November 22, 2024

Markets Tumble on Europe’s Debt Crisis

Monday’s weak start in the financial markets reflected a series of blows, including a hangover of disappointing economic news from the United States over jobs data, debt talks that worked to depress sentiment and lingering worries as European officials met in Brussels to discuss fiscal troubles in the euro zone.

After weeks of uncertainty related to bailouts for Greece, the Italian authorities moved to rein in short-selling on the Milan stock exchange as fears mounted that Italy could become the next victim of the sovereign debt crisis.

A half-hour before the close of trading, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 178.38 points, or 1.41 percent, to 12,478.82. The broader Standard Poor’s 500-stock index fell 25.61 points, or 1.91 percent, to 1,318.26. The Nasdaq composite, heavy with technology shares, lost 62.24 points, or 2.18 percent, to 2,797.57.

“There is so much going on in the world that you almost need a scorecard to keep up,” Kevin H. Giddis, the executive managing director and president for fixed-income capital markets at Morgan Keegan Company, wrote in a research note.

“If Italy becomes more of a problem, then it could spiral out of control and cause the much-feared contagion that some have predicted,” Mr. Giddis wrote. “If that is the case, then a global economic slowdown will likely hit our shores here and take the legs out of an already wounded U.S. economy.”

As risk aversion stepped up on Monday, United States Treasuries were trading higher. The euro fell 1.4 percent to $1.4017.

“Global issues are still outstanding,” said Jason Arnold, a financial analyst with RBC Capital Markets Corp. “Markets were still digesting the jobs numbers from Friday, so I think that it is also a factor.” Asian markets, in particular, reacted to the United States government report that just 18,000 jobs were added in June.

In Europe, the Milan Stock Exchange fell 3.8 percent on Monday. London’s FTSE was down 1.03 percent, the CAC in Paris was down 2.71 percent and the DAX in Frankfurt was down 2.33 percent.

On the broader market in the United States, financial shares were down more than 2 percent, while energy and materials indexes were lower by nearly that much.

Brian M. Youngberg, an energy analyst for Edward Jones, said the dollar rise connected with the events in the euro zone was putting downward pressure on oil prices, which in turn was affecting energy stocks. “Everything is revolving around Europe right now in some way,” he said.

Another weight on sentiment was the report over the weekend that inflation in China had reached a three-year high.

“It is kind of like this cocktail of disappointing information and data,” said Stephen Wood, chief market strategist for Russell Investments Chief.

William J. Schultz, chief investment officer for McQueen, Ball Associates Inc. , said that the debt ceiling talks and euro zone problems in particular “put this tone” to the market.

But he and other market analysts are pinning their hopes on the coming corporate reporting season for the second quarter.

“Those things are weighing, and now the hope is we are going to get earnings surprises on the positive side,” he said.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/12/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Worries Grow About Breadth of Debt Crisis

The worry is that the worst case, a Greek debt default, would lead to damaging losses for European banks and spur a global panic, replaying the events of September 2008. Then, investors fled all but the safest government debt, unloading everything from corporate bonds to American and emerging country stocks. Global markets froze.

As European officials headed into a long weekend of critical talks, the European Union and the International Monetary Fund said that they were confident of a deal to secure a vital 12 billion euros ($17 billion) in outside aid needed to stave off an imminent Greek default.

The comments, reflecting belated advances in negotiations that have been going on for weeks, were aimed at calming anxious financial markets. But so far, the deepening concerns are stopping short of transferring forcefully to the United States. For the time being at least, investors seem to believe enough shock absorbers have been built in to comfortably withstand any default by Greece or other highly debt-ridden nation.

The interest rate on United States 10-year Treasury bonds remains below 3 percent. In contrast, Spanish bond yields rose to an 11-year high of 5.74 percent as anxious investors fretted that it could be next in the firing line after Greece.

“U.S. financial institutions are very cash-rich, so that means a liquidity crisis would have to be extraordinary before it affects them,” said Guy LeBas, the chief fixed-income strategist for Janney Montgomery Scott.

After a 179-point sell-off on Wednesday, American markets stabilized, with all the main United States indexes closing higher.

But the cost to investors of insuring their holdings of Greek government debt, to make sure they recoup their money in the event of a default, registered its single biggest one-day move.

An investor now has to pay about $2 million annually to insure $10 million of Greek debt over five years, compared with about $50,000 on the same amount of United States government debt, according to Markit.

Insurance rates on the debt of Irish and Portuguese governments, as measured by rates in the market for credit-default swaps, also climbed to record highs. In addition, Spain struggled to kindle investor interest on its auction of bonds, selling 2.8 billion euros ($4 billion), missing its top target and with average yields creeping up again. The fear is that a Greek default could threaten the integrity of the euro zone, require European countries to bail out banks that lent heavily to Greece and other deeply indebted countries, and spread panic across global markets.

The European Union’s top economic official, Olli Rehn, said he had reached a deal with the International Monetary Fund to avoid a Greek default through at least the fall.

But he warned politicians they must agree to new austerity measures or the program would be worthless.

The mood in the markets was made more nervous when Michael Noonan, finance minister of Ireland, said on Wednesday that the Irish government was ready to impose losses on senior unsecured bondholders of Anglo Irish Bank and the Irish Nationwide Building Society if the European Central Bank agreed. That added to fears that countries beyond Greece might be involved in a broader restructuring.

Also, some well-regarded economists say that a Greek default is almost inevitable. The chances of Greece defaulting are “so high that you almost have to say there’s no way out,” Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve, said on a “Charlie Rose” broadcast, shown on Bloomberg TV on Thursday night. He added that as a result, some American banks may be “up against the wall.”

The financial markets are watching nervously as the Greek government tries to push through austerity measures required to secure more international aid.

Greece “needs to better inform the markets as well as the Greek people that what’s being done is actually achieving results, which will help restore confidence,” said Claude Giorno, the senior economist for Greece at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, based in Paris.

But the United States, for the time being, appeared insulated from the problems, and American assets remain a destination for anxious global investors, with the dollar and Treasuries rising.

The Standard Poor’s 500-stock index rose 2.22 points, or 0.18 percent, to 1,267.64. The Dow Jones industrial average closed up 64.25 points, or 0.54 percent, to 11,961.52. The Nasdaq composite index fell 7.76 points, or 0.29 percent, to 2,623.70.

Still, two Deutsche Bank strategists, Jim Reid and Colin Tan, warned in a report on Thursday that this Greek crisis had echoes of the collapse of the Lehman Brothers investment bank in September 2008, an event that plunged the financial system into chaos and required the commitment of trillions of dollars in government support to stave off another Great Depression.

“Everyone in every corner of global financial markets should be keeping a very close eye on upcoming Greek events,” they wrote. “The period is resembling the buildup to the Lehman collapse where, although markets were increasingly nervous, virtually everyone expected a last-minute buyer.”

One ugly scene that some analysts are imagining involves a default by Greece leading to losses inflicted on banks in other European countries that own large amounts of Greek debt. The European Central Bank, too, is a big holder of debt, and analysts said in the event of a default it might need to be recapitalized, another blow to confidence.

Those losses could then cascade to the United States because the American and European banking systems are so interlocked, lending billions of dollars to each other every day.

American banks and insurance companies may also be liable for the biggest share of default insurance payments to European institutions if Greece or other countries fail. And the trillion-dollar money market fund industry could also suffer.

About 44.3 percent of money-market fund assets are European bank debt, according to Fitch Ratings, although they may be a little insulated because they have sold much of their Spanish, Portuguese and Irish debt. The funds have never held Greek bank debt, which rarely met the funds’ credit rating standards. The markets are keenly watching for signs that contagion is spreading through the global financial system.

The renewed volatility in the markets has again trained a spotlight on the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index. The VIX, as it is known, measures the implied volatility of options on the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index. It rose to settle above 21 on Thursday for the first time since March.

Another pressure gauge under scrutiny is the overnight interbank lending rate. As of Monday, investors’ expectations for three months from now of the overnight interbank lending rate showed an increase of about 10 basis points to nearly twice its current levels.

Still, increases in those two measures so far pale in comparison to the spikes in both during last year’s flare-up in Europe.

Contributing reporting were Eric Dash, Stephen Castle, Matthew Saltmarsh and Liz Alderman.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/business/17debt.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

I.M.F.’s Emerging Market Directors Criticize Selection Process for Top Post

Ms. Lagarde has been focusing intently on her candidacy in recent days, a French government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Tuesday. Late Tuesday, she scheduled a news conference to start just before noon on Wednesday in Paris, without confirming the topic.

Respected internationally, Ms. Lagarde has won support from Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, the British chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne, and most of Europe’s political establishment.

This has made her front-runner to succeed Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who resigned from the helm of the I.M.F. last week to fight charges that he sexually assaulted a maid in a New York hotel.

Still, the selection process for the job — which has always been held by a European — has drawn increasing criticism from leaders of emerging markets and other countries, which have sought to promote strong candidates of their own in recent days.

On Tuesday, the I.M.F.’s executive directors representing Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — the emerging economies commonly known as the BRICS — issued a firmly worded statement condemning the custom of appointing Europeans to lead the fund.

A transparent, merit-based and competitive process for the selection “requires abandoning the obsolete unwritten convention that requires that the head of the I.M.F. be necessarily from Europe,” they said in the statement.

“We are concerned with public statements made recently by high-level European officials to the effect that the position of managing director should continue to be occupied by a European,” they said, adding that these comments contradicted announcements, made by Jean-Claude Junker, president of the Euro group when Mr. Strauss-Kahn was selected in 2007, that the next I.M.F. leader would not be a European.

The statement stopped well short of rejecting Ms. Lagarde’s candidacy, saying merely that technical background and political acumen, rather than nationality, should be the main factors determining the choice of future managing directors.

But the statement also spotlighted what has become in increasingly common refrain among emerging market nations on the global economic and political stage: that the gradual shift in economic and demographic influence to rapidly developing countries should be reflected in increasing representation for them in international institutions.

“Adequate representation of emerging market and developing members in the fund’s management is critical to its legitimacy and effectiveness,” the executive directors’ statement said.

Still, in the absence of any consensus among emerging-market nations on a single candidate from their ranks, there appeared to be little to indicate that a bid by Ms. Lagarde would be derailed.

Mexico is nominating the governor of its central bank, Agustin Carstens, who told Reuters in an interview that the United States had welcomed his participation in the race for the job but was neutral on whether to support his candidacy.

Arvind Virmani, who represents India and three other countries on the I.M.F. board, told Bloomberg News in an interview that there appeared little chance that a candidate from an emerging market would succeed in getting the job. “There is no indication which suggests that the result will be any different this time,” he said.

Liz Alderman reported from Paris.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/26/business/global/26fund.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Europe Investigating Banks Over Credit Swaps

11:05 a.m. | Updated European Union antitrust regulators announced on Friday two sweeping antitrust investigations into the world’s largest banks and their roles in a market for derivatives where a small number of companies control trillions of dollars of financial instruments.

The European officials are looking at whether banks, including Barclays and Goldman Sachs, have harmed rival organizations that could compete in markets for providing information and clearing a form of transaction that had become critical to the smooth functioning of the entire economy.

“Lack of transparency in markets can lead to abusive behavior and facilitate violations of competition rules,” the European Union antitrust commissioner, Joaquin Almunia, said in a statement. “I hope our investigation will contribute to a better functioning of financial markets and, therefore, to more sustainable recovery.”

The inquiry follows an examination of that market last year by The New York Times that highlighted efforts by banks like JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and others to control access to the derivatives market, even as global regulators try to bring transparency and safety to a murky corner of the financial world.

Derivatives — instruments that shift risk from one party to another — added to the panic during the financial crisis, because banks and regulators did not know all the parties involved in trillions of dollars of interweaving contracts.

The roughly $600 trillion market is controlled by a small number of players, concentration that has raised competition concerns in recent years. Those banks have recently taken many steps to try to hold on to their advantages in the market, even as regulators have tried to exert greater control over the market.

The European Commission inquiry is focused on one type of derivative known as a credit default swap, which is essentially an insurance contract. They are widely used in stock investing and mortgage investing, when an investor wants to bet against a company’s bond or a mortgage bond. They are frequently used as a measure of the credit worthiness of companies and governments and have become a crucial component in gauging borrowing costs.

The commission has previously estimated the value of all the positions on the market for credit default swaps to be $21.5 trillion, with about $3.27 trillion of that amount representing position on the market for credit default swaps in sovereign debt.

The banks are involved in two crucial components of the market for credit default swaps.

Sixteen of the banks are shareholders in Markit, a London-based organization that is the leading provider information on the market for credit default swaps. European Union officials suspect that the banks’ arrangements with Markit could effectively lock out other data providers.

Nine of the banks involved also have a financial relationship with the IntercontinentalExchange, a public company that owns ICE Clear Europe and ICE Clear U.S. That company is involved in a new business area known as clearing — which regulators are promoting as a way to bring more safety to the derivatives market. The banks had been creating their own effort to clear derivatives through a company they owned called the Clearing Corporation. In 2008, they sold that company to ICE, which was developing its own business. In exchange, ICE allowed the banks to influence the way the clearing business was set up and also granted them multiyear price breaks on clearing fees.

Critics say the banks worked with ICE to create rules and practices that were anticompetitive, like membership rules that for a while blocked other brokers from signing up to do business there.

Amelia Torres, a spokeswoman for Mr. Almunia, said that officials began the investigation without receiving formal complaints from competitors but said wrongdoing would be “obviously harming other players in the market.”

ThomsonReuters, Standard Poor’s and Bloomberg are among companies that could compete with Markit provide information on trading credit default swaps. Eurex and L.C.H. Clearnet are among the companies that also provide clearing services for credit default swaps.

The derivatives market has exploded in size since the 1990s as more companies and investors looked for ways to take positions in commodities, corporate defaults, mortgages and other assets without having to purchase actual goods.

Derivatives allow one party — usually a bank — to give customers exposure to price changes in goods through a written agreement to pay based on changing prices.

The Justice Department has also been investigating this market and told The Times in December that its inquiry was focused on “the possibility of anticompetitive practices in the credit derivatives clearing, trading and information services industries.”

The Justice Department began its investigation of Markit in the summer of 2009, and by last fall it had expanded into looking at clearing practices between companies like ICE and the banks. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange also has a clearing house business and has partnered with the banks to develop it.

The European Commission was in frequent contact with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission about the investigations announced on Friday, but it had received no indications that their United States counterparts were still actively pursuing similar investigations, said European Union officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not allowed to speak publicly. The European Commission’s investigation may increase the pressure on the Department of Justice to take action.

European regulators could fine the banks involved in the case up to 10 percent of their global annual sales for the kinds of antitrust and cartel violations that officials are investigating in Europe.

Even so, the commission may find other ways to inject greater competition into the market. The commission has increasingly favored settling major investigations to win quicker results, and it could waive fines if the banks agreed to adjust their contracts with Markit and ICE Europe.

The banks named in the investigation are JPMorgan, Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Commerzbank, Crédit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Scotland, UBS, Wells Fargo, Crédit Agricole and Société Générale. All of these banks declined to comment or did not return an inquiry. The IntercontinentalExchange did not reply to a request to comment.

Markit issued a statement defending its actions.

The company said it “has no exclusive arrangements with any data provider and makes its data and related products widely available to global market participants.” It said it was “unaware of any collusion by other market participants as described by the commission.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a3e10838ad5e1217d2f8535ad64bf7bb