May 20, 2024

Archives for July 2019

Russia squeezes out Saudi Arabia in race for Asia’s oil market share

The opportunity is huge as, a senior source who works closely with Iran’s Petroleum Ministry exclusively told OilPrice.com last week, Iran as of last week was exporting just 266,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil compared to the 2.5 million bpd exported just before the US withdrew from the nuclear deal last May. Although some of the headline figures appear to offer some scope for Saudi optimism, a look beneath the surface shows the situation is far from rosy, with threats from both US and Russian supplies. Indeed, with the recent scare over contaminated barrels now apparently behind it, Russia is also ramping up its threat against increased US supplies as well, signalling a broader burgeoning relationship with the Asian powerhouse of China.

Also on rt.com Oil will go ‘bust’ if recession hits

Specifically, over the January to May period, Saudi state-owned behemoth, Aramco, seemed to hold its own in China, Asia’s biggest oil consumer. According to the latest figures from China’s General Administration of Customs, the country imported 223.858 million barrels of crude oil from Saudi Arabia, up 9.8 percent from the 203.811 million barrels of a year earlier. It is crucial to note, however, that this positive position was due to the addition of two new independent refinery customers – Zhejiang Petrochemical Co., and Hengli Petrochemical (Dalian). Hengli, with a total capacity of 400,000 barrels per day (bpd), signed a term contract with Aramco in late 2018 to buy 130,000 bpd from it, whilst Zhejiang Petrochemical, also with a 400,000 bpd total capacity, agreed to take 116,000 bpd from Aramco on a term basis. This latter deal coincided with Aramco offering to take a 9 percent stake in Zhejiang Petrochemical.

Without these two deals, Saudi would again have lost its top crude supplier position for China to Russia, which supplied 220.201 million barrels and held a 14.6 percent market share in China for the January to May period. A similar – but worse – theme was evident with the other big Asian customers of South Korea and Japan. South Korea bought in 126.648 million barrels of crude oil from Saudi Arabia over the January to May period, a 1.2 percent drop compared to 128.229 million barrels received in the same period a year ago. Japan, meanwhile, imported around 5.5 percent less crude from Saudi over the period, a total of 1.169 million bpd.

Also on rt.com Another global oil glut looms: International Energy Agency forecasts ‘oversupplied market’ for 2020

For Russia, the ongoing OPEC+ production cap deal allows it a lot more flexibility that it allows Saudi Arabia. “Russia sort of produces whatever it wants whenever it wants, according to the dynamics of the oil price not the dynamics of the OPEC+ deal, as it knows that Saudi has to toe the production cap line as an example to the rest of the OPEC producers but Russia merely has to lend its vocal support to the deal to keep Saudis happy, and it [Russia] will effect real cuts if and when the oil price action requires it,” Sam Barden, chief executive officer of global energy trading firm, SBI Markets, in Melbourne told OilPrice.com. “The Kremlin was also the earliest of all the major oil producers – with the exception of the US itself perhaps – to position itself to make up the supply shortfall that was going to be caused by the new US sanctions on Iran, as its ESPO [East Siberia-Pacific Ocean] blend was a very good substitute for the Iran blends in high demand in Asia,” he said. 

The strategy to target Asia in general and China in particular was properly put into action after the launch of the East Siberia-Pacific Ocean pipeline in 2010, which allowed much more oil to go directly to Asia, and was given a further boost in January last year with the launch of a second parallel pipeline, which means that China itself can import around 30 million tons of oil (around 600,000 bpd) every year from Russia, Mehrdad Emadi, head of global risk analysis and energy derivatives markets consultancy, Betamatrix, in London, told OilPrice.com. The original idea was that this increase to Asia could be achieved simply by boosting crude oil output in East Siberia but this did not occur as early as was needed, so it was necessary to make some adjustments to crude oil intended for Europe, both in terms of quality and quantity. By the end of 2017, ESPO crude export levels had quadrupled since 2010, to nearly 1.2 million bpd, and are set to increase to around 1.6 million bpd in 2020, according to Russia’s energy ministry. These numbers include long-term deliveries to China via the Skovorodino-Mohe pipeline offshoot from the ESPO trunk network as well as spot cargoes via the port of Kozmino on the Pacific Ocean.

Also on rt.com Little drama for OPEC meeting as Russia is the real power behind the scenes

This drive to capture as much of the Asia market – especially that of China – as soon as possible was a key reason for the drop in quality seen in ESPO flows to Europe, even before the recent contamination with Russian crude manifested itself. As early as November 2017, Russian national pipeline monopoly Transneft stated that the sulphur content of Urals oil exports from the Baltic port of Ust-Luga and the Druzhba pipeline running to Europe would increase to a critical level of 1.8 percent in 2017 – the very edge of the level considered allowable for Urals crude, according to the quality range set by the Russian standards agency Rosstandart – and then would continue to rise, as more low-sulphur crude oil is shipped to China. According to an-end December press release on Transneft’s own website, the sulphur content in Urals produced by Tatneft and Bashneft was more than 2.0-2.3 percent.

FILE PHOTO © Global look Press /  Jack Stein Grove Russia’s Novatek hits major milestones in Arctic LNG plans

Given these logistical developments and the ever-closer relationship between Russia and China in other energy projects (the mammoth ‘Power of Siberia’ gas pipeline running from Russia into China is 99% complete) and security (Russia was an original founder alongside China of the political, economic, and security alliance, the ‘Shanghai Cooperation Organisation’), it is entirely unsurprising that the vast majority of China’s state-run and independent sectors continue to favour Russia’s ESPO blend. In June, the ESPO blend was the top feedstock crude for China’s independent refineries, with 16.273 million barrels imported, up 33.3% from May’s 12.168 million barrels, according to various independent industry data. This shift back to Russian supplies has also been exacerbated by the worsening security fears attached to doing business with Saudi Arabia in the current geopolitical environment. “Potential buyers are looking at threats from Iran, threats from the Yemeni Houthis launching strikes into Saudi, and attacks in southern Iraq, which is deterring buyers form dealing with Saudi,” the Iran source told OilPrice.com. “China National Petroleum Corporation very recently refused to go ahead with a major term contract with Saudi for this very reason,” he added.

“In addition to the better security profile, the easier general logistics, the voyage times for Russia ESPO are shorter than those for Saudi grades, the lot sizes are more flexible, and it yields more gasoil as well, which is very useful for a lot of these Chinese refiners,” said Betamatrix’s Emadi. “Moreover, Russia is offering term contract deals that are framed in such a way that for a certain amount of crude oil bought by key Asian customers every month for whatever number of years, these customers will also be given the right to buy oil derivatives, including various petrochemical products, at deeply discounted prices,” he concluded.

This article was originally published on Oilprice.com

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/465366-russia-saudi/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

How We Fact-Check in an Age of Misinformation

Neither party has a claim on factual purity. But that’s not to say their sins against accuracy are equivalent in the era of Mr. Trump, who stands alone in his tendency to spin up his own reality and to do so in ways that go far beyond misstating a statistic or blurring an old policy position.

Given the power of the presidency and the platform he commands, Mr. Trump’s departures from the truth have substantial consequences for policy, politics and the nature of our democracy. In recent weeks alone, he has falsely characterized Representative Ilhan Omar’s position on Al Qaeda, made misleading claims about his environmental record, and kicked off his re-election campaign with factually incorrect, misleading and exaggerated statements about Russia, the southwestern border wall, the economy and health care.

“Of course, Democratic politicians and the 2020 candidates also bend the truth and mislead, but Mr. Trump is unlike any other politician I’ve ever fact-checked,” Ms. Qiu said.

“He is often unscripted, which lends itself to more mistakes,” she said. “He also just doesn’t seem to care if he’s wrong — sometimes I’ve been bewildered by his tendency to escalate true claims into false ones or marveled at the sheer brazenness of, say, his denials of something that happened despite video evidence.”

While there’s a value to highlighting our fact-checking in separate stories, we also incorporate it into more general news articles and use digital forms like video to document the gulf between claims and reality. Where possible, we provide a clear verdict — true or false — though we also recognize that in some cases there are legitimate disputes and subjective differences that require a more nuanced assessment or context to help readers reach their own conclusions.

Even as we grapple with how best to hold the president and others to account for what they say, The Times is also confronting a related and fast-evolving challenge: the proliferation of online disinformation (untruths that are deliberately disseminated to sway people) and misinformation (false or misleading content that spreads on its own).

It is one thing to keep track of statements made by a relatively finite number of high-profile political figures. It is quite another to identify and assess a torrent of made-up, distorted, malicious or mischievous tweets, Facebook posts, videos and other material that misleads or inflames.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/30/reader-center/fact-checking-politics-presidential-election.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

You Can Read This Book in Russian, Except for the Parts About Russia

Andrew Solomon was infuriated to learn that the Chinese translation of his 2001 book about depression, “The Noonday Demon,” left out his references to being gay, despite a provision in his contract stating that he had approval over any changes from the original. He only learned of the changes after PEN, a free-speech organization, checked the translations against the originals of several books as part of a report on Chinese censorship.

“The dishonesty of the publisher was as troubling as the censorship,” Mr. Solomon said. He’s since rescinded translation rights from that company and sold them to another publisher in China that will release an unexpurgated edition.

Although censorship has been declared illegal in Russia, the situation with Mr. Harari’s book reminded many of Soviet-era methods. For instance, Ernest Hemingway’s “For Whom the Bell Tolls” was published for the first time in 1968 with at least 20 cuts, according to Russian researchers. More recently, “Rocketman,” a movie released earlier this year based on the life of Elton John, had gay scenes cut from the Russian version, according to film critics.

Mr. Harari said that in general, he is in favor of making changes in order to reach a global audience, as long as those changes don’t undermine the substance of his arguments. “We are living in a more complicated reality, and it’s important to reach people in nondemocratic societies,” he said. “And for that you have to make compromises.”

Yet some reform advocates see such compromises as a setback. Natalia Arno, the president and founder of the nonprofit Free Russia Foundation, said she felt it was hypocritical of Mr. Harari to write about “post-truth” and information manipulation, then omit his reference to disinformation coming from the Kremlin.

She added that he was wrong to think that the only way to reach Russian readers was to alter the book when bootleg translations of banned books and articles are common. “If this book was prohibited in Russia,” she said, “many more Russians would read it.”

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/30/books/yuval-harari-21-lessons-russian.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

He Once Shilled for ‘Shogun.’ Then ‘Hamilton’ Came Along.

How did you discover theater?

My junior year in college I got involved with the Penn State Thespians. Some friends of mine were involved, and the next thing you know, you’re painting sets, and then you’re the assistant stage manager, and then you’re the president.

You started in New York as an assistant to the publicist Shirley Herz.

I was answering phones and doing typing and opening the mail and mimeographing press releases, and I never left. She was one of the most influential people in my life, and until she died [in 2013], we worked in tandem.

What’s the most exciting project you worked on?

“Hamilton” is in a class by itself, and class is the operative word. I went to see it again a few weeks ago, and it was a very emotional experience — it’s a masterpiece, and everything about it is so compelling and so beautiful.

And the biggest flop?

“Shogun” seemed like a good idea for a musical, but when we got to the point where the ship wrecks on the rocky coast of Japan, and emerging from under the ship was dancing seaweed, we thought, “This is not good.” Not to mention the fact that on a press night the set fell and hit the lead actor — by the time Shirley and I got there, one or two press people had climbed up onstage, and the crew had put the actor in an ambulance. And that was the most positive coverage that show got — poor Philip Casnoff getting beaned by the set.

You worked with Edward Albee for a long time.

In 1980, Shirley got hired to do press for “The Lady From Dubuque.” That was during Edward’s bad-boy days, when he was drinking and acting out and being rude. He had two Pulitzers, but he was definitely falling out of favor, and he was going overseas to get his plays done. But then his personal assistant called and said he had a new play, at Vienna’s English Theater, and that was “Three Tall Women” — his third Pulitzer, and a big success. And then “The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?” became my play.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/29/theater/sam-rudy-broadway-hamilton-publicist-exit-interview.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Guest-Edits British Vogue’s September Issue

“She wanted, instead, to focus on the women she admires,” he added. “As you will see from her selections throughout this magazine, she is willing to wade into more complex and nuanced areas, whether they concern female empowerment, mental health, race or privilege.”

Inside the magazine, the duchess recounts a candid conversation with Michelle Obama, the former first lady. The edition also features an interview by Prince Harry with the ethnologist and primatologist Jane Goodall. Meghan was an advocate of women’s rights and diversity long before her marriage made her part of the British royal family, so her editorial decisions — celebrating strong women with a range of backgrounds — are a continuation in that vein.

The decision not to appear on the cover is also of a piece with the actions Meghan and Harry have made since their wedding. The couple have a complicated relationship with the British news media — particularly the tabloids — after they took various steps to safeguard their privacy, including declining to release publicly the names of the godparents of their son, Archie.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex also eschewed the traditional photo opportunity to showcase their baby in favor of choosing carefully curated images online — a decision that did not go down well with some sectors of the British news media.

Nonetheless, Meghan’s position as a former actress and biracial member of the royal family has afforded her immense power to draw attention to the causes she supports, not to mention to the fashion brands she wears and the publications she opts to associate with.

In that light, the decision to guest-edit a print edition of British Vogue will be seen as a boon to Condé Nast, which has — like much of the publishing sector — suffered dwindling magazine sales and reduced budgets in recent years.

The September issues of fashion magazines are traditionally seen as the most important of the year because they carry the most advertising, and cover stars generally have pull within the industry. Last year, British Vogue had Rihanna on its September front, while American Vogue’s cover star was Beyoncé.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/29/fashion/meghan-markle-british-vogue.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

U.S. and China Resume Trade Talks Amid Dim Prospects for Deal

The two sides also appear to differ over how explicit the agreement should be. Chinese negotiators previously objected to demands that certain provisions be enshrined in Chinese law, and have pushed for a more vaguely worded text.

Michael Pillsbury, a China expert at the Hudson Institute, said that leaving more uncertainty in the agreement could foster more trade fights between the world’s two largest economies, particularly given a complex enforcement mechanism the two sides previously agreed to establish to ensure both countries lived up the agreement.

“If there are loopholes and gray areas subject to interpretation, then the extensive appeal process the Trump administration has designed will be a recipe for a decade of acrimony,” he said.

Negotiators for the United States insist that China must wind the clock back to where it was before the talks stalled in order for things to progress. Yet the objections to the agreement appear to have come directly from China’s president, Xi Jinping.

“The real question in the next week is, ‘Will they go back to where we were before they changed their mind?’” Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary, said in an interview on Fox Business Network on Friday. “That’s what’s the important thing, because we were very close to a transaction before.”

In June, Mr. Trump and Mr. Xi agreed on the sidelines of the Group of 20 gathering in Osaka, Japan, to try to get negotiations back on track. Mr. Trump emerged from the meeting saying that China had agreed to buy some American farm goods. In return, he said, the United States would hold off on imposing additional tariffs and approve the sale of some nonsensitive goods to Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications giant that the United States government has blocked from buying American technology over national security concerns.

Even that truce has not unfolded as Mr. Trump planned. China has been preparing to make agricultural purchases, and on Sunday the state-run Xinhua News Agency reported that millions of tons of American soybeans had been shipped to China. But elsewhere, Chinese officials have continued to insist that they are not making purchases as a condition of the talks.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/29/us/politics/trade-china-trump.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

Boeing better ‘get their s**t together,’ Ryanair boss says as 737 MAX delays drag on

Addressing his airline’s 24-percent drop in first-quarter profits, O’Leary blamed the impact of MAX deliveries’ delays.

Ryanair has 135 of the 737 MAX models on order, the first five of which are due for delivery in the autumn. The airline, however, will not be able to fly MAX jets until regulators have declared them safe.

Also on rt.com Fitch Moody’s cut Boeing’s debt outlook over 737 MAX crisis

Ryanair expected 58 of the planes for the summer of 2020, but may not have any of them ready, O’Leary said. “It may well move to 20, it could move to 10, and it could well move to zero if Boeing don’t get their s**t together pretty quickly with the regulator.”

The grounding of the global fleet of 737 MAX aircraft has already taken its toll on Ryanair. The airline was forced to halve its growth targets for next year as it scrapped 30,000 planned flights and warned it could close bases at airports.

Last week another carrier – Southwest Airlines – which operates an all-Boeing 737 fleet, said it plans to take its new MAX planes out of its schedule until early January.

Also on rt.com Boeing execs could face lengthy prison terms over MAX crashes, attorney tells Boom Bust

Many airlines across the world have grounded their fleets of Boeing 737 MAX aircraft since mid-March, following crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia that killed 346 people.

The US airplane manufacturer said it had been forced to cut future services because of uncertainty over the timing of deliveries of 737 MAX planes.

International ratings agency Moody’s said last week the grounding of Boeing’s MAX aircraft will run longer than expected, which will compound its operational disruption, costs, and the size of the investment in working capital.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/465315-boeing-max-grounding-ryanair/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

U.S. and China Resume Trade Negotiations With Slim Hopes for a Deal

“China is looking to go back to the status quo before the trade war started, and to rewind the clock to before Huawei was put on the entity list” of companies that require special licenses to buy American goods, said Andy Mok, a trade specialist at the Center for China and Globalization in Beijing. “The biggest threat right now is what happens on Huawei,” he added.

Mr. Trump insists that the American economy is still insulated from the trade war and has repeatedly said the United States is benefiting financially from the tariffs he has imposed on Chinese goods. But economic data suggests that the tensions with China, America’s largest trading partner, are taking a toll.

Data released on Friday showed that the American economy slowed in the second quarter of the year, with gross domestic product expanding at an annual rate of just 2.1 percent as net exports and business investment slumped. The Federal Reserve has frequently cited the trade war as a problem for the economy and it is expected to cut interest rates on Wednesday to help keep the economic expansion going. American stock markets have risen on news that talks would resume, only to plummet when negotiations came to a standstill.

Big American companies whose performance has faltered are also citing tariffs and trade tensions on both sides of the Pacific as a reason. Caterpillar cited cooling activity in China, a major market, when it reported falling sales growth for the second quarter, while Hasbro, Nintendo and other companies have discussed plans to move part of their supply chains out of China to countries like Vietnam.

The trade war is also dragging on the Chinese economy. The shift of multinational companies out of China, a trend that was already underway as a result of rising Chinese wages, could have a corrosive effect on growth.

Foreign investment in China has been crucial over the past four decades in bringing new technologies and new management techniques to the country. But blue-collar wages in China have soared to the point that the country is increasingly uncompetitive in lower-skilled industries.

“What this trade issue has done is accelerate a process that was going to happen anyway, from an export-based economy to a consumer-based economy, the same as in Japan or South Korea,” said Harley Seyedin, the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in South China, in an interview in Guangzhou, China.

Article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/29/us/politics/trade-china-trump.html?emc=rss&partner=rss

China continues importing Iranian oil in defiance of US sanctions

The imports were, however, almost 60 percent down from a year earlier.

A total of 670,000 tons (about 163,000 bpd) of Iranian crude oil was discharged in June at Tianjin in north China and Jinzhou in the northeast, according to assessments by Refinitiv Oil Research. Another 430,000 tons of Iranian crude oil was discharged in July at Jinzhou and Huizhou in South China.

Also on rt.com US sanctions Chinese company, big buyer of Iranian oil 

Last week, Washington blacklisted Chinese company Zhuhai Zhenrong which is the largest buyer of Iranian oil in the world. The company’s CEO Youmin Li was also placed on the US blacklist.

Exports of Iranian crude oil have been put in jeopardy since the White House re-imposed sanctions on Iran in November last year, demanding all countries stop importing oil from the country.

Tehran said it will defy the sanctions and continue to export oil.In April, Washington said it will end Iran sanction waivers which have been granted to China, India, Greece, Italy, Taiwan, Japan, Turkey, and South Korea to ensure low oil prices and avoid disruption to the global oil market. The decision to end waivers “is intended to bring Iran’s oil exports to zero,” Washington said, warning that countries which continue to buy Iranian crude after the May 2 deadline will risk facing US sanctions.

Also on rt.com China rejects US ‘sanctions’ on Iran oil, vows to protect its energy security

Tehran has already admitted that tighter US restrictions had affected exports although the country’s authorities insist they will continue to sell crude through unconventional methods.

China has criticized Washington’s use of sanctions against other states, designating them as a form of “bullying.” Beijing said it would keep its trade and energy ties with Tehran despite the fact that several major Chinese companies have been affected by US sanctions over their role in energy imports from Iran.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/465303-china-iran-oil-us/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

JP Morgan, Barclays, RBS among big banks facing UK class action over Forex rigging

According to US law firm Scott + Scott, the claim which is estimated to be worth more than £1 billion (US$1.24 billion), was filed at the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) on Monday.

The “massive” action is a “perfect” case to be brought as a so-called opt-out collective class action for breaches of UK or European Union competition law, the Scott + Scott lawyer David Scott told Reuters.

Also on rt.com Forex scandal: White collar criminals must face jail not fines, say UK experts

“It is a very difficult case to put together individual damages which are significant enough,” he said.

Michael O’Higgins, the former chairman of British watchdog the Pensions Regulator, who is leading the lawsuit, said the total value of the claim would depend on the number of Forex trades executed in London for UK-domiciled units.

Given the size of London’s Forex market, the total value would likely exceed a billion pounds, O’Higgins said.

“Even on a relatively conservative assumption it’s certainly a billion pounds and possibly several,” he said, adding that “Markets should be fair as well as free and in this case the markets weren’t fair.”

Forex manipulation was one of a series of rate-rigging scandals to engulf the global financial sector. Criminal traders at some of the world’s biggest banks conspired to manipulate the $5.4 trillion-a-day market, while making handsome profits in the process.

Also on rt.com Barclays traders acquitted in Libor trial

They rigged the foreign currency trades via email and online chat rooms with such names as ‘The Cartel’, ‘The Mafia’, and ‘The Bandits’ Club’, to the detriment of the companies and investors who had placed trust in them. The rogue traders then relayed instances where they bolstered their profits, while lobbying their managers for bigger bonuses.

Some of the banks have already paid more than a combined $11 billion in fines to settle US, British, and European regulatory allegations that traders rigged the currency markets.

In May, the EU fined five banks a combined €1.07 billion ($1.19 billion) for Forex rigging through cartels of traders known as ‘Essex Express’ and ‘Three Way Banana Split’.

For more stories on economy finance visit RT’s business section

Article source: https://www.rt.com/business/465289-barclays-jp-forex-rigging/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS