November 22, 2024

Europe’s Big Central Banks Hold Interest Rates Steady

The move came shortly after the Bank of England decided to leave its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 0.5 percent to help the weakening British economy, amid concerns that Europe’s debt crisis might become more of a drag on growth.

The E.C.B. left its main rate at 1.5 percent, as expected, a level that some analysts consider to be too high now that indicators are pointing to stagnant growth or even a recession in the euro area, and sovereign debt worries threaten a renewed financial crisis.

The E.C.B. raised rates from a record low of 1 percent in April and again in July, each time by a quarter of a percentage point, to combat what it said were signs of inflation. Analysts would have been surprised if the bank reversed itself. But many expect the bank to signal that it will not raise rates again for some time.

“We expect the ECB to indicate it has reached an early halt to its policy rate hiking cycle,” economists at Royal Bank of Scotland said in a research report Wednesday.

The E.C.B. president, Jean-Claude Trichet, was to hold his customary news conference at 2:30 p.m. Frankfurt time.

As he nears the end of his term leading the E.C.B., the bank is on the front lines of the most acute crisis the euro has ever seen. Some European banks are struggling to borrow on the interbank market because of questions about their solvency; the E.C.B. is keeping them afloat by providing them with emergency low-cost loans. The E.C.B. is also buying Spanish and Italian bonds on the open market to stem pressure on their borrowing costs, which threatened to reach ruinous levels.

Some analysts argue that the bank needs to go further and aggressively cut rates to avert recession, even though it only recently raised rates.

“The E.C.B. is the only policymaking institution with any room to maneuver. It should use it to the full,” said Marie Diron, an economist who advises consulting firm Ernst Young. “But,” she wrote in an e-mail, “there is a risk that due to divisions within the governing council, the E.C.B. will not take such steps.”

Several members of the council, including Jens Weidmann, president of the German Bundesbank, are known to oppose the E.C.B. intervention in bond markets, arguing that the bank has exceeded its mandate by becoming involved in government fiscal policy.

Mr. Trichet’s press conference will be his second-to-last such appearance before he turns over the job to Mario Draghi, the governor of the Bank of Italy, at the end of October. He will certainly be asked about the E.C.B.’s stance toward interest rates, its bond-buying program, and whether it might take further steps to provide banks with emergency cash.

But with events moving so swiftly, analysts at the Royal Bank of Scotland said, it may be difficult even for Mr. Trichet to accurately predict what the E.C.B. may do.

“Given how quickly the situation has deteriorated over the past month, we do not believe the E.C.B. will be in a position to provide much credible forward-looking guidance,” the R.B.S. analysts wrote. “Like many it has been surprised by the relentless pressure by the market to continue testing the system.”

The British central bank, in addition to keeping its main rate at a record low, also left its asset purchasing program at £200 billion, or $319 billion. Some economists had said earlier that the Bank of England could resume its bond purchasing program, or so-called quantitative easing, as early as this week, to try to stimulate the economy by injecting more money into the market.

In Britain, inflation has put the squeeze on consumers, who in turn curbed spending because of concern about rising unemployment and cuts in public spending. Businesses also became more reluctant to invest and more recently exports have suffered as economies in the country’s biggest market — the euro area — slowed.

“One by one, Britain’s engines of growth are coming to a halt,” Philip Shaw, chief economist at Investec in London, said. “If indicators continue on that path it’s feasible we’ll see more quantitative easing soon.”

Goldman Sachs said on Monday that it believed the Bank of England could resume buying bonds in the coming months, most likely in November.

Other central bank policy makers also have discussed the need for more stimulus. In the United States, some Federal Reserve policy makers said last month that the current economic slowdown would justify “a more substantial move.” Fed officials have discussed the option of buying more government bonds and other tools, and were to take the issue up again at their next meeting later this month.

Adam Posen was the only member of the Bank of England monetary policy committee who repeatedly voted in favor of more quantitative easing, arguing that the economic recovery was not strong enough to withstand the large public spending cuts underway, the biggest since World War II.

George Osborne, the chancellor of the Exchequer, admitted in a speech on Tuesday evening that the economy was growing more slowly than predicted in March. But he said it was still flexible enough to withstand the government’s wide-ranging austerity measures.

Mr. Osborne said Britain’s economy was “not immune from events around the world” and that “These are very unsettling times for the global economy.”

Signs that Britain’s economy was weakening have mounted. House prices fell in August, the first drop in four months, and consumer sentiment declined. Dixons, the electronic goods retailer, said Wednesday that sales fell 7 percent in the three months through July 23, and Thorntons, the British chocolate maker, reported a full-year loss compared with a profit a year earlier.

Manufacturing increased 0.1 percent in July from the previous month, according to the Office for National Statistics. Some economists predict the Bank of England would keep interest rates at a record low for another year after Britain’s economic growth slowed to 0.2 percent in the second quarter.

Julia Werdigier reported from London.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e403f896d66c7d00c70974131edd0bed

An Inflation Hedge Carries Its Own Risks

This year, however, the winning streak has faltered a bit as inflation expectations have shifted radically. As the United States economy has slowed, European debt worries have revived and oil prices have fallen back from their recent highs, inflation expectations have moved downward.

For Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, that has not been good news.

“TIPS have gone through a period where just about everything has gone right for them,” said Robert Johnson, director of economic analysis at Morningstar. “Now the situation has changed, and they are looking quite expensive.”

TIPS pay interest on a principal amount that rises with inflation, so investors are compensated as consumer prices rise. When the securities mature, the investor is paid the adjusted principal amount or the original principal, whichever is greater.

Investors have poured money into TIPS, particularly since last August, amid concerns that the Federal Reserve’s plan to buy $600 billion in Treasury securities would fuel inflation. Those fears grew even more frantic early this year when turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa drove crude oil prices well over $100 a barrel, and gasoline prices in the United States began to climb.

According to EPFR Global, which tracks fund flows, investors added more than $7 billion to inflation-protected bond funds in the first half of this year, roughly equaling the amount for all of 2010.

The big swings in inflation expectations have been most evident in the so-called break-even rate — which is the difference between yields on 10-year Treasury notes and 10-year TIPS and reflects trader expectations for consumer prices over the life of the debt. That rate climbed to a high of 2.67 percent in April, just as crude oil prices peaked at around $114 a barrel, from 1.5 percent last August.

But in May, as signs of an economic slowdown appeared and investors began to anticipate an end to the Fed’s bond-buying spree, inflation expectations collapsed. As measured by the break-even rate, expectations for consumer price inflation dropped to 2.14 and the TIPS market stumbled.

TIPS funds returned just 0.3 percent in May, before rebounding in June as worries eased about Greek debt and a sustained slowdown in the United States economy.

For the second quarter, inflation-linked bond funds returned about 3.1 percent according to Morningstar, compared with 3.6 percent for funds that invest in regular long-term government bonds.

Over longer periods, however, TIPS have sometimes outpaced the returns of regular Treasury funds. Over the last five years, inflation-linked bond funds have returned 6.36 percent, annualized, compared with 6.04 percent for intermediate government debt funds and 7.4 percent for long-term government bond funds.

“The TIPS market clearly got a bit exuberant going into the spring,” said Daniel O. Shackelford, manager of the $387 million T. Rowe Price Inflation Protected Bond fund. “Over the last several weeks, the market has made an adjustment to more modest inflation expectations,” he said.

The T. Rowe Price TIPS fund returned 3.3 percent in the quarter, after gains of 6.29 percent in 2010 and 10.43 percent in 2009.

DESPITE the recent adjustment, analysts say TIPS remain expensive, particularly those with shorter maturities. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions, and TIPS maturing in five years, for example, yielded a negative 0.37 percent at the end of the second quarter. That compared with a 1.76 percent yield on a regular five-year Treasury note. Ten-year TIPS yielded 0.69 percent, compared with 3.16 percent for noninflation-linked 10-year Treasury debt.

Managers of TIPS funds say the inflation protection offered by TIPS makes sense for a portion of a portfolio.

“If you buy a two-year Treasury note yielding 40 basis points while inflation is running at 2 percent, that is wealth destruction,” Mr. Shackelford said. “TIPS may not be a formula for building wealth; they will do what they were constructed to do, which is to compensate you for increases in consumer prices.”

Some money managers say they are shifting into the longer-term end of the TIPS market, where yields for 30-year maturities were 1.7 percent as of the end of June.

“We’ve been moving out of the intermediate sector of TIPS and buying the long end,” said Martin Hegarty, co-head of global inflation-linked portfolios at BlackRock, the New York-based money manager, which oversees $3.6 trillion in assets. Mr. Hegarty said purchases of intermediate-term TIPS, those of 5 to 10 years, by foreign central banks had helped to depress yields in that sector.

The $4 billion BlackRock Inflation Protected Bond fund gained 2.6 percent in the second quarter and 4.66 percent this year through June.

Still, analysts said the current pricing of TIPS should raise at least one red flag. TIPS may be inflation-protected and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, but they are far from being risk-free.

“If the Fed were to make any pre-emptive move against inflation, TIPS could get killed,” said Mr. Johnson at Morningstar. “People tend to think TIPS have no risk, but if you sell them before maturity, or if you own a fund that it weighted with longer-term maturities, they can have substantial risk.”

Fund managers say that while these problems are real, TIPS may still be useful.

“Investors certainly should not judge TIPS by taking a backward view of how they have performed,” said John W. Hollyer, a manager of the $35 billion Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities fund, which returned 3.4 percent in the second quarter. “They are not a risk-free asset because they have a high sensitivity to changes in interest rates. But if inflation makes a sudden move upward, you will be compensated, and that’s important.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=6a21159bcc8fadc6933cf490e40725b1