November 15, 2024

Wealth Matters: Money Advice for Doctors and Lawyers and the Rest of Us

But their attitudes toward money and investing can create financial challenges later in life. And the years of education that got them to where they are, their financial advisers say, can also stand in the way of their financial decision-making.

As Greg Erwin, managing principal at Sapient Private Wealth Management who works with doctors, put it, “A lot of these physicians would like to believe that investing and savings is pure science, and that’s not true. It’s an art form.”

Over the last two columns, I have looked at the behaviors of some highfliers — athletes and people who make their living drilling and transporting oil and gas; and those who have built their wealth in volatile fields like technology and real estate.

In each of those cases, I asked financial experts to share their insights into the financial and investing mistakes that are often typical of these clients. In this column, I’m going to look at what the rest of us can learn from doctors and lawyers.

DO NO HARM Doctors have a reputation among financial advisers for spending every bit of money they make. They earn a lot, after all, and figure they can work a long time. But doctors who engage in this type of spending can forget how hard it will be to maintain their lifestyle in retirement without millions of dollars saved.

“Doctors can have a sense of entitlement,” said Lewis Altfest, chief executive of Altfest Personal Wealth Management, who has a specialty in advising doctors. “Doctors are highly respected in their communities. They have historically been among the most gifted intellectually and they’re not afraid to exercise it.”

(He has dentist clients as well, but said they generally acted more like accountants than doctors: conservative and more risk-averse.)

While doctors are certainly smart, their medical ability does not necessarily translate to financial acumen.

Mark Gurland, 59, a hand surgeon in New Jersey who is married to a psychiatrist, said he had a theory about doctors’ financial behavior. Since most do not finish their internships and residencies until age 32 — if they have gone straight through from college — they have been living cloistered existences even as their college friends have been working for at least a decade.

“When they’re done, my feeling is, there is this repressed self-sacrifice and when money appears, they’re living in huge houses and driving the fanciest new cars,” he said. “They have a lot of money they worked hard for, and they’re spending it.”

On the investment side, he said, doctors often believe that their knowledge of medical issues translates into something seemingly simpler, like investing.

Dr. Gurland, who has always been a saver, said he had been guilty of making investments on a tip or a hunch. A cardiologist friend persuaded him to invest in fiber optic cables a decade or so ago: he said he doubled his money and then lost almost all of it. When he invested in a company that was promoting a drug for hand surgeries, he thought he had a winner but lost money on that one as well.

Now, he said, he defers to his adviser on investments and thinks of some of his most annoying patients who try to tell him what’s wrong with them. “Every day, we see patients in today’s world who seemingly know more about medical conditions than the doctor,” he said. “Why? Because they went on the Internet and read about this.”

Mr. Erwin, the adviser, said he tried to offer doctors a financial plan that dealt with their desire for rewards. At the same time, he lets his clients know about the risks inherent in not saving and in trying to fit in time for investing when they have an all-consuming job.

“They’re very methodical thinkers, but they’re also extremely busy,” Mr. Erwin said.

He said he spent time coaching his doctor clients not to get swayed by a friend who thinks they should invest in something they know nothing about or has an opinion about timing the market.

But doctors generally get two important things right. Doctors, particularly those with a unique specialty, buy disability insurance because they know that if they can’t work as a hand surgeon, for example, their income will plummet, even if they can still work as a doctor in a different capacity.

Given their high incomes, they can eventually be persuaded to defer a large portion of their income into retirement plans to lower their current tax bill. Mr. Altfest said he had clients contributing as much as $150,000 a year often in a defined benefit plan, but it many cases it took showing them how dire retirement could be if they didn’t save. Yet those who have the bulk of their savings in retirement plans can end up with a different problem, Mr. Erwin said. Since the doctors never paid income tax on that money, it is taxed as ordinary income when they withdraw it. People who save in brokerage accounts, by contrast, pay the lower capital gains rate when they sell those securities. And most other professionals have nontax savings to balance the tax bill from their retirement account distributions.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/30/your-money/money-advice-for-doctors-and-lawyers.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: The Breakfast Meeting: The ‘Today’ Show’s Popularity Woes, and Anxiety at Time Inc.

NBC’s “Today” has continued to lag behind ABC’s “Good Morning America” for 10 months now, a ratings slump that started just one week after its co-host, Matt Lauer, signed a contract with NBC said to be worth $25 million a year, the highest compensation ever on a morning show, Brian Stelter reports. Some “Today” staffers cite a lack of audience connection to Mr. Lauer as the root of the problem. Mr. Lauer’s popularity plummeted when his co-host, Ann Curry, was forced out last summer. Mr. Lauer, 55, started a belated image campaign this week, publicly stating that he thought his bosses had botched Ms. Curry’s departure, but it may be too late.  Alex Wallace, the NBC News executive in charge of “Today,” said NBC wants Mr. Lauer to be host for “years to come.”  The network has denied suggestions that it may replace him with a younger host like Willie Geist, 37, or David Gregory, 42.

At a lavish party for Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg last week, some Time Inc. employees seemed rattled about the publishing company’s coming separation from Time Warner, Christine Haughney writes. Parties like this one, held at Time Warner’s headquarters, may become a thing of the past for Time Inc. as it confronts its steep financial challenges. As a stand-alone entity, the magazine publisher will face $500 million to $1 billion in debt — unlike News Corporation’s publishing arm, which will be debt-free when it separates from its parent company this year — and Time Inc.’s circulation and advertising revenue have suffered sharp declines in recent years. The company’s executives hope their newfound freedom lets them use profits to transition to a digital age rather than paying them back to a parent company.

Some good news for Spain is finally enjoying media attention, Raphael Minder reports. Blogs like Bright Spain and newspapers like Buenas Noticias (Good News) offer an alternative to the relentless pessimism about the country’s economic prospects. Buenas Noticias, which is backed by Coca-Cola and Pepsico, ignored Spain’s 26 percent unemployment rate to publish articles about companies that are recruiting workers in Spain, including Renault, McDonald’s and Telefónica, which is offering 200 internships (Telefónica also plans to lay off 5,600 workers, which the article did not mention).

The approaching end of the television season means it’s time for shows to be renewed or canceled, and leads Mike Hale to wonder: what will become of the ABC Family comedy “Bunheads”? ABC has not yet announced if it will be canceled, and the show, about life and dance in the California hills, has lost about 40 percent of its audience over the course of its season. It would be a shame to give up on a show that, beyond being charming and funny, is unlike anything else on television at the moment, Mr. Hale writes.

Joe Chetrit, a secretive property mogul in New York, could come into the spotlight on Friday with the closing of his biggest deal: the $1.1. billion purchase of the Sony Building on Madison Avenue, Charles V. Bagli writes. Mr. Chetrit outmaneuvered about 20 other bidders to secure the deal and plans to convert the building, which has served as the headquarters for ATT and Sony, into a mix of luxury condominiums, a hotel and high-end retail shops. Many experts say the deal is very risky because Sony plans to remain in the building for three years, after which it will take two years and $500 million to renovate the building.  Interest rates could soar and the condo market could dry up before the building is ready in 2019.

NBC’s “Smash,” an ambitious drama about creating a Broadway production, essentially ended on Wednesday when the network announced that the show would be moved to Saturday for the remainder of its second season, Bill Carter reports. The show’s ratings have been abysmal, and the move, set to take place on April 6, basically means the show will die in obscurity. NBC said that the Tuesday slot previously held by “Smash” would be filled by the new reality dating show, “Ready for Love.”

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/the-breakfast-meeting-the-today-shows-popularity-woes-and-anxiety-at-time-inc/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Spinoff of Time Inc. Rattles Employees

But another executive was drawing a crowd of his own: Richard Stengel, Time Magazine’s managing editor. Throughout the evening, well-wishers made their way through the crowd to Mr. Stengel, among them Suze Orman, who told him how great she thought it was that Time Inc. was separating from its parent company, Time Warner, and striking out on its own.

The encouragement seemed heartfelt, but also framed by the timing and the setting. Only days before, Time Warner announced that it was spinning off its struggling magazine division, after failing to reach a deal to sell many of Time Inc.’s magazines to the Meredith Corporation. And the high-wattage party, with Mr. Stengel as one of the hosts, seemed like just the kind of lavish expense that Time Inc. might have to leave behind as it confronts the steep financial challenges buffeting the magazine industry.

The new magazine company is expected to start with $500 million to $1 billion in debt, in contrast to the publishing company that the News Corporation will spin off this summer, which will have no debt. Circulation and advertising revenue at Time Inc. have suffered sharp declines.

In the three months that ended Dec. 31, revenue fell 7 percent, to $967 million, while revenue at Time Warner’s cable channels has soared. After the split occurs, Time Inc. will no longer have the lucrative film and television assets to prop it up.

“It’s sort of put up or shut up time,” Mr. Stengel acknowledged. “I think great, let’s really test that hypothesis that people will pay for great content and great journalism. We can now invest our own capital.”

Time Inc. executives hope that they can build a company that can pour its profits into helping its magazines transition into the digital age, rather than hand them back to the parent company. They also hope that their new independent structure will let them restore the journalistic vision created by the founder, Henry Luce.

Analysts tracking the magazine industry point out that even though Time Inc.’s profits have declined in recent years, the newly created company will remain by far the biggest player in the business. On its own, Time Inc. generates one-quarter of the revenue produced by the nation’s top 50 magazines, according to data tracked by John Harrington, a magazine industry consultant.

He said that Time owned four of the nation’s top 10 revenue-generating magazines — People, Sports Illustrated, Time and InStyle. Together they produce $3.1 billion of the $6.379 billion generated by the nation’s top 10 grossing magazines, he estimated. People alone brings in $1.4 billion.

“Time Inc. as a whole is still the biggest force in magazine publishing,” Mr. Harrington said. “They’re an attractive group of magazines.”

The announcement of the spinoff last week at least provided some clarity to nervous Time Inc. employees. On Jan. 30, Time Inc. said it would lay off 6 percent of its global work force, about 500 employees. Two weeks later, Time Warner announced it was in talks with Meredith, leaving those who had kept their jobs to nervously await word of the fate of their magazine, and whether they might have to relocate to Meredith’s headquarters in Iowa.

Several current and former Time Inc. employees spoke about the unease at the magazines, requesting anonymity so they could publicly discuss private conversations. “This is for the most part a really nice place to work and people are happy to know that it will stay intact,” said a current Time Inc. executive. “The layoffs were really hard. The uncertainty on the heels of the layoffs made it particularly painful. Some people were really nervous about this Meredith idea.”

A former company executive who is still in touch with many employees said, “Morale dipped dramatically when the layoffs occurred just a couple of months ago. No merit increases were given. Bonuses were extremely low. Then rumors spread Meredith was going to purchase the magazines and morale dipped. Generally people are really pleased that Time Inc. is going to be given the opportunity to survive on its own.”

Some employees blame Time Warner’s chairman and chief executive, Jeffrey L. Bewkes, for the problems at Time Inc., saying his priorities lay elsewhere.

Amy Chozick contributed reporting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/business/media/spinoff-of-time-inc-rattles-employees.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: Murdoch Publishing Wing Shows Loss of $2.1 Billion

Potential investors got a glimpse of the financial challenges that Rupert Murdoch’s soon-to-be spun-off publishing company could face. In a regulatory filing, News Corporation said its publishing businesses lost $2.1 billion in the fiscal year that ended June 30.

The disclosure was filed to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday, as the media conglomerate prepares to split its publishing assets from its more lucrative entertainment segments. The new, stand-alone company will retain the name News Corporation and include newspapers like The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post and The Times of London; the HarperCollins book publisher; and a handful of fast-growing Australian pay-television assets.

The entertainment company, which will be called the Fox Group, will include 20th Century Fox studios, Fox Broadcasting and cable channels like Fox News and FX. That company has annual revenue of more than $23 billion.

The losses in the publishing business came largely from $2.8 billion in impairment and restructuring charges, mostly related to the closure of The News of the World tabloid in Britain, which was shut down in July 2011 after revelations of widespread phone hacking. Revenue at the publishing business fell to $8.65 billion in fiscal year 2012, from $9.1 billion a year earlier.

The S.E.C. Form 10 filing moves the company closer toward the split and gives shareholders a better idea of what the stand-alone publishing company, called “New News Corporation” in the report, will look like financially when the spinoff is completed in mid-2013.

The company warned investors that “newspaper and advertising circulation revenues have been declining, reflecting general trends in the newspaper industry.” In addition to industrywide headwinds, the company said illegal activity at its British newspapers “could damage New News Corporation’s reputation and might impair its ability to conduct its business.”

As additional civil lawsuits related to phone hacking are filed in Britain, News Corporation said it “is not able to predict the ultimate outcome or cost associated with these investigations.”

The fallout from the phone hacking scandal, and an investor base that increasingly expressed disapproval of the newspaper business, prompted Mr. Murdoch to announce the split of his $60 billion media conglomerate in June.

“The filing of the Form 10 is another important step forward in the evolution of our company and in the establishment of two independent global leaders in Fox Group and the new News Corporation,” said Mr. Murdoch, who serves as chairman and chief executive of the combined News Corporation.

Earlier this month Mr. Murdoch said Robert Thomson, a confidant and the former managing editor at The Wall Street Journal, would serve as chief executive of the new News Corporation. Mr. Murdoch will continue to serve as chairman of both companies and chief executive of the Fox Group.

In his new role Mr. Thomson, 51, will have a base salary of $2 million with a performance-based $2 million bonus, according to the filing.

In addition to hundreds of newspapers on several continents, the publishing company will also include Australia’s RealEstate.com.au; Fox Sports in Australia; 50 percent of Foxtel, the No. 1 pay-TV provider in Australia; and 44 percent of Sky Network Television in New Zealand. Analysts expect those businesses to drive profits and support some of the weaker newspapers.

Fox Sports had revenue of $3.6 billion and Foxtel of $2.5 billion in 2012. Those results were not included in the publishing company’s 2012 earnings, but will contribute to the new company’s bottom line.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/in-filing-news-corp-says-publishing-business-showed-2-1-billion-loss/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder: New Editor for a Shrinking Washington Post

Martin Baron, the new editor of The Washington Post.Essdras M Suarez/The Boston Globe Martin Baron, the new editor of The Washington Post.

3:23 p.m. | Updated The Washington Post, facing steep financial challenges and striving to find profitability as readers abandon print newspapers for digital formats, changed its newsroom leadership on Tuesday.

The Post announced that Marcus Brauchli, its executive editor for the last four years, will step aside but remain with the company. Martin Baron, 58, editor of The Boston Globe, will replace Mr. Brauchli effective Jan. 2.

“We are thrilled to have Marty Baron lead The Washington Post’s newsroom,” said Katharine Weymouth, publisher of The Post. “He has a demonstrated record of producing the highest quality journalism, which matches the legacy and expectations of The Post.”

Mr. Brauchli joined the paper in 2008, leaving The Wall Street Journal several months after it was taken over by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Under Mr. Brauchli’s stewardship, The Post won four Pulitzer Prizes.

Mr. Brauchli will stay on as a vice president of The Washington Post Company, working closely with Donald E. Graham, the chairman and chief executive. He will evaluate new media opportunities, The Post’s statement said.

The change in leadership comes at a time when The Post, like many newspapers, has been struggling on many fronts. As Post readers have shifted their reading from print to online, the company has suffered from declining advertising revenue and steady circulation drops in recent years.

Revenue at its newspaper-publishing division dropped by 4 percent, to $137.3 million, in the third quarter, largely because of a decline in advertising. According to the Audit Bureau of Circulations, The Post’s circulation from Monday through Friday declined to 507,615 in March, compared with 698,116 in 2007. The company has already started laying off staff members in departments, including advertising and the technology team, to stem losses.

The paper also faces fresh competition from online news outlets, like Politico, whose founders include former Washington Post reporters. The Post Company’s news division also can no longer depend on Kaplan, its college and test preparation business, to help offset its losses.

But the company’s larger, industrywide problems have been made worse by internal tension between Mr. Brauchli and Ms. Weymouth, the granddaughter of Katharine Graham, the longtime publisher. Mr. Brauchli was quickly criticized by members of the newsroom, who described him as more distant than his predecessors, like Leonard Downie and Benjamin Bradlee.

Marcus Brauchli, the departing editor of The Post, will remain with the company.Katherine Frey/The Washington Post Marcus Brauchli, the departing editor of The Post, will remain with the company.

The relationship between Ms. Weymouth and Mr. Brauchli chilled as she pushed him to make newsroom cuts he was uncomfortable with, according to people in the newsroom familiar with the discussions.

Ms. Weymouth told journalists at public events this past summer that she wanted to remove Mr. Brauchli, people familiar with those discussions said. But Mr. Graham, her uncle and the company’s chairman, stepped in and advised her to try to work things out, these people said. Mr. Graham praised Mr. Brauchli in an interview last month.

Discussions between Ms. Weymouth and Mr. Brauchli broke down again in recent weeks when Mr. Brauchli brought to her a newsroom budget that incorporated the cuts she asked for; despite that, she rejected it, according to a person in the newsroom familiar with the discussions.

But Ms. Weymouth was more complimentary toward Mr. Brauchli in Tuesday’s announcement. She credited him with developing the paper’s Web operations and said he would be involved with finding “new media opportunities” for the company.

“Please join me in in thanking Marcus for all that he has done for The Post and in congratulating him on his new role with the company,” Ms. Weymouth said in a statement.

Mr. Brauchli, who received a long ovation in the newsroom after the 11:45 a.m. announcement, credited his staff with taking on “the hardest targets in journalism” and for becoming “pioneers in blogs and social media.” Ms. Weymouth declined to answer questions from the staff at the meeting about why the change was made.

Mr. Graham said that he looked forward to having Mr. Brauchli help him with the company’s digital developments. “It is raining start-ups and new-media projects and I’m in up to my neck, and Marcus and I are going to work on them together,” Mr. Graham said. He did not address the conflicts between his niece, the publisher, and Mr. Brauchli. “It is the publisher’s job to select the editor and I think Marcus Brauchli has been an excellent editor of The Washington Post and I think Marty Baron will be, too.”

Mr. Baron has overseen The Globe since 2001, and during this tenure the paper won six Pulitzer Prizes. Mr. Baron previously was executive editor of The Miami Herald and worked as a senior editor at The New York Times. Earlier in his career, he also worked for The Los Angeles Times.

Mr. Baron said in an interview that he looked forward to running a newspaper “that has had a defining and distinctive role in American journalism.” He said he was realistic about the challenges he would face in running a newspaper during tough financial times for the industry, and said it would be crucial to have a strong relationship with the newspaper’s publisher.

“There isn’t a news organization that isn’t facing significant financial pressures,” he said. “Every editor is having to make tough choices and I would expect to make tough choices. I’ve worked with many different publishers. I worked with three here at The Boston Globe. It’s an important relationship. It’s not always an easy relationship. At times, there can be moments of tension. But we certainly have to share our goals and be compatible and everyone needs to work at that.”

Christopher M. Mayer, the publisher of The Globe, which is owned by The New York Times Company, was informed of the news while he was in London celebrating his 25th wedding anniversary. He said he received the news “with mixed emotions,” describing Mr. Baron as “a staunch advocate of the kind of accountability journalism that digs deep and serves the public, and a fierce advocate of the First Amendment.” He cited Mr. Baron’s leadership of the paper’s investigation into the sex abuse scandal in the Roman Catholic Church.

While the news of Mr. Brauchli’s imminent departure has generated much chatter within the newspaper industry, it has apparently meant little to the readers who still faithfully turn to The Post for information and analysis.

Sean Gibbons, vice president for communications of the centrist research organization Third Way and a former CNN producer, said that while he received most of his election night coverage via Twitter, he made sure to read The Washington Post the day after for the insights of some of its reporters and columnists.

“The Post still holds the advantage of being the sort of grande dame of Washington,” Mr. Gibbons said. “It’s been there. It’s still an institution.”

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/new-top-editor-at-washington-post-brauchli-to-be-replaced-by-marty-baron/?partner=rss&emc=rss