November 22, 2024

Undercover BBC Trip to North Korea Is Criticized

But among the students, the university announced in an outraged statement over the weekend, were three BBC journalists filming an undercover documentary. The BBC, the university said, “deliberately misled” the group to underplay the scope of the reporting, placed the students in danger and jeopardized its work in politically fraught nations. It demanded that the BBC pull the film, set for broadcast on Monday, and issue an apology.

The BBC declined, saying that the documentary on a country so few people understand was in the public interest. And in a statement released Sunday, the BBC disputed the university’s account. It said the students had been told that a journalist would be present “and were reminded of it again, in time to have been able to change their plans if they wanted to.”

But the BBC, which the university says actually sent three journalists, also later acknowledged that it had not told the students of the nature of the documentary, in what it characterized as a bid to keep them safe if the journalists were found out and the students were questioned about what they knew.

Although at least some tourists are now allowed into the police state, reporters need government permission to work there and are assigned minders. In 2009 two American journalists, Laura Ling, then 32, and Euna Lee, then 36, were arrested and sentenced to 12 years of hard labor after being accused of illegally entering North Korean territory while researching a report on women and human trafficking. They were spared the prospect of years in a brutal gulag when former President Bill Clinton flew to Pyongyang and negotiated their release four months later.

Alex Peters-Day, the lead student representative for the university, said Sunday that students had received e-mails from the North Korean government on their return saying that it had learned that reporters were with the group and was very angry. Ms. Peters-Day disputed the BBC version of events, saying the students had not been given enough information to give informed consent.

Craig Calhoun, the university’s director, said in a post on Twitter that the trip “was not an official LSE trip.” He said the BBC had essentially recruited some students in a university-affiliated student international relations group, the Grimshaw Club, and had “passed it off” as a student trip.

Ms. Peters-Day said that students had received an e-mail suggesting the trip from one of the BBC journalists, Tomiko Sweeney, who is married to the lead reporter on the documentary, John Sweeney, and is a former LSE student. Mr. Sweeney did not respond to a message left on his cellphone, but said, in a BBC radio interview and on Twitter that he disputed the school’s allegations. There was no answer at a London number listed for the couple.

Ceri Thomas, the BBC’s head of news, said Sunday that though the trip had been organized by Mr. Sweeney’s wife, it “was going to happen before the BBC got involved.” The students were warned of the dangers in two meetings in London and again in Beijing, he said. “The only people we deceived,” he said of the documentary, “was the North Korean government. And if the students were in on that deception they were in a worse position.”

The public interest argument for the documentary was “overwhelming,” Mr. Thomas said. North Korea is “a country that is hidden from view, where we suspect that brutal things are happening, one of the most oppressive regimes on the planet which is threatening nuclear war in the Korean Peninsula.”

The standoff marks the second time this year that the world’s delicate diplomatic dance with North Korea over its escalating nuclear threats has been disturbed by a television crew. In late February, the magazine Vice sent the former Chicago Bulls star Dennis Rodman to Pyongyang to meet the country’s leader, Kim Jong-un, an avid basketball fan, for a documentary series it is producing in collaboration with HBO.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/world/europe/undercover-bbc-trip-to-north-korea-is-criticized.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Geithner Considers Leaving Treasury Job

WASHINGTON – Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner is considering leaving the Obama administration after a deal is reached to reduce the federal deficit, two officials familiar with his thinking said Wednesday.

Mr. Geithner has not made a decision, this official said, and he would not leave before President Obama strikes deal with Congress averting a possible default on the national debt. But he is being guided in part by family considerations, this official said. His son has opted to finish high school in New York.

Bloomberg News first reported that Mr. Geithner, who will turn 50 in August, was weighing his departure. The White House and Treasury declined to comment on the report.

But earlier in the day in Chicago, at a conference organized by former President Bill Clinton, Mr. Geithner said he planned to be in his job “for the foreseeable future.”

“I live for this work, it’s the only work I’ve done, and I believe in it,” Mr. Geithner said in answer to a question from Mr. Clinton about his career plans. “I’m going to be doing it for the foreseeable future.”

Mr. Geithner said his son had decided to attend his final year of high school in New York, which meant that he would be commuting between Washington and New York for a while. Officials said family issues were weighing on Mr. Geithner, as well as the recognition that there was a window of opportunity for him to leave once a deal averting a debt crisis was reached.

If Mr. Geithner does exit later this year, he would be the last member of Mr. Obama’s economic brain trust to leave the administration, after two-and-a-half years of turmoil, during which the White House confronted a financial crisis, a historic recession, near double-digit unemployment, and a recovery that has yet to gain traction. Before coming to the Treasury, Mr. Geithner was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York where he played a leading role in the bailouts of several financial institutions in 2008.

Austan Goolsbee, one of Mr. Obama’s chief economic advisers, recently announced he would return to his teaching post at the University of Chicago. Lawrence H. Summers, a former Treasury Secretary in the Clinton administration, and a top Obama adviser, left late last year for Harvard, while Christina Roemer, Mr. Obama’s first head of the Council of Economic Advisers, returned last summer to the University of California at Berkeley.

Of all these departures, Mr. Geithner’s would have arguably have the greatest impact. He has become one of the president’s closest and most trusted counselors, attending his daily briefings and coordinating the White House’s strategy on a range of crucial issues, from financial reform to pressuring China on its currency.

The job of Treasury secretary increasingly demands a background in finance, to advise the president on the government’s financial challenges and to shape federal oversight of the financial industry.

Erskine Bowles, former chief of staff to President Clinton and co-chairman of President Obama’s deficit commission, commands respect in Democratic policy circles. So does Roger Altman, an investment banker and former deputy Treasury secretary in the Clinton years. Two current officials regarded as credible candidates are Janet Yellen, the vice chair of the Federal Reserve, and Gene Sperling, director of the National Economic Council, who previously served as a lieutenant to Mr. Geithner. Whomever is chosen, the prospect is good that there will be a contentious confirmation hearing in the Senate as the country heads into a presidential election year and especially so if the economy remains sluggish. 

Binyamin Appelbaum contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=28845b4a7b78dbd40d3a2e8d6bf0d7d8