November 22, 2024

As SpinMedia, Web Publisher Aims to Lift Smaller Sites

In the race for Internet advertising, could a few dozen runner-up blogs win in the end?

That is the goal of Buzzmedia, a Los Angeles-based company that owns or sells advertising for more than 40 Web sites that cater to young pop-culture obsessives, like Celebuzz and JustJared for celebrity news and Stereogum, Idolator and Brooklyn Vegan for music.

Individually, many of its sites do not lead their categories. For news about alternative music, for example, Stereogum lags behind Pitchfork in audience and influence; for celebrity gossip, Celebuzz trails TMZ and others.

But altogether, Buzzmedia’s sites draw 41 million people each month, according to comScore. That is more than some of Buzzmedia’s main competitors, like Gawker Media (32 million) or Mashable (5.6 million); BuzzFeed had 25 million visitors last December, according to comScore, although BuzzFeed says the number was 40 million.

On Monday, in a move that could help elevate Buzzmedia, the company will rename itself SpinMedia, after Spin magazine, which it bought last year. It will also introduce a site for preteenagers, HeartsandFoxes, as well as technological changes to try to keep readers lingering longer and track them as they move from one device to another.

“The content experience in 2013 needs to be anywhere, anytime, on mobile, desktop or smartphone; it needs to be current and instantaneous,” Steve Hansen, the chief executive, said. “What we need to do is evolve the user experience to take advantage of that.”

Dealing with one publisher for dozens of sites can make business easy for advertisers, said Tony Effik, a managing director at the digital advertising agency R/GA.

“The problem with dealing with niche pop-culture sites is that, if you’re a big brand, you don’t want to go and do 50 deals with people like this,” Mr. Effik said.

But SpinMedia must also convince advertisers that its 41 million readers are more than just dozens of disconnected audiences. The company has also had growing pains lately: it raised $15 million in investments, but laid off 50 employees, almost 20 percent of its staff.

To connect the audiences of its sites, SpinMedia’s new platform can track reader behavior and recommend articles from across its network. Someone reading a Celebuzz item about Justin Timberlake, for example, can be pointed to similar articles on JustJared, Spin or Celebslam. Advertisers can also sponsor particular topics across multiple sites.

Like other Web companies, SpinMedia is emphasizing video, as well as branded content — features created with advertisers, which are increasingly common but controversial for blurring the line between advertising and editorial content.

“We know that consumers don’t care if the content they are consuming is editorial driven or brand driven as long as it’s great,” said Doug Rohrer, SpinMedia’s chief revenue officer. (In an interview, SpinMedia executives also said their sites preserved editorial integrity.)

The value of a large aggregated audience remains unclear compared with a more dedicated one.

Spin, for example, has notched up its competition against Pitchfork since July, when Buzzmedia bought the magazine (and within weeks shut down its print edition). Spin’s 870,000 readers now closely challenge Pitchfork’s 1.1 million. But comScore’s figures show that visitors to Pitchfork spend more than quadruple the time as visitors to Spin.

Pitchfork also shuns many now-standard Web site features, like comments on articles. And while Pitchfork also publishes branded content, its president, Chris Kaskie, said the company turns down many such deals over the issue of control.

“Our job is to protect our readers and make sure that whatever we do is adding value to their experience,” Mr. Kaskie said. “Doing anything more than that would make us feel ugly. Whether that makes for a more effective ad campaign is not something we really want to think about doing.”

Of course, SpinMedia wants to be the winner, not just the runner-up, and Mr. Hansen said the company’s changes are meant to help reach that goal.

“You can’t have a portfolio of brands that are all market leaders,” Mr. Hansen said. “That being said, I want to focus on Idolator, Celebuzz, Buzznet, in their respective categories. They have the potential to evolve into market leaders. We have to do a lot of work. That is what this company is focusing on.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/business/media/as-spinmedia-web-publisher-aims-to-lift-smaller-sites.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

The Media Equation: Buffeted by the Web, but Now Riding It

It didn’t turn out that way. If anything, digital technology has overwhelmed those who sought to master it. The Web may be a technological marvel, but to most people who use it for work, it functions like an old-fashioned hamster wheel, except at Internet speed.

Brian Lam was both a prince and a casualty of that realm. After interning at Wired, he became the editor of Gizmodo, Gawker Media’s gadget blog. A trained Thai boxer, he focused his aggression on cranking out enough copy to increase the site’s traffic, to a peak of 180 million page views from 13 million in the six years he was there.

He and his writers broke news, sent shrapnel into many subject areas with provocative, opinionated copy and was part of the notorious pilfered iPhone 4 story that had law enforcement officials breaking down doors on Apple’s behalf. I saw Mr. Lam on occasional trips to San Francisco, and he crackled with jumpy digital energy.

And then, he burned out at age 34. He loved the ocean, but his frantic digital existence meant his surfboard was gathering cobwebs. “I came to hate the Web, hated chasing the next post or rewriting other people’s posts just for the traffic,” he told me. “People shouldn’t live like robots.”

So he quit Gizmodo, and though he had several lucrative offers, he decided to do exactly nothing. He sold his car, rented out his house, took time to mull things over and eventually moved to Hawaii because he loves surfing.

This is the point in the story where we generally find out that the techie is now a wood carver, or an oboe player.

But leopards don’t change their spots, and they certainly don’t turn into unicorns. An accomplished technologist and writer, Mr. Lam worked to come up with a business that he could command instead of the other way around.

The problem is that these days, ad-supported media business models all depend on scale, because rates go lower every day. Success in Web media generally requires constant posting to build a big audience. Mr. Lam knew where that led.

With friends — including Brian X. Chen, who now works at The New York Times — he came up with his own version of a gadget site. But instead of chasing down every tidbit of tech news, he built The Wirecutter, a recommendation site that posts six to 12 updates a month — not a day — and began publishing in partnership with The Awl, a federation of blogs founded by two other veterans of Gawker Media, Choire Sicha and Alex Balk.

While there are many technology sites that evaluate and compare products, usually burying their assessments in a tsunami of other posts, Mr. Lam and his staff of freelancers decided to rely on deep examinations of specific product categories.

Using expert opinions, aggregated reviews and personal research, they recommend a single product in each category. There are no complicated rankings or deep analytics on the entire category. If you want new earphones or a robot vacuum, The Wirecutter will recommend The One and leave it at that.

“I was tired of doing posts that were obsolete three hours after I wrote them,” Mr. Lam said. “I wanted evergreen content that didn’t have to be updated constantly in order to hunt traffic. I wanted to publish things that were useful.”

He bootstrapped the site, spurning outside investment. “If you take the money, you have to pony up in terms of scale, and I don’t want to do that,” he said.

The clean, simple interface, without the clutter of news, is a tiny business; it has fewer than 350,000 unique visitors a month at a time when ad buyers are not much interested in anything less than 20 million.

But The Wirecutter is not really in the ad business. The vast majority of its revenue comes from fees paid by affiliates, mostly Amazon, for referrals to their sites. As advertising rates continue to tumble, affiliate fees could end up underwriting more and more media businesses.

“Brian’s insight is that in a world of loudest and fastest, he has turned it down, doing it slow and doing it right,” Mr. Sicha said. “And by being consumer facing, he doesn’t have to have monster numbers. The people come ready to buy.”

In fact, 10 to 20 percent of its visitors click on links, a rate that would make ad sellers drool. Mr. Lam hardly invented the model. The Web is full of mom-and-pop shops that live on referral fees for things like pet supplies and camping gear. Many companies also pay for referrals — eBay, Half.com, even retailers like Gap and Old Navy. A business that used to be mired in spam is becoming far more legitimate.

For small businesses like Wirecutter, it’s risky to rely so much on a single company, but Amazon seems disinclined to mess with its very successful model.

“We have been working hard to give publishers of all sizes the tools to work with Amazon,” said Steve Shure, Amazon’s vice president for worldwide marketing.

But it’s not just the little guys. Hearst’s Good Housekeeping has commerce links to Amazon, and Gawker Media, Mr. Lam’s old employer, is building affiliate revenue and other nonadvertising revenue into a seven-figure business by next year. In a sense, it’s back to the future, the days of the Whole Earth Catalog and its compendium of splendid things. Kevin Kelly, its former editor and publisher and now “senior maverick” at Wired, has a site called Cool Tools that will be observing its 10th anniversary.

“Affiliate income is six times as much as advertising by now,” Mr. Kelly said in a phone call, describing the revenue at Cool Tools. “Part of what is attractive about our site and Brian’s is that it is a distillation, a trusted friend. You don’t find out everything, just what you need to know.”

Mr. Lam’s revenue is low, about $50,000 a month, but it’s doubling every month, enough to pay his freelancers, invest in the site and keep him in surfboards. And now he actually has time to ride them. In that sense, Mr. Lam is living out that initial dream of the Web: working from home, working with friends, making something that saves others time and money.

“I don’t want to get too hippie about it, but surf is bad when it comes in lots of messy waves,” he said. “Our traffic is spaced out in manageable ways that we will grow over time. And even if it doesn’t, that’s fine by me.”

E-mail: carr@nytimes.com;

Twitter: @carr2n

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: December 16, 2012

An earlier version of this article said that Mr. Lam’s Web site revenue was doubling every month. It should have said doubling every quarter.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/business/media/buffeted-by-the-web-but-now-riding-it.html?partner=rss&emc=rss