November 15, 2024

Square Feet: Real Estate Firms Learn to Do Business in China

But developing in China can be fraught with obstacles. In 2005, the Simon Property Group, the largest shopping center owner and operator in the United States, announced with some fanfare that it would begin developing malls with two partners.

Four malls were built in so-called second-tier cities, like Hangzhou, which has 5.5 million people according to its municipal Web site. But in 2009 — before three of the malls had opened — Simon sold its interest and left China. The company told analysts that the cities lacked enough middle-income consumers to make the centers profitable. Simon said it lost $20 million in the venture.

But in October, Simon’s chief executive, David Simon, disclosed that his company was in “serious discussions” about opening outlet centers in China with a joint-venture partner, and would make a decision in a couple of months.

Another major American mall company, Taubman Centers, the developer of the only major mall currently under construction in the United States (City Creek Center in Salt Lake City), is planning a foray into China. Last summer, Taubman bought TCBL, a retail consulting company based in Beijing. Robert S. Taubman, the chief executive, said the company planned to build, acquire and update malls throughout China. “It will be the full spectrum of what we do here,” said Mr. Taubman.

Other well-known names in North American real estate, including Hines Interests of Houston, Tishman Speyer of New York and Ivanhoé Cambridge of Montreal, are developing projects in China, all with Chinese partners.

To gain access to the huge Chinese market, they have had to brave significant language and cultural barriers, nurture close relationships with receptive local partners, and deal with layers of bureaucratic complexity as well as opaque and unpredictable regulatory and legal systems.

“You don’t want to get involved in a legal action because it won’t go anywhere,” said Daniel Winey, a managing principal at Gensler, an international architectural firm with a long track record in China. Gensler was the design architect for the Shanghai Tower, a supersize 121-story office, hotel and retail building now under construction in the architecturally striking Pudong section of Shanghai.

Many private equity investors that flocked to China in 2007, when real estate prices in the United States were soaring, have since left the country.

In China, real estate specialists point out, what gets built depends more on the government’s current goals and policies than on market forces. “It’s such a policy-driven market that you have to time not just the market cycles but also the policy cycles,” said Martin Lamb, the director of Asia Pacific real estate investment for Russell Investments. In recent months, the government has been trying to bring down home prices by tightening credit (though lately this policy appears to be easing). The Chinese have also been encouraging more development of mixed-use communities outside the urban cores and more consumer spending — and developers have been responding accordingly.

Hines, the developer of the Galleria malls in Houston and Dallas, completed the first phase of one mixed-use development — the 45-acre California Place in New Jiangwan Town in Shanghai — before selling its stake last year to two Hong Kong developers. In June, Tishman Speyer, whose properties include Rockefeller Center, began development of the Springs, an even larger project north of Pudong.

Portman Holdings of Atlanta and its partners have nearly finished transforming Jian Ye Li, a cluster of 1930s traditional-style residential buildings in Shanghai, into a mix of luxury apartments and furnished housing for temporary stays. Portman was the designer and one of the developers of China’s first mixed-use development, the 1990 Shanghai Center, where the Portman Ritz-Carlton hotel is located.

Of the commercial property sectors, retail seems to offer the greatest opportunities for foreign investors. American developers have played only a minimal role in the tightening office market in Beijing and Shanghai. Hines developed the new 21st Century Tower, a 49-story office building in Pudong with a Four Seasons Hotel, but sold its stake last year to a Hong Kong company.

Western hotel brands are rapidly adding to their management contracts in China, but few foreign companies are developing or investing in the hotels themselves, said David Ling, in charge of China and Southeast Asia for the consulting company HVS Global Hospitality Services.

But some foreign retail developers are venturing into second- or even third-tier cities — populous places where the modern shopping center is often a novelty. That strategy is not without risks. “There’s not a lot of historical data to do your planning,” said Sanjay Verma, Cushman Wakefield’s chief executive for Asia and the Pacific.

Retailing specialists say local mall developers are not currently seeking foreign capital but can profit from Western expertise in design, merchandising and attracting the right mix of tenants. “Partnering with somebody with experience will help them on leasing and builds up the confidence of the retailer,” said Siu Wing Chu, a senior director at the international brokerage Savills.

Ivanhoé Cambridge, the Canadian firm that developed Mary Brickell Village in downtown Miami, says it has had success in teaming up with the Bailian Group, the Chinese department store chain, to redevelop La Nova, a lackluster 861,000-square-foot shopping center in Changsha, the capital of Hunan Province. Ivanhoé Cambridge made the center more inviting and persuaded its partners to focus on so-called fast fashion.

When the center opened last April, 129,000 people showed up, said Richard Vogel, a senior vice president at Ivanhoé Cambridge. In the first week, shoppers virtually emptied the HM and Zara stores, said Mr. Vogel, who is based in Shanghai. “They had to schedule additional deliveries to keep their shelves filled,” he said.

In 2008, the private equity firm Blackstone bought a vacant shopping mall in Shanghai, called Channel One, and brought in tenants like HM, Zara and Sephora before selling it to a Hong Kong investment company.

“Private equity companies have been net sellers over the past 12 months,” said Chris Brooke, the president and chief executive of CBRE in China. Though Simon blamed the absence of a mature consumer market for its frustrating experiences in China, other retail specialists say the giant mall company encountered other problems that are common there, including a difficult relationship with its state-owned partner. (Simon declined to be interviewed for this article.)

Before joining Russell Investments, Mr. Lamb was in China to develop shopping centers anchored by Walmart stores. Just getting a copier was an exercise in frustration that required three different licenses, he said. “Once we had Chinese employees, one of them said, ‘You should have asked me. My brother would have gotten it for you,’ ” Mr. Lamb said.

In China, he said, a contract is considered more of a guide than a legally binding document “We were always told, ‘If you have a dispute with your tenant, take them out to dinner,’ ” he said.

Despite the potential pitfalls, companies with the breadth of a Simon or a Taubman have the potential to succeed in China, but others may face insurmountable challenges, because China’s fast-growing development companies see no need to share their profits, said Jack Portman, a vice chairman of his family’s company. “If you’re not already there with existing relationships, it’s probably too late,” he said. “Unless you have something special to contribute, they don’t need it.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=56eb7e7f8e1d46ff90f5cd6a779f36f7

DealBook: Court Denies Saab Protection From Creditors

The Saab 94X on display in Stockholm.Linus Hook/Bloomberg NewsThe Saab 94X on display in Stockholm.

6:06 p.m. | Updated

Taking a bleak view of Saab Automobile’s prospects for recovery, a Swedish court on Thursday rejected the troubled carmaker’s application for protection from creditors. The decision sharply narrows its room for maneuvering and pushes it a step closer to financial collapse.

Saab employees have not been paid for August, and the company’s unions had been considering legal action that could have forced the company into liquidation when the bid for protection from creditors was announced on Wednesday.

Saab’s unions had given guarded support to bankruptcy protection, partly because the government would have been asked to guarantee workers’ salaries. But with its prospects dwindling, unions may feel they have no choice but to press on with their legal action.

Saab and two subsidiaries had petitioned the District Court in Vänersborg, Sweden, on Wednesday for “voluntary reorganization,” a move to gain time for Chinese partners to come through with long-term financing and prevent the legal challenge from unions.

But the court was not convinced by the plans.

Noting that Saab had just undergone a restructuring in 2009, when it was owned by General Motors, “the court did not see sufficient reason to believe that the chances were any better today than they were then,” said Cecilia Tisell, a court spokeswoman.

The court also found that the financing plans of Saab’s parent, Swedish Automobile, relying as they did on Chinese companies that had not yet received Beijing’s approval, were not concrete enough, Ms. Tisell said.

A further consideration, she added, was that Saab’s production lines completely stopped operating in June, and the court believed that even if production resumed, it might be difficult for the company to begin selling cars again.

“Saab Automobile is disappointed with the ruling,” the company said in a statement, adding that it would appeal the decision and disclose “further developments” on Friday.

One of Saab’s unions will decide within a few days whether to ask that Saab be declared bankrupt, said Leif Hakansson, a spokesman for the IF Metall North Älvsborg union.

“We regret that Saab Automobile is not going to get the time it needs until the funding from Pang Da and Youngman arrives,” he said in a statement.

Formerly known as Spyker Cars, Swedish Automobile, based in Zeewolde, the Netherlands, bought Saab from General Motors in 2010. Attracted by Saab’s loyal customers, Spyker’s entrepreneurial chief executive, Victor Muller, bet he could turn the company around where G.M. had failed.

But the company has never been able to sort out its finances, and production suffered after suppliers began cutting off credit in March.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=99005fd0c02113aa755a1b7bde63ab32