November 24, 2024

Plan at G-20 Is to Tighten Global Rules on Taxes

They are expected on Friday to agree to enact new tax laws that would limit the ability of multinational corporations like Apple and Starbucks to legally avoid paying taxes by operating subsidiaries in certain countries.

The practice came to the fore during the global recession as national coffers were strained and leaders looked for new sources of revenue. The recent positive economic news has not damped that desire or relieved the pressure to crack down.

In the United States, economic news has pointed to continued growth. On Friday, the Labor Department is expected to issue a healthy jobs report with 180,000 jobs created in August. It is the last set of economic data the government will release before the Federal Reserve meets to consider tightening monetary policy and raising interest rates in the United States.

On Thursday, the Institute for Supply Management issued its closely watched report, which said service companies were hiring more, and fewer people are applying for unemployment benefits. Auto sales are up sharply.

Recent economic reports from Britain, France, Germany and other countries in Europe’s northern tier have also been optimistic, although central bankers there remain cautious.

If the United States government reports that even more jobs were created, analysts expect that the 10-year Treasury note, which rose to 3 percent on Thursday, will rise further.

Currencies in many of the developing economies that benefited from the expansionist policies of the Federal Reserve have recently been falling sharply against the dollar as the Fed signaled its plans to tighten, and as money flows have reversed. Growth in many of the so-called BRICS economies — Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — that had buoyed global growth have slowed as momentum shifts to the United States, Japan and northern Europe.

The heads of state have two days of meetings and will issue a communiqué on Friday that is expected to address the tax overhaul and other questions of economic policy.

Though the meeting is overshadowed by the crisis in Syria, and deep divisions between nations over possible American military action there, the heads of state are still expected to collectively endorse an economic policy statement that will encourage the continuing fiscal stimulus, or government spending, to help the recovery.

Germany, in the driver’s seat of European economic policy, had objected but appeared ready to acquiesce to a statement endorsing fiscal stimulus at a ministerial-level meeting in July in Moscow.

That meeting also encouraged governments to carefully coordinate tapering off monetary stimulus programs like the Federal Reserve’s so-called quantitative easing. The end of cheap credit has curbed growth in emerging markets as investors bring money back to the United States to take advantage of rising interest rates.

On Thursday, Russia’s deputy minister of finance, Sergei A. Storchak, said the leaders were set to endorse a similarly worded statement on Friday.

“It’s not going to be more than the agreements that were reached in Moscow,” Mr. Storchak told Reuters at the summit meeting, being held in the restored Czarist-era Catherine Palace in St. Petersburg.

In a reflection of the depth of concern about currency outflows caused by rising interest rates in the United States — meaning investors can obtain similar returns in emerging markets at far lower risk — the BRICS nations announced an intention to create a collective fund of $100 billion to defend their weakening local currencies. It was unclear when it would be operating and able to intervene in currency trading.

The effort at tax reform, if enacted widely, would squeeze more money from multinational corporations and shift a portion of the global tax burden from individuals and small businesses to large corporations. The proposal is for countries to better coordinate tax treaties to close loopholes that multinational corporations exploit by registering in tax havens like Delaware or the Cayman Islands. Another tactic of concern is shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions and costs to high-tax ones.

In one widely cited example, Starbucks last year paid no corporate tax in Britain despite generating sales of nearly $630 million from more than 700 stores in that country. The company volunteered to pay more in coming years. Apple, despite being the most profitable American technology company, avoided billions in taxes in the United States and around the world through a web of complex subsidiaries.

Even with the high-level agreement, it will take years to put in place, and companies that benefit and have structured their business to comply with the laws in place today are all but certain to lobby to retain these advantages. The G-20 governments endorsed a draft of the tax agreement in Moscow in July.

The reform would encourage nations to adopt new standardized tax treaties, to replace the web of thousands of such agreements that exists now.

Russia is hosting the G-20 for the first time since the group was formed in 1999 and began discussing strategies for priming the global economy.

Mr. Storchak, the deputy finance minister in Russia, said in an interview before the opening meeting on Thursday that Russia had asked all governments to explain their spending plans for the years ahead, and that most had complied and agreed to release the results of this survey during the forum.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/business/global/plan-at-g-20-is-to-tighten-global-rules-on-taxes.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Toyota Returns to No. 1 in Global Auto Sales

General Motors, which held the top spot in 2011, mustered 9.29 million vehicles in global sales last year. The U.S. company had been the top-selling automaker for decades before losing its lead to Toyota in 2008.

Volkswagen sold 9.1 million vehicles last year, a record for the German automaker, which has expanded its presence in emerging markets. VW also outsold Toyota in 2011.

Toyota estimated last month that it sold 9.7 million vehicles for the year, and final figures released Monday were slightly higher.

By confirming its No. 1 title, Toyota cements a strong comeback from several years of tumbles.

A sharp slowdown in exports during the global economic crisis led to the automaker’s biggest loss in decades, while controversy over its handling of recalls greatly tarnished its image for quality and reliability.

In 2011, the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, as well as widespread flooding in Thailand later that year, severely disrupted production, weighing on sales in important markets like the United States and pushing Toyota to No. 3 in global sales.

Toyota had a bumper year in 2012, however, as production rebounded and the automaker went on an offensive to win back market share. Toyota sales in the United States surged 27 percent, to 2.08 million vehicles. In Japan, sales rose 35 percent, to 2.41 million units, helped by government incentives for fuel-efficient cars.

Those increases were enough to offset a decline in sales in China, where Japanese businesses have been hurt by consumer boycotts amid a bitter territorial dispute between the two countries. In Europe, sales of Toyota cars rose by 2 percent. Toyota’s sales figures include deliveries from its subsidiaries Hino Motors and Daihatsu Motor.

The other automakers among Japan’s big three also sold more cars in 2012 and are set for even higher sales this year on the back of a weaker yen, which makes Japanese-made cars and parts more price competitive. Honda Motor said global sales jumped 19 percent to 3.82 million vehicles, while Nissan Motor logged a 5.8 percent sales growth to 4.94 million vehicles.

This year, Toyota aims to improve on its record for this year to sell 9.91 million cars worldwide.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/business/global/toyota-returns-to-no-1-in-global-auto-sales.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Dutch Officials Widen Inquiry Into Hacking

The Dutch government said Tuesday that it was widening its investigation into an Internet security breach in an effort to learn whether the private data of Dutch citizens, many of whom file income tax returns online, had been compromised.

The Dutch data protection agency has asked the government security contractor at the center of the controversy, DigiNotar, to report whether the integrity of special digital certificates that guarantee the authenticity of interactions with government computers had been breached.

“We are hoping to receive an answer from DigiNotar within a few days,” said Harriet Garvelink, a spokeswoman for the agency in The Hague, who said the request was made Friday.

The hacking scandal in the Netherlands, one of the most digitally advanced countries in Europe, erupted last week when DigiNotar disclosed that hackers had broken into its systems in July and issued fraudulent digital certificates, which are used to verify the authenticity of Web sites. An independent report released Monday traced the origin of the breach to Iran.

“DigiNotar found evidence on July 28th that rogue certificates were verified by Internet addresses originating from Iran,” said the report prepared by Fox-IT, a company hired by the government to investigate the breaches.

Google said last week that users of its services “primarily located in Iran” may have been affected by the use of fraudulent certificates issued by DigiNotar. These could allow a hacker to intercept information moving between a user and a service like Gmail that appeared to be secure.

The Fox-IT report said that DigiNotar discovered 333 fraudulent “rogue certificates” circulating from July 19 to July 28, many of which were for the sites of major Internet companies. The company subsequently revoked and invalidated the certificates.

The Dutch interior minister, Piet Hein Donner, told members of Parliament on Tuesday that the government so far had no evidence that the hackers had used the certificates to obtain the personal information of Dutch citizens from government sites.

Vincent van Steen, a spokesman for Mr. Donner, said the interior ministry was working to learn more about how the intrusion occurred and how to prevent a future attack. “This matter shows us how vulnerable we are,” Mr. van Steen said.

Several security experts have speculated that the Iranian government may have orchestrated the hacking, which would have required the control of an Internet service provider, to spy on dissidents. The Iranian government has not commented on the situation.

DigiNotar, a unit of the American company Vasco Data Security International, has been criticized by Dutch lawmakers for not immediately informing the government of the certificate theft. Dutch prosecutors told The Associated Press on Tuesday that they were investigating DigiNotar for possible criminal negligence.

Vasco said in a statement that it was cooperating with the Dutch government.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/technology/dutch-widen-probe-into-hacking-of-official-sites.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

U.S. Endorses France’s Lagarde as New I.M.F. Chief

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner had announced earlier Tuesday that the United States would back Ms. Lagarde, France’s influential finance minister, over the Mexican central bank governor, Agustín Carstens, her only competitor for the job, a move that all but sealed her victory.

“Minister Lagarde’s exceptional talent and broad experience will provide invaluable leadership for this indispensable institution at a critical time for the global economy,” Mr. Geithner said in his statement. “We are encouraged by the broad support she has secured among the Fund’s membership, including from the emerging economies.

The I.M.F. executive board met Tuesday in Washington to decide between Ms. Lagarde and Mr. Carstens. But having secured the backing of China, most countries in Europe and then the United States — which holds the largest number of votes at the fund — Ms. Lagarde’s appointment for a five-year term was effectively a foregone conclusion.

Ms. Lagarde will be taking over at a delicate time, following the resignation last month of Dominique Strauss-Kahn after his indictment on charges of the attempted rape of a hotel maid in New York.

As the finance minister of one of Europe’s most powerful economies, she has been at the forefront of efforts to contain the European debt crisis, which has led Greece, then Ireland and Portugal, to seek bailouts to help them pay their huge sovereign debts.

But a year after Greece secured a €110 billion, or $140 billion, rescue package from the I.M.F., the European Union and the European Central Bank, the country’s debt problems have now re-emerged with a vengeance.

Financial markets have see-sawed in recent weeks as the Greek government was buffeted by widespread social unrest stemming in part from the I.M.F.’s demands for greater austerity measures as a condition of releasing more aid. The Greek Parliament is to vote on the measures Wednesday.

Although emerging markets fought to claim the I.M.F. leadership from Europe, which has produced every managing director since the fund’s inception more than 40 years ago, Ms. Lagarde received substantial backing from Europe, the United States and China. Her key argument was that only another European could continue the I.M.F.’s leadership in managing Europe’s deepening debt crisis.

Yet Ms. Lagarde also came under fire from critics who say she and other top European policy makers mishandled the crisis from the beginning and are now having to scramble to clean up problems of their own making.

“For the I.M.F. to be devoting so much financial and human capital to try to combat a problem in Europe which is largely political in origin and can only be solved by political agreement is controversial,” said Simon Tilford, the chief economist of the Center for European Reform in London. “It threatens the I.M.F.’s credibility.”

What is more, French banks have the largest exposure of any in Europe to Greece, having loaded up on sovereign debt over the years, while Ms. Lagarde has been a major player in negotiating the bailout for Greece. She has adamantly opposed a full-blown debt restructuring or any solution other than a voluntary restructuring by banks.

That has led some analysts to raise questions about whether her impartiality on the issue would be clouded as she leads the fund.

“There is a risk that her perceived objectivity will be brought into question because of this,” Mr. Tilford said. On the other hand, “it’s possible she will come to believe debt restructuring could be in France’s interest, and that kicking the can down the road could ultimately cost the French more than an earlier move to lance the boil.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/business/global/29fund.html?partner=rss&emc=rss