November 21, 2024

U.S. Judge Orders Argentina to Pay Holdout Bondholders

BUENOS AIRES — Argentina has finally run out of wiggle room in a billion-dollar showdown over foreign debts unpaid since the country’s world-record default a decade ago.

Late Wednesday, a federal judge in New York ordered Argentina to pay immediately and in full everything it owes to what the Argentine president calls “vulture funds” that she blames for much of her country’s troubles. That adds up to $1.3 billion, due Dec. 15.

The judge also barred Argentina from paying other bondholders until it satisfies this judgment, putting the president’s back against the wall: if President Cristina Fernández doesn’t reverse her longstanding position and pay up, she risks setting off another Argentine debt default, this time totaling more than $20 billion.

“It is hardly an injustice to have legal rulings which, at long last, mean that Argentina must pay the debts which it owes,” Judge Thomas P. Griesa of Federal District Court concluded. “After 10 years of litigation, this is a just result.”

Argentina’s government did not immediately respond to Judge Griesa’s orders, delivered just before the Thanksgiving holiday.

Senator Agustín Rossi, who leads the ruling party’s bloc in the Argentine Congress, said in a local radio interview on Thursday that he believed Argentina’s government would be within its rights to reject the order, “on behalf of all the Argentines, after we’ve made such an enormous effort to get out of default.”

Argentina’s president and economy minister insisted earlier this week that they would not pay a single dollar to the plaintiffs, and said they would appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.

But the judge gave President Fernández no room to maneuver in the interim, ordering that the money be put in an escrow account for the plaintiffs to collect.

“These threats of defiance cannot go by unheeded,” the judge wrote. “The less time Argentina is given to devise means for evasion, the more assurance there is against such evasion.”

If the president refuses to pay, the judge said that the Bank of New York, which processes Argentina’s bond payments, will find itself in violation if it does not hold up payments to all other bondholders.

“It’s a mess. This does not help Argentina. Default could happen,” Alberto M. Ramos, a Goldman Sachs analyst in New York, said on Thursday. “The markets will react negatively to this.”

The remedy also sent jitters through the legal departments of the most powerful financial institutions in the United States.

The Federal Reserve and the Clearing House, a trade group representing the world’s largest commercial banks, told the judge to make sure his order would not affect the funds transfer system, which automatically moves an average of $2.6 trillion a day in half a million transfers between more than 7,000 banks.

The entire system depends on transfers being “immediate, final and irrevocable” when processed. Requiring intermediaries to identify, stop and divert payments according to court orders “would impede the use of rapid electronic funds transfers in commerce by causing delays and driving up costs.”

The judge dismissed these concerns Wednesday night, saying among other things that “if Argentina complies with the rulings of the Court of Appeals, there will be no problem.”

As with so many other things involving Argentina, this case is rooted in the bloody dictatorship that ruled from 1976 to 1983. The military junta more than tripled the country’s foreign debts. By 2001, the burden had become unsustainable and the economy collapsed. Argentina’s $95 billion default still stands as a world record.

Sovereign debt is supposed to be paid no matter who runs a country, but President Fernández has always considered this defaulted debt to be illegitimate, forced onto the Argentines by dictators acting in concert with international financial speculators. She and her late husband and predecessor, Néstor Kirchner, who took office in 2003, have never made any payments on the defaulted bonds.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/23/business/global/us-judge-orders-argentina-to-pay-holdout-bondholders.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Emerging Nations Warm to Lagarde for I.M.F. Role

Despite their alarm over efforts to put yet another European in one of the most powerful positions in global finance, China, Brazil and other fast-growing nations appear to be concluding that it would be in their interest to support Ms. Lagarde over her main rival, the Mexican central bank governor, Agustín Carstens.

For now, some of the biggest developing nations seem to see Ms. Lagarde as their best bet for increasing their power at the I.M.F. as their economies gain status in the global financial order.

With a deadline looming Friday for nominations to the I.M.F. directorship, Ms. Lagarde has mounted an energetic campaign — including sending messages via Twitter of her impressions of meetings with country leaders at each stop, and promising to give developing nations more sway at the fund.

On Tuesday, Ms. Lagarde sought to broaden her appeal in India. There, officials have fumed about the European arrogance they perceive in pushing her to succeed the former I.M.F. chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who resigned last month to fight charges in New York of attempted rape and sexual assault.

Ms. Lagarde vowed Tuesday at a news conference in New Delhi to represent the needs of emerging markets so thoroughly that “a little part of me will become Indian.”

Ms. Lagarde plans to go to China on Wednesday. Her campaign could gain even more momentum if leaders there decide that supporting her could pave the way for a Chinese citizen to be named as one of the I.M.F.’s three deputy managing directors, three people with ties to Beijing’s decision makers said.

Mr. Carstens is on his own international tour and plans stops in India, China and Japan to seek support.

Although I.M.F. representatives from Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have condemned the “obsolete, unwritten convention” of reserving the top job for a European, they have not displayed similar solidarity for one candidate of their own.

Instead, officials in Brazil, Russia and China have already privately conceded that Ms. Lagarde may have more ability than Mr. Carstens, or another candidate, to increase their own influence at the I.M.F.

“I think that it will be very difficult to compete with Christine Lagarde,” said Sergei A. Storchak, a Russian deputy minister of finance. “The countries with the most votes in the I.M.F. stand behind her.”

Ms. Lagarde and Mr. Carstens began their campaign swings through emerging economies in Brazil. But after the meetings, Brazilian government officials privately said they were leaning toward Ms. Lagarde. Argentina was also not willing to commit to Mr. Carstens.

On Tuesday, before her news conference in New Delhi, Ms. Lagarde met with the prime minister of India, Manmohan Singh, and the finance minister Pranab Mukherjee. Mr. Mukherjee later told reporters that India had not decided to back Ms. Lagarde, and that it would like to be part of a consensus of nations that chooses a new managing director for the fund.

Europeans and the Group of 8 wealthy economies have backed Ms. Lagarde to address concerns that a debt crisis in the euro monetary union, where most of the I.M.F.’s rescue programs are focused, could become more unwieldy if a European did not run the fund. The I.M.F. has lent about 100 billion euros to Greece, Ireland and Portugal to prevent a wider crisis.

“It would be a mistake at this point to give up the European leadership of the I.M.F.,” said a senior fund official, who would not be identified because the selection process was not complete. “The sovereign debt problems in Europe are still so severe that the international community doesn’t have one or two years for a new candidate to learn on the job,” the official said.

In an interview Monday, Mr. Carstens, whose résumé includes four years as a senior I.M.F. official, played down concerns that he would not be able to manage Europe’s debt crisis, saying he would bring a “pair of fresh eyes” to the situation.

He pledged to take new steps to improve the representation of emerging markets and developing countries at the I.M.F., calling those taken so far too “timid.”

Liz Alderman reported from Paris and Keith Bradsher from Hong Kong. Reporting was contributed by Heather Timmons in New Delhi, Elisabeth Malkin in Mexico City, Andrew E. Kramer in Moscow and Alexei Barrionuevo in São Paulo.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dd44981195ad2566d1f20fc4e2155f0f