November 21, 2024

Ford Chief Benefits From Auto Comeback

Ford said on Friday that it paid Alan R. Mulally, the chief executive, about $21 million last year, and paid $14.8 million to its executive chairman, William C. Ford Jr.

Mr. Mulally’s bonuses dropped to $4 million, from $5.4 million in 2011, with a steep drop in his stock awards and other compensation to about $15 million last year, from about $22 million the year before. Those reductions were based on the company’s falling short of overall performance targets, especially cash flow goals.

Despite the decrease, he remains among the highest-paid auto executives in the world, earning at least $20 million for a third consecutive year for his role in streamlining the nation’s second-largest carmaker and returning it to consistent profitability.

Over all, the company earned $5.67 billion in profits last year, a 5 percent drop from 2011 excluding one-time valuation changes.

Its profits were hurt last year by big losses in the troubled European market, but Ford continued to post record pretax profits in its core North American market. The company also was returned to investment grade by ratings agencies, and it reinstated its dividend.

Mr. Mulally, who is 67, was recruited to Ford in 2006 just as the Detroit automakers were tumbling into a financial crisis that would force the company’s two main rivals, General Motors and Chrysler, to seek government bailouts and file for bankruptcy.

Ford survived without federal help and has thrived since, posting pretax profits for 14 consecutive quarters through the end of 2012, while improving revenue and market share.

G.M., the largest American car company, paid Daniel Akerson, its chairman and chief executive, about $11 million last year.

The company has not yet revealed its compensation data for 2012, but last month submitted documents to Congress that said it was proposing to pay Mr. Akerson $11.1 million this year.

G.M. said that figure was the same level as Mr. Akerson received in 2012, making his compensation among the highest for seven bailed-out companies that remain under pay restrictions imposed by the Treasury Department.

Chrysler’s chief executive, Sergio Marchionne, received $1.2 million in compensation in 2012. That does not include his pay as chief executive of Chrysler’s parent company, the Italian automaker Fiat.

The pay levels at G.M. and Ford far exceed what the companies were paying their executives a few years ago, when the automakers were losing billions of dollars, shutting factories and eliminating thousands of hourly and salaried jobs.

In 2005, for example, Mr. Ford, who then served as chief executive and chairman of Ford, agreed to take no compensation until the company became profitable again.

He then recruited Mr. Mulally from the aircraft company Boeing, a move that started Ford’s revival.

Since joining Ford, Mr. Mulally has earned more than $160 million in compensation. He also has been given stock awards totaling about $126 million, according to figures compiled by Bloomberg News Service.

“We believe our 2012 performance clearly shows our management team performed exceedingly well in a difficult environment,” Ford said in a statement.

Mr. Mulally has indicated that he will retire from Ford by 2014. The odds-on choice to succeed him is Mark Fields, who was promoted to chief operating officer in December after leading the company’s Americas division for several years.

Mr. Fields earned about $8.6 million in total compensation from Ford in 2012, a slight increase from the previous year.

The healthy pay packages come as Ford and other automakers anticipate another strong year in the revitalized American car market.

Sales of all new vehicles have risen 8 percent through February, compared with the same period a year ago. The industry is on track to sell more than 15 million new cars and trucks in 2013 — the first time that level has been reached since 2007.

While Ford’s executives are enjoying the rewards of the company’s comeback, so are its workers.

Because of its hefty earnings last year in North America, Ford will pay an average of $8,300 in profit-sharing checks to each of its 45,000 union workers in the United States.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/16/business/another-lucrative-year-for-car-executives.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Weak Earnings in Germany Raise Concerns of Slowing Growth

Siemens, the electronics and industrial conglomerate that is a bellwether for German industry, reported that net profit in the three months ending June 30 fell 65 percent to 501 million euros ($716 million), worse than expected.

The decline was caused partly by charges related to Siemens’s exit from a joint venture with the French nuclear technology company Areva, but also by lower demand for health care equipment and by the effects of a strong euro.

Volkswagen, Europe’s largest carmaker, said profit in the quarter more than tripled to 4.8 billion euros ($6.9 billion), in line with expectations, as it sold more cars both in Germany and abroad. But the company’s preferred shares fell 5 percent after Martin Winterkorn, the chief executive, warned that Europe’s sovereign debt crisis could hurt sales.

“The coming months will be challenging for us,” Mr. Winterkorn said.

Meanwhile, the European Union’s economic sentiment indicator fell by 2.2 points to 103.2 in the euro area, as both business people and consumers became less optimistic about their prospects. The reading, the lowest in almost a year, indicates that growth is likely to continue, but at a slower pace.

“The slowdown should be temporary,” Lavinia Santovetti, an analyst at Nomura, said in a note, but she added, “Uncertainty remains on the spillover effects from the ongoing sovereign debt crisis onto the economy directly and through confidence indirectly.”

Italy and Spain showed the biggest declines in overall confidence, but a sharp fall in optimism among German exporters could be a bad omen.

A deceleration of German growth would add to the challenges Europe faces in getting the sovereign debt crisis under control. Germany’s success in exporting cars and machinery to China and other foreign markets has helped drive growth for the Continent and compensate for economic weakness elsewhere, especially in countries like Greece, Spain and Italy that are trying to cope with large debt.

“All in all, this survey provides more evidence of the loss of momentum in the euro area economy in the beginning of the third quarter,” analysts at Barclays said in a note.

In another sign that the economic outlook remained tentative, the European Central Bank reported that the increase in demand for business loans slowed, while demand for consumer credit declined. “Prospects for loan demand remain generally subdued,” the bank said in a statement Thursday.

Banks are hoarding cash while there is little activity on debt markets, said Dougald Middleton, head of capital and debt advisory at the consulting firm Ernst Young. “What this means for corporate borrowers is that funding will be more difficult to come by and is increasingly expensive,” he said in a statement. “This will be most acute for smaller borrowers and the peripheral economies inside or outside the euro zone.”

Credit Suisse, the second-largest bank in Switzerland, continued a pattern of weak earnings from big banks this week. Credit Suisse said Thursday it planned to cut about 2,000 jobs after a “disappointing” second quarter that included a big drop in earnings in investment banking.

On Tuesday UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank, said it would also have to cut jobs after profit fell by half, also largely because of poor results in investment banking.

Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest bank, said Tuesday that net profit rose 6 percent, but that was below analysts’ forecasts.

There was some good news, as German unemployment continued to decline on a seasonally adjusted basis. The jobless rate remained at 7 percent, according to official data.

But hiring could slow if demand for German autos and industrial technology, the two pillars of Europe’s largest economy, begins to slow.

Siemens reported that profit improved in the division that supplies products and services for industry, like factory automation equipment. But earnings declined sharply in the division that supplies health care equipment like X-ray scanners, and declined in the energy division as well. Siemens said its renewable energy unit, which had been growing fast, was suffering from increased price pressure in the market for wind turbines.

Though Volkswagen’s profit met expectations, some analysts expressed concern about a dip in the profit margin on cars carrying the company’s core Volkswagen badge. The company makes many other brands including Audi and Skoda.

Growth in China, Volkswagen’s largest market, also slowed.

“Although Audi and Skoda still shine,” Christian Aust, an analyst at UniCredit in Munich, said in a note, “the lower gross margin and margin decline at the VW brand raise some questions.”

Julia Werdigier contributed reporting from London.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dc2a7137a39e50528c07967d03ec6f04