December 22, 2024

U.S. and Europe Seek Backing for Landmark Trade Pact

BRUSSELS — President Barack Obama and the top trade official for the European Union sought to rally support Tuesday for a landmark trans-Atlantic free trade deal, saying it would benefit a wide variety of exporters and offer a significant boost to growth.

Karel De Gucht, the E.U. trade commissioner, said one of the biggest beneficiaries of a trade deal with the United States would be automobile manufacturers like BMW that have long rankled at tariffs.

Mr. De Gucht was shoring up support for a mandate to negotiate on behalf of E.U. member states — like Germany, home to a powerful auto sector — and whose governments still must agree to let him lead the talks. He called on the bloc to “now quickly decide to open negotiations so work can begin with the United States before the summer break.”

Mr. De Gucht also sought to assuage France, where there is widespread skepticism about the benefits of free trade, by suggesting that Paris would not have to dismantle quotas and subsidies designed to promote French films and other cultural products.

His comments came as Mr. Obama spoke in Washington, signaling the challenges that lay ahead, indicating that “we’re going to need the help of industry and labor” to get a deal done.

“One of the things that we’ve also been trying to do during the course of this process is to make sure that it’s not just the Xeroxes and the Dow Chemicals that are benefiting from this,” Mr. Obama said, “although we want our Fortune 100 companies to be selling as much as possible.”

“We actually think that there’s room for small and medium-size businesses to export directly — not just supplying large businesses, but also to break open and enter into these markets,” Mr. Obama told the President’s Export Council, his main trade advisory committee on international trade, made up of lawmakers and other officials.

Exports of motor vehicles from Europe to the United States could increase 149 percent if a deal removed existing tariffs and harmonized different safety standards, according to a study conducted by the Center for Economic Policy Research in London and released Tuesday by Mr. De Gucht’s office.

“I feel just as safe when I drive a car in the U.S. as I do when I drive in Europe, so we should find ways to align our systems to find ways to cut costs,” Mr. De Gucht said at a news conference.

He also said that product tariffs, currently 4 percent on average, should be dropped to zero, either immediately or over an agreed period of time.

A surge in trans-Atlantic trade would increase the Union’s vehicle manufacturing sector 1.5 percent, according to the study issued by his office. Other sectors in Europe likely to see significant increases in sales included metal products, processed foods, chemicals and transport equipment, the study said.

European auto companies, particularly German ones, want to make it easier to sell cars they now make in the United States in their home markets. An agreement could add hundreds of millions of euros annually to BMW’s revenue, in part by easing restrictions that now add tariffs to the cars the company makes in Spartanburg, South Carolina, but ships back to sell in Germany and other European countries.

Between them, the United States and Europe already account for about half of global economic output and one-third of world trade. Bilateral trade in 2011 amounted to €455 billion, or about $593 billion, with a positive balance for the Union of more than €72 billion, according to Mr. De Gucht’s office. The United States is the bloc’s main export market, buying €264 billion of goods, or about 17 percent of total E.U. exports, according to his office.

But previous attempts to forge a free trade deal have failed.

Government officials and industrialists who support such a pact say it is different this time, partly because Europe is seeking ways to accelerate growth without raising domestic spending in the wake of its sovereign debt crisis, and partly because the United States is eager to set global standards with Europe that giant emerging economies like China would have to follow.

Mr. Obama gave the talks added impetus last month when he pledged to “launch talks on a comprehensive Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union” during his State of the Union address.

Mr. Obama’s pronouncement at the time met with a frenzy of enthusiasm from large swathes of the business community on both sides of the Atlantic. On Tuesday, he reiterated that he wanted “to lock in” a deal.

But there are huge obstacles, largely because the biggest gains will not come from the relatively easy goal of dropping tariffs but from bulldozing “behind the border” restrictions like customs procedures that create bureaucratic hurdles.

In particular, the Union wants to pry open so-called public procurement markets and scrap “Buy American” clauses that restrict the ability of European companies to sell goods and services to states and cities. The Europeans also have long complained about restrictions on foreign ownership of U.S. airlines.

The Americans are eager to see a reduction in barriers to exports of agricultural goods including produce from genetically modified organisms and cloning, opposed by many Europeans.

The talks also could run into difficulties over European initiatives like privacy restrictions on major online operators like Facebook and Google, and a tax on financial transactions aimed at recouping money from bankers.

Mr. De Gucht said there still should be a “comprehensive agreement” covering a wide variety of sectors, but he also said it was possible to reach a “living agreement with a number of approaches in it for the future that you then develop once the agreement is in place.”

“I’m not saying every topic and every comma should be finally and in a definite way resolved,” he said.

Jack Ewing contributed reporting from Frankfurt and Brian Knowlton contributed reporting from Washington.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/business/global/us-and-europe-seek-backing-for-landmark-trade-pact.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Setting Boundaries for Internet Privacy

BERLIN — Watchful European privacy regulators are wielding increasing influence beyond the Continent’s borders. Last week, they pressed Google, as they had Apple, to change the way it collected data on cellphone locations worldwide.

But there is one area where even European regulators appear stymied — the tracking of consumer Internet surfing habits by technology companies, advertisers, Internet service providers and Web businesses that focus on consumers on the basis of online behavior.

For 18 months, the European Commission has been considering how to put into practice a 2009 law that regulates software cookies, the unique digital markers that Web sites place on visiting computers to identify consumers and deliver ads tailored to individual interests.

This year, a consensus appeared to be building in Brussels for letting the online advertising industry regulate its use of cookies. The main industry group, the Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe, set up a Web site this summer to let consumers choose not to receive — “opt out” of — receiving advertisements directed as a result of profiling.

The idea was conceived in a series of roundtable meetings this year by Interactive Advertising members and Neelie Kroes, the European commissioner responsible for electronic privacy. The site, called youronlinechoices.eu, is supported by members of Interactive Advertising — the majority of online advertisers.

But regulators representing E.U. member states, backed by consumers’ rights groups, are balking at the voluntary arrangement, which they argue does not adequately protect individuals from unwittingly permitting marketers to collect personal data. Last week, they began a drive to require E.U. consumers to “opt in” to profiling by clicking on Web icons within ads.

Consumer advocates hope to insert an opt-in mandate in the revision of the European Union’s Data Protection Directive, the main body of privacy law, which will be considered next year.

“We believe that by having consumers opt in, rather than opt out, they will be better protected and informed about what happens with their information,” said Kostas Rossoglou, a senior legal officer at the European Consumers’ Organization, a Brussels group.

An opt-in requirement would be cumbersome, Web advertisers argue, requiring a layer of pop-up windows, and could kill a popular, growing form of online advertising.

The opt-out “fits with the needs of today’s Internet users,” said Stephan Noller, chief executive of a Berlin ad firm, nugg.ad, who heads Interactive Advertising’s policy committee. “Information is provided contextually where relevant and is instantly available. We use the dynamism and interactivity of the Internet to provide pragmatic privacy control.”

According to Interactive Advertising, online advertising generated revenue of €17.7 billion, or $24.4 billion, in Europe in 2010. The bureau has no estimate on how much of that was behavioral ads. But a 2010 survey by AWeber Communications, a company in Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, found that two-thirds of merchants intended to use such advertising.

On Wednesday, the privacy advisers to the commission, a panel of national regulators called the Article 29 Working Party, held a closed-door meeting with members of Interactive Advertising and other industry groups to discuss concerns about industry self-regulation. After the meeting, the panel reiterated its belief that the opt-out approach violated European privacy law, which requires consent before personal data can be used.

A consumer’s failure to opt out of behavioral ads, the panel said in its statement, is not a form of implicit consent, which is the position held by the industry.

“Only statements or actions, not mere silence or inaction, constitute valid consent,” the Article 29 panel said in a statement released after the meeting. The group is planning to make a recommendation this year that may call for more stringent controls.

The European commissioner in charge of revising the bloc’s data protection law, Viviane Reding, said she was also likely to call for a form of prior consent in her draft of the new data protection legislation, which will not be completed until early next year.

“Companies must obtain prior consent before individuals’ data is used,” Mrs. Reding said in a statement released by her office.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=42b9fe5c370563e61cbcb3c56130430a