November 15, 2024

Bucks Blog: Used Car Prices Vary by Market, Analysis Finds

A used car for sale in Miami.Joe Raedle/Getty Images
A used car for sale in Miami.

The city where you buy a used car can make a big difference in price, a new analysis finds.

CarGurus, a car shopping Web site, analyzed listings for about 3 million cars in large metropolitan areas to see how prices varied. A market was defined as an area within a 50-mile radius of the city center, to see how prices varied.

The analysis found that the less-expensive markets tend to be the most heavily populated urban areas, where there are more car dealerships and thus more competition, said Langley Steinert, founder of CarGurus. Costlier areas, in turn, tend to be smaller, less competitive markets.

The vast majority of listings on CarGurus are from dealers; it’s not certain that cars sold by private sellers would follow the same trend. But since private sellers also try to price their cars competitively, it’s “probable” that the trend is the same for those cars too, the site says.)

The analysis was based on an “instant market value” for each vehicle, a price estimate that CarGurus calculates using its own formula. The formula factors in the car’s make, model, year, mileage, trim, options, accident history and the listing’s specific location. CarGurus then used the average prices in each metropolitan area compare with the nationwide average. The study excluded cars from model years before 2000.

The analysis found that Miami topped the list of “most affordable” markets, followed by Cleveland; Rochester; and Detroit. (Next on the list came Stamford, Conn.; Akron, Ohio; Buffalo; Toledo, Ohio; New York; and Minneapolis.)

The most expensive cities are Jackson, Miss.; Seattle; Montgomery, Ala.; and Little Rock, Ark. (Followed by Knoxville, Tenn.; Mobile, Ala.; Fresno, Calif.; Memphis; Wichita, Kan.; and Lincoln, Neb.)

Compared with nationwide prices, used cars in Miami are nearly 7 percent less expensive on average, while those in Jackson, Miss., are 9 percent more expensive — a difference of about 16 percentage points, the analysis found.

What are consumers to make of the data? After all, even if you can find a car in a cheaper market, is it worth your while to travel a long distance way to pick it up?

Mr. Steinert conceded that it was unlikely to make sense for someone who lives in, say, Seattle, to travel to Miami just to save money on the price of the car. But the findings do suggest that when searching online for a car, you should widen your potential search area as far as possible beyond your local ZIP code.

When searching car listings on CarGurus, for instance, the default distance the tool uses is 75 miles — about an hour’s drive. But you could double that distance, to 150 miles, and still be within a reasonable drive to an area with potentially less expensive cars.”At least, drive two hours,” he said.

Before driving that far, however, he has some tips: First, try to make sure the car is actually there. Some dealers may advertise a car at a potentially attractive price to draw traffic, but you may find it’s been “sold” when you arrive.

Then, if you do decide you want to buy the car, always take the time to obtain a vehicle history report (from a service like CarFax, for instance). The reports run about $40. Also, pay a local mechanic to examine the car for potential problems. If you do those things, he said, you’ll greatly lower your risk of getting a lemon and you’ll save significant money by buying used.

Have you ever purchased a car far from where you live? How did it work out?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/used-car-prices-vary-by-market-analysis-finds/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Thursday Reading: Those Plentiful Weight-Loss Myths

January 31

Thursday Reading: Those Plentiful Weight-Loss Myths

Those plentiful weight-loss myths, Toyota recalls one million cars for air bag and wiper problems, keeping track of the pennies on your smartphone and other consumer-focused news from The New York Times.

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/thursday-reading-those-plentiful-weight-loss-myths/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Toyota to Settle Class-Action Suits Over Sudden Accelerations

The proposed settlement, filed in a Federal District Court in California, would be one of the largest of its type in automotive history. If the agreement is approved by Judge James V. Selna, Toyota would make cash payments for the loss of value on vehicles affected by multiple recalls and install special safety features on up to 3.2 million cars.

While there are still individual personal-injury and wrongful death lawsuits pending against Toyota, in addition to an unfair business practice case brought by the attorneys general of 28 states, the class-action case was the largest legal action related to economic losses by vehicle owners.

The suit was filed in 2010 after numerous complaints were made to federal regulators that Toyota vehicles were accelerating suddenly without warning and causing accidents and injuries. Toyota has recalled more than eight million vehicles in the United States for problems related to floor mats that could become entangled with accelerator pedals, or pedals that could stick with the throttle open.

But the class-action case contended that Toyota’s electronics systems were at fault. After a long investigation, government officials concluded last year that there was no evidence that faulty electronics systems contributed to the acceleration issues. But a subsequent review of that inquiry by a branch of the National Academy of Sciences found that federal regulators had lacked the expertise to monitor electronic controls in automobiles.

The company has been fined more than $60 million by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for failing to inform regulators of internal information about the sudden acceleration, which the company has largely attributed to driver error.

The recalls mushroomed into broader problems for Toyota, which had long enjoyed a pristine reputation for quality, safety and reliability, and the class-action suit was a lingering obstacle to its steady comeback from the acceleration issues, which included testimony by its chief executive, Akio Toyoda, before Congress.

“This agreement marks a significant step forward for our company, one that will enable us to put more of our energy, time and resources into Toyota’s central focus: making the best vehicles we can for our customers,” said Christopher P. Reynolds, Toyota’s chief legal officer in the United States.

Under the proposed settlement, Toyota agreed to create a fund of $250 million to pay claims to former owners of cars affected by the acceleration recalls. The company also agreed to install so-called brake override systems on cars whose pedals could stick or become trapped in floor mats. The company said it had already installed the systems on 2.6 million vehicles but that an additional 550,000 cars had not received the equipment.

In addition, the settlement provides a customer support program for more than 16 million current Toyota owners, who will be eligible for free repairs on certain parts for up to 10 years.

Toyota has also agreed to contribute $30 million to finance automotive safety research related to driver behavior and unintended acceleration.

The lead law firm for the plaintiffs estimated that the overall settlement could total $1.2 billion to $1.4 billion.

“We are pleased that Toyota has agreed to a settlement that was both extraordinarily hard-fought and is exceptionally far-reaching,” said Steve Berman, the lawyer who led the settlement talks for the plaintiffs.

The amount a Toyota owner may receive for economic loss will be determined by a settlement administrator.

In its statement, Toyota said it would take a one-time charge of $1.1 billion against earnings to cover the costs of the class-action case as well as possible costs to resolve a consumer-protection lawsuit filed in California and the unfair-business-practices case.

One legal expert said the settlement appeared large but may be part of Toyota’s longer-term strategy to move beyond the acceleration scandal.

“The class is very large, so each plaintiff will not receive very much,” said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. “The timing of this and the huge fine Toyota recently agreed to pay suggest Toyota may be concerned about the personal injury cases, in which several trials are set for this spring.”

Toyota has recovered much of the sales lost in the aftermath of the sudden-acceleration problems in 2010 and its supply-chain troubles caused by the Japanese earthquake and tsunami in 2011.

The company’s sales in the United States have increased 28 percent this year, about double the pace of growth for the overall market. One industry analyst said the proposed class-action settlement would help Toyota continue to rebuild its reputation and market share.

“Toyota wants to put its unintended acceleration recalls behind it once and for all,” said Jesse Toprak, an analyst with the auto research site TrueCar.com. “As costly as it may be, this settlement will allow them to remove most of the lingering financial uncertainty.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/27/business/toyota-settles-lawsuit-over-accelerator-recalls-impact.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Business Briefing | Company News: Honda to Recall Nearly 1 Million Cars

Honda Motor Company will recall 962,000 cars worldwide to fix power windows and computer systems. Honda will recall 936,000 units of the Fit subcompact, CR-V crossover and Fit Aria in North America, Asia, Europe and Africa, the company said on Monday. Honda says the recall was prompted by defects in driver-side power window switch units, which could potentially melt and catch fire. It will also recall 26,000 CR-Z compact hybrids because of programming problems with the engine control unit. There have been no injuries because of the defects, Honda says.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b33272db433d6130a56c34200567fd69