November 15, 2024

Toyota Will Make Lexus ES 350 in Kentucky

Toyota has been eager to bolster its Lexus brand in the United States, the automaker’s biggest overseas market, where luxury car sales now outpace sales of other autos. Toyota also wants to shift more production from Japan to overseas markets to better insulate itself from the currency gyrations that have wreaked havoc with its bottom line in recent years.

For communities like Georgetown, Toyota’s decision to expand auto production came as a vote of confidence in American auto manufacturing after years of painful cutbacks by domestic automakers. Despite that decline, the United States remains one of the top auto manufacturers and employers in the world, thanks to Japanese and other foreign automakers that have expanded production here.

Those foreign automakers are getting plenty of incentives. On Wednesday, the Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority approved $146.5 million in state tax benefits to help Toyota expand production in Georgetown, in a sign of how aggressively states are wooing companies that will create and maintain local manufacturing jobs.

“I feel like the state has just won the Kentucky Derby,” Gov. Steven Beshear of Kentucky said as cheers erupted in a broadcast streamed live in New York from Toyota’s Georgetown plant. The site is Toyota’s first wholly owned factory in the United States, and its largest manufacturing plant outside of Japan. “We actually see Toyota as a Kentucky company,” he said.

Toyota said that it would invest $360 million to install a new production line that will build about 50,000 of its flagship Lexus ES 350 sedans at Georgetown. The move will increase annual production at the plant, which already assembles the Camry, Avalon and Venza models and employs about 6,600 people, to about 550,000 vehicles a year.

“For manufacturing, Kentucky is Toyota’s home. It has some of the most experienced engineers in the world,” Akio Toyoda, president of Toyota Motor, said in New York. He said that building the Lexus here would help Toyota better meet the needs of its American customers, and would reduce the effect of the exchange rate on car prices for American consumers.

Since 2008, a punishingly strong yen has weighed on Toyota’s profitability, making it more expensive in dollar terms to produce in Japan and eroding the value of its overseas earnings in the home currency. Mr. Toyoda said a recent respite in the yen’s strength would not affect the company’s plans to protect itself from future ups and downs in currency.

Toyota’s new expansion follows brisk sales in the United States of the Lexus ES, a midsize luxury car that is selling twice as fast as it did in 2012. Though the car comes in conventional gasoline and gas-electric hybrid models, only gas-powered cars will be made in Kentucky for now, Toyota said.

Toyota currently builds the Lexus ES at a plant on the island of Kyushu in southern Japan. Seeking to soothe worries back home that Toyota is reducing manufacturing jobs there, Toyota said that it expected to announce soon that the plant would manufacture another model. The Kyushu plant will also make and export the hybrid version of the ES, Toyota said.

Toyota’s chief executive for North America, Jim Lentz, said the investment came on top of plans already under way to spend $2 billion to expand and upgrade Toyota factories in Indiana, Mississippi, West Virginia and Canada in the last two years. Those expansions have also created new jobs.

Traditionally tightly controlled from its headquarters in Toyota city, Toyota has revamped its management structure in recent months to give more authority to regional managers, including a new team of executives in North America led by Mr. Lentz. Mr. Lentz said bringing Lexus production to the United States was the first decision made by his team, and that he expected similar decisions to follow.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/business/toyota-will-make-lexus-es-350-in-kentucky.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Off the Shelf: In New Books, Investment Help From Many Angles

IT seems that the nation’s publishers are just as perplexed about investing as the rest of us.

You might expect them to be rushing out dozens of books offering advice about what to do in a market that has bounced around like a 7-year-old on a sugar high — and has lately tripped over its own feet. But they have published very few.

Instead, they have mainly opted to approach the problem sideways. They are telling you how to put money in context, so that you will presumably be less upset about the market’s gyrations. They are telling you how to save more, so that you presumably can offset your investment losses. And they are even releasing a novel about an appealing young economics professor struggling to make his way in the real world — to show you, presumably, that things are tough even for the experts.

Let’s start with a compendium of savings tips, “Howard Clark’s Living Large in Lean Times” (Avery, $18). Mr. Clark, who has a syndicated radio show and a program on HLN television, has a premise that is simple — and depressing. He says that it could take as long as 10 years for the economy to recover, so you need to cut costs now.

The book offers more than 250 suggestions, many of them familiar: Buy a used car instead of a new one. Reduce or eliminate what you pay for cable or satellite entertainment. Raise your insurance deductibles.

But it also offers ideas you might not have considered: Buy three copies of the Sunday newspaper — not to pad circulation, but to get more sets of the coupons inside; have your eyeglass prescription filled online; cancel your gym membership and see whether your local hospital will let you use its rehabilitation/fitness facilities. And, when your computer printer sends a message that it is almost out of ink, remove the cartridge and shake it for what he says may be “several weeks’ more use.”

“The Ultimate Financial Plan” (Wiley, $27.95) deals with less tangible matters. While it covers most of the traditional topics found in a personal finance book, it really isn’t one. Insurance and estate planning get the bulk of the attention in its 250 pages. Investing and portfolio management receive just one 39-page chapter.

But to their credit, the writers — Jim Stovall, an inspirational speaker and author, and Tim Maurer, a financial planner — say up front that they are not writing the usual personal finance book. Their goal is to help you decide where money fits into your life. “Money without purpose is like fuel without a destination,” they write. “It is useless if not dangerous to have around.”

You need to understand that purpose so you aren’t frustrated by the goals you set. If, for example, you decide you want to be “present, physically and intellectually and emotionally” for your family, it will be very hard to save $3 million to retire comfortably by age 55.

If you line up your financial goals with your personal ones, you may choose to spend more money today to have the kind of life you want, leaving you less for retirement. If you have truly considered that choice, the authors say, the decision is a good one. They believe you should have a complete life, one that shouldn’t begin at retirement.

Retirement planning should “never be undertaken with the thought that with enough money you could buy your way out of servitude in a job or career you hate,” they write. It “should be looked upon as a way to continue to live your life the way you have always lived your life as a happy, fulfilled, contented person, making a difference in the world around you.”

A traditional book in the current bunch is “The Smartest Portfolio You’ll Ever Own” by Daniel R. Solin (Perigee, $22). As in his previous books, Mr. Solin is critical of traditional investment advisers, many of whom, he says, put their interests ahead of their clients’. He advocates a diversified portfolio of index funds.

What is different here is that he suggests a greater concentration of small-cap and value stocks within the equity part of a portfolio.

How concentrated? Mr. Solin offers five model portfolios, ranging from what he describes as low risk (20 percent stocks; 80 percent bonds) to high risk (100 percent stocks). In the medium-risk portfolio (60 percent stocks; 40 percent bonds), small-cap and value investments would make up 36 percent of your total holdings. Increasing your concentration in any specific investment increases risk, but Mr. Solin says it will be more than offset by the potential return.

FINALLY, let’s consider that novel — “Something for Nothing” (MIT Press, $24.95), by Michael W. Klein, a Tufts economics professor.

The story follows David Fox, a newly minted Ph.D. who has just been hired on a one-year contract to teach at a small college in upstate New York. He is struggling to learn how to teach, and he can’t find time to do the research that will help him get tenure. And his social life is, well, complicated. On top of all that, a right-wing research group wants to promote a paper he did in grad school that proved the economic benefits of sexual abstinence — but that was based on math that is suddenly in doubt.

This book is not merely entertaining. It manages to slip in some extremely clear explanations of supply and demand, game theory, marginal costs and the like, which might well seem fuzzy when presented in more conventional form. And understanding how markets are supposed to work can be helpful in figuring out what to do on your own.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=4edfdc671ad74e7476f90e723b3ad251

Wealth Matters: Challenging Dollar-Cost Averaging and Other Bad Ideas

The sheer magnitude of the world’s problems — high unemployment and legislative gridlock in the United States, debt problems in Europe, signs of a slowdown in China — makes this a scary time for investors.

But what about the urge to take some sort of action? As I have written before, the better strategy is almost always to focus on a long-term plan and not abandon it the moment it gets tested. After the last three years, this is tougher to do than ever.

“It’s very hard to do nothing when everybody is trying to talk you into doing something, even when it’s wrong,” said Susan Fulton, founder and president of FBB Capital Partners.

Michael Martin, a trader and the author of the new book “The Inner Voice of Trading” (FT Press), put it a different way. The big risk for average investors now is confusing volatility with opportunity.

He said professional traders become more wary when prices are changing rapidly for no fundamental reason. And he equated the market, with its wild swings, to a drunken uncle at a holiday dinner. “When someone’s behavior becomes more volatile, you don’t want to warm up to that person,” he said. “You want to get away.”

But ignoring those swings can be difficult. Below are some bad ideas as well as some slightly contrarian thoughts that may offer comfort.

BAD IDEAS Fear causes investors to do all sorts of things that could hurt them in the long run.

The recent drop in gold prices to about $1,600 an ounce from just under $1,900 in August has damped down some of the enthusiasm for gold. But the gyrations in stocks have led some investors to think that they can find something there that will soar as gold did.

“People want to swing for the fences,” Ms. Fulton said. “We’re not going to have stocks that multiply by 10 in the near future.”

She said she advised clients to look instead at companies that had a lot of cash and were paying steady dividends. There is a predictability to those stocks that will help battered portfolios.

A variation on the stock-picking strategy involves using tax losses accumulated over the years to bet heavily on a risky company. The hope is that any gains will get an investor back to even and also be tax-free.

The problem is that unless the investor picks the next Google, his losses could be substantial. And even if he’s lucky enough to pick a stock that appreciates greatly, it could be years before he sells the stocks and is able to use the tax losses to offset the gains.

“You should use your tax losses on things that can benefit you today,” said Lewis Altfest, chief investment officer of Altfest Personal Wealth Management.

Mr. Altfest said a client recently wanted him to put money into some risky stocks because he was down so much. Instead of agreeing, Mr. Altfest suggested the client reallocate his portfolio back to 65 percent stocks and 35 percent bonds and then go back to that allocation whenever the stock position dropped below 63 percent.

“He’s got a human problem now — he’s behind,” Mr. Altfest said. “I could explain to him that this is the worst recession we’ve had in 80 years. It might help him intellectually, but he hurts, and he wants an answer.”

CONSOLING THOUGHTS One of the great comforts to average investors in a volatile market is dollar-cost averaging. This is a fancy way of saying you should invest your money over a period of time as opposed to investing it all at once, which is known as lump-sum investing.

Proponents of dollar-cost averaging offer two arguments. By putting money into, say, a stock over time, you will be buying shares at varying prices, which will benefit you in the end. This seems particularly appealing when stock prices are rising and falling so much.

The second advantage is psychological: If you put all your money into an investment and it is worth 10 percent less the next day, you’re going to feel horrible about it. Worse, you may also be less inclined to make further investments or pull your money out.

But new research from Gerstein Fisher, a money manager in New York, raises questions about that investing philosophy. It found that from January 1926 to December 2010, investing your money on one day yielded better results over a 20-year period than investing the same amount of money in equal chunks over 12 months.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=90a4d733ac782efae338a23b99bea603