November 15, 2024

News Analysis: As Japan Recovers, Fears That Tax Increase Could Halt Progress

TOKYO — Japan is on a roll. Its economy is growing at a robust rate of 3.8 percent, thanks to the bold monetary and economic policies of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Japanese stocks are up 40 percent this year, and the country is on the cusp of overcoming 15 years of deflation. To boot, Tokyo has just won in its bid to hold the 2020 Summer Olympics, raising hopes of an investment and construction boom.

But some economists worry that a plan to raise taxes is coming at the worst possible moment — and could demolish the foundations of a recovery.

“It’s nonsense. Japan is only midway to recovery and hasn’t fully escaped deflation,” said Goushi Kataoka, chief economist at Mitsubishi UFJ Research Consulting, which is affiliated with Japan’s largest bank, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

“Just as we are beginning to see the light, we’re threatening to snuff it out,” Mr. Kataoka added. “We’re trying to roast the pig before it’s fat enough to eat.”

After weeks of debate, Mr. Abe appears set to go ahead with a plan to raise the sales tax rate in April to 8 percent from 5 percent — part of his bid to rein in the country’s public debt, which has surged to more than twice the size of the economy.

Opponents say raising taxes on spending is premature, especially because it could dampen consumer spending, considered the weakest link in Japan’s nascent recovery. If spending slumps, Japan could slide back into the deflationary morass that has dogged it during the past 15 years, putting the brakes on some of the most promising growth this year among the world’s developed economies.

Still, proponents of raising the tax are pushing for action now because they fear a return to the dysfunction that has marred Japanese politics over the last several years, with a revolving door of prime ministers, said Noah Smith, an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University in New York.

Mr. Abe, with solid support, could be the last prime minister in a while to be able to push through unpopular overhauls, he said.

“The optimal policy is to wait to raise the consumption tax, maybe a year. But given Japan’s political dysfunction, many people are afraid that if you wait too long, that will never get done,” Mr. Smith said. “The idea is that if we see a chance to make unpopular structural reforms, we need to take it now, even though it’s not the optimal time.”

To soften the blow, the Japanese government is considering putting together a stimulus package of as much as ¥5 trillion, or about $50 billion, a sum that would return the equivalent of two percentage points of the tax rate increase to consumers and companies, local news reports have said — though Mr. Abe has said he will not a make an official decision on the matter until early October. Japan’s business lobby has also called on the government to cut the country’s relatively high corporate tax rates to make up for a decline in consumption.

Speaking at a government panel on economic and fiscal policy on Friday, Mr. Abe suggested that Japan’s recovery was robust and that its economy was already escaping deflation. He also said that both government and private sector spending before the 2020 Tokyo Games would further bolster economic recovery.

The Games “will be a catalyst that will clear away 15 years of deflation and shrinking,” he told the panel. He stressed that he had made no decision on a tax increase yet.

Backers of a higher sales tax, including Japan’s powerful Finance Ministry, say the move is necessary to rein in the country’s public debt, which by all measures is gargantuan, thanks in large part to the costs of caring for Japan’s swelling ranks of the elderly. This year, national debt topped ¥1 quadrillion for the first time — more than twice the size of Japan’s economy and larger than the economies of Britain, France and Germany combined.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/16/business/global/as-japan-recovers-fears-that-tax-increase-could-halt-progress.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Prosecutors in Japan Raid Olympus’s Headquarters

TOKYO — More than two months after Olympus’s former president blew the whistle on a huge accounting fraud, the Japanese authorities raided the company’s headquarters here Wednesday, emerging several hours later with boxes full of documents.

TV camera crews were in position outside the building for the raid by investigators wearing dark business suits. But it will probably take more than symbolic action at this point to assure investors that meaningful action will be taken to address a scandal that has caused Olympus’s stock-market value to plunge since early October.

Top Olympus executives admitted last month to covering up $1.7 billion in past investment losses in a global scheme that has led to public investigations on three continents. Olympus came clean on some losses in five years’ worth of revised statements last week, which showed shareholders’ equity plunging to just ¥42.9 billion, or $550 million, and casting a shadow over its long-term viability.

Three executives implicated in the cover-up have left the company. Still, the rest of the Olympus board has been scrambling to retain control of the company with the backing of Japan’s biggest banks, which hold great sway over top corporations, serving as both top lenders and as major shareholders.

The Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group is the biggest lender to Olympus, with ¥227.5 billion in outstanding loans and bonds, according to Reuters, and also holds a 3.4 percent equity stake in the company. Olympus’s other main lender-cum-shareholder, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, has also stood by the company’s management.

Together, they are likely to bring in a new domestic investor to inject more capital into the company, diluting the influence of foreign investors and their role in shaping the company’s future, according to several people with knowledge of the plans. That has caused dismay among foreign shareholders, who say the current management is tainted and should go for the sake of robust corporate governance.

In fact, foreign investors say that the reaction to the scandal is shaping up to confirm their worst fears about Japan Inc.: that entrenched executives — with the help of friendly bankers and staid institutional investors — will thwart any attempts at much-needed overhaul. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial declined to comment Wednesday.

The eventual Olympus bailout could even be a Japan-wide effort: earlier this week, the Nikkei business daily reported that Olympus might issue about ¥100 billion in new preferred shares, and that Japanese technology companies like Fujifilm or Sony could be possible buyers. The two companies denied that any such investment was in the works.

The U.S. fund manager Southeastern Asset Management, a supporter of Michael C. Woodford, the company’s ousted chief executive, and a big foreign shareholder with a stake of about 5 percent in Olympus, has urged Olympus not to go ahead with any fund-raising plans until a new board is put in place.

Any moves by Olympus to inject new equity into the company would also shut down efforts by Mr. Woodford to return to the company’s helm with a new slate of directors. Mr. Woodford, a British national and one of a handful of foreign executives to have led a top Japanese corporation, was fired in mid-October after he quizzed the Olympus board over a series of outsize acquisition payments that were later found to be part of the company’s loss cover-up.

Mr. Woodford has said he has enlisted “impressive” members of the Japanese business community to join his would-be board and has outlined his own plans to raise capital, either through private equity or a rights issue.

But working with private equity firms, especially from overseas, may not go down well with Japanese investors, who often see them as vulture funds looking to feast on weak Japanese companies and sell off their assets piecemeal.

But Mr. Woodford argued that accepting help from a rival like Fujifilm or Sony would be an even more perilous way forward for Olympus. “What would their motivation be?” Mr. Woodford said. “An investment could eventually move toward a takeover of Olympus, of Olympus giving up independence.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=7e2db5fbe162c0a020a9ec0976cc7b7a