November 18, 2024

Scene Stealers : The Hollywood Reporter Dusts Off Its Party Clothes

But Ms. Min, above, sparkling in a yellow jeweled shift dress by Miu Miu, had also just pulled off a coup. A swarm of A-list stars, that most finicky of Tinseltown species, had descended to walk the red carpet — her red carpet.

Steven Spielberg, Jennifer Lawrence, Jessica Chastain, Naomi Watts, Ben Affleck, Amy Adams, Sally Field and a bevy of other Oscar nominees had all shown up for the party, the latest in a string of Reporter-hosted events here.

“I think this turnout says it all,” Ms. Min said, flashing a smile in the direction of Jim Gianopulos, the big boss at 20th Century Fox, and Donna Langley, co-chairman of Universal Pictures. “The whole town is here.”

But where was Snoop Dogg, who had been hired to be the D.J.? “Going on any minute,” Ms. Min said brightly.

As recently as 2010, The Reporter would have had a hard time persuading its own etiolated staff to gather for a party, much less marquee stars. The trade newspaper, founded in 1930, was bleeding from layoffs, vanishing advertisers and ferociously competitive entertainment industry blogs. It had become what moviedom dreads most: a has-been.

Then Ms. Min, 43, arrived from New York, where she successfully ran Us Weekly, and set about transforming The Reporter from a dull daily trade publication into a glossy large-format magazine. With money from new private-equity owners, the Reporter went on a hiring spree and started to break news again. Ad sales rose by more than 50 percent, while Web traffic increased by more than 800 percent.

Some people here now refer to the revamped Reporter, with its social-scene pages and power-lunch tidbits mixed with exposés and frothy celebrity features, as the “new” Vanity Fair. That’s certainly a stretch when it comes to making money. But certain similarities between the two magazines are starting to be striking and not just because they tread similar editorial and advertising turf.

Ms. Min and The Reporter’s fiery publisher, Lynne Segall, also seem to be taking a page out of Vanity Fair’s party playbook. Hosting Hollywood parties, particularly around the Oscars, has long been a way for Vanity Fair to woo advertisers and polish its brand while simultaneously creating content for its pages. Its annual Oscar party will be held at the Sunset Tower next Sunday after the Academy Awards.

The Reporter has been aggressively raising its profile with a similar strategy. On Saturday, for instance, it will replace Variety as the longtime media sponsor of the Night Before Party, a fund-raiser that can draw more powerful Hollywood figures than the Oscar ceremony itself.

“There is also a whole social side to the entertainment industry that is not well reported on, or it at least it wasn’t until we started,” Ms. Min, sitting at her orchid-laden desk, said last week. She added that parties also help her newly hired editors, 10 of whom have relocated from New York, to cultivate entertainment industry sources. “The best publications create an atmosphere you want to inhabit,” she said.

Before Ms. Min arrived, The Hollywood Reporter held two events a year: one tied to its “next generation” issue — studio executives, writers, directors and agents on the rise — and a dull breakfast marking the publication of its list of the 100 most powerful women in entertainment. It also sponsored the Key Art Awards, given for achievement in movie marketing.

Last year, The Reporter sponsored or staged 13 events.

Various parties in Los Angeles have been tailored to stylists, managers and lawyers. Ms. Min teamed with Google on an event in Washington the night before the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner. The Reporter also was the host of an event in New York, attracting people like Katie Couric and Barbara Walters.

“We want to be looked at as The Hollywood Reporter setting the agenda for entertainment,” Ms. Segall said.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/fashion/the-hollywood-reporter-dusts-off-its-party-clothes.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Data Networks Pose a Threat to Wireless Carriers

Wireless carriers now funnel voice and data traffic over two separate networks and charge customers accordingly. In the not-so-distant future, analysts and industry executives say, all mobile services, including text messages and voice and video calls, will travel over data networks.

Microsoft’s recent $8.5 billion deal to buy Skype, the Internet calling service, could accelerate this change — one that is forcing wireless carriers to adapt. Services like Skype can cut into the carriers’ revenues because they offer easy ways to make phone calls, videoconference and send messages free over the Internet, encroaching on the ways that phone companies have traditionally made money.

The telecommunications industry is already in a state of flux as more people disconnect their home telephone lines in favor of cellphones. Now the wireless carriers are looking for new ways to make money based on mobile broadband and applications, rather than voice minutes.

“Eventually, everything migrates to a data channel,” said Brian Higgins, an executive at Verizon Wireless who is developing products and services for the company’s high-speed 4G network. “We’re moving away from silos of communication to one where everything is combined together.”

Analysts tend to agree that Microsoft is not looking to steal business from the wireless carriers. Instead it hopes to revitalize itself by creating innovative software for smartphones and tablets, with Skype’s services built in. Microsoft will need companies like ATT and Verizon Wireless to put their confidence and marketing budgets behind those devices to appeal to consumers.

But the Skype deal also signifies a larger interest in next-generation communications services. It is not just Skype that the wireless companies need to worry about. A bevy of mobile messaging applications, including WhatsApp, Kik, GroupMe and textPlus, allow people to send messages over data networks, sidestepping the cost of sending and receiving standard text messages.

Carriers already must deal with many new competitors in the communications game. Name companies like Apple, Facebook and Google are making services available that traditionally only carriers could offer. Google, like Skype, offers ways to make free phone and video calls over the Internet. Apple lets iPhone owners make video calls.

The ultimate risk for the carriers, analysts say, is becoming “dumb pipes,” providing only the data connection and not selling any more sophisticated communications services themselves.

“Much of the value in communication now sits above basic connectivity,” said Charles S. Golvin, a telecom analyst with Forrester Research. “Things like IM, video calling like FaceTime, and Web conferencing. These are delivered to consumers by companies like Google, Apple and Cisco — not the carriers.”

Chetan Sharma, an independent telecommunications analyst, points to one instance in which the growing popularity of using mobile applications to communicate has hurt a wireless company.

Last month, KPN, a wireless carrier in the Netherlands, cut its profit forecast and reported a 10 percent decline in quarterly revenue from text messaging, which the company attributed to applications that give people free access to voice and text services if they have a data plan.

“It’s an early indicator that it could happen elsewhere,” Mr. Sharma said.

In the United States, no signs indicate that the volume of text messages sent or voice minutes used is in decline, he said. But revenue from voice services has dropped steadily as carriers have move toward unlimited calling plans to stay competitive with one another, lowering the average revenue that can be generated per minute of talk time.

In the United States, Mr. Sharma said, voice revenue has declined 7 percent over the last four years, while data revenue has soared 132 percent. Over all, data revenue now makes up 35 percent of the total revenue for the wireless industry.

Carriers have responded to the shift toward digital communication differently. Some seek to leverage the new wave of services to differentiate themselves and gain an edge over competitors. Sprint, for example, recently united with Google to let its customers link their Sprint phone numbers to Google Voice, a service that rings all of a person’s phones and even Gmail when someone calls that person’s number.

Others, like Verizon Wireless, say there is plenty of money to be made from their mobile data networks. They say demand for data services will drive sales and adoption of smartphones, which are more lucrative to wireless carriers because they require expensive data plans.

“There will be an increased appetite for devices that can access higher bandwidth, which I find very encouraging,” Mr. Higgins of Verizon said.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=ab931fd2f87a0d12537e9a48464465f4