November 15, 2024

Mercurial Mortgage Rates to Stabilize Soon, Analysts Say

While rates on home loans are likely to remain modest by traditional standards, the ultralow borrowing costs that encouraged millions of homeowners to refinance and helped revive the moribund housing market are quickly becoming a memory. As yields on 10-year government bonds rise amid signs that the economy is improving and that the Federal Reserve will reduce bond purchases, mortgage rates have quickly followed.

Rates on 30-year fixed mortgages hit 4.25 percent on Thursday, up from 4.12 percent on Wednesday morning before the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, signaled the central bank might begin easing back on stimulus efforts later this year. As recently as May, the average interest rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage stood at 3.5 percent, close to the lowest in decades.

While mortgage rates are moving higher, rates on other forms of credit like car loans, home equity loans and credit cards are not expected to budge. They are either already set at relatively high levels, like most credit card borrowing costs, or tied to short-term interest rates, which the Fed has indicated will not rise before 2015. For example, the rate on a five-year car loan currently is just over 4 percent, about where it was in mid-May. Similarly, a fixed-rate home equity loan carries a rate of 6.1 percent, not far from where it was a month ago.

But the fact that the Fed is keeping the short-term bank lending rate it controls at close to zero also means that savers will not see any improvement in the paltry interest paid on savings accounts at banks, money market accounts and short-term certificates of deposit, which are also tied to short-term rates.

By contrast, long-term rates are rising because the central bank’s current program of purchasing $85 billion a month in Treasury securities and mortgage bonds is expected to start tapering off later this year, if the economy continues to recover. Despite the sudden jump in long-term borrowing costs, some experts say it is unlikely that government bond rates will keep spiking from current levels, and could actually ease slightly.

“Mortgage rates tend to move a lot in a short amount of time, then do nothing for a longer period,” said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com, a personal finance Web site. “Rates will stabilize and potentially pull back as Bernanke’s words fade and economic reality sets in.”

Nor should holders of adjustable-rate mortgages panic. “Someone who already has one doesn’t have to worry until the Fed starts raising short-term rates,” Mr. McBride said.

Still, the recent move upward in mortgage rates signals the beginning of a longer-term trend of higher borrowing costs for home buyers, which had reached lows not seen in decades.

“Clearly, mortgage rates and bond yields will be higher in the long run than they are today,” Mr. McBride said, adding that he expects borrowing costs on 30-year fixed mortgages to hover in the 4 to 4.5 percent range for the rest of the year. “I don’t think rates will go back below 4 percent,” he said.

Even if mortgage rates do move higher than that, they will still be well below the levels that prevailed as recently as 2007, before the recession and the financial crisis. Between 2000 and 2007, rates averaged 6.5 percent on 30-year mortgage notes.

“I don’t think this foreshadows a huge rise in rates but there will be more volatility in the fixed-income markets than we’ve seen recently,” said Brian Rehling, chief fixed-income strategist at Wells Fargo Advisors.

Mr. Rehling predicts yields on 10-year Treasury bonds, the benchmark for pricing mortgages, to be at 2.25 percent at the end of this year, slightly below where they finished the day on Thursday, at 2.42 percent. Paul Edelstein, director of financial economics at IHS Global Insight, also expects yields to stabilize. “I’m being cautious,” he said. “Rates are going to be higher than I thought last month but I’m not sure the rates we are seeing today will be sustained throughout the rest of the year.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/business/mercurial-mortgage-rates-to-stabilize-soon-analysts-say.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Beware of Investments Promoted as ‘Just Like a C.D.’

Carl Richards

Carl Richards is a financial planner in Park City, Utah, and is the director of investor education at the BAM Alliance. His book, “The Behavior Gap,” was published last year. His sketches are archived on the Bucks blog.

A recent New York Times article highlighted the sad trend of investors getting fleeced after putting their money in exotic, alternative investments they hoped would help them recover from past investing losses.

I understand the problem. Many of us lost a bunch of money in 2008-9. And if you’re retired or coming up on retirement, the situation is even tougher. You’re sitting on less money than you planned for and have little time to rebuild your savings.

At the same time, you may have been planning to live off the income from that money. But with interest rates near zero, the income you can safely earn has been cut dramatically.

It’s a double whammy! Less money, earning less interest.

That is leading to a frantic search for alternative investments that can make up the difference quickly.

Often the search for a “solution” comes in two flavors:

  1. Looking for investments that will grow fast. This is a bit like doubling down at the casino to make up for losses, often with the same outcome.
  2. Looking for investments that pay higher interest. This is also called “chasing yield.” When traditional, income-generating vehicles like savings accounts or certificates of deposit are paying next to nothing, you start looking for something “just as safe,” but with a higher interest rate.

Enter slick salespeople with alternative investments that just happen to solve your problem. One sentence in the Times article perfectly illustrates this point:

While the offering was unfamiliar — part ownership in a fleet of luxury cars — Ms. Beck bought the pitch because her broker had been around for years, and the product offered what seemed to be a modest annual interest rate of 7 percent.

Who wouldn’t prefer a “modest 7 percent” return to living with stock market gyrations or earning 1.5 percent on a bank C.D.? Sign me up!

It would be great if we could find an alternative investment like this, but what we’re really talking about is finding an alternative to the basic idea of taking a risk to generate a return. The trouble is that risk and expected return are still — and will always be — closely related.

Take, for instance, stock mutual funds, which come with the risk that the value of your investment will go up or down a lot in the short term. The reward comes over the long term, with the higher returns historically associated with owning stock versus other types of investments.

Now there are other “safer” investments that don’t come with as much risk, but offer a smaller reward, like bank C.D.’s. It’s common to see alternative investments pitched as comparable to these safe investments, but the numbers tell a different story.

The current average one-year C.D. nationwide pays 0.6 percent, and a five-year Treasury bill yields 0.78 percent. Those returns should give you a benchmark for the return on a relatively low-risk investment.

So when someone comes to you offering an investment that’s “just like a C.D.,” but it pays 7 percent, guess what: This investment is NOT just like a C.D. If it was just like a C.D., it would pay you what you expect a C.D. to yield.

Yes, we’re in a terrible, tight spot. But the answer isn’t to hope that a dubious, new product someone sells you will solve your problem. The odds are high it will only make things worse.

Let’s use these sad stories of fraud and loss as a important reminder. Be honest with yourself if you discover what appears to be a brilliant loophole to the fundamental rules of investing. As tough as the current situation is, you’re likely to make things worse when you think you can separate risk from expected returns.

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/26/beware-of-investments-promoted-as-just-like-a-c-d/?partner=rss&emc=rss