April 27, 2024

Archives for January 2022

Fed Officials Make It Clear on Inflation: This Time Is Different

“While it might be tempting to err on the side of caution, the potential costs associated with an excessively large balance sheet should not be ignored,” she said. She suggested that shrinking the balance sheet could allow policymakers to raise rates, which are currently set near-zero, by less.

Mary C. Daly, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, also argued for an active — albeit still gradual — path toward removing policy help.

The Fed is not behind the curve, she said on a Reuters webcast, but it needs to react to the reality that the labor market appears at least temporarily short on workers and inflation is running hot. Prices picked up by 5.8 percent in the year through December, nearly three times the 2 percent the Fed aims for on average and over time.

“We’re not trying to combat some vicious wage-price spiral,” Ms. Daly said. Still, she said she could support a rate increase as soon as March, and hinted that four rate increases could be reasonable, a path that would slow things down while “not pulling away the punch bowl completely and causing disruptions.”

Even so, she said it would be “misinformation” to suggest that officials are coalescing around a clear path forward — the Fed will have to figure out how rapidly rates will increase as it learns more about the economy.

Wall Street economists increasingly expect a rapid pace for rate increases this year: Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan both expect five rate moves in 2022, and some Fed watchers have suggested as many as seven are possible. Markets are pricing in a small but meaningful chance that the Fed is going to raise rates by a half-point in March, instead of a more typical quarter-percentage-point increase.

Officials have been careful to emphasize that they do not know what is going to happen next with policy because the economy is so uncertain — rents are rising and supply chains remain messy, which could keep inflation elevated, but government support programs are waning, which could weigh down demand.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/31/business/economy/fed-inflation-economy.html

What a Disconnect From Swift Would Mean for Russia

If the United States decided to levy sanctions on Russian banks, it could then say that Swift was in violation of those sanctions by continuing to let those banks use its system. The Defending Ukraine Sovereignty Act of 2022, which Senate Democrats unveiled this month, would authorize sanctions on providers of specialized financial messaging services, such as Swift, but the Biden administration could also impose such sanctions without the approval of Congress.

Cutting a country’s access to Swift is not without precedent.

In 2012, Swift expelled as many as 30 Iranian financial institutions, including its central bank, in order to comply with European Union sanctions that were enacted in response to Iran’s disputed nuclear energy program. Services were reconnected after the 2015 nuclear deal, and then cut again in 2018 after the Trump administration withdrew from the pact and resumed sanctions.

Russia has faced such threats before. In 2014, when Russia invaded and annexed Crimea, there were calls in Europe to exclude Russia from Swift. Dmitri A. Medvedev, then Russia’s prime minister, said at the time that such a move would be a “declaration of war.” According to the Carnegie Moscow Center, Russian forecasts at the time projected that being cut off from Swift would shrink the country’s gross domestic product by 5 percent.

Last week, Nikolay Zhuravlev, the vice speaker of Russia’s Federation Council, told the government-run news agency TASS that removing Russia from Swift would also have economic consequences for European countries, which he said would not be able to receive imports of Russian oil, gas and metals as a result of Russia’s being unable to receive foreign currency.

Mr. Smith, the former Treasury official, said the United States and Europe might look for ways to exempt certain Russian sectors, such as energy, from sanctions. However, moves to cut off Russia’s economy could have unintended consequences, such as Moscow retaliating, that could rattle global markets.

“They are not without their own cards to play,” he said.

The threat of being cut off from Swift might not be as dire as it was in the past.

Several countries including Russia have developed their own financial messaging systems that, while less sophisticated than Swift, could allow Russian financial firms to maintain communications with the world. Russia began developing its system in 2014 amid threats of escalating sanctions from the United States.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/31/us/politics/russia-swift.html

How Facebook Is Morphing Into Meta

What the metaverse focus means for the company’s existing social networking products like Facebook and Instagram remains in flux, two employees said. At Facebook and Instagram, some teams have shrunk over the last four months, they said, adding that they expected their budgets for the second half of 2022 to be smaller than in previous years.

A spokesman for Meta, which reports quarterly earnings on Wednesday, said building for the metaverse was not the company’s only priority. He added that there hadn’t been significant job cuts to existing teams because of the new direction.

Adam Draper, a managing director of Boost VC, a venture capital firm that invests in companies focused on “sci-fi technology,” said Meta’s new bet was well timed.

“There will be entire economies and countries built digitally through VR/web3, and we are just scratching the surface,” he said, using terms to describe next-generation technologies for building the metaverse. He noted that Meta was in the lead with virtual reality because of products like its Oculus headsets, adding, “This is the sci-fi future, and Meta made the bold move to make it a reality.”

Facebook’s pivot to the metaverse started in its top ranks. In September, Mike Schroepfer, the long-serving chief technology officer, said he would step down by the end of 2022. In his place, Mr. Zuckerberg appointed Andrew Bosworth, known as Boz, who has for the past few years led development on products like the Oculus headsets and Ray Ban Stories smart glasses.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/31/technology/facebook-meta-change.html

World’s second-biggest LNG producer appeals to EU over resale strategy – reports

The world’s second-biggest producer of liquified natural gas (LNG), Qatar, has reportedly requested that the European Union restrict the reselling of its gas outside the bloc, if it is to provide emergency shipments in the event of a disruption of deliveries from Russia.

“Qatar’s supply wouldn’t be conditional on requests. But the issues need to be dealt with to ensure long-term and short-term solutions for Europe’s LNG crisis,” unnamed sources briefed on the talks said, as quoted by Reuters.

The news comes amid the continued speculation fueled by the US that Russia is preparing to invade Ukraine. In the event of a military conflict, Moscow has been threatened with severe economic sanctions that may target the country’s energy exports.

Russian gas supplies account for nearly 40% of Europe’s consumption. Any interruption will inevitably exacerbate the existing energy crunch amid the rapid recovery of major economies after the pandemic-related slowdown.

Can Europe survive without Russian gas? READ MORE: Can Europe survive without Russian gas?

Although Qatari producers lack enough spare gas, Doha has pledged to divert some volume from its Asian consumers with mediation from Washington. However, sources told Reuters that no such request has so far been made.

Qatar also wants the EU to conclude a 2018 investigation into the country’s long-term contracts, which the European Commission had said might be inhibiting the free flow of gas in Europe and its single gas market.

“That will ensure the EU can enter into long-term contracts with Qatar and others, instead of more costly spot contracts or searching for short-term solutions during a crisis,” the source said, as quoted by the agency.

Doha is also asking for guarantees that EU member states will divert any surplus LNG only within the bloc.

“If not implemented, emergency shipments to the EU could be resold as spot shipments for a profit out of the EU, basically prolonging the energy shortage in the EU,” the source said.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/547848-qatar-eu-gas-crisis-russia/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Europe’s gas reserves sink to record low

Gas reserves in Europe nosedived to historically low levels this month. According to data by Gas Infrastructure Europe, consumption from storage facilities this January is one third more than the average for the previous five years.

Experts have been raising concerns about the risk of full supply disruption to the EU if tensions between Moscow and Kiev escalate. The European Union receives roughly 40% of its gas via Russian pipelines, several of which run through Ukraine.

Statistics showed that storage facilities were 39.65% full of gas as of January 27. This is the first time that inventories dropped below the 40% mark. The level is 15.6 percentage points below the five-year average.

Typically, Europe’s gas inventories don’t fall even to half until about early-to-mid February. During some mild winters, the inventories don’t sink below midpoint until early March.

This month, the weather was very mild in Europe, but stockholders decided to use reserves to protect against high prices. In many contracts with suppliers, an exchange index “for a month ahead” is used, and now the price of its execution is at an all-time high. On average, gas was traded at $1,310 per thousand cubic meters last month at the TTF hub, with a maximum value of up to $2,138. Under such conditions, buying gas on the spot market at $976 per thousand cubic meters on average looks like a good solution, experts say.

The defensive behavior of importers has also seriously reduced the physical import of gas to Europe. In the first half of January, Gazprom’s exports to non-CIS countries fell by 40%. However, analysts note that export volumes may change as early as February as prices stabilize.

According to the experts, the arrival of liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargos in Europe has alleviated the energy crunch. Last week, Europe’s gas transportation system received approximately 434 million cubic meters, a record for that date.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/547809-europe-gas-reserves-sink/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Spotify loses $2 billion in Joe Rogan controversy

The market capitalization of streaming services provider Spotify dropped some $2.1 billion within three days after folk-rock legends Neil Young and Joni Mitchell voiced their protest against its most popular podcast ‘The Joe Rogan Experience’ demanding to delete the show from the streaming platform over spreading fake pandemic information.

The outcry came in response to Rogan’s December 31 program featuring Robert Malone, a doctor and the “inventor” of mRNA vaccines. Malone had earlier been banned from Twitter for circulating anti-vaccine misinformation, while YouTube deleted a recording of the Rogan podcast shortly after it was uploaded to the website by a third party.

“I want you to let Spotify know immediately TODAY that I want all my music off their platform. They can have [Joe] Rogan or Young. Not both,” Young posted, in a since-deleted message to his management team and record label.

Another rock star wants music off Spotify in vaccines stand READ MORE: Another rock star wants music off Spotify in vaccines stand

The audio-streaming giant took down the songs of the folk-rock star, who had 2.4 million followers and over six million monthly listeners on Spotify.

Joni Mitchell, a Canadian-born songwriter who rose to acclaim in the folk-rock scene in the late 1960s and 1970s, announced she would join Young’s effort, becoming the first prominent musician supporting the move.

“Irresponsible people are spreading lies that are costing people their lives,” Mitchell said Friday, in a message posted on her website. “I stand in solidarity with Neil Young and the global scientific and medical communities on this issue.”

Spotify reportedly paid $100 million for rights to The Joe Rogan Experience podcast in 2020. The program is the top podcast on Spotify, and is reportedly downloaded almost 200 million times a month.

Joe Rogan responds to Spotify controversy  READ MORE: Joe Rogan responds to Spotify controversy 

Shares in Spotify declined 6% in three days through January 28. They have dropped 25% since January 1, washing $2.1 billion from its market cap. The company’s stock grew to $173 per share at the end of last week, but plummeted again, after Mitchell joined the protest.

The decline was exacerbated after music-streaming platforms Apple Music and Tidal voiced their support for Neil Young’s music. Young’s songs will now be streamed exclusively on SiriusXM and, amid the furor, the rocker’s greatest hits album rocketed into the top five on Apple Music.

Last month, 270 scientists and medical professionals sent Spotify an open letter, calling for a rapid adoption of a misinformation policy after an episode of The Joe Rogan Experience’ promoted what they said were “baseless conspiracy theories” about the pandemic.

Neil Young reacts to Spotify choosing Joe Rogan over him READ MORE: Neil Young reacts to Spotify choosing Joe Rogan over him

Spotify is the number one audio-streaming service in the US, capturing 31% of total subscribers in the country, followed by Apple Music at 15%, Amazon Music and Tencent tied at 13%, while YouTube Music rounds out the top five at 8%.

Since digital media continues its rapid growth, the latest scandal may go unnoticed against the background of Spotify’s commercial success. The company’s paid subscription streaming revenues increased by 18.5% in 2020. That number is widely expected to come in even higher for 2021, according to IFPI’s latest Global Music Report.

The effects of similar controversies on Netflix, which faced outrage in 2020 over the controversial ‘Cuties’ series and over Dave Chappelle’s comedy special, had a negligible impact on its stock.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/547806-spotify-stock-joe-rogan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Inflation and Deficits Don’t Dim the Appeal of U.S. Bonds

Mr. Bernstein stipulated that while debt financing has its place, the White House also believes it has firm limits within its agenda. “The outcome of all this is going to be some mix of progressively raised revenues and investments in essential public goods with a high return financed by some borrowing.”

What would have to happen for these rock-bottom borrowing costs to rise significantly? There could be a crisis of confidence in Fed policy, a geopolitical crisis or steep increases in the Fed’s key interest rates in an attempt to kill off inflation. In a more easily imagined situation, some believe that if inflation remains near its current levels into the second half of the year, bond buyers may lose patience and reduce purchases until yields are more in tune with rising prices.

The resulting higher interest payments on debt would force budget cuts, said Marc Goldwein, the senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Mr. Goldwein’s organization, which pushes for balanced budgets, estimated that even under this past year’s low rates, the federal government would spend over $300 billion on interest payments — more than its individual outlays on food stamps, housing, disability insurance, science, education or technology.

Last month, Brian Riedl, a senior fellow at the right-leaning Manhattan Institute, published a paper titled “How Higher Interest Rates Could Push Washington Toward a Federal Debt Crisis.” It concludes that “debt is already projected to grow to unsustainable levels even before any new proposals are enacted.”

The offsetting global and demographic trends that have been pushing rates down, Mr. Reidl writes, are an “accidental, and possibly temporary, subsidy to heavy-borrowing federal lawmakers.” Assuming that those trends will endure, he said, would be like becoming a self-satisfied football team that “managed to improve its overall win-loss record over several seasons — despite a rapidly worsening defense — because its offense kept improving enough to barely outscore its opponents.”

But at least one historical trend suggests that rates will remain tame: an overall decline in real interest rates worldwide dating back six centuries.

A paper published in 2020 by the Bank of England and written by Paul Schmelzing, a postdoctoral research associate at the Yale School of Management, found that as political and financial systems have globalized, innovated and matured, defaults among the safest borrowers — strong governments — have continuously declined. According to his paper, one ramification may be that “irrespective of particular monetary and fiscal responses, real rates could soon enter permanently negative territory,” yielding less than the rate of inflation.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/30/business/economy/inflation-bonds-treasury-yields.html

UK divulges what it might do with Russian oligarchs

The British government is expected to introduce new legislation to expand the scope of sanctions London can apply to Russia in the event of a hypothetical war with Ukraine, according to UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss.

“What the legislation enables us to do is hit a much wider variety of targets. So there can be nobody who thinks that they will be immune to those sanctions,” Truss said in an interview with Sky News.

The secretary has previously refused to rule out probable personal sanctions against Russia’s President Vladimir Putin if Russia were to invade Ukraine.

The US, along with several Western allies including Britain, has threatened to announce a wide range of new financial and economic sanctions against Moscow. The threats of crippling penalties have been voiced since November, when Washington raised the issue of Russia’s probable military assault in Ukraine for the first time. Since then, the speculation has been persistently fueled and spread by Western media outlets as well as by European officials.

“Any company of interest to the Kremlin and the regime in Russia would be able to be targeted so there will be nowhere to hide for Putin’s oligarchs, for Russian companies involved in propping up the Russian state,” Truss, who is expected to visit both Ukraine and Russia in the coming weeks, explained.

Will fears of ‘Russian invasion’ of Ukraine obliterate world financial markets? READ MORE: Will fears of ‘Russian invasion’ of Ukraine obliterate world financial markets?

“Nothing is off the table,” she said, when asked whether the new legislation could allow seizing property in London.

The official rhetoric on new sanctions comes amid global hype over Moscow’s recent amassing of troops in its regions bordering neighboring Ukraine, which has been treated by the US and the allies as evidence of Russia’s aggression towards Kiev and a preparation for an invasion.

The Kremlin, however, has repeatedly stressed that no such intentions exist and that movement of a country’s troops within its borders should not concern outsiders.

On Saturday, the UK authorities said it was considering making a major NATO deployment as part of a plan to strengthen Europe’s borders in response to the massing of Russian troops.

Meanwhile, Britain has provided lethal weapons to Ukraine to help it defend itself, as well as a small number of military personnel to provide training.

According to Truss, however, it is “very unlikely” British combat troops would be sent to fight in Ukraine.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/547780-uk-new-sanctions-russia-ukraine/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

UK gas production could plunge 75% by 2030

The UK could become much more vulnerable to price shocks and geopolitical events unless new offshore fields are approved and developed—and the UK’s gas production could plummet by 75% by 2030, the offshore energy industry body OGUK said on Thursday.

Without new investment in new gas fields in the North Sea, the UK will be left more vulnerable to crisis, such as the current one between Russia and Ukraine, the industry association noted.

Additional price shocks would add to the ongoing energy crisis in the UK where gas and power suppliers are going bust, while customers face a cost-of-living crisis when the energy market regulator Ofgem raises the price cap on energy bills as of April 1. The worst is yet to come for consumers in April, when millions of households would be thrown into energy poverty, with many people having to choose between eating and heating. 

Domestic production currently meets 47% of the UK’s gas demand, 31% comes from pipeline imports from Europe, mostly from Norway, and 21% from LNG imports. In 2020, Russia supplied 3.4% of the UK’s gas, OGUK said.

According to the industry body, new fields are needed in the UK North Sea to stave off a predicted 75-percent plunge in domestic supplies if no new fields are approved. Many fields remain to be tapped, according to geological surveys. Such fields are estimated to contain oil and gas equivalent to 10-20 billion barrels of oil—enough to sustain production for 10-20 years, OGUK said.

“In the longer term, if UK gas production is allowed to fall as predicted, then our energy supplies will become ever more vulnerable to global events over which we have no control – as we now see happening with Russia’s threatened invasion of Ukraine,” OGUK Energy Policy Manager Will Webster said on Thursday.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/547672-us-gas-production-plunge/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

Ukraine crisis may hit vital global economy sector, UN says

Current tensions between Russia and Ukraine are expected to have a negative impact on global grain markets, as both countries are among the world’s largest grain producers.
However, it’s currently difficult to assess the scale of potential damage as food prices depend on a range of factors, according to Monika Tothova, an economist with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

“Taking into account the input of both nations into the world market of grain, the tensions between them inevitably influence the situation,” the economist said in an interview with TASS.

According to Tothova, the markets are also deeply dependent on such factors as volatility, climate conditions, costs of production materials, and many others.

“Thus, it is difficult to say exactly what impact we should expect, but certainly the current situation contributes to creating uncertainty in the markets,” Tothova said.

Will fears of ‘Russian invasion’ of Ukraine obliterate world financial markets? READ MORE: Will fears of ‘Russian invasion’ of Ukraine obliterate world financial markets?

The economist added that much depends on how long the current situation could last and the way it could unwind.

“If further developments affect production, export logistics and other effects on grain markets will be very tangible,” she said.

The economist noted that Russian grain exports currently account for 20% of the global market, while Ukrainian grain currently accounts for around 10%. Nearly 10% of global grain output is produced in Russia, while Ukrainian production amounts to 3% of the world’s output.

A wide range of Western media outlets, along with multiple US officials, have been speculating about an imminent Russian invasion of Ukraine since November 2021. The White House and some US allies threatened the Kremlin with a new round of ‘crippling’ sanctions in the event of a military assault, citing the movement of Russian troops within the country’s vast western territory as evidence of such a plan. Moscow has consistently rejected the accusations, saying it has a right to carry out military maneuvers as it pleases within its own borders.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/547768-ukraine-crisis-russia-un-grains/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS