November 17, 2024

Bold Play by CBS Fortifies Broadcasters

But in one area, CBS and Mr. Moonves have led to a shake-up in the broadcast world that could be labeled revolutionary: the issue of compensation for retransmission rights. Before almost anyone else in the business, Mr. Moonves effectively pushed for distributors to pay fees to the broadcast channels just as they do to cable networks.

The result has been a windfall for all the broadcasters and a crucial lifeline as audiences continue to shrink.

“One of the things people misjudged about CBS was the growth potential,” Mr. Moonves said in an interview. “We were considered a low-growth company: how are they going to grow this business? This was one of our keys. We were going to get paid for retransmission, and that’s how we were going to grow.”

The most recent fight — a high-noon showdown between CBS and Time Warner Cable — ended this week the way all recent confrontations between big broadcasters and cable operators have ended, with the cable operator pulling out a checkbook instead of a gun.

The fight was longer — 32 days — and nastier than either side expected. The network had never before seen its stations go dark in a fee dispute. The two sides traded blows in full-page newspaper ads, and Time Warner Cable even offered some subscribers free antennas. (Time Warner Cable executives declined to comment.)

In the final deal, the cable provider will pay CBS a hefty increase in fees for the right to retransmit the signals of its stations in big cities like New York, Los Angeles and Dallas — a reported rise to $2 per subscriber over the next five years, more than double the network’s previous deal with Time Warner Cable.

At the same time, CBS rejected demands that it give up the opportunity to sell separately its content to digital outlets like Amazon and Netflix, insuring another bountiful revenue stream, likely to be worth hundreds of millions a year.

CBS projects that by 2017 it will take in $1 billion annually in retransmission payments. David Bank, an analyst with RBC Capital markets, said that the figure could easily go to $2 billion.

To further underscore the advantage for CBS, the company’s stock price shot up 6 percent in the first two days after the settlement. (The CBS network, along with the company’s television production arm, interactive division and a half-share of the CW network, made up about 55 percent of total revenue.)

“I just knew how valuable our content would be,” said Mr. Moonves, who last year received total compensation of $62.2 million, making him the country’s highest-paid media executive. “People kept saying cable is a better business because they have a dual revenue stream. I felt strongly we should be as well.”

Mr. Moonves credits Chase Carey, the chief operating officer from News Corporation, and the acquisition of NBC by Comcast, the nation’s biggest cable operator, for the move toward big fee increases for broadcasters. But Mr. Banks says that CBS has been the unquestioned leader.

“I do think the other broadcasters have a pretty big debt to pay to Les,” he said.

One longtime rival network executive, who asked not to be named, said, “If anyone was going to break the code on retransmission it was going to be Les and CBS.”

Their success is a culmination of a long campaign, which Mr. Moonves began in 2005. At that point, CBS had no cash compensation from cable operators. Viacom, then CBS’s corporate owner, had decided to split its television assets, sequestering its lucrative cable networks, like MTV and Nickelodeon, from CBS, then considered a low-to-no-growth burden on its stock price.

The plan to demand cash won Mr. Moonves a chorus of derision from cable executives, who had long pledged almost a blood oath never to pay broadcasters cash as compensation for retransmission rights. At one industry gathering, a senior cable executive, whom Mr. Moonves preferred not to name, approached him, angry, shaking his finger at him, telling him he would never get a penny for retransmission rights.

“They resisted it,” Mr. Moonves said. “There were a lot of people saying the same old thing: you’re a network, you should not get paid.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/business/media/bold-play-by-cbs-fortifies-broadcasters.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

N.F.L. Television Pioneer to Step Down Next Year

He will be succeeded by Brian Rolapp, the chief operating officer of NFL Media since January 2011.

Bornstein, 61, joined the N.F.L. in 2002 and laid the groundwork for the growth of the league’s media operations, in part by establishing the NFL Network, which made its debut in 2003.

Much of Bornstein’s time was spent securing full distribution for the new network on cable systems throughout the country. Known throughout the industry as aggressive, Bornstein engaged in sometimes contentious negotiations with cable operators. When deals finally closed with Cablevision and Time Warner in 2012, the NFL Network was available in more than 70 million households in the United States.

“Steve was great making sure we understood it was not going to be an easy road,” N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell said .

Rolapp was also involved in the negotiation with the cable operators, as well as in the talks for the eight-year deal that will keep “Monday Night Football” on ESPN through 2021. Before joining the N.F.L., Rolapp worked in acquisitions and strategy for NBC Universal in New York.

“Technology is a great opportunity for the N.F.L., and Brian understands that,” Goodell said. “He’s been at the center of what we’ve been doing in technology, and that’s going to be his focus now that we have our broadcasting agreements in place.”

Before it was NBC Universal and when it was still owned by General Electric, NBC figured in one of Bornstein’s biggest accomplishments with the N.F.L. — persuading Dick Ebersol, then the chairman of NBC Sports, to bring the N.F.L. back to the network in 2006. The negotiations involved switching the league’s cable TV package from Sunday to Monday nights so NBC could have marquee games for its new “Sunday Night Football” lineup and could take advantage of flexible scheduling late in the season.

In 2006, Bornstein also presided over the first season of games on the NFL Network — eight games in prime time, which echoed the first season of eight Sunday-night N.F.L. games carried by ESPN in 1987, when Bornstein was the sports network’s programming chief. Securing N.F.L. games was a breakthrough for ESPN, enabling it to increase the fees it charged cable systems.

Bornstein joined ESPN in 1980, during its first year of existence, and in 1990, at 38, became the network’s president. He stayed through 1997, when he was named chairman of ESPN and president of ABC, its broadcast-network counterpart. In 1998, ESPN began broadcasting its first full season of N.F.L. games.

Bornstein, who will also give up his title as the N.F.L.’s executive vice president for media, said he had not decided what he would do next.

“If you want to talk about what’s on my tombstone, which I hope is far away, both the NFL Network and ESPN would have to be mentioned,” he said. “The difference is, the N.F.L. was going to thrive with or without me. At ESPN, we were faced with a touch-and-go situation. There were no guarantees that business was going to survive.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/31/sports/football/nfl-television-pioneer-to-step-down-next-year.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder: Viacom Sues Cablevision Over iPad App

3:57 p.m. | Updated While it tries to resolve a dispute with Time Warner Cable over the iPad, the cable channel owner Viacom is suing another cable operator, Cablevision, over the same issue.

Viacom said Thursday it was taking the action because its discussions with Cablevision about licensing MTV, Nickelodeon and its other channels for iPad streaming have been “limited and unproductive.”

Cablevision said in a statement that its app “falls within our existing cable television licensing agreements with programmers – including Viacom.” The company continued, “It is cable television service on the iPad, which functions as a television, and is delivered securely to our customers in the home on Cablevision’s own proprietary network.”

At issue are the rights of cable operators like Time Warner Cable and Cablevision to transmit cable channels in new ways. The two companies released popular apps last spring that allowed subscribers to replicate the live-TV experience of a living room television on the iPad, effectively turning it — and conceivably other tablet computers like it — into TV screens.

Some channel owners cried foul, saying that their existing contracts with the operators did not cover new screens like the iPad. Viacom was louder than any other channel owner, and in April it sued Time Warner Cable claiming breach of contract and copyright violations. The same day, Time Warner Cable sued Viacom to seek a judge’s ruling that it has the right to stream live channels to iPads.

Conceivably, channel owners like Viacom could demand more money for the right of cable operators to stream channels over the Internet to tablet computers, creating a new revenue stream for the owners — and perhaps a new cost for consumers.

Earlier this week, amid behind-the-scenes discussions, Viacom and Time Warner Cable agreed to suspend their lawsuits temporarily. Viacom’s decision on Thursday to sue Cablevision implies that the discussions with that cable operator have been less satisfactory.

“We have taken this action to protect our valuable content,” Viacom said in a statement Thursday afternoon. “Over the last few months, we have had limited and unproductive discussions with Cablevision about licensing iPad rights. We remain open to productive discussions, but we cannot wait indefinitely while our networks are being distributed without permission.”

The company declined to comment on the discussions with Time Warner Cable.

The apps have proven to be popular among Time Warner Cable and Cablevision customers. Other cable operators are developing similar apps, but have not made them available to customers yet.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=4417a4b3d973a9f3fede262cbd526f24