May 20, 2024

Archives for December 2013

An Imported Sport, Soccer Gets Its Own Glossy Magazines in the U.S.

Also this year, NBC paid a record $250 million for broadcast rights to every English Premier League game over the next three years.

But if professional soccer has gained a solid foothold in the United States, soccer journalism continues to lag its foreign peers. There have been no prominent publications dedicated to the sport, featuring A-list writers and designers.

Now two soccer magazines are trying to change that, hoping that enthusiasm generated by the approaching 2014 World Cup will help create a readership that will endure for years afterward.

One of the magazines, Eight by Eight, introduced its first issue in Manhattan last month. The other, Howler, is a year old. (A third, called XI, is in the throes of a financial crisis after a year in print, and its future is unclear.)

The publications, all quarterlies, have had modest beginnings, with small subscriber figures so far. But the pedigree of the founders of Eight by Eight and Howler, with decades of experience in publishing pantheons like Esquire and National Geographic, suggests they represent the first attempt to create a niche genre aimed at a passionate audience.

The editors acknowledge that much of the optimism is fueled by the excitement generated by the World Cup, to be held in Brazil beginning in June. The quadrennial event is followed by billions of people worldwide. Then there’s the recent ESPN poll in which American fans, for the first time, chose a soccer player — Argentina’s Lionel Messi — among their top 10 favorite athletes.

But there’s also a more primal impulse. “When we started (the magazine), we didn’t think, ‘Here’s a market we could exploit,’ ” said George Quraishi, co-editor at Howler along with Mark Kirby. “We wanted to make a magazine about something we love.”

Several years ago, when Mr. Quraishi worked at Condé Nast and Mr. Kirby was at GQ, the two used to play soccer together on Wednesdays at Pier 40 in Manhattan. “He’s a goalkeeper, I’m an attacker,” Mr. Quraishi said. “We had a good partnership.”

Soon they decided to combine their professional and sporting passions and start Howler.

Similarly, Robert Priest, one of the founders of Eight by Eight, describes himself as a “West Londoner who has strangely always been passionate about Manchester United.” Mr. Priest, 67, has been living in the United States since 1979, and has coached his two sons in youth soccer.

But passion doesn’t pay the bills. Howler got its start with $69,000 from Kickstarter and “pretty sizable” support through advertising by Nike and beIN Sport, the Al Jazeera-affiliated sports network, Mr. Quraishi said. He is the only full-time staff member, which keeps costs down. After a little more than a year, Howler has published three issues, with the fourth coming in early January, and Mr. Quraishi said subscriptions, which cost $50, are approaching 5,000 and increasing with each issue.

Asked why he was confident the magazine could make it, Mr. Priest pointed to the years of financial success he has had in designing magazines, most recently with his partner Grace Lee, at Priest Grace. Their client list includes Esquire; Forbes; O, the Oprah Magazine; and Bloomberg.

Mr. Priest and Ms. Lee, who are also partners in the magazine, said they had financing in the “six figures” to start their magazine, and that the first issue’s print run was 4,500 copies.

The magazines aim to go beyond the win-loss column and delve into personalities and issues. But they also differ in their approaches: Howler is a large-format publication that sends writers to locations like Mexico and Rome in search of long-form articles; Eight by Eight’s first issue splashes bright illustrations across many of its pages. XI, now struggling to put out a fourth issue, is smaller in size, almost academic and focused solely on North America.

Top writers from Britain, Germany, France and the United States have appeared in the magazines, including The Guardian’s Graham Parker and Sports Illustrated’s Jonathan Wilson.

Though all three decided to produce a print magazine, they also rely on digital media to reach their readers.

Mr. Priest said his publication intended to use its website to offer merchandise, up-to-the-minute news, and multimedia presentations. Mr. Quraishi has expanded Howler’s presence during the last year with online offerings that include podcasts and email bulletins. “We’re a print magazine, but most of the way we get the word out is digital,” he said, adding that many subscribers had come through social media.

The appearance of three soccer quarterlies in the same year has not been without behind-the-scenes drama. Mr. Priest and Mr. Lee were part of Howler’s founding team, working on that magazine’s first two issues. But then, Mr. Priest said, creative differences emerged, leading them to start Eight by Eight. “We wanted to develop something that was our own,” Ms. Lee added.

But there has also been uncommon camaraderie displayed as well. When XI announced its financial troubles, Howler wrote on Twitter: “totally bummed for our buds at @xiquarterly. we know how tough it is.”

Asked about this, Mr. Quraishi said: “The main idea we share with XI is that soccer fans have been ignored by the U.S. press. So there’s an idea we’re in this together. That’s part of our DNA.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/30/business/media/an-imported-sport-soccer-gets-its-own-glossy-magazines-in-the-us.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

The Movies With Pasts Ruled the Year

Movie studios sustained some devastating flops in 2013, among them the samurai epic “47 Ronin,” which limped into theaters on Christmas. But it was a solid 12 months over all: Rentrak, a firm that compiles box-office data, projected on Sunday that North American ticket sales for the year would total $10.9 billion, a 1 percent increase from 2012. Analysts predict similar attendance numbers to last year’s, about 1.36 billion people.

Hollywood did it largely by serving more of the same. The five leading films at the global box office were all sequels. “Iron Man 3” was the top-selling movie of the year, taking in $409 million in North America, for a global total of more than $1.2 billion. “Despicable Me 2” was second with nearly $920 million in sales, followed by “Fast Furious 6,” “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire” and “Monsters University” (actually, a prequel). And get ready for more: Crucially for their future business prospects, movie studios managed to introduce an unusually large number of new franchises. Sequels are already in the works for at least eight of the nonsequel films released in 2013, including “The Conjuring,” “The Croods,” “We’re the Millers” and “Man of Steel.”

“It bodes very well for our future,” said Greg Foster, chief executive of Imax Filmed Entertainment, which set a series of box-office records over the year.

Despite the celebration, some studio executives are doing a little soul searching. Again and again, audiences showed that they were starving for originality.

“Gravity,” the 3-D space picture with essentially a cast of two, Ms. Bullock and George Clooney, became a phenomenon. It took in $254.6 million in North America, for a global total of $653.3 million. “Now You See Me,” the kind of middle-budget movie that most big studios left for dead a few years ago, sold $117.7 million in tickets, for a worldwide total of $351.7 million.

“This Is the End,” a raunchy apocalyptic comedy starring James Franco and Jonah Hill as themselves, took in $101.5 million domestically — only a smidgen less than the 2013 movie that may have epitomized more of the same, “The Hangover Part III.”

“People do seem to want different,” said Richie Fay, president for domestic distribution at Lionsgate. “You’ve certainly now got to give people movies that they will come away talking about.”

Moviedom is also ending the year, as it has the past few, ruminating about ceding cultural ground to television. Combined, three presumed best picture contenders — “Nebraska,” “Her” and “Inside Llewyn Davis” — have been seen by roughly one-tenth of the more than 10 million viewers who tuned in to the last episode of “Breaking Bad.”

The serious side of feature filmmaking kept slipping toward a future in which theatrical release is just a seal of approval for pictures that are intended to be seen elsewhere. Among the year’s documentary success stories was “Blackfish,” about SeaWorld’s treatment of orcas and their trainers. The film stayed in theaters long enough to be certified as a “movie” by reviewers and awards voters, but the payoff came when it moved to video-on-demand services a month later, and CNN Films, its backer, quickly landed it in front of the real audience: television viewers.

“Moviegoers want compelling ideas,” Mr. Foster said, noting “Gravity” as one film that delivered (particularly in his theaters). “I take my hat off to television for it. Television has been incredibly compelling and thoughtful.”

It was a tough year for the good-behavior watchdogs of popular culture. Oprah Winfrey smoked in “Lee Daniels’ The Butler,” a late-summer hit, as did Meryl Streep in “August: Osage County.” Cigarettes glammed up the cafe scenes in “Inside Llewyn Davis.” The monitoring group SceneSmoking.org even gave a black lung rating for excessive tobacco use to “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug.” (Smog?)

By June, every major studio was peddling guns in its marketing for films like Universal’s “R.I.P.D.” and “2 Guns,” and a study backed by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania found that gun violence in the top-selling PG-13 movies had surpassed that in best sellers rated R.

In a wearying year, Americans sidestepped wearying movies. They rejected “The Fifth Estate,” an Oscar hopeful centered on the WikiLeaks organization; it cost DreamWorks Studios about $26 million to make and took in a total of $8.6 million, roughly half of which goes to theater owners. Even returning to the Old West even seemed too much, as “The Lone Ranger” became one of the biggest flops in memory, requiring a write-down of about $160 million.

When consumers did leave their sofas, whether to watch “Star Trek Into Darkness” or “Thor: The Dark World,” it was to get away from their problems, not to work them out. “People are jittery in the country,” said Brad Grey, chief executive at Paramount, which found hits in films like “Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa.” “They’re jittery over Obamacare, a whole list of issues.” The best response for a movie studio, he suggested, is “to think very, very long term.”

No serious documentary made a deep impression at the box office. The only chart topper was Morgan Spurlock’s boy-band concert film “One Direction: This Is Us,” which had about $28.9 million in domestic sales. It was a far cry from 2004, when “Fahrenheit 9/11” and Mr. Spurlock’s own “Super Size Me” filled seats.

Even when moviegoers watched nonfiction, or at least a lightly fictionalized version of it, they seemed to be showing up less for a history lesson or pieties than for a good time, as was offered by Sony’s “American Hustle,” promoted with hairdos and cleavage, or Martin Scorsese’s “The Wolf of Wall Street,” with its hookers and drug use.

“The Wolf of Wall Street” (Paramount) was the No. 1 new movie over the weekend, taking in an estimated $18.5 million, for a total since opening on Wednesday of $34.3 million. Still, the movie’s hefty cost — about $100 million, independently financed by Red Granite Pictures — and lackluster C score from audiences in exit polls make profitability an extremely steep climb.

Ben Stiller’s “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” (20th Century Fox) was the second-most-watched new movie over the weekend, selling a soft $13 million in tickets, for a total since opening on Wednesday of $25.6 million. It cost about $90 million to produce and will need to make up significant ground to become a financial success.

The lightly marketed “47 Ronin” (Universal) fizzled as expected, taking in $9.9 million, for a five-day opening total of $20.6 million. Championed at Universal by the studio’s former chairman — who was fired in the fall — “47 Ronin” cost $175 million to make. Analysts estimate the movie will lose roughly $100 million, putting it in “The Lone Ranger” territory. Universal declined to discuss specific losses but confirmed in a statement that it had already taken a write down on the film, saying, “We adjusted film costs in previous quarters, and as a result our financial performance will not be negatively impacted this quarter.”

Although Universal also experienced a big flop in the summer, “R.I.P.D.,” the studio had both “Despicable Me 2” (which has yet to open in China) and “Fast Furious 6.” It also had one of the year’s best-performing comedies in “Identity Thief,” starring Melissa McCarthy, who had a very good year; she also co-starred in “The Heat,” which took in more than $134.5 million for Fox.

But it wasn’t just the big movies that made a difference for Hollywood. Solidly performing little films also offered a lift. TheWrap.com, an entertainment trade news site, counted seven movies that started out in very limited release — pictures like Woody Allen’s “Blue Jasmine” and the independently produced “The Way, Way Back” — and managed to take in more than $20 million.

“Instructions Not Included,” from Pantelion, part owned by Lionsgate, became the highest-grossing Spanish-language film ever in the United States, with more than $44 million. Taken with the success of several movies with predominantly African-American casts, including “The Butler” and “The Best Man Holiday,” “Instructions Not Included” demonstrated an audience hunger for diversity in pictures.

“Those are niche types of films,” Lionsgate’s Mr. Fay said, “that went beyond their borders to become solid hits.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/30/movies/the-movies-with-pasts-ruled-the-year.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Signs of a Russian Thaw (Toward Business)

And business was good. A year earlier, Mr. Telkov, who has tightly cropped brown hair and the shoulders of a hockey player, traveled to Guangzhou, on China’s southern coast — he speaks Mandarin, along with Arabic and English — to attend a trade show and meet with local fabric manufacturers. He negotiated a production contract on the spot. By cutting out the middlemen, Mr. Telkov was able to sell fabric for less than half the price charged by his more-established Russian competitors: around $5 per linear meter, as opposed to $12. In less than a year, Mr. Telkov had recouped his start-up capital of around $1 million and had a fleet of trucks, three warehouses and 18 employees. “I saw no limits to how big it could get,” said Mr. Telkov, now 33.

That May morning, not long after Mr. Telkov got to his warehouse, a convoy of speeding cars pulled up. Out came 10 police officers, some carrying automatic weapons. The officers told Mr. Telkov that he was under suspicion of copyright violations and that they would have to confiscate some of his goods as evidence.

Other men in plain clothes walked around and pointed to rolls of fabric: Take this, take that. The search lasted the whole day and continued into the next. In the end, the police carried away 527 rolls of fabric. Mr. Telkov was confused, not to mention panicked: a big furniture exhibition in Moscow was two days away, and he had just lost 80 percent of his inventory. He went from one government office to another, as he put it, “knocking on doors and saying, ‘Guys, you stole my goods, where are they?’ ” He got no answers.

Two months later, in July, investigators officially charged Mr. Telkov with copyright infringement. The indictment cites designs for five styles of fabric that Mr. Telkov had supposedly stolen; among them was a leopard-print pattern, as well as one that resembled a slab of marble. It was funny, absurd even, but it was also uncomfortably serious. If found guilty, Mr. Telkov could spend up to six years in prison.

Some 100,000 Russian businesspeople are either in prison or have been subject to criminal prosecution. Among the most famous is Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the former head of the Yukos oil company, who had been in prison for more than a decade until he was unexpectedly released this month by President Vladimir V. Putin. The pardon, coming as it did on the cusp of the Winter Olympics to be held in Sochi, Russia, was viewed more as a political expedient than as a harbinger of reform.

Mr. Telkov says that in his situation, investigators seemed more interested in pressuring him to plead guilty than in building a case; he says he was promised a suspended sentence, in which he would avoid prison but lose his confiscated goods. That’s how Russian businesspeople who find themselves in the middle of such cases often choose to plead. But Mr. Telkov was, simply put, a nuisance, filing requests and demanding to see the fabric that had been taken from him. If someone wanted to intimidate him or wear him down, it wasn’t working.

Finally, in January, at the request of investigators, a judge ordered Mr. Telkov arrested and held in pretrial detention. He was put into a cell with 10 other men, most of whom were facing drug charges. As Mr. Telkov remembers, investigators suggested that it was his own fault — if he would only make a deal, he could go home.

Weeks passed, then months. Mr. Telkov’s wife, Adilya, said she was sure that the court would see the absurdity of the case and release her husband. “At first I was absolutely certain that if not at this hearing, then the next one. If not there, then one more,” she said. After a few months, though, she said she “stopped being naïve.”

A Well-Placed Advocate

When Boris Titov heard about Mr. Telkov’s case, it struck him as a clear reminder of why his job is necessary. Mr. Titov, who holds the official title of presidential commissioner for entrepreneurs’ rights, was appointed to his position — which reports directly to Mr. Putin — in June 2012. Fighting corruption and easing the way for business are among the main priorities, at least in rhetoric, of Mr. Putin’s current economic agenda. After years of oil-fueled growth and rising consumption, the economy is slowing, with growth in gross domestic product falling to just over 1 percent. Kremlin officials hope that an improved climate for small business will help save the country from a prolonged period of stagnation, thus preserving social and political stability.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/business/international/signs-of-a-russian-thaw-toward-business.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Fair Game: Clawbacks? They’re Still a Rare Breed

The case was filed Dec. 4 against Fifth Third Bank, which is based in Cincinnati and has $126 billion in assets. Daniel T. Poston, the bank’s former chief financial officer, was also named in the suit.

The S.E.C. contended that both the bank and Mr. Poston improperly delayed writing down the value of $1.5 billion of nonperforming loans in 2008. Mr. Poston certified that Fifth Third’s financial statements had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but the S.E.C. said that wasn’t the case.

Both the bank and Mr. Poston settled the case, the bank paying $6.5 million in penalties and Mr. Poston paying $100,000. Neither the bank nor Mr. Poston, who became chief strategy and administrative officer at Fifth Third in October, admitted or denied the S.E.C.’s allegations.

The Fifth Third case is interesting because it shows that securities regulators can indeed require executives to pay penalties out of their own pockets when they settle charges of flouting securities laws.

But the regulatory action is also notable for what it did not involve: an executive pay clawback under the Sarbanes-Oxley law. Indeed, the Fifth Third action illustrates how challenging it is for regulators to mount such cases.

Sarbanes-Oxley, you’ll recall, was the legislative response to Enron, WorldCom and the other titanic accounting frauds of the early 2000s. Hoping to eliminate the temptation among executives to misstate their companies’ financial positions — making their performance look better and reaping rich bonuses as a result — the law required chief executives and chief financial officers to affirm the accuracy of their books. If misconduct resulted in an earnings restatement, those executives might have to forfeit incentive pay or proceeds from stock sales made during the 12 months after the misstatements.

That sounds relatively straightforward. But bringing such cases is complicated.

Consider the Fifth Third matter, which seems at first glance tailor-made for a clawback. The events began in August 2008, as the financial crisis was gathering force. The bank wanted to rid itself of some bad loans and arranged to sell about $1.5 billion worth the next month.

But when it came time to sell, Mr. Poston and his colleagues at Fifth Third did not write down the loans — assign them a lower value, reflecting the market’s travails — as it was required to do under accounting rules. If properly accounted for, the S.E.C. said, Fifth Third would have recorded a $297 million loss in the third quarter of 2008. Instead, it reported a loss of less than half that size: $128 million.

Securities filings show that Mr. Poston received incentive pay — stock and option awards — of almost $350,000 the year after the misstatements, the period subject to clawbacks under Section 304 of Sarbanes-Oxley.

Mr. Poston declined to comment through a Fifth Third spokesman, who was also unwilling to discuss the settlement.

The S.E.C. declined to discuss the Fifth Third case as well. But it probably didn’t result in a clawback because the misconduct took place during one quarter and was corrected by the time the company’s executive compensation was determined.

When Sarbanes-Oxley was passed, its executive-accountability provisions were hailed as tough medicine that could generate a flurry of recoveries.

But as the Fifth Third case illustrates, many pieces must fall into place before a case can be brought. The first requirement is a restatement of earnings, where a company goes back and adjusts previous results to reflect the accounting errors. The actions must also have been reckless or intentional. Finally, there must be recoverable executive compensation, such as a bonus received or stock sales made within one year.

“We don’t hesitate to pursue clawbacks when the law’s requirements are met,” said Andrew J. Ceresney, S.E.C. co-director of enforcement.

Still, the hurdles limit the number of cases. Since 2007, when the S.E.C. brought its first case, it has demanded forfeiture of compensation from executives at just 31 companies.

Of those clawback actions, 13 have come in the last three years. Executive pay has been returned in just seven of them; the rest of the cases remain in litigation or are stayed pending criminal trials.

Looking for financial-crisis cases on this roster? You won’t find many. In 2010, the S.E.C. recovered some pay from executives at New Century Financial, a Wild West mortgage lender that collapsed in 2007. But that’s about it.

One reason for this is that rather than restating earnings when the values of securities or loans they held plummeted, many financial companies simply wrote down the assets after the collapse. They contended that their rosy valuations of the securities in previous periods were appropriate, not fraudulent.

“That might be why we didn’t see an uptick in restatements after the mortgage fiasco,” said Don Whalen, director of research at Audit Analytics, an accounting and regulatory research company in Sutton, Mass.

One of the S.E.C.’s bigger monetary recoveries involved Beazer Homes, a large home builder. That matter, filed in 2011, generated almost $8 million in cash and 119,000 shares of stock from two former executives.

Since the Beazer case, though, the clawbacks have been small. In the five subsequent suits, executives have forfeited a total of about $990,000 and 160,000 stock options.

The list of cases brought by the S.E.C. indicate that defendants fight hard and agency lawyers devote much time for potentially small sums. In 2008, for example, the agency lost a case when the court agreed with an executive’s argument that because the company had not restated its results, the S.E.C. had been wrong to sue.

Another factor affecting the number of cases is that big, ugly earnings restatements aren’t as common as they used to be. Audit Analytics researched restatements made by 7,000 relatively large companies over the last 12 years and found that the number of companies restating results peaked in 2006, at 1,550. By last year that figure had fallen to 713.

The significance of the restatements on companies’ financials has also been dwindling. Last year, almost half of the restatements had no impact on a company’s income statement, up from 37 percent in 2007. Mr. Whalen says he thinks Sarbanes-Oxley forced companies to tighten controls over financial reporting, leading to fewer and less severe restatements.

If true, that’s good news. But consider this data point: In its 2013 fiscal year, the S.E.C. received 557 whistle-blower tips alleging accounting abuses. If even some of those tips pan out, we’ll be expecting a jump in clawback cases.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/business/clawbacks-theyre-still-a-rare-breed.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Datapoints: Placing Odds on Your Health (and Its Cost)

What is the chance that you will rack up big health care bills in 2014?

For the typical American adult under 65 who does not have health insurance, the total of all health care bills would be $2,700. That’s according to calculations by Milliman, an actuarial firm.

The obvious problem is that you can’t know in advance if your costs for the year will be typical. If you are unfortunate enough to have a costly medical problem, you could end up with far higher bills. Milliman calculated that 5 percent of the population will incur bills, absent insurance, exceeding $47,300.

Milliman estimated what patients will be billed without insurance, not what is paid to providers. According to Milliman, uninsured patients, who don’t have the benefit of insurance negotiators, are billed about 30 percent more than insured patients. The Affordable Care Act requires individuals to purchase insurance, but at what coverage level? If half of Americans without insurance will be billed less than $2,700, as Milliman projects, a healthy person, might do better under a plan with lower premiums but with high deductibles. (They can generally run as high as $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a couple.)

Of course, Milliman doesn’t know whether you are likely to become sick and to be among the top 5 percent or even the top 20 percent (who are billed more than $13,300). When choosing insurance, consumers need to consider their personal situations — and their stomach for risk.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/business/placing-odds-on-your-health-and-its-cost.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Larry Lujack, a Cranky Voice on Chicago Radio, Dies at 73

The cause was esophageal cancer, his wife, Judith, told The Associated Press.

Before Mr. Lujack hit the Chicago airwaves in 1967, Top 40 D.J.’s were known for rapid-fire patter, velvet sonorities and inexhaustible cheer. Mr. Lujack was laconic, sandpapery and curmudgeonly — and, to judge from the one million listeners he garnered at his height, delightfully so.

In 2000, The Chicago Sun-Times called him (approvingly) “a crabby coot dropping PG-rated acid bombs at a snail’s pace.”

First at WCFL-AM and later at WLS-AM, a station that could be heard far beyond Chicago, Mr. Lujack — known on the air as Uncle Lar’ or Superjock — spent 20 years spinning records and spouting opinions.

Frequent targets of his opprobrium included the very albums he was playing, the very stations he was working for and various rival D.J.’s. (Mr. Lujack once stormed a competitor’s show and threatened, on the air, to ram the man’s head through a wall.)

He became famous for regular features including “Klunk Letter of the Day” and “Cheap and Trashy Showbiz Report.” His best-known feature, done in collaboration with his longtime on-air partner Tommy Edwards (“Li’l Snot-Nose Tommy,” Mr. Lujack fondly called him), was “Animal Stories.”

Growing directly from the farm reports that Mr. Lujack had to give early in his career, the feature involved his reading comic news reports about animals — among them the tale of a chicken who lived on despite having parted company with his head days before — to an astonished Mr. Edwards.

“Animal Stories” prefigured the “Stupid Pet Tricks” television segments of David Letterman, on whom Mr. Lujack was an acknowledged influence.

Mr. Lujack’s style, which also included strategic pauses, audible paper-shuffling and grandiloquent references to himself in the third person, demonstrably shaped that of Mr. Limbaugh, who in 1990 told The New York Times Magazine that Mr. Lujack was “the only person I ever copied.”

That influence by all accounts made Mr. Lujack even crankier. “His appeal escapes me,” he once said of Mr. Limbaugh.

Larry Lee Blankenburg was born in 1940 in Quasqueton, Iowa, and reared in Caldwell, Idaho. At 18 he joined KCID-AM in Caldwell, adopting the surname of his idol, the Chicago Bears quarterback Johnny Lujack.

After working at stations in Idaho and Washington State, Mr. Lujack joined WCFL in 1967 and moved to WLS four months later. Except for a four-year stint back at WCFL, he remained with WLS for the next two decades.

In 1984 WLS gave Mr. Lujack a 12-year, $6 million contract, making him one of the country’s highest-paid radio personalities. (“I am not the least bit excited,” he was reported to have said.) But in 1987, amid declining ratings, the station’s corporate parent, Capital Cities-ABC, bought out his contract.

Mr. Lujack’s marriage to his first wife, Gina, ended in divorce; a son from that marriage, John, died in 1986. His survivors, The AP reported, include his second wife, the former Judith Seguin; two children from his first marriage, Anthony Lujack and Linda Lujack-Shirley; a stepson, Taber Seguin; and two grandchildren.

His honors include membership in the Illinois Broadcasters Association Hall of Fame (“It’s not Mount Rushmore,” he said on learning of his induction) and the National Radio Hall of Fame.

Broadcasting from Santa Fe, Mr. Lujack made occasional comebacks on Chicago radio in recent years. But on balance, he said, he was relieved to be retired.

“I did rock ’n’ roll radio for 30 years,” he told The Sun-Times in 2008. “It got to the point if I had to play ‘Surfin’ U.S.A.’ one more time, I was gonna puke.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/us/larry-lujack-a-cranky-voice-on-chicago-radio-dies-at-73.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Hey, Stars, Be Nice to the Stagehands. You Might Need a Loan.

The stagehands of Local 1 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees bring some of New York City’s most glittering stage effects to life, from the auditoriums of Lincoln Center to the theaters of Broadway. But their work comes at a steep price, even at venues where they do little more than load in orchestras and set up music stands.

Those high costs were underscored by a stagehands walkout that forced the cancellation of this season’s opening night at Carnegie Hall and called attention to the hall’s five full-time stagehands’ total yearly compensation, an average of more than $400,000 each. An examination of tax records, contracts and other documents by The New York Times found that hefty stagehand salaries at many New York nonprofit performance institutions are more widespread than was previously known.

At nine top such institutions that have contracts with Local 1, stagehands make up 36 of the 98 most highly compensated employees, or about 37 percent. The average annual total salary and benefits of those highest-paid stagehands, at places from the Metropolitan Opera to the Roundabout Theater Company, is nearly $310,000, according to the nonprofits’ most recent tax filings.

Backstage workers can earn more than the onstage talent. Five stagehands at the David H. Koch Theater at Lincoln Center were each paid more in total compensation in 2011 than the highest-paid dancer at New York City Ballet, filings showed. And, in 2010, “Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark” paid its stagehands a total of $138,000 a week, while the principals and members of the ensemble earned slightly less than $100,000 put together, according to documents submitted to the state attorney general’s office.

Even as organized labor in the United States has weakened significantly, the nearly 2,600 active members of Local 1 have retained their clout, allowing them to push for good wages and work rules. Labor historians, Broadway producers and executives at the nonprofit performance institutions chalk up the union’s power to two major factors: that Local 1’s members have hard-to-replace skills, and that their jobs cannot easily be outsourced.

The threat of a strike can be enough for Local 1 to win favorable terms, said Martin J. Oppenheimer, a former board member and negotiator for New York City Opera, which is now bankrupt. “Particularly in the not-for-profit area, it is just so important for the organization to perform,” he said. “You can’t take a chance.”

James J. Claffey Jr., the local’s president, rarely grants interviews. “While I can appreciate your obligation to report to your readers,” he wrote in an email, “I sincerely hope you can appreciate my obligation to represent the membership of Local 1. The story you wish to do will not serve my union or my members well.”

Local 1 was founded more than 125 years ago, in 1886, when most major theaters were below 14th Street in Manhattan and lit by gaslight. In the 19th century, popular entertainment strove for the spectacular, and the scenery and special effects made stagehands a necessity.

Since then, the demands of the job have only increased. The electricians, carpenters, stage riggers and other members of Local 1 build, run and break down the most complicated of sets, handle the lighting and sound equipment and manage the special effects. At the Metropolitan Opera, that means moving tons of scenery day and night.

Their tasks are “extremely complex, extremely high-tech and possibly extremely dangerous,” said Martha S. LoMonaco, a professor of theater at Fairfield University, in Connecticut. “They should not be viewed as the schleppers of the theater industry.”

Although Local 1 officials declined to comment for this article, a close reading of their newsletter, Spotlite, gives an indication of their goals, priorities and mind-set.

“We are a proud, unified, hard-working, family-oriented bunch of people with only the welfare of our families, the future of our children and the pride of being the best stagehands in the world deeply embedded in our hearts,” Robert S. Score, the union’s recording-corresponding secretary, who worked at the New York State Theater (now the Koch) for more than 25 years, wrote after the 2007 Broadway strike. “We simply are not what they said we were. Will they ever understand that?”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/arts/hey-stars-be-nice-to-the-stagehands-you-might-need-a-loan.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Benefits Ending for One Million Unemployed

The program, in place since the recession started in 2008, provides up to 47 weeks of supplemental unemployment insurance payments to jobless people looking for work. Its expiration is expected to have far-reaching ramifications for the economy, cutting job growth by about 300,000 positions next year and pushing hundreds of thousands of households below the poverty line.

An extension of the unemployment program did not make it into the two-year budget deal that was passed just before Congress left on its winter recess. When the federal program expires, just one in four unemployed Americans will receive jobless benefits — the smallest proportion in half a century.

“I really depend on unemployment,” said David Davis of Chantilly, Va., adding that the $1,600 a month he receives is helping keep him afloat while he interviews for new positions. “I’ve got a résumé that knocks your socks off. The reason for this long period of unemployment is that the work just isn’t there.”

At one point, Mr. Davis, 68, made more than $100,000 a year as an information technology expert and web designer. He is now living on ramen noodles and $140 he counted out from his change jar. Since being laid off over the summer, he has missed mortgage payments, forcing him to take out a reverse mortgage on his home. He sold his car and got a late-1990s model Ford Taurus, and is looking to cut his utility and cellphone bills. Soon, he might start taking Social Security.

“It’s very stressful,” Mr. Davis said. “At least I’ve had the ability to maneuver my finances so I don’t wind up homeless. That’s one goal, to avoid living on the street or in my car.”

Democrats on Capitol Hill are pushing for an extension of the program, though the constrained fiscal environment makes its reinstatement somewhat less likely, aides said. Members of the Republican leadership have indicated that they might be willing to extend the benefits, but only if Democrats offset the new spending with other cuts.

On Friday morning, President Obama called Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island, and Senator Dean Heller, Republican of Nevada, to extend his support for their proposal to extend emergency unemployment benefits for three months.

“The president said his administration would, as it has for several weeks now, push Congress to act promptly and in bipartisan fashion to address this urgent economic priority,” said Josh Earnest, a White House spokesman.

As the last payments are distributed, Democrats have initiated a campaign aimed at shaming Republicans — particularly those in leadership and in swing districts — for letting the program expire over the holiday season.

“I don’t know if our colleagues who have opposed passing the unemployment-insurance legislation know or care about the impact on families,” said Nancy Pelosi of California, the House minority leader. “The impact is very, very strong. It hurts the dignity of a family, of a worker.”

Americans United for Change, a liberal group, is running an advertisement on cable television stations. “You know who had a Merry Christmas? The richest 1 percent, that’s who. Republicans in Congress made sure of that, protecting billions in taxpayer giveaways,” it says. “For those facing tough times? Republicans stripped 1.3 million Americans of jobless benefits — folks who want to work, but cannot find a job — kicking them to the curb during Christmas.”

Republican aides said they remained willing to negotiate. “Why didn’t they offer a plan that met the speaker’s requirements — fiscally responsible, with something to create jobs — or any plan, for that matter, before they left for the holidays?” asked Michael Steel, a spokesman for John A. Boehner of Ohio, the speaker of the House.

Some Democrats have suggested that continuing the program for three months, with the estimated $6 billion in spending offsets coming from agricultural subsidies in the farm bill.

But some conservatives have shown stauncher opposition.

“I do support unemployment benefits for the 26 weeks that they’re paid for,” said Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky on Fox News. “If you extend it beyond that, you do a disservice to these workers. When you allow people to be on unemployment insurance for 99 weeks, you’re causing them to become part of this perpetual unemployed group in our economy.”

Ashley Parker contributed reporting from Honolulu.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/us/benefits-ending-for-one-million-of-unemployed.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bowing to Pressure, A&E Revokes Suspension of ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star

The indefinite suspension of Phil Robertson, the patriarch of the family at the center of the AE Network’s huge ratings hit “Duck Dynasty,” became definite Friday — at zero episodes. The network announced he would not be suspended after all.

AE released a statement, noteworthy both for its concessions to the Robertson family’s refusal to accept the suspension as well as its timing — at close of business on Friday of a holiday weekend on the slowest week of the year in the entertainment business.

The bottom line: Phil Robertson will resume work on the show when it begins taping new episodes in the spring.

The network moved to suspend Mr. Robertson on Dec. 18 after comments he made about gay people in a magazine interview. At the time AE described the comments, which described homosexual acts in crude terms and labeled them a sin, as extremely disappointing and not reflective of the network, which considered itself “champions of the L.G.B.T. community.”

The suspension stirred an uproar among fans of the show and also conservative political and religious leaders. More than 250,000 signed a petition demanding Phil Robertson’s reinstatement. Cries of anti-Christian bias from famous Republicans like Sarah Palin and Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana also followed.

More ominously, the family issued a statement saying in effect there would be no show without their patriarch.

On Friday, AE bowed to the pressure and released a new statement, accompanying the news that Mr. Robertson would miss no episodes. The statement cited Mr. Robertson’s later comments that his views were in no way intended to “incite or encourage hate,” as well as the way the Robertson family’s interaction in the show demonstrated values like “unity, tolerance and forgiveness.”

AE also promised to initiate a public service campaign endorsing those values.

“Duck Dynasty” is by far the highest-rated show on AE. It has also become a marketing powerhouse. Merchandise based on the show is sold in six departments in Walmart stores, and the “Duck Dynasty” Christmas album, “Duck the Halls,” which features Mr. Robertson, has sold more than 700,000 copies since it was released. Industry insiders predicted that the controversy would increase sales.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/business/media/bowing-to-pressure-ae-revokes-suspension-of-duck-dynasty-star.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Loyal Subscribers Keep Hobby Magazines Afloat

Mr. Prucnal’s wife dumped Family Circle, Taste of Home and Better Homes Gardens because she no longer found enough interesting recipes. His daughter said goodbye to Glamour. And he didn’t renew Newsweek and The Dallas Morning News because the family was getting their general-interest news from television.

But Mr. Prucnal refuses to part with Model Railroader, Classic Trains and Classic Toy Trains. When it comes to the toy train magazines that fuel his passion, he has drawn the line.

“I would probably give up my train club before I would give up my train magazines,” said Mr. Prucnal, an employee at a Walmart outside of Dallas and a Navy reservist, who spends about $120 a year on these publications. “There’s a lot of ‘how to’ articles and a lot of product news.”

Readers like Mr. Prucnal have helped hobby magazines become the darlings of the struggling magazine industry. For decades, the nation’s top general-interest publications, like Time and Newsweek, attracted millions of readers who considered those magazines to be household staples. But as readers increasingly turn to the Internet for news and information, niche magazines continue to retain and attract loyal followings, making them a bright spot in an otherwise dim outlook for print periodicals.

“Titles like Trains aren’t easily replaced,” said Andrew Davis, author of the book “Brandscaping” and a media consultant. “It’s a really passionate community with high-quality content that speaks specifically to them.”

Some high-end hobby magazines like Wine Spectator and Cigar Aficionado have not only experienced steady circulation growth, but have also brought in big revenue by staging special events for subscribers. Wine Spectator’s total circulation in the last decade grew 11 percent and Cigar Aficionado’s total circulation grew 1 percent, according to the Alliance for Audited Media. And Marvin Shanken, who owns both publications, said that subscribers to another magazine in his portfolio, Whisky Advocate, sold out its 17th annual WhiskyFest within hours.

The event, which will be held in Chicago in April, is expected to attract about 1,800 whisky lovers and generate nearly $300,000 in ticket sales.

Other niche magazines like Cycle World and Hot Bike have achieved such strong subscription renewal rates that they have modestly expanded their editorial staff, even as many large publications are trimming their employee ranks. While circulation numbers at Cycle World and Hot Bike have declined slightly in the last decade, both have successfully raised subscription rates, offsetting the drop in circulation, said Andrew Leisner, a senior executive at Bonnier and publisher of both.

“All of the publishers I see on the niche side are making money,” said Mr. Davis, the consultant, who has advised both larger magazines and niche ones like Premier Guitar and Bird Watcher’s Digest. “They’re smaller operations for the most part. But some of them make a really healthy profit.”

While hobby magazines may never grab the attention that a Vogue cover or Time’s Person of the Year issue attracts, their publishers talk of their devoted readerships. Kevin P. Keefe, vice president for editorial and publisher at Kalmbach Publishing, which produces many of Mr. Prucnal’s favorite train magazines, said that his readers were so loyal that some subscribers paid for issues through the 2030s and bought $199.95 DVD sets that let them read all of the issues in the magazine’s then 75-year history. In the eight months since the company introduced a paid website for Model Railroader magazine, nearly 10,000 subscribers have agreed to pay $4.95 a month for access.

Food magazines also have die-hard fans. The Rev. Michael Tang of the Transfiguration Parish in Los Angeles, says that he cannot afford to spend much on travel or clothing. But he also cannot live without his subscriptions to the food magazines Saveur and Bon Appétit. He saves the issues and cooks meals from them both for himself and potential church donors, and also dreams of visiting some of the culinary hot spots featured in those publications.

“Taking a vow of poverty and being a priest, you live vicariously a bit,” said Father Tang. “The magazines are an affordable way to experience life. I will never go to some of those places. But I can have an idea of someone who has gone there.”

That kind of devotion shows up in the advertising numbers: Both magazines outperformed the industry in the third quarter for advertising pages, according to the Publisher’s Information Bureau. While niche publications depend heavily on circulation revenue, advertisers also value their readers’ loyalty. In the third quarter of 2013, Bon Appétit’s advertising dollars jumped by about 27 percent compared to the same time period the year before, while Saveur’s advertising increased by roughly 11 percent. Advertising for the entire industry grew by only 4 percent during that time.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/business/media/loyal-subscribers-keep-hobby-magazines-afloat.html?partner=rss&emc=rss