November 22, 2024

Off the Charts: Risk Creeps Up in Long-Term Bonds

Fed officials do not think that will happen until late 2015, but they could be overly pessimistic. A year ago, they thought that the rate would not get as low as it is now until 2014.

The prolonged low level of interest rates — both short-term rates that are administered by the Fed and longer-term rates that are more subject to market forces — has caused many investors to search for yield by purchasing longer-term bonds.

That has provided a bonanza for companies in the United States and in many emerging markets, where the amounts of newly issued bonds have risen rapidly.

“Almost any kind of corporate activity is acceptable to the bond market,” said Michael Shaoul, the chief executive of Marketfield Asset Management. “That is really a sign the bond market is becoming indiscriminate.”

For a bond investor, there are two things that can go wrong. The first is credit quality, when bonds either default or at least fall in market value because a default seems more likely. The second is interest rate risk — the risk that market interest rates will rise significantly.

Mr. Shaoul said he thought investors in emerging market bonds were more likely to run into credit problems, while American bond buyers were more likely to face interest rate problems as the American economy improved.

“Five years down the road,” he said, “you are likely to have significantly higher interest rates.”

For a bond market investor now, the choice is to stick to shorter-term bonds, and get very low yields, or to move to longer-term ones that pay higher interest rates but that could lose market value if the interest rate offered on new bonds rose.

Much of the recent issuance in bonds has been because of refinancing, in which companies repay existing bonds with money borrowed on better terms. For holders, it can seem the worst of both worlds: if rates rise, they have old bonds that have lost value. If rates fall, their old bonds are redeemed by the company, depriving them of the yield they expected.

As can be seen in the accompanying graphic, corporate bond issuance in the United States has risen to record levels this year, and the average interest rate on high-yield bonds, also known as junk bonds because they are rated below investment grade, has fallen even more rapidly than have rates on higher-quality bonds.

Martin Fridson, the chief executive of FridsonVision and a veteran high-yield market analyst, said he thought high-yield investors were likely to lose money in 2013, as declines in prices offset the interest income realized from the bonds.

His model says the yield spread between the Bank of America Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II index and similar Treasury securities should now be around 6.5 percentage points, based on historical spreads as well as economic conditions, current default rates and the relative availability of bank credit. The actual difference, as shown by the chart, is about 5.3 percentage points, which he thinks is not enough to offset the risk.

Floyd Norris comments on finance and the economy on nytimes.com/economix.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/business/risk-creeps-up-in-long-term-bonds.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Wells Fargo Exceeds Expectations with $3.9 Billion Profit, Up 29%

A Wells Fargo sign is installed in Richmond, Va.Joe Mahoney/The Richmond-Times Dispatch, via Associated PressA Wells Fargo sign in Richmond, Va.

Wells Fargo, the nation’s biggest consumer bank, said profit rose 29 percent in the second quarter from the period a year earlier as loan losses eased significantly.

The bank reported record second-quarter earnings of $3.9 billion, or 70 cents a share, beating the 69-cents-a-share consensus estimate of analysts. That compared with a profit of $3.1 billion, or 55 cents a share, in the period a year earlier.

Wells Fargo’s earnings benefited from the reversal of about $1 billion that the bank had previously set aside to cover loan losses. That helped offset a 5 percent drop in revenue, which fell to $20.4 billion, as new regulations curbed overdraft charges and its big home lending business slowed. New mortgage originations dropped nearly a quarter to $64 billion from $84 billion in the first quarter.

Wells Fargo’s investment bank is far smaller than most of its big rivals, which meant that the difficult market conditions that affected competitors like Citigroup and Bank of America did not hurt as much.

Still, meager loan growth, the rising cost of servicing troubled mortgages and the effect of new financial rules have weighed on its results.

John Stumpf, chief of Wells Fargo.Richard Patterson for The New York TimesJohn Stumpf, chief of Wells Fargo.

“While the economic recovery continues to be slower than expected, there are signs that businesses are investing for growth,” the bank chairman and chief executive, John Stumpf, said in a statement. “Our business fundamentals were strong with increased revenues, loans and deposits, lower operating costs, improved credit quality and higher capital levels.”

San Francisco-based Wells Fargo quietly emerged from the financial crisis as one of the nation’s strongest banks. With its takeover of the Wachovia Corporation in Charlotte, N.C., in the fall of 2008, it established a network of retail branches along both coasts. But its go-slow approach to converting its computer systems and store signage meant that the New York metropolitan area did not change over until this spring, and the integration of its operations in Washington and the Carolinas, the last of its major markets, won’t occur for another few months.

Despite its strong performance over the last few years, many analysts remain cautious. At a time when its rivals are betting on faster-growing areas overseas, some worry about Wells Fargo is too entrenched in the United States, where the housing and job markets remain weak.

Still, the bank’s share price has outpaced the industry, rising about 3 percent over the last year when most bank stocks were down. The stock was up about 42 cents, or 1.6 percent, to around $27 in morning trading. And bank officials suggested the second quarter once again showed the power of its expanded franchise to offset a sluggish domestic economy.

Although total revenues declined from a year ago, several businesses — including corporate banking, commercial real estate, and retirement services — saw double-digit increases from the first three months of the year.

“We are pleased with increased revenue in the quarter, reflecting the stability in loan balances and overall strength of our diversified sources of fee income,” said Tim Sloan, Wells Fargo’s chief financial officer. And unlike competitors like Citigroup, Wells kept its operating expenses in check.

Tuesday’s results showed that Wells Fargo’s operating expenses were $12.5 billion, down $258 million from the first quarter, despite setting aside more money for foreclosure-related matters and litigation. The bank added another $242 million to its reserve to buy back loans from troubled securities that it sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other private investors. Over the prior two quarters, it set aside about $713 million.

Wells Fargo, which already had one of the biggest real estate portfolios of any bank, took on with its Wachovia acquisition more than $219 billion worth of commercial real estate and corporate loans, and a big book of risky mortgages. But tighter underwriting standards during the boom, and aggressive management of the problems that followed, have enabled Wells to fare better than many of its peers.

Bank of America announced a $20 billion hit to second-quarter earnings to accelerate the clean-up its mortgage troubles, while Chase has announced a series of multi-billion charges tied to its home lending business to bolster its litigation and loss reserves and improve its loan servicing practices. Citigroup, which has a much smaller business, has set aside about $1 billion to cover loan repurchases and expects only a modest uptick in servicing costs.

Overall, Wells Fargo said that loan losses were easing. As a result, bank officials said they released another $1 billion from loan loss reserves after seeing six straight quarters of improvement. Bank officials expect to keep drawing down reserves in the coming quarters.

“Absent significant deterioration in the economy, we expect future reserve releases,” said Mike Loughlin, the bank’s chief risk officer.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b52fae6ebf7df23beb95c971e35ba354

DealBook: Wells Fargo Profit Jumps 48%

Noah Berger/Bloomberg News

Wells Fargo, the nation’s biggest retail bank, posted record first-quarter profit on Wednesday of $3.8 billion, a 48 percent increase from the period a year earlier, even as it contended with industrywide problems including a slowdown in mortgage lending and the costs of cleaning up the foreclosure mess.

The bank beat analysts’ estimates by a penny, reporting earnings of 67 cents a share in the quarter. That compared with profit of $2.6 billion, or 45 cents a share, in the period a year earlier.

Wells Fargo reduced the amount set aside to cover future loan losses by $3 billion at the same time as its pile of bad loans decreased. The move helped offset a drop in revenue, which fell 5.2 percent, to $20.3 billion, as a mortgage refinancing boom tapered off amid rising rates. Home mortgage originations fell to $84 billion from $128 billion in the final quarter of 2010.

Although losses are easing and corporate lending has picked up, Wells Fargo’s earnings were tempered by the same forces that weighed on the results of Citigroup, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase. Sluggish consumer lending, the rising cost of servicing troubled mortgages and new financial regulations, like limits on credit card penalties and overdraft fees, have cut into earnings.

Competitors had big Wall Street businesses to make up for some of the missing income from traditional banking activities during the first quarter. But Wells Fargo, which is more heavily oriented to retail banking, could not rely on investment banking and trading profit to bolster the bottom line.

Nevertheless, Wells Fargo’s chairman and chief executive, John Stumpf, said he was pleased with the bank’s performance despite the “uneven recovery.”

“Our strong first-quarter results reflected positive trends in our business fundamentals as credit quality improved, capital ratios increased and cross-selling reached new highs,” he said in a statement.

Wells Fargo quietly emerged from the financial crisis as one of the nation’s strongest banks. After its takeover of the Wachovia Corporation in the fall of 2008, it has also become one of its largest consumer banks, with a large network of retail branches along both coasts. This spring, Wells Fargo converted computer systems and put up new signs on its branches in the New York metropolitan area.

Still, many analysts remain cautious. At a time when its rivals are betting on faster-growing overseas markets, some worry that Wells Fargo is too dependent on the United States recovery. In his statement, Mr. Stumpf acknowledged that while corporate lending activity was up, consumers remained hesitant to borrow.

Along with the slowdown in mortgage lending, Wells Fargo faces rising operating costs — especially in its loan servicing business after it reached a deal with federal regulators to increase staff levels and tighten oversight. Wells Fargo said its operating losses had increased $272 million, almost all related to additional money set aside for higher foreclosure-related matters and compensation.

Citigroup said it expected operating costs for its smaller servicing business to rise about $25 million to $30 million each quarter, and also planned to book as much as $50 million in additional charges related to the foreclosures. Bank of America said its expenses would increase, too. JPMorgan Chase said it took a one-time $1.1 billion charge related to the rising cost of foreclosures.

Like the other big banks, Wells Fargo may be required to buy back bad loans it sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other private investors. In the first quarter, the bank set aside $249 million to cover future repurchases, after setting aside $464 million in the fourth quarter.

Still, the spill of red ink has slowed. Athough the housing market and broader economy remain fragile, Wells Fargo said it had released $1 billion from its loan loss reserves in the first three months of the year and expected to continue drawing down its reserves in the coming quarters.

Wells Fargo already had one of the biggest real estate portfolios of any bank. But with the Wachovia deal it absorbed more than $219 billion worth of commercial real estate and corporate loans — and a big book of at-risk mortgages.

“We continue to be optimistic about the improvements in credit quality and remain focused on managing through this cycle,” said Michael J. Loughlin, Wells Fargo’s chief risk officer.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=55a81aaab66c4659ac6965e5eb79b4e2