam after a Goldman Sachs board meeting and told the hedge fund manager secrets about the bank, according to an indictment unsealed last week.

That same day, Mr. Gupta had two doctor appointments, dined with Ethiopia’s health minister and got a haircut.

His calendar for Sept. 23, 2008 — entered into evidence during Mr. Rajaratnam’s trial as Government Exhibit 3035 — provides a lens into the busy and influential life of Mr. Gupta at a time when federal prosecutors say he was also breaking the law.

Mr. Gupta, then 59, was an éminence grise in the worlds of international business and philanthropy, juggling his work as a senior partner at McKinsey, the elite management consulting firm that he had once run, with his public company directorships, investment activities and charitable pursuits.

After an early morning call with an executive in Qatar, Mr. Gupta spent the next several hours with physicians. He also sandwiched in a 15-minute haircut at an establishment called Rudy’s before being driven into Manhattan from his home in Westport, Conn.

Mr. Gupta did not get to his office at McKinsey until 2 p.m., the calendar says. He then had back-to-back meetings with Sandeep Tyagi, chairman of Estee Advisors, a money management firm based in Singapore, and K. Balasubramanian, a board member of the GMR Group, an infrastructure investment business in Bangalore, India.

The Goldman call came at 3 p.m. He participated in a 38-minute telephonic board meeting during which the bank approved a $5 billion investment by Warren E. Buffett — news that the convulsing stock market, and Goldman’s investors, would surely love.

The government highlighted Mr. Gupta’s Sept. 23 schedule at the Rajaratnam trial during the testimony of Lloyd C. Blankfein, Goldman’s chief executive.

The calendar established for the jury that the Goldman board meeting took place when it did. Then, using a phone log, prosecutors showed that Mr. Gupta called Mr. Rajaratnam immediately afterward. Minutes later, just before the stock market closed, Mr. Rajaratnam purchased large blocks of Goldman shares, according to trading records shown during the trial.

A jury convicted Mr. Rajaratanam in May. On Wednesday, the government charged Mr. Gupta, 62, with passing tips to Mr. Rajaratnam about Goldman and Procter Gamble, where he also served as a director. Two of the five counts against Mr. Gupta, who is fighting the charges, relate to Mr. Rajaratnam’s Sept. 23 Goldman trades.

His day did not end with the Goldman meeting. Mr. Gupta spent the balance of the afternoon on his numerous nonprofit causes, including a meeting with Julian Schweitzer, the World Bank‘s head of health nutrition, and Raymond G. Chambers, the United Nations special envoy for malaria. He had a separate sit-down with Michel Katzatchkine, the director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, to discuss a project to root out disease in Rwanda.

During those meetings, around 5 p.m., Goldman announced Mr. Buffett’s big investment to the public.

Mr. Gupta closed out the day with a dinner at Django, the now-defunct midtown Manhattan brasserie, in honor of Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the health minister of Ethiopia. He then spent the night in a room at the Palace Hotel on Madison Avenue, the calendar shows. His suite was booked by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, the private equity firm where, just that month, he had been named a senior adviser.

The next morning, prosecutors say, with Goldman’s shares opening higher, Mr. Rajaratnam sold his position in the bank, booking an illegal profit of about $840,000.

Rajat K. Gupta’s calendar for Sept. 23, 2008

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=c606cb8aaf760ab144c0ac1b9f410ddb

Waiting for a New Blueprint From Bank of America

Will he break up the company and spin off Merrill Lynch? Cut tens of thousands of jobs? Put its subprime mortgage albatross, Countrywide, into bankruptcy? If not such a bold move, how does Mr. Moynihan plan to reverse the company’s painful slide?

The earliest clues could come Thursday, when the top executives of the country’s largest bank gather at its Charlotte, N.C., headquarters to review recommendations of a 44-member internal team that has been preparing restructuring plans since March.

Company officials say a split-up is out of the question for now, as is imminent bankruptcy for Countrywide. But 30,000 jobs, roughly 10 percent of the company’s work force, could be eliminated over the next three years as a result of the restructuring initiative known as Project New BAC.

 There has been plenty of drama already this week, with the abrupt exit Tuesday of two top executives, Sallie Krawcheck and Joe Price, and the splitting of the bank into two basic units, one dealing with individual customers, the other focusing on businesses and institutions.

While company officials say the reorganization would actually make it harder to break up the company, it has not stilled the speculation.

“At some point, it gets too big to manage,” said Brian Wenzinger, a principal at Aronson Johnson Ortiz, a Philadelphia money management firm. “Smaller works better, and the less complicated it is, the better it can work.”

Bank of America shares rallied sharply Wednesday on a broader market jump, rising 7 percent to close at $7.48. They are still off 50 percent since January, weighed down largely by fears that the company could have to pay out tens of billions of dollars more to settle claims stemming from the subprime mortgage meltdown.

Those losses set off worries the company might need to raise fresh capital, but the $8.3 billion sale of its stake in China Construction Bank and a $5 billion investment by Warren Buffett last month have eased those fears for now.

Despite the cold water from executives, some big investors would like to see the Merrill brokerage and investment banking unit spun off.

“As a stockholder in Bank of America, I feel like Merrill Lynch would be worth $7 a share on its own, at least,” said Buzzy Geduld, who sold his brokerage firm — Herzog, Heine, Geduld — to Merrill in 2000, and now owns more than 2.5 million shares in Bank of America. “I think the upside is terrific.”

No one disputes the idea that Bank of America has become too complex. In some ways, the company resembles a crazy quilt assembled through acquisitions pursued by Mr. Moynihan’s predecessor, Kenneth D. Lewis, whose deal-making culminated in 2008 with the purchase of both Merrill Lynch and Countrywide Financial, the subprime mortgage giant at the root of many of Bank of America’s problems today.

Mr. Moynihan has spent much of his 18 months at the helm undoing Mr. Lewis’s legacy. In fact, company officials say the need to turn what was a sprawling empire into a leaner, more focused enterprise is what is driving both Project New BAC, which takes its name from the company’s ticker symbol, and Tuesday’s reshuffling.

“We’ve simplified the company in the aftermath of the financial crisis and regulatory reform,” said Anne M. Finucane, Bank of America’s top global strategy and marketing officer. “And we’re reducing risk to both the company and the financial system by evaluating businesses that are not core to the strategy or were bolted on.”

She added that the new structure follows the blueprint Mr. Moynihan presented to the board shortly before he was tapped to become chief executive in December 2009.

Looking ahead, executives say the reorganization actually makes it harder to split off Merrill Lynch, because it will be more integrated into the overall company and will not remain under one main leader. Its famous “thundering herd” of 16,000 financial advisers will be under David Darnell, who will also head up Bank of America’s more traditional consumer businesses. The institutional business will still be under Tom Montag, a Goldman Sachs veteran who joined Merrill shortly before Bank of America acquired it in 2008.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=6efb8bb16ffa649d03c7ab5180ebff2e

Stocks & Bonds: Shares Rise on Earnings, but Some Leading Companies Falter

The Dow Jones industrial average closed at a high for the year. The 30-company index rose 52.45 points, or 0.42 percent, to 12,505.99.

“There are a lot of concerns out there, but investors are looking at the bottom line right now, and that’s earnings,” said Yu-Dee Chang, the chief trader at ACE Investment Strategists, a money management firm based in Virginia.

The Standard Poor’s 500-stock index gained 7.02, or 0.53 percent, to 1,337.38. The S. P. 500, a benchmark for most mutual funds, is now less than six points from its highest close of 2011.

The gains were broad. All 10 company groups that make up the S. P. index rose, led by a nearly 1 percent gain in technology companies.

The Nasdaq composite index rose 17.65 points, or 0.63 percent, to 2,820.16.

Apple rose nearly 3 percent after reporting sales and income late Wednesday that came in ahead of analysts’ estimates. The company sold 18.65 million iPhones in the latest quarter, millions more than expected. Verizon Wireless started selling the phones in February, ending three and a half years of exclusivity by ATT.

The Travelers Companies rose nearly 4 percent, leading the 30 companies in the Dow average, after reporting stronger earnings and a 14 percent dividend increase. The company, a commercial insurer, benefited from a decline in losses from catastrophe claims and an increase in corporate insurance sales.

UnitedHealth, a health insurer, rose 8 percent after reporting a 13 percent increase in profit as more employees signed up for coverage.

The stronger earnings results were tempered by weaker-than-expected economic reports. The Labor Department said that the number of people who applied for unemployment benefits fell last week to 403,000. Economists had expected a larger drop. A separate report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia found that manufacturing activity in the Philadelphia area fell in April.

Other companies in the Dow fell after investors found worrying signs in their earnings reports.

McDonald’s fell nearly 2 percent, despite beating analysts’ earnings estimates, after the company said it expected the cost of most of its ingredients to rise as much as 5 percent throughout the year.

General Electric fell 2 percent, also despite beating estimates. The company said revenue at its industrial businesses was not growing as quickly as the company’s rivals’.

Interest rates were steady. The Treasury’s benchmark 10-year note rose 2/32, to 101 28/32, and the yield slipped to 3.40 percent from 3.41 percent late Wednesday.

In currency trading, the dollar fell to a 16-month low against the euro with investors expecting the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates near zero, even as many companies were posting better-than-expected quarterly results.

The Fed next meets to talk about interest rates and other monetary policy on Tuesday and Wednesday. The central bank is not expected to cut short the $600 billion bond-purchasing program, set to expire in June, that was intended to drive down interest rates.

The euro was worth $1.4544 late Thursday, up from $1.4514 late Wednesday. The euro earlier rose as high as $1.4648, its strongest level since December 2009.

The British pound rose to $1.6517 from $1.6407, while the dollar fell to 81.90 Japanese yen from 82.37 yen.

The weak dollar drove most commodity prices higher. The Commodity Research Bureau’s index of commodity prices rose 1.90 points, or 0.52 percent, to 367.44.

Gold and silver continued to rise as concerns persisted about global economic issues. The two precious metals attract investors during uncertain economic times because of their reputation as relatively stable assets.

Wheat rose 1.9 percent on worries that dry weather has damaged the winter crop from Kansas to Texas, and rains may delay spring planting in some areas.

Oil prices also rose. Crude oil on the New York Mercantile Exchange rose 84 cents, to $112.29 a barrel.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e86fd32074b685085fe2b5d9a0e6fed0