November 15, 2024

Obama Nominates 2 Senate Aides for S.E.C. Posts

President Obama continued his shake-up of the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, naming two Senate aides to senior posts at the Wall Street regulatory agency.

The nominees to the five-member agency are Kara M. Stein, a Democrat, and Michael Piwowar, a Republican. If confirmed by the Senate, they will succeed commissioners whose terms are set to expire.

The move comes just months after Mr. Obama named Mary Jo White, a former federal prosecutor turned Wall Street defense lawyer, to be chairwoman of the agency. In recent weeks, Ms. White has started to overhaul the staff, naming co-heads of the agency’s enforcement unit, new leaders of other major divisions and her own chief of staff. She also hired a general counsel, Anne K. Small, who rejoined the S.E.C. from the White House.

The transition period has coincided with challenges for the agency, which has fallen far behind its rule-making responsibilities. Nearly three years after Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act, the overhaul of Wall Street regulation, the S.E.C. has carried out only a small fraction of the changes.

The possible arrival of Ms. Stein and Mr. Piwowar could add to some delays as they settle into the agency. Yet the nominees are hardly strangers to the S.E.C.’s business.

Ms. Stein is an aide to Senator Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who is a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the S.E.C. Mr. Piwowar is the committee’s Republican chief economist.

In a statement late Thursday, the committee chairman, Tim Johnson, expressed support for both nominees. “I look forward to moving both their nominations forward to ensure the commission continues to operate at full strength,” said Mr. Johnson, Democrat of South Dakota.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/business/obama-nominates-2-senate-aides-for-sec-posts.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Credit Suisse Discloses U.S. Inquiry Over Taxes

An office of the Swiss bank Credit Suisse in Zurich.Arnd Wiegmann/ReutersAn office of the Swiss bank Credit Suisse in Zurich.

7:50 p.m. | Updated

Credit Suisse disclosed Friday that it was being investigated by the Justice Department to see whether its private banking unit helped Americans evade taxes, raising the possibility that the bank could face legal proceedings similar to those that led its Swiss rival, UBS, to pay a costly settlement and open its books to American tax authorities.

Citing “a broader industry inquiry,” Credit Suisse said it had previously received subpoenas and other information requests from the Justice Department and other government agencies regarding the cross-border services that its private banking arm provided to its rich American clients. The bank also said it was told it was “a target” of the investigation on Thursday.

“Subject to our Swiss legal obligations, we will continue to cooperate with the U.S. authorities in an effort to resolve these matters,” the bank said.

Jeffrey A. Neiman, a former federal prosecutor who had been assigned to the UBS case, called Credit Suisse’s disclosure “déjà vu all over again.”

“The Justice Department could not signal more strongly to an individual entity that they consider them to be in gross violation of the law than by calling them the target of an investigation,” he said. “The bank, and its U.S. clients, should take that very seriously.”

Four private bankers tied to Credit Suisse were indicted in the United States in February for helping American citizens evade taxes. The four — Marco Parenti Adami, Emanuel Agustoni, Michele Bergantino and Roger Schaerer — were also linked to Bank Leumi, the big Israeli bank, and Bank Frey and Maerki Baumann, two smaller Swiss private banks. They have been accused of conspiracy and fraud.

The bankers, three of whom had left Credit Suisse before they were indicted, were accused of helping American clients set up offshore accounts under false names, and shifting money from Credit Suisse accounts to smaller Swiss private banks.

At the time, Credit Suisse said it was not the object of an investigation by the Justice Department, and industry analysts thought the bank might be able to strike a deal with American authorities by paying a fine, much like UBS did in 2009.

The announcement on Friday raises the stakes for Credit Suisse. UBS paid a $780 million fine and handed over data on thousands of clients to avoid a conviction in a similar case that could have cost it its banking license in the United States.

On Friday, a Swiss court upheld the Swiss government’s decision to force UBS to hand over client data, citing “virtually uncontrollable economic repercussions for Switzerland” if it had not done so. That decision implies that Credit Suisse, too, may be ordered to surrender information about customers’ accounts to American authorities.

“The U.S. government will most likely demand not just payment of back taxes but the disclosure of client data,” Mr. Neiman said, suggesting that there could be no half measures because of Swiss banking secrecy laws. “They don’t reach resolution with a corporate entity unless they cooperate fully,” he said.

In March, an American citizen, Edward Gurary, pleaded guilty to tax evasion and admitted hiding assets not only at UBS, but also at Credit Suisse. The Justice Department began its investigation of Credit Suisse’s private banking operations, along with those of HSBC, in 2008, as an outgrowth of the UBS inquiry. The investigation began by focusing on suspicions that the two banks held $30 billion in offshore accounts that American clients had not declared to the Internal Revenue Service.

Last month, Steven T. Miller, the deputy commissioner for services and enforcement at the I.R.S., said during a conference on taxation in Washington that the authorities planned to take action against one or more banks soon, without mentioning any by name, an attendee at the meeting said.

Credit Suisse has tangled with the Justice Department before and lost. In December 2009, Credit Suisse paid $536 million to settle charges that it had broken American sanctions by helping Iranian banks to hide the identity of their clients in international dealings.

Representatives for the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service declined to comment.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=95001dbc864c9fc1b48e5ae550468c9b