November 18, 2024

Music Industry Records First Revenue Increase Since 1999

PARIS — The music industry, the first media business to be consumed by the digital revolution, said Tuesday that its global sales had risen last year for the first year since 1999, suggesting that a long-sought recovery might have finally begun.

The increase, of 0.3 percent, was tiny, and the total revenue, $16.5 billion, was a far cry from the $38 billion that the industry took in at its peak more than a decade ago. Still, even if it is not time for the record companies to party like it’s 1999, the figures, reported Tuesday by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, are a significant psychological boost.

“It’s clear that 2012 saw the global recording industry moving onto the road to recovery,” said Frances Moore, chief executive of the federation, which is based in London. “There’s a palpable buzz in the air that I haven’t felt for a long time.”

For years, the music industry’s decline looked terminal, with the record companies seemingly unable to come up with legitimate digital business models that could compete with the lure of piracy. Last year, however, digital sales and other new sources of revenue finally grew significantly enough to offset the continuing decline in CD sales.

“At the beginning of the digital revolution it was common to say that digital was killing music,” said Edgar Berger, chief executive of the international arm of Sony Music Entertainment. “The reality is that digital is saving music.”

Digital revenue comes in a variety of forms. Sales of downloaded singles and albums, from services like Apple’s iTunes, continue to grow. More promising for the industry, however, are subscription-based services like Spotify, Rhapsody and Muve Music, which have attracted a combined 20 million users worldwide. Subscription fees and licensing revenue are both growing rapidly.

Performance remains highly uneven around the world. Eight of the 20 biggest music markets showed growth last year, but in some countries that the industry classifies as “emerging,” like Russia and China, piracy remains endemic and licensed, legitimate digital services struggle.

There are also worrying signs in some more developed markets that had previously been relatively robust, like Britain. There, the recent bankruptcy of the leading retail music chain, HMV, has prompted fears about an acceleration of the decline in CD sales.

In the United States, sales slipped slightly last year. But Enders Analysis, a research firm in London, predicted in a separate report published Tuesday that this year would mark the beginning of a turnaround, with revenue rising to $5.35 billion from $5.32 billion.

Alice Enders, a senior analyst at the firm, said growth in the coming years was likely to remain slow, as CD sales continue to plunge. Still, after more than a decade of falling revenue, the performance last year was encouraging for the industry.

“It’s huge,” she said. “It’s a milestone.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/27/technology/music-industry-records-first-revenue-increase-since-1999.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder: Comedy Central Makes Deal with Sirius XM

AC/DC’s There, So Now Who Can’t You Find on iTunes?

Steadily over the years, the big names in music have come to terms with iTunes, including Led Zeppelin, and, in 2010, the Beatles. Recently, AC/DC agreed to sell its music there. Still, you won’t find Garth Brooks and others. Whose music have you looked for, unsuccessfully, on iTunes? Who should Apple be coming to terms with next?

  • Share your thoughts here.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/comedy-central-makes-deal-with-sirius-xm/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: Earlier Kickoff for Super Bowl Advertising Campaigns

AC/DC’s There, So Now Who Can’t You Find on iTunes?

Steadily over the years, the big names in music have come to terms with iTunes, including Led Zeppelin, and, in 2010, the Beatles. Recently, AC/DC agreed to sell its music there. Still, you won’t find Garth Brooks and others. Whose music have you looked for, unsuccessfully, on iTunes? Who should Apple be coming to terms with next?

  • Share your thoughts here.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/12/earlier-kickoff-for-super-bowl-advertising-campaigns/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bits: Apple Unveils App and Tools for Digital Textbooks

Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg News

10:29 a.m. | Updated Adding more details as the press conference progresses.

Apple wants students to bid farewell to the days of lugging around backpacks of heavy textbooks, and to welcome the iPad tablet as their new all-in-one reading device.

On Thursday the company released iBooks 2, a free app that will support digital textbooks that can display interactive diagrams, audio and video. At a news conference, the company demonstrated a biology textbook featuring 3-D models, searchable text, photo galleries and flash cards for studying. Apple said high school textbooks from its initial publishing partners, including Pearson, McGraw-Hill and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, would cost $15 or less.

“Education is deep in our DNA and it has been from the very beginning,” said Philip W. Schiller, Apple’s senior vice president of marketing, at the event at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York.

Apple also announced a free tool called iBooks Author, a piece of Macintosh software that allows people to make these interactive textbooks. The tool includes templates designed by Apple, which publishers and authors can customize to suit their content. It requires no programming knowledge and will be available Thursday.

The company also unveiled the iTunes U app for the iPad, which allows teachers to build an interactive syllabus for their coursework. Students can load the syllabus in iTunes U and, for example, tap to open an electronic textbook and go directly to the assigned chapter. Teachers can use iTunes U to create full online courses with podcasts, video, documents and books.

Apple’s push into textbooks brought with it far less buzz than is usual with the company’s new product announcements, in part because of an unusual spoiler. In “Steve Jobs,” the biography that was published in October shortly after Apple’s former chief executive died, Mr. Jobs declared that he wanted to transform the textbook market with the iPad.

Mr. Jobs told the book’s author, Walter Isaacson, that he wanted to hire well-known textbook writers to create electronic versions of their books. He said that Apple could sidestep the state certification process for K-12 textbooks by making them available free for iPads.

By most estimates, Apple has not captured as much of the electronic book market with the iPad and its iBookstore as its chief rival in the business, Amazon, has with the Kindle e-reader.

But while Amazon was a much earlier entrant into the e-books business, it has been less successful in the education market.

Amazon in 2009 announced plans to target the textbook publishing industry with the Kindle DX, a larger version of its e-reader. Not only did Amazon fail to make a dent in the digital textbook market, it also did not impress students. For instance, at Princeton, one of the universities that offered a Kindle DX pilot program, students complained about the device’s sluggishness, lack of color and limited interactivity, according to the university’s student newspaper, The Daily Princetonian.

Education is where Apple has an advantage against Amazon. Apple has a deep and longstanding connection with the education market that could serve it well as it enters the textbook business. Even as its Macintosh computers were shunned by big purchasers of technology inside corporations in decades past, Apple found success selling them to K-12 schools and colleges.

The advent of the iPad and iPhone, along with a resurgence in the growth of the Mac, has made Apple products an even more ubiquitous sight on campuses than they are in the general population.

Before Apple formed official partnerships with textbook publishers, some universities had already embraced the iPad as an experimental learning tool for the classroom. In 2010, Seton Hill University, George Fox University and Abilene Christian University began pilot programs, in which students received iPads as part of their tuition and instructors were trained to use mobile software to teach their courses.

The base price of an iPad is $500, but that cost is inconsequential when considering the lower prices of digital textbooks purchased through iBooks, says Bill Rankin, a professor of medieval studies at Abilene Christian University. In 2008, Mr. Rankin helped start a pilot program in his school where students and teachers used iPhones in the classroom. He explained that textbook publishers typically mark up the prices of print textbooks by six times, because they predict the books will be resold six times, and therefore students would quickly get their money’s worth after purchasing iPads.

Mr. Rankin predicted that with digital textbooks, publishers will realize they can sell more titles for less money, which would drive down overall costs of textbooks both in print and digitally.

He called Apple’s new education apps and tools “revolutionary,” because they give teachers, authors and publishers the ability to create and share books easily. He compared this to how Apple’s App Store democratized the way software was distributed.

“This is something we’ve been dreaming about for years,” he said. “And to see the first steps of this being realized is immensely exciting.”

However, an executive at CourseSmart, an electronic textbook provider that offers digital textbooks for the iPad, iPhone and Android devices, said in response to Apple’s announcements that it was an issue that the company’s digital textbooks would be exclusively available for Apple products.

“Based on the fact that you have to mandate a specific device, that’s going to be difficult for school districts to decide students are going to take their strained budgets to purchase these devices,” said Jill Ambrose, chief marketing officer at CourseSmart, in an interview.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d0149bbe4bc32a38fb70888dd19d4294

Bucks: Out of Office: Call Bernanke in Case of Emergency

June 13

Monday Reading: How to Avoid Credit Card Problems Abroad

How to avoid credit card problems when traveling abroad, safeguarding your passwords, the new iTunes and other consumer-focused news from The New York Times.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1358e9e88166ce724666b141e261d4f6

Bucks: Monday Reading: How to Avoid Credit Card Problems Abroad

June 13

Monday Reading: How to Avoid Credit Card Problems Abroad

How to avoid credit card problems when traveling abroad, safeguarding your passwords, the new iTunes and other consumer-focused news from The New York Times.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=3c7f8b8e526f21e0e6c17f9a85619998

Royal Wedding, Groundbreaking Coverage

PARIS — It may not be the first royal wedding of the digital era, but it is the first full-on British royal wedding of the digital era in which a potential future king of Britain will marry.

So, when Prince William weds Kate Middleton on April 29, the event will be commemorated by a series of media firsts as well.

It will be the first big British royal wedding to be streamed live on the Web. It will be the first to give birth to mobile applications. And it will be the first whose soundtrack will be released on iTunes within hours of the ceremony.

These are, of course, only a few examples of the growing media frenzy surrounding the event. For the world’s media organizations — including television giants like the BBC, cable channels like TLC and myriad digital outlets — April 29 is a red letter day. And not only because the British government has declared a public holiday for the occasion.

How was it that a young couple’s plan to tie the knot, a ritual as traditional as they come, has turned into an interactive, multimedia, multichannel, cross-platform, 24/7, user-generated, hyperlinked, search-engine-optimized, downloadable extravaganza?

Well, this is not just any young couple, and after a global economic crisis, disasters in Japan, the upheaval in the Middle East and other weighty news of recent weeks and months, media executives say the public is eager for a break.

“There’s a lot of tough and very serious stuff happening in the world right now, and we’re putting a lot of resources into covering them,” said Mark Lukasiewicz, vice president of specials and digital media in the news division of NBC, the U.S. television network. “I think audiences are also going to welcome an event like this that’s a little more about old-fashioned pomp and fun.”

Not long after Prince William and Ms. Middleton announced their engagement last November, news outlets swung into action. Newspapers like The Washington Post and Web sites like The Huffington Post quickly created special online sections — The Huffington Post declaring that “some news is so big it needs its own page.”

While the digital media have played a big role in the buildup, television will come into its own on the wedding day. ITV, the biggest commercial broadcaster in Britain, for example, will start wedding-related programming at 6 a.m. and continue until at least 4 p.m., said Cristina Nicolotti Squires, executive producer of the channel’s royal wedding program.

“The hope is that people will get up in the morning, turn on their TVs and sort of leave them on all day,” Ms. Squires said.

Only a handful of journalists will actually be allowed into Westminster Abbey in London, where the ceremony will take place, said Victoria Ribbans, a spokeswoman for the abbey.

Television coverage of the wedding will be pooled, with the BBC manning most of the cameras inside the abbey. ITN, a news provider that works with ITV, and the news channel of British Sky Broadcasting, a pay-TV company, will film along the procession route.

“The feeling is they would like to keep it to a minimum,” Ms. Ribbans said. “You could fill the abbey with the world’s press many times over, but that isn’t what it’s about.”

Broadcasters from all over the world are sending crews to London to supplement the pool coverage with the obligatory interviews of people in the cheering crowd who might once have sat in a Starbucks with someone who once lived next door to someone who once went to school with Ms. Middleton.

Despite the media hype over the wedding, live television viewership will probably fall well short of the audience for some of the most-watched television events in history, like the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics in 2008, which attracted an estimated one billion live viewers, said Kevin Alavy, who analyzes television audiences at Initiative, a media buying agency.

One oft-quoted figure — that the wedding of Prince Charles and Princess Diana in 1981 was watched by 750 million people worldwide — is “vastly overstated” he said. That number, he explained, might include people who later saw clips on the news or elsewhere. A more realistic estimate for the wedding this month would be a continuous live television audience of 100 million, he added.

“When looking at major events of this kind, it’s important not to take too Anglocentric an approach,” Mr. Alavy said. “Will it be a big event in the U.K., the U.S. and Australia? Of course. But you can’t just extrapolate that to the rest of the world. Is this going to be of interest to the average person in Russia, China or Brazil? Probably not.”

Even in places where the audience is expected to be large, the commercial opportunities will be more limited than for, say, a soccer match with comparable viewership. In Britain, for example, advertisements are banned on the BBC. And ITV plans to broadcast without ad breaks during the ceremony and some other parts of the day.

Still, some channels are optimistic about the potential business benefits. TLC, a U.S. cable network that is popular with women viewers, sees the wedding as a way to promote its recent international expansion. TLC, which is owned by Discovery Communications, plans live coverage in about 30 countries.

“This is not just a news event,” said Luis Silberwasser, executive vice president of Discovery Networks International. “We see this as a brand-defining event for TLC.”

For the royal family, criticized for its aloof response to the British public’s display of grief over Diana’s death, the wedding preparations have also been a branding exercise of sorts. While in the past the royals might have been happy to let the professional media do their thing, this time around they have set up their own, official Web site. The digital presence also includes royal wedding Facebook pages and Twitter feeds.

Most of the tweets seem to emanate from Clarence House, Prince Charles’s office, and tend toward the uncontroversial: “I think they will be a perfect match,” Prince William’s younger brother, Prince Harry, or perhaps one of his handlers, opined in a recent contribution.

The royals have also been receptive to the likes of Universal Music Group, whose Decca record label plans to release the soundtrack of the wedding ceremony, on Apple’s iTunes store and, later, on compact disc. it could be one of the rare opportunities for musicians in the choir of the Westminster Abby, the Chapel Royal Choir, the London Chamber Orchestra and the fanfare team of the Central Band of the Royal Air Force, which are all expected to perform in the ceremony, to top the pop charts. In return, Universal promised a donation to charity.

But even digital-savvy royals sometimes have to say enough is enough. That happened when they rejected a request from Sky to broadcast the wedding in 3-D. Sky had gone to great lengths to try to persuade the family of the merits of 3-D coverage, even staging and filming a mock wedding at a church near London.

Clarence House, which is handling the wedding arrangements, explained that it did not want to have to deal with the extra “footprint” that the 3-D cameras would have taken up in the abbey.

“I know you have all become increasingly enthusiastic about 3-D and I’m sorry that this will come as a disappointment,” a spokesman wrote in a letter to Sky and other broadcasters, which was quoted in the British newspaper The Guardian. “I hope you feel the process we have gone through will be helpful for other live events and of course we do not rule out facilitating 3-D at some point in the future.”

In other words, should Prince Harry, someday decide to marry, there might still room for him to be a digital media innovator, too.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=341cbb1ddfa6acb10a93afd3ae364206

Advertising: Cashing In Coins and Skipping the Surcharge

“We have videos of folks pouring coins into the machine and they’re watching the ticker go up and up and they can’t believe it, because they usually have about 50 percent more than they thought they had,” said Engle Saez, vice president for consumer experience at Coinstar. “They’re elated.”

What may come as less welcome news, however, is the Coinstar service fee, which is 9.8 percent in the United States.

Now Coinstar — with operations throughout the United States, Canada and Britain — increasingly is teaming up with retailers, who essentially pay that service fee on behalf of consumers, who in turn agree to spend their bounty with them. After tallying, instead of receiving a levied cash voucher, users choose a gift certificate for the full value of the coins from retailers including Starbucks, Gap, iTunes and Amazon.com.

For Coinstar, which receives fees for transactions regardless, the growth potential for such partnerships is considerable, because the companies promote Coinstar to their own customers on their Web sites, through promotional e-mails, and in print and online advertisements.

While Coinstar, which converts $3 billion in coins annually, has offered the fee-free option from some retailers for as long as five years, the company had until recently never advertised the option. While Mr. Saez declined to say how many customers opted for no-fee gift certificates, he said that “the ratio is inordinately high” for cash vouchers.

“We haven’t told anyone about it,” Mr. Saez said. “For all intents and purposes it’s been the best kept secret out there.”

•

But now Coinstar is trying to change that. Late last year, in publications including People and The New York Times, Coinstar advertised a program where several retail outlets, including iTunes, Borders and Regal Cinemas, went beyond shouldering the fee to offer gift cards that exceeded the value of a $40 minimum coin exchange by $10, meaning that $40 in coins could be redeemed for a $50 gift certificate.

After that promotion ended on Jan. 1, iTunes made the same bonus offer for the 30 days that ended March 6, while another company, Rixty, is offering a $30 gift certificate in return for cashing in $25 in coins from March 25 through April 17.

Rixty enables consumers who lack credit cards to make cash-based purchases online, primarily for virtual goods in games like Farmville and on social networks like Facebook. When the company first started selling credits to consumers in 2009, it began by offering fee-free credit exclusively to Coinstar users.

“When we launched they were our first partner, and the great thing was on Day 1 we were live on 10,000 kiosks across the country,” said Ted C. Sorom, chief executive of Rixty. (Today there are about 17,000 Coinstar machines in the United States.)

While most Rixty consumers are adults, many are adolescents who earn cash baby-sitting and mowing lawns, but lack credit cards.

“When they go to their parents and say, ‘Can I borrow a credit card to buy a pair of virtual pants in a virtual world that you’ve never really heard of?’ the results are not positive,” Mr. Sorom said.

While his company today has numerous ways to use cash for online purchases, including Rixty gift cards available at retailers like Kmart and J. C. Penney, Mr. Sorom is partial to the freewheeling nature of Coinstar consumers.

“It is found money,” he said of their transactions. “It doesn’t come from a wallet or bank account, and people are much more willing to spend it on something on the edge of their budget, something they couldn’t justify spending money on before.”

•

Coinstar, which says it has kiosks within five miles of 95 percent of the United States population, says it has an average coin transaction of $38 and about 76 million transactions annually.

The largest coin exchange on record for the company involved Edmond Knowles of Flomaton, Ala., who in 2005 cashed in $13,084.59 — all in pennies. Coinstar sent an armored truck to Mr. Knowles’s home to retrieve the pennies.

Amazon, which has offered fee-free gift certificates through Coinstar since 2005, says spending among Coinstar users increases every year, though the online retailer declined to give specifics.

“We know there’s a segment out there that doesn’t have access to credit cards, and we also see a lot of college students who don’t have credit cards,” said Marcell King, senior manager at ACI Gift Cards, the issuer of Amazon gift cards.

More than eight million consumers stopped using credit cards in the last year, a nearly 11 percent increase in the number of consumers who forgo them, according to a recent report from TransUnion, a credit rating agency.

The latest effort by Coinstar, in pilot programs under way at both the Albertsons and Stop Shop supermarket chains, entails a first for the company: offering no-fee gift cards at the very store where shoppers are exchanging coins.

Stop Shop is running its pilot program for a six-month period through May at 50 stores, most of them in Massachusetts, and promoting it through newspaper circular advertisements and billboards — by Eleven Inc. in San Francisco — and in-store radio announcements.

“What we’re hearing from our customers is that they like it and they’re happy with it,” said Mark McGowan, president of the Northeast division of Stop Shop, who declined to provide preliminary data from the pilot program.

Mr. Saez, of Coinstar, said such in-store programs had enormous potential — and should have been initiated long ago.

“We’re trying to appeal to those consumers who are fee-averse by putting a product in front of them that we know is highly, highly relevant to them,” he said. “To convert coins into a grocery store gift card — that one was a no-brainer that skipped over a lot of brains here for many years.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e27e9b1da28238a7c7f033d879a5dc82